0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in jack smith's brief to the supreme court, jack smith argued there was no need for the supreme court to hear the case at all. but if the supreme court was inclined to hear the case, jack smith asked the supreme court not to send the case back for another round at the appeals court, but to set an expedited hearing at the supreme court, schedule that expedited hearing. and that is what the supreme court now has done. leading off our discussion tonight is neal katyal, former acting u.s. solicitor general and host of the podcast courtside with neal katyal. he is an msnbc legal analyst. and neal, i want to begin the way all lawyers begin when they get these notices from the supreme court that they're going to hear your case. they have the supreme court identified for the lawyers on both sides the question, and the only question, they want to hear addressed. and i want to give that question to the audience now. the question is whether, and if so to what extent, does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during
in jack smith's brief to the supreme court, jack smith argued there was no need for the supreme court to hear the case at all. but if the supreme court was inclined to hear the case, jack smith asked the supreme court not to send the case back for another round at the appeals court, but to set an expedited hearing at the supreme court, schedule that expedited hearing. and that is what the supreme court now has done. leading off our discussion tonight is neal katyal, former acting u.s. solicitor...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court, over to you. but first, more on this stunning decision of the supreme court entertain donald trump's immunity claims. which justices wanted to hear this case? that's coming up next. up next. have you ever considered getting a walk-in tub? well, look no further. proudly made in tennessee, a safe step walk-in tub is the best in it's class. the ultra-low easy step helps keep you safe from having to climb over those high walled tubs, allowing you to age gracefully in the home you love. and now, back by popular demand, for a limited time, when you purchase your brand-new safe step walk-in tub, you'll receive a free shower package! yes! a free shower package, and if you call today, you'll also receive $1600 off. now you can enjoy the best of both worlds. the therapeutic benefits of a warm, soothing bath, that can help increase mobility, relieve pain, boost energy, and even improve sleep. or, if you prefer, you can take a refreshing shower all in one product! call now! type 2 diabetes? discover the ozemp
supreme court, over to you. but first, more on this stunning decision of the supreme court entertain donald trump's immunity claims. which justices wanted to hear this case? that's coming up next. up next. have you ever considered getting a walk-in tub? well, look no further. proudly made in tennessee, a safe step walk-in tub is the best in it's class. the ultra-low easy step helps keep you safe from having to climb over those high walled tubs, allowing you to age gracefully in the home you...
0
0.0
Jun 4, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course. one that's credible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the fact that we have to come to the floor of the senate to plead this case makes it clear avenues to be followed for ethical consideration before the court■ today. that can change. the bill that's pending on the calendar is a step in the right direction and i totally support it. i close by asking unanimous consent that the letter sent to me by justice alito part of the congressional record. without objection. >> regularly to the floor to scheme run by a bunch of right wing billionaires to capture and control the supreme court and how that has come to affect so many americans' lives. well, in case there were not enough ethics problems already at the supreme court after the ionaire gift program for certain justices gave them luxuriouspre-undisclosed travel, gifts aroun paid for homes for parents, even an expensive motor coach that appears never to have had the principal repaid, now we know
to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course. one that's credible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the fact that we have to come to the floor of the senate to plead this case makes it clear avenues to be followed for ethical consideration before the court■ today. that can change. the bill that's pending on the calendar is a step in the right direction and i totally support it. i close by asking unanimous consent that the letter...
