0
0.0
Apr 13, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch. incredible people. for having the courage to allow this long-term, hard-fought battle to finally end. this 50 year battle over roe v. wade took it out of the federal hands and brought it into the hands, minds and hearts of the people of each state. now it is up to the states to do the right thing. like ronald reagan i am strongly in favor of exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother. you must follow your heart on this issue but you also must win elections to restore culture and win back our country which is currently and sadly a nation in decline. vice president harris: the former president yet again how proud he is of his responsibility for overturning roe v. wade. he said he is probably responsible for overturning roe v. wade. one in three women of reproductive age now live in a state with an abortion ban and probably responsible that doctors and nurses can be jailed in some states for life for providing care. probably responsible that states have passed bands with no excep
gorsuch. incredible people. for having the courage to allow this long-term, hard-fought battle to finally end. this 50 year battle over roe v. wade took it out of the federal hands and brought it into the hands, minds and hearts of the people of each state. now it is up to the states to do the right thing. like ronald reagan i am strongly in favor of exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother. you must follow your heart on this issue but you also must win elections to restore culture...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
neil gorsuch moated the possibility of this situation, he said would lead to just every president pardoning themselves on the way out of office which is a novel and kind of dangerous situation for the court to be in which has never had to consider to thelegality of whether presis can do that. we also saw that justice samuel alito. another republican appointeee to the court. a conservative one albeit not a trump appointed justice. this would lead presidents to essentially try to stay in office unlawfully. to hole on to power. he said that would put america in a dangerous cycle of undermining democracy. so there were quite a bit of concerns. i don't want to overstate the case and say a majority of the court is going to reulg rule in trump's favor. i think you heard quite a bit of skepticism of the degree of immunity that former president trump is seeking. but i think -- i think that a majority of the court is probably going to coalesce around some form of legal protection for presidents over their official act and the question is what does that do to this prosecution and what what is that goi
neil gorsuch moated the possibility of this situation, he said would lead to just every president pardoning themselves on the way out of office which is a novel and kind of dangerous situation for the court to be in which has never had to consider to thelegality of whether presis can do that. we also saw that justice samuel alito. another republican appointeee to the court. a conservative one albeit not a trump appointed justice. this would lead presidents to essentially try to stay in office...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice neil gorsuch swoops in there. hey now, let's finish up off this talk about presidents and former presidents knowing they can go to prison. why the rush? let's talk about having more hearings. let's talk about new tests for what types of presidential behavior count as presidential behavior. new tests we will maybe invent. that will be a big long discussion. let's talk about further proceedings. yes. further proceedings. that we would like to see. >> and that left open in that case the possibility of furred proceedings and trial. >> exactly right. and that would be a very natural course for this court to take. this court should reverse the holding of the dc circuit that there is no such thing as official acts. >> but you agree further proceedings would be required. >> that is correct. >> definitely, many, many further proceedings. our colleague joy read has joined us. i felt that was a tell when justice gorsuch came in there and said this isn't going well. don't talk about presidents knowing they can be prosecuted b
justice neil gorsuch swoops in there. hey now, let's finish up off this talk about presidents and former presidents knowing they can go to prison. why the rush? let's talk about having more hearings. let's talk about new tests for what types of presidential behavior count as presidential behavior. new tests we will maybe invent. that will be a big long discussion. let's talk about further proceedings. yes. further proceedings. that we would like to see. >> and that left open in that case...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice neil gorsuch swoops in. hey, let's finish up all of this talk about presidents and former presidents knowing they can go to prison. why the rush? let's slow down and talk about having more hearings and talk about new tests for what types of behavior count as presidential behavior. new tests we will invent and that will be a long discussion and we have to spend a lot of time on that. let's talk about further proceedings, yes, further proceedings that we would like to see. >> in that case the possibility of further proceedings and trial. >> exactly right and that would be a natural course for this court to take. the court can and should reverse the categorical holding of the d.c. circuit that there is no such thing as official acts. >> what you agree further proceedings would be required? >> that is correct. >> definitely, definitely, many, many further proceedings for as long as possible. joy reid has just joined us. i'm not a lawyer and neither are you, but watching ms. proceedings today i felt that that was
justice neil gorsuch swoops in. hey, let's finish up all of this talk about presidents and former presidents knowing they can go to prison. why the rush? let's slow down and talk about having more hearings and talk about new tests for what types of behavior count as presidential behavior. new tests we will invent and that will be a long discussion and we have to spend a lot of time on that. let's talk about further proceedings, yes, further proceedings that we would like to see. >> in...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