0
0.0
Jun 4, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
overturn the election in fisher versus the united states the court, again, the supreme court will determine whether the obstruction statute applies to the january 6th rioters who tried to stop congress from exercising constitutional duty to certify the election. the court's ruling on these issues will be cri to ensuring that those responsible for one of the chapters in our history are held accountable. but displaying the upsidedown appearance that justice alito has already aligned himself with the stop the steal campaign. he cannot credibly claim being an umpire calling balls and strikes in these cases. donne favorite team and that's why i called on justice alito to recuse himself and urge chief justice roberts to finally step up and take what steps are necessary to alito does not sit these cases, rather that hc"e recuse himself. last week, justice alito refused my request. i'm going to keep this letter, the original version was sent to me and senator whitehouse, by justice alito in which he makes an argument that theould that it was his wife's complications in her decision. it's hard t it'
overturn the election in fisher versus the united states the court, again, the supreme court will determine whether the obstruction statute applies to the january 6th rioters who tried to stop congress from exercising constitutional duty to certify the election. the court's ruling on these issues will be cri to ensuring that those responsible for one of the chapters in our history are held accountable. but displaying the upsidedown appearance that justice alito has already aligned himself with...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court nominee. other republicans, including people in donald trump's administration, who wanted him to pull the nomination of brett kavanaugh. he didn't know the guy. donald trump, decided to stay and fight. he got the guy on the bench. here, you have his lawyer. very naked on fox. i'm sure that brett kavanaugh watches it. i'm sure the justice watches it. saying that you probably like your job. donald trump, he fought for you. we will see what you do. >> that is a great restaurant. it would be a great shame if something happened to it. on the contrary, we were talking about abortion, death penalty, or firearms. matters that are cultural issues around which there are deep partisan divides. of course, it would be fair to predict a conservative leading in the supreme court to rule a certain way. frankly, we have years of data suggesting that. the issues at play, they affect republican candidates and their opponents. these are not standard issues. these are complex issues from constitutional interpretat
supreme court nominee. other republicans, including people in donald trump's administration, who wanted him to pull the nomination of brett kavanaugh. he didn't know the guy. donald trump, decided to stay and fight. he got the guy on the bench. here, you have his lawyer. very naked on fox. i'm sure that brett kavanaugh watches it. i'm sure the justice watches it. saying that you probably like your job. donald trump, he fought for you. we will see what you do. >> that is a great...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and neil, on supreme court nights we go straight to you because you are the supreme court practitioner, here. let's go to the threshold question. the trump lawyers filed a petition for the supreme court to hear the case. will the supreme court grant that petition and hear the case? >> almost certainly, yes. lawrence, we've seen many times, other cases involving trump that the supreme court doesn't take them. they take very few cases a year, about 60. but i suspect that this is one case that the court can't pass up. and indeed, both sides are basically saying to the court, to the supreme court, take this case, we hear this case. i very much suspect that they will. i think they can order a briefing to occur really quickly, and oral argument to take place in a matter of a few weeks. >> andrew weissmann, what stands out to you in the trump petition to the supreme court? >> two things, one is that as a matter of being a lawyer and in the same field that neal is an, the amount that we have become a northward to just how poorly argued and reasoned and the sort of gall that the brief represent
and neil, on supreme court nights we go straight to you because you are the supreme court practitioner, here. let's go to the threshold question. the trump lawyers filed a petition for the supreme court to hear the case. will the supreme court grant that petition and hear the case? >> almost certainly, yes. lawrence, we've seen many times, other cases involving trump that the supreme court doesn't take them. they take very few cases a year, about 60. but i suspect that this is one case...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
all eyes are now turning to the supreme court. also, that republican effort to impeach the homeland security secretary over the border, just went down in flames. they failing spectacularly in the house this evening, it is a major investment for the house speaker, but really for the house gop. also tonight we are tracking, this is for the first time, ever the -- has been held responsible for her actions related to her own sons murderous rampage. what it could mean for the future of school shootings in america. i am kaitlan collins, and this is the source. the answer, if you are, wondering is no. the president can order seal team six to assassinate his political opponent with absolute immunity from prosecution in the future. remember the striking hypothetical that was post-just one month ago to trump's attorney by a panel judges, that attorney that went on and actually tried to defend, even hypothetically. well today, the dc circuit court of appeals took a sledgehammer not to just that, but who really all of donald trump's -- the fo
all eyes are now turning to the supreme court. also, that republican effort to impeach the homeland security secretary over the border, just went down in flames. they failing spectacularly in the house this evening, it is a major investment for the house speaker, but really for the house gop. also tonight we are tracking, this is for the first time, ever the -- has been held responsible for her actions related to her own sons murderous rampage. what it could mean for the future of school...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
today, the supreme court hour. today, the supreme court appellate court. by merely deciding to do this, though, the court has essentially upended the attempt to hold donald trump accountable for his actions to subvert democracy. in fact, the court may have ended that attempt entirely. this decision is also certain to reshape the 2024 presidential race, and it will likely play a determinative role in its outcome. as much as the significance of this ruling is already apparent, the full consequences here hinge on the timing. in it the supreme court said it would hear oral arguments in the case the week of april 22 nd. now, april 22nd is not close to today, and we'll get into exactly why exactly the court didn't choose a date a lot sooner than that, but april 22nd also on its face sort of seems pretty far from the november election. it's not. because when you start crunching the numbers and looking at how a trial could actually time out after the supreme court makes its decision here, the window in which trump could face trial, the window of that happening bef
today, the supreme court hour. today, the supreme court appellate court. by merely deciding to do this, though, the court has essentially upended the attempt to hold donald trump accountable for his actions to subvert democracy. in fact, the court may have ended that attempt entirely. this decision is also certain to reshape the 2024 presidential race, and it will likely play a determinative role in its outcome. as much as the significance of this ruling is already apparent, the full...
0
0.0
Jan 9, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court is blessing this interpretation of the 14th amendment and the supreme court that would disqualify donald trump, not just in colorado but throughout the entire country. i have a hard time seeing chief justice roberts leading the supreme court. 50 to 30 points in early primary states. presidential electoral politics. if your call was the court saying that the state of florida's courts were using inconsistent standards in how counting ballots county to county. i think that the the court too will grant circ. suppose that you're worried that there might be 5 votes to affirm the colorado supreme court and you don't want the supreme court to be the one who decides nationwide whether trump is going to be on the ballot or not. maybe you don't grant circ. maybe you let colorado have its way and case for another case, wait toe see if there's conflit and the court -- that would be the traditional way the supreme court would exercise its circ power to see if there's conflict on this issue. minnesota has rejected the argument. first amendment grounds not fourth amendment grounds. we
supreme court is blessing this interpretation of the 14th amendment and the supreme court that would disqualify donald trump, not just in colorado but throughout the entire country. i have a hard time seeing chief justice roberts leading the supreme court. 50 to 30 points in early primary states. presidential electoral politics. if your call was the court saying that the state of florida's courts were using inconsistent standards in how counting ballots county to county. i think that the the...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court? caller: i have not trusted them for a while. even when obama was president, mitch mcconnell would not let him, obama, bring up merrick garland, to bring someone on the court. so the court has become political for a while, not only now. i do not trust the court. i think of our becoming -- i think they are becoming too political. the last three before jackson, i think they have really been too political, and i think the courts now are very, very political. i would give them a 10%. host: that's ann in new york. a favorability ratings are any indication, the supreme court becoming more unfavorable over time, according to public polling. this is pew research with their chart, dating back to 1987. back then, the favorability ratings of the supreme court would bounce from 80% to 65%. you can see those numbers tightening over time, from 2000 7, 2017, almost 50-50, just after 2022, unfavorable ratings then favorable ratings, that dating up last year, and some of the latest numbers from the gal
the supreme court? caller: i have not trusted them for a while. even when obama was president, mitch mcconnell would not let him, obama, bring up merrick garland, to bring someone on the court. so the court has become political for a while, not only now. i do not trust the court. i think of our becoming -- i think they are becoming too political. the last three before jackson, i think they have really been too political, and i think the courts now are very, very political. i would give them a...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court is a supreme court. john roberts has the opinion and of the supreme court and the american public's my in his hands. and he values so supreme court, he is the chief justice. that is his job. >> if very interesting to hear you say that congressman steve cohen, thank you very much for joining us. >> you're welcome, abby. nice to be with you >> and next, the republican who is responsible for changing the architecture of that supreme court announces that he is taking a back venture role on the very same day that the court but he built steps into the spotlight, again, much more ahead on these side sunday >> van jones, it's home find out what is driving the divide in tennessee politics. >> there has been a very active 20 to 30 year effort to separate us. >> the whole story with anderson cooper sunday up on cnn liberty mutual customize my car insurance and i saved hundreds >> that's great. >> i know i've been telling everyone how many people did you tell only pay for what you need >> i know what, it's like to p
the supreme court is a supreme court. john roberts has the opinion and of the supreme court and the american public's my in his hands. and he values so supreme court, he is the chief justice. that is his job. >> if very interesting to hear you say that congressman steve cohen, thank you very much for joining us. >> you're welcome, abby. nice to be with you >> and next, the republican who is responsible for changing the architecture of that supreme court announces that he is...