during oral arguments at the supreme court yesterday justice neil gorsuch spoke about the dual standards of justice. specifically referencing how left wing protesters seem to always get away with it. never being charged like the j-6ers for disrupt ago congressional proceeding. >> would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify would a heckler at today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address. would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? for 20 years in federal prison? >> laura: well, we all know the answer, don't we? no, because congressman jamal brown, who pulled that fire alarm when the house was in session, was charged with a nothing burger misdemeanor by the d.c. attorney's office. yeah. that's justice voters need to understand that the legal assault against donald trump in new york and georgia and in d.c. it will become a regular part of american politics unless, unless democrats are made to suffer at the polls. until then, if you're a conservative or some type of traditionalist, you dare to stand up for the middle class or donate t
during oral arguments at the supreme court yesterday justice neil gorsuch spoke about the dual standards of justice. specifically referencing how left wing protesters seem to always get away with it. never being charged like the j-6ers for disrupt ago congressional proceeding. >> would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify would a heckler at today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address. would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify?...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
listen to justice neil gorsuch yesterday. >> would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify? would a heckler in today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address? would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? >> dana: the best explaining legal arguments and where justices are going to the rest of us not lawyers. what should we know? >> before i became a.g. a wrote a 19-page memo on this toying. a lot of people were raising this when i was confirmed. i did it as a private citizen and i sadekar eid much too far and has to be restricted to the repairment of evidence. it can't be used the way they are using it. it is very comprehensive. now several courts have agreed and i think the supreme court is going to rule that way. >> bill: if that's the case you have hundreds of january 6th defendants who are in jail and the whole idea about this obstruction charge is borne out of the enron disaster. jack smith has a count against the former president for obstruction. what would be the end result of that? >> he will try to differentiate that. things li
listen to justice neil gorsuch yesterday. >> would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify? would a heckler in today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address? would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? >> dana: the best explaining legal arguments and where justices are going to the rest of us not lawyers. what should we know? >> before i became a.g. a wrote a 19-page memo on this toying. a lot of people were raising this...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
during oral arguments at the supreme court yesterday, justict neil gorsuch spoke brilliantly about the dual standards of justice, specifically inreferencing how left-wing protesters seem to always get away with it neverge being chard like the j6 mike 6 if any rs. >> access to a federal courthouse qualify for what a heckler in today's audience qualify for the state of the union address? would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? and for 20 years in federal prison? >> laura: well, we all know thcause answer, don't we smirke, because congressman jamaal brow, who pulled the fire alarm when the house was in session wass of charged with nothing burger misdemeanor by. the d.c. attorney's office, yeah, that is just as pure as nownst voters need to understand the i legal assault against donald trump in new york andof georgia and d.c., it will become a regular part of american politics unless, lessen democrats are made to suffer ato the polls. until then, if you are a concert, conservative, you dare to stand up for the middle class or donate to someone who is in your stand against the was
during oral arguments at the supreme court yesterday, justict neil gorsuch spoke brilliantly about the dual standards of justice, specifically inreferencing how left-wing protesters seem to always get away with it neverge being chard like the j6 mike 6 if any rs. >> access to a federal courthouse qualify for what a heckler in today's audience qualify for the state of the union address? would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? and for 20 years in federal prison? >> laura:...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch said that the justices will be writing a opinion that is one for the ages. >> and what did we hear from david pecker there in new york, rehema? >> yes, he has been, and a lot of it is testimony about the relationship that they had about the catch-and-kill scheme that the viewers have been following. this is in reference to karen mcdougal who is a "playboy" model with the affair she alleges to have had with donald trump. what david pecker says is that donald trump micromanaged everything. michael cohen, his former attorney, was the intermediary, and it was donald trump who and he said that he could not pay for lunch if they went together, because he had not authorized it. listen to what he said about david pecker when he was attending a campaign stop earlier today before the court testimony began in mid-town manhattan. take a listen. >> are you satisfied with the testimony of david pecker so far? >> david is a very nice guy. a very nice guy. >> and nothing to say about david pecker. the prosecution brought up that he has immunity in this particular case, and then the judge inst
gorsuch said that the justices will be writing a opinion that is one for the ages. >> and what did we hear from david pecker there in new york, rehema? >> yes, he has been, and a lot of it is testimony about the relationship that they had about the catch-and-kill scheme that the viewers have been following. this is in reference to karen mcdougal who is a "playboy" model with the affair she alleges to have had with donald trump. what david pecker says is that donald trump...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch said you speaking to the ages this will be with us for the rest of our lives, remember whether it evolves to the credit of the sitting president or not during an election we should remember that it is part of the president's official duties to ensure that the integrity of our election system is sound whether it cuts against him or not and it's an argument that donald trump's actions if he believed that the election had really been undermined are within his official duties if he felt like it had been impugned. maria: were to be watching that. by the way it's good to see you. i wanted to ask you about harvey weinstein and the rape charge overturned in new york. real quick. >> i think that's very significantly for the donald trump case because the donald trump involves prior bad acts and that's what got the weinstein case thrown out. it's sandoval all the two cases that are implemented. that is likely going to matter if the case appeals for donald trump. let me just say for this reason and others i can tell you and go to the top question. as a cop and not as a lawyer. if i had bro
gorsuch said you speaking to the ages this will be with us for the rest of our lives, remember whether it evolves to the credit of the sitting president or not during an election we should remember that it is part of the president's official duties to ensure that the integrity of our election system is sound whether it cuts against him or not and it's an argument that donald trump's actions if he believed that the election had really been undermined are within his official duties if he felt...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch. and it was his questions followed up by amy coney barrett, ketanji brown jackson, they'll reference back to them. what was your take away? >> i was struck by i thought the extreme positions of both sides. we have donald trump arguing absolute immunity for all official from criminal prosecution from all official acts and you had the department of justice arguing zero immunity. i thought to myself how can a president function if they have no immunity whatsoever from criminal prosecution for their official acts? brett kavanaugh, who i worked for, when he was going through his confirmation process, i thought he raised some very interesting points. he talked about how troubled he was for the trajectory of the american presidency. if they were to side with the department of justices approach which is this zero immunity, this pastor, so i was also struck by the dojs argument of don't worry about it because prosecutions are not politically motivated. we take both about that kind of stuff and
gorsuch. and it was his questions followed up by amy coney barrett, ketanji brown jackson, they'll reference back to them. what was your take away? >> i was struck by i thought the extreme positions of both sides. we have donald trump arguing absolute immunity for all official from criminal prosecution from all official acts and you had the department of justice arguing zero immunity. i thought to myself how can a president function if they have no immunity whatsoever from criminal...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch, as the justice put it, we are writing a rule for the ages. the question at hand can a u.s. president be prosecuted for his actions in office? is there absolute immunity? is there limiteds immunity?d imi can obama be charged, for example, for killing in a drone overke which happened overseas ? can george w bush be charged? with allegedly lying to congress about iraq? if a far left prosecutor decides to cook up charges, and could joe biden be chargedoo for killing a family in afghanistan during deadly withdrawal? >> now, here's how trump's legal team put it earliehere ir today. >> listen. the implications of the court's becision here extend far beyond the facts of this case. ge w >> could president george w bush have been sent to prison for obstructing an official proceeding or allegedly lying to congress to induce war in iraq? >> could president obamabe be charged with murder forr killing u.s. citizens abroad by drone strike? >> all right. ultimately, the constitutional judges on the court seem to favor limited immunity over absolute . in but
gorsuch, as the justice put it, we are writing a rule for the ages. the question at hand can a u.s. president be prosecuted for his actions in office? is there absolute immunity? is there limiteds immunity?d imi can obama be charged, for example, for killing in a drone overke which happened overseas ? can george w bush be charged? with allegedly lying to congress about iraq? if a far left prosecutor decides to cook up charges, and could joe biden be chargedoo for killing a family in afghanistan...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think thomas and samuel alito have staked out a strong program position, neil gorsuch is somewhere in between. i think that for chief justice roberts especially, he probably recognizes at this point what that article pointed out, which is that team trump has pulled off the heist. the supreme court has slow walk to this case as compared to the ballot removal case from earlier this term, the nixon cases in the 1970s during watergate. they have in short, i think, that this trial will not happen before november, before election day. and, you know, when john roberts is embarrassed by a case for sometimes he goes quiet, he doesn't say anything. one thing i will be looking to is whether the chief justice mostly keeps his mouth shut or whether he tries to direct arguments toward some kind of consensus position. >> i know that this supreme court is "impenetrable and they don't pay attention to press." and they are not victim to whatever the political climate of the day is. but, do you think the widespread public outcry over the slow pace with which they have taken this up, the fact they too
i think thomas and samuel alito have staked out a strong program position, neil gorsuch is somewhere in between. i think that for chief justice roberts especially, he probably recognizes at this point what that article pointed out, which is that team trump has pulled off the heist. the supreme court has slow walk to this case as compared to the ballot removal case from earlier this term, the nixon cases in the 1970s during watergate. they have in short, i think, that this trial will not happen...