0
0.0
Feb 18, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he was working as an aide at the supreme court in library. and so the day after pearl harbor day on december 8th, 1941, he was doing what a library aide does dropping off books, picking up books. and all of a sudden the front door, he saw all of these u.s. army soldiers come with their weapons drawn and take positions at the windows and the roof all around the court. and the reason was because at noon that day fdr was going to be at the capitol, right across the street from the supreme court. that's where he gave his famous day of infamy speech. that december 7th is a date which will live in infamy. and in fact, the justices adjourned early. so that they could go there and be there. and the soldiers were there as part of an expanded security perimeter. this was just one day after this devastating surprise attack in pearl harbor. but what you see is quite literally, the war, the quiet prison of the supreme court. and the second anecdote was the day after christmas, 1941, and winston churchill had made this dramatic surprise by his visit to was
he was working as an aide at the supreme court in library. and so the day after pearl harbor day on december 8th, 1941, he was doing what a library aide does dropping off books, picking up books. and all of a sudden the front door, he saw all of these u.s. army soldiers come with their weapons drawn and take positions at the windows and the roof all around the court. and the reason was because at noon that day fdr was going to be at the capitol, right across the street from the supreme court....
0
0.0
Jun 2, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he was working as an aide at the supreme court in library. and so the day after pearl harbor day on december 8th, 1941, he was doing what a library aide does dropping off books, picking up books. and all of a sudden the front door, he saw all of these u.s. army soldiers come with their weapons drawn and take positions at the windows and the roof all around the court. and the reason was because at noon that day fdr was going to be at the capitol, right across the street from the supreme court. that's where he gave his famous day of infamy speech. that december 7th is a date which will live in infamy. and in fact, the justices adjourned early. so that they could go there and be there. and the soldiers were there as part of an expanded security perimeter. this was just one day after this devastating surprise attack in pearl harbor. but what you see is quite literally, the war, the quiet prison of the supreme court. and the second anecdote was the day after christmas, 1941, and winston churchill had made this dramatic surprise by his visit to was
he was working as an aide at the supreme court in library. and so the day after pearl harbor day on december 8th, 1941, he was doing what a library aide does dropping off books, picking up books. and all of a sudden the front door, he saw all of these u.s. army soldiers come with their weapons drawn and take positions at the windows and the roof all around the court. and the reason was because at noon that day fdr was going to be at the capitol, right across the street from the supreme court....
0
0.0
Mar 31, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the supreme court in particular. and that every year through the eighties, even through the nineties, under chief justice rehnquist and it continues for four years under john roberts and in thousand and nine, roberts stops he stops asking congress for anything because if you ask congress for stuff you, convey the message that actually congress give and congress can take away. and so to me, again, like the notion that the supreme court has the power of judicial review is not new. the notion that the court might abuse that power in ways that are deeply unpopular is not new. what is missing today are the bricks that actually used to keep the court not completely in line with public, but at least loosely in line with public opinion. and i think that's the real problem, that if we just look at the decisions the courts handed down, we tend to miss. i just want to add an anecdote of my own that supports what you said when chief justice warren got the court together to decide brown versus the board, he said no dissents and i
and the supreme court in particular. and that every year through the eighties, even through the nineties, under chief justice rehnquist and it continues for four years under john roberts and in thousand and nine, roberts stops he stops asking congress for anything because if you ask congress for stuff you, convey the message that actually congress give and congress can take away. and so to me, again, like the notion that the supreme court has the power of judicial review is not new. the notion...