0
0.0
Apr 20, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
officially always know, we always know the same three are always going to take aside and there are neil gorsuch, they are samuel alito and they are his good, good, good powell lauren strong, clarence, thomas owe you all know already i was i was ridiculous. gorsuch is the most pro criminal defendant justice on the court, regardless of the politics of it, that's why he votes with liberals all the time. i think there is zero chance that any justice will, will endorse trump's view of complete and total immunity to criminal things. trump will lose that nine zero, whether there's a qualified immunity dependent on specific cases in circumstances, maybe on capitol hills speaker mike johnson with some fancy footwork to win a key vote in the house amid republican threatened just a firearm. so did johnson out fox, the far right then pulling the plug with a big drop in sales we're asking, is tesla in trouble? and later double whammy are tortured poets are ready to dish taylor swift's big albums surprise you know that i you're there's new ally in the fight against climate change. this is new car bus
officially always know, we always know the same three are always going to take aside and there are neil gorsuch, they are samuel alito and they are his good, good, good powell lauren strong, clarence, thomas owe you all know already i was i was ridiculous. gorsuch is the most pro criminal defendant justice on the court, regardless of the politics of it, that's why he votes with liberals all the time. i think there is zero chance that any justice will, will endorse trump's view of complete and...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it has a conservative majority three of them those justices were appointed by him, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, and amy coney barrett. so i'm sure that he thinks he's going to get better shake from this court, then he might be getting up in manhattan, but we'll see the justices action to hear this case now, rather than earlier in the year special counsel jack smith's and urged the justices means that the federal trial here in dc was postponed from its original march start date, and john, i don't expect a ruling from the justices until late june. that's likely when it will come, and that will mean that any trial, if the justices dues say he is not he has no immunity here. any trial would not come until i'd say shortly before the election if it comes at all, biskupic for us in washington, john, thank you very much for that. the breaking news overnight indicted in arizona some of donald trump's closest allies. now charged for their efforts to overturn the results there, trump is labeled as coconspirator number one, we have new developments from there and violent confrontations with poli
it has a conservative majority three of them those justices were appointed by him, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, and amy coney barrett. so i'm sure that he thinks he's going to get better shake from this court, then he might be getting up in manhattan, but we'll see the justices action to hear this case now, rather than earlier in the year special counsel jack smith's and urged the justices means that the federal trial here in dc was postponed from its original march start date, and john, i...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
are going to get a pass or at least dramatically reduced criminal exposure questions like these from neil gorsuch are tropic to the bench about what else might fall under the law >> what does sit in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify would a heckler in today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address would pulling a fire alarm before for a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison >> sit-ins, hecklers, fire alarms they might be an impediment, but it is not an insurrection. for everyone, but forgets this is what the mob looked like. it's hard to see how anyone can argue that the intent here was not to obstruct a constitutionally important official proceeding, but the court's conservatives seem ready to do just that protesters block to the golden gate bridge in san francisco and disrupted traffic and san francisco, what if something similar to that >> happened all around the cabin? capital so that members all the bridges from virginia were blocked and members from virginia who needed to appear at a hearing couldn't get there our word delayed in ge
are going to get a pass or at least dramatically reduced criminal exposure questions like these from neil gorsuch are tropic to the bench about what else might fall under the law >> what does sit in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify would a heckler in today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address would pulling a fire alarm before for a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison >> sit-ins, hecklers, fire alarms they might be an...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch. i will nominate judge brett kavanaugh, judge amy coney, barrett >> in june of 2022, after nearly 50 years, the court struck down roe versus wade and trump, who is now trying to say that he doesn't support the strictest restrictions that have been exploding and red states across the country >> he has repeatedly >> bragged about how he made that possible. >> we ended roe v. wade, we terminate it. >> roe >> v. wade. >> i was able to terminate roe v. wade after 50 years of trying the results have been stories like this one told him the biden campaign ad, yes, but about a woman, a family who wanted their child wanted a child >> and were devastated by the consequences of the fall of roe the outfit she was gonna maybe where home from the hospital >> all >> this is the blanket that she would okay >> there's also kate cox. she's the texas woman who also desperately wanted a baby when she was told that her baby likely wouldn't live for more than a few days outside the womb. she sought an aborti
gorsuch. i will nominate judge brett kavanaugh, judge amy coney, barrett >> in june of 2022, after nearly 50 years, the court struck down roe versus wade and trump, who is now trying to say that he doesn't support the strictest restrictions that have been exploding and red states across the country >> he has repeatedly >> bragged about how he made that possible. >> we ended roe v. wade, we terminate it. >> roe >> v. wade. >> i was able to terminate roe...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's the issue for me and we'll see what they do very soon joey, it's obvious that neil gorsuch said, set as much directly on the bench yesterday that this is about future presidencies, future presidents but there's this very immediate question about donald trump and whether or not voters are going to get a chance to understand whether or not he is convicted of trying to overturn conspiring to try to overturn an election before they have to decide whether or not to send him back to the oval office. >> and while officially the supreme court is supposed to be above politics, it seems very clear that they understand how they operate in a political environment, including the chief justice john roberts. he seems to want to protect the court from that, but he also understands how that plays out are they not making a political decision if they effectively delay this trial, past the election yeah, i think so. casey and i think we have to be really concerned, right. because we have these institutions and in these institutions we want them to be non-political. we expect the supreme court to ma
that's the issue for me and we'll see what they do very soon joey, it's obvious that neil gorsuch said, set as much directly on the bench yesterday that this is about future presidencies, future presidents but there's this very immediate question about donald trump and whether or not voters are going to get a chance to understand whether or not he is convicted of trying to overturn conspiring to try to overturn an election before they have to decide whether or not to send him back to the oval...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
neil gorsuch said that fell to justice sonia sotomayor. they're really stress what was at issue. and michael driven kept pounding away, pounding away on the allegations against former president then trump and his disruption of the peaceful transfer of power all right, joan biskupic, outside the supreme court. >> thank you so much. let's look talk about the politics of all this because i don't know how the supreme court is going to roll. but certainly if they put forward an argument like alito did today, seeming more concerned about how if a hypothetical president is fearing prosecution, he might be inclined to stage a coup, which is certainly an interesting way to look at this case. i don't know that that's going to bolster confidence in the us supreme court among the members of the public do i think i've told that we have that soundbite if you want to play it, do we want to do if we have it, let's play it if a an incumbent who loses a very close hotly contested election knows that a real possibility after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off int
neil gorsuch said that fell to justice sonia sotomayor. they're really stress what was at issue. and michael driven kept pounding away, pounding away on the allegations against former president then trump and his disruption of the peaceful transfer of power all right, joan biskupic, outside the supreme court. >> thank you so much. let's look talk about the politics of all this because i don't know how the supreme court is going to roll. but certainly if they put forward an argument like...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
then listen at the end is neil gorsuch swoops in to save trump's lawyer. to give him a better idea. may be a delay would be a good idea to get everybody out of this. >> when you were giving your opening statements, you were talking about, you know, you suggested that the lack of immunity and the possibility of prosecution in the presidential context is like an innovation, and i understood it to be the status quo. i understood that every president from the beginning of time essentially has understood that there was a threat of prosecution and they have continued to function into their jobs and do all the things that presidents do. it seems you are asking now for a change in what the law is related to immunity. >> i would, quote, from benjamin franklin said at the constitutional convention, history provides one example only of a chief magistrate who is subject up public justice criminal prosecution. everybody cried out against that. >> i understand but since benjamin franklin, everybody is thought including presidents without the office that they were taking this office subject to pot
then listen at the end is neil gorsuch swoops in to save trump's lawyer. to give him a better idea. may be a delay would be a good idea to get everybody out of this. >> when you were giving your opening statements, you were talking about, you know, you suggested that the lack of immunity and the possibility of prosecution in the presidential context is like an innovation, and i understood it to be the status quo. i understood that every president from the beginning of time essentially has...