54
54
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 54
favorite 0
quote 1
supreme court and this is it's unfortunate. that's a summary for you, gillian, as we move along with our show now. >> gillian: thank you. let's bring in criminal defense attorney jonna spilbor to talk more about this very important case in new york supreme court. the jury will decide whether trump is guilty or innocent. he is well aware of the fact that he is on trial before the nation and that's why we saw him do some campaigning outside the court today and why we saw him do more campaigning now inside the court. he opened by talking about the ways in which he thinks president biden has fallen short. >> it really is genius the way he is using a felony criminal trial to continue to campaign despite in particular this judge trying to shut him up and keep him off the campaign trail with all of the decisions that he has made so far that he has to be sitting at defense table, he can't go to the supreme court, etc. the gag order, the invalid, unconstitutional gag order which is the first order of business today. i don't mean to be f
supreme court and this is it's unfortunate. that's a summary for you, gillian, as we move along with our show now. >> gillian: thank you. let's bring in criminal defense attorney jonna spilbor to talk more about this very important case in new york supreme court. the jury will decide whether trump is guilty or innocent. he is well aware of the fact that he is on trial before the nation and that's why we saw him do some campaigning outside the court today and why we saw him do more...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court. so what do i mean by that? right i mean, so look at sort of some of the big things that have happened with the supreme in the last couple of years. you might have noticed there have been some ethical questions about behavior. some of the justices, many of the most sincere issues that have arisen related behavior that was in some cases, 15 or 20 years ago. why are we only learning about it now? because there's an entire press corps that covers the supreme court that never thought this was part of their job. right. to actually look at the justices personal behavior and that it took propublica and its reporting. when we look at sort of the supreme decisions. i suspect you guys have been following some of them lately. this is a it's relatively new for the court to be in the headlines every. right. and yet is. how did that happen? well, that actually happened because quietly. but gradually over the 20th century, congress gave and the court took more and more power over stuff no one cares a
the supreme court. so what do i mean by that? right i mean, so look at sort of some of the big things that have happened with the supreme in the last couple of years. you might have noticed there have been some ethical questions about behavior. some of the justices, many of the most sincere issues that have arisen related behavior that was in some cases, 15 or 20 years ago. why are we only learning about it now? because there's an entire press corps that covers the supreme court that never...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court says. of course, i will follow whatever order is in place throughout the election. >> you have said and obviously it's clear from what you said there the court made the right decision. many trump critics warn this risks turning trump into a martyr and tearing the country apart. what do you say to people like that, who certainly don't like donald trump and may agree with you on some issues of whether or not he's an insurrectionist? >> i do believe that the colorado supreme court got it right. there have only been two courts in this nation that have grappled with the decision, did donald trump engage in an insurrection? both of those courts were right here in colorado, and both of them said yes, he did. i also do not believe that there should be some loophole in the constitution for a president who decides to engage in rebellion. when we say no person is above the law, we should mean it. it shouldn't be an interpretation that no person is above the law except donald trump when he tries to ste
supreme court says. of course, i will follow whatever order is in place throughout the election. >> you have said and obviously it's clear from what you said there the court made the right decision. many trump critics warn this risks turning trump into a martyr and tearing the country apart. what do you say to people like that, who certainly don't like donald trump and may agree with you on some issues of whether or not he's an insurrectionist? >> i do believe that the colorado...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court keeps trump on ballot. states cannot borrow gop front-runner over his role in the capital attack. here's the washington times. unanimous ruling to keep trump on the ballot. states have no power in federal elections. the washington post. supreme court keeps trump on ballot nationwide. usa today. 9-0, supreme court keeps trump on ballot. other states cannot invoke insurrection clause. here is the new york times. justices rule 9-0.ru colorado loses the case. while you are dialing in we will speak to a reporter with the wall street journal, jess freeman. welcome to the program. questions did the supreme court rule on yesterday? guest: there were a number of arguments donald trump raised in his appeal. the supreme court honed in on one of them, which is only congress can enforce section 3 of the 14th amendment which bars former officials who engage in insurrection or rebellion from public office. the supreme court said only congress can set out the rules for enforcing the provision against a federal candidate an
supreme court keeps trump on ballot. states cannot borrow gop front-runner over his role in the capital attack. here's the washington times. unanimous ruling to keep trump on the ballot. states have no power in federal elections. the washington post. supreme court keeps trump on ballot nationwide. usa today. 9-0, supreme court keeps trump on ballot. other states cannot invoke insurrection clause. here is the new york times. justices rule 9-0.ru colorado loses the case. while you are dialing in...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for the supreme court. if they decide to take this case, jack smith told the court, if they decide to take the case that -- forced to file their appeals brief ten days after the supreme court agrees to take the case, and that jack smith should then be required to file his brief seven days thereafter, and that the trump lawyers could then be allowed to file a reply brief five days thereafter. that allows a total of three weeks for all of the briefs to be written, submitted to the court, after the day the supreme court agrees to take the case. if today is any indication of the speed of jack smith's team, they probably would not use all seven days to write the brief. so it could be a few days friday than three weeks. it can be done. it has been done. when the stakes for this high once before in 1974, when a criminal president was seeking the protection of the united states supreme court, the united states supreme court quickly and unanimously refused to protect the republican president of the united states. in
for the supreme court. if they decide to take this case, jack smith told the court, if they decide to take the case that -- forced to file their appeals brief ten days after the supreme court agrees to take the case, and that jack smith should then be required to file his brief seven days thereafter, and that the trump lawyers could then be allowed to file a reply brief five days thereafter. that allows a total of three weeks for all of the briefs to be written, submitted to the court, after...
0
0.0
Jun 9, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. this and more on another hour of velshi starting now. >>> good morning it's sunday june 9th. president biden is wrapping up his trip to france today where he spent much of the week recognizing d day. this morning he will be at a cemetery near paris and he and the first lady will fly back home. but in a few days he will head back to italy. biden's upcoming trips to europe are valuable opportunities for him to highlight the importance of america's role in the world stage. he's cast his opponent as a strong man who will usher in an era of corruption in america and support such things abroad. trump's first term also saw the country shift toward a more isolationist stance which raised concerns among our partners that america might abandon its alliances. biden has taken the opposite approach. he's touted the importance of america, this has been one of its goals to france as well. biden called his country, called france quote our first friend. and during remarks at a d day ceremony on thursd
supreme court. this and more on another hour of velshi starting now. >>> good morning it's sunday june 9th. president biden is wrapping up his trip to france today where he spent much of the week recognizing d day. this morning he will be at a cemetery near paris and he and the first lady will fly back home. but in a few days he will head back to italy. biden's upcoming trips to europe are valuable opportunities for him to highlight the importance of america's role in the world stage....
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, which to be clear in supreme court time is light speed. >> the they fast schedule by supreme court standard, but not an unreasonable schedule. >> it is expedited in supreme court land. the only time line by which they have to operate is really their own. >> and we'll show you what that looks like. trump appealed that case and two days later, january 5th, the court took it. two days. they said we'll take it and promptly scheduled those oral arguments that we covered. the headlines out of that hearing were very clear. the court likely to side with trump. so on a trump-friendly case when he wanted fast action they moved fast. this is a case where trump wants to move slowly because in that other case he has to get back on the ballot and in this case he just wants the trial to go away. the last time the supreme court had to weigh in on an actual presidential election that had occurred and just different on the ballot thing that's coming up was the very famous case in 2000 in bush v. gore. i told you we'll show you the evidence tonight and the court and the judges claim they used precede
, which to be clear in supreme court time is light speed. >> the they fast schedule by supreme court standard, but not an unreasonable schedule. >> it is expedited in supreme court land. the only time line by which they have to operate is really their own. >> and we'll show you what that looks like. trump appealed that case and two days later, january 5th, the court took it. two days. they said we'll take it and promptly scheduled those oral arguments that we covered. the...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court, and the supreme court said no. to the extent there were any justices who dissented from the denial of jack smith's effort to go straight to the court, we don't know there were any nor who they were. but by february 8th, we could have a decision in that case from the d.c. circuit and the supreme court could also have told us by then what they intend to do on the immunity argument. we could be substantially more advanced in terms of whether or not former president trump will face trial and on what time frame with respect to the case before judge tanya chutkan. >> your friend neal called this winnable. >> i never disagree with him, especially when it comes to the supreme court. so, he has pulled many, many rabbits out of the hat. i think that it is definitely winnable. i do think that everyone should be cautioned that, in order to win this case, that people who are defending the colorado supreme court decision have to win on a whole range of issues. there are many off-ramps for the supreme court if they are trying to
court, and the supreme court said no. to the extent there were any justices who dissented from the denial of jack smith's effort to go straight to the court, we don't know there were any nor who they were. but by february 8th, we could have a decision in that case from the d.c. circuit and the supreme court could also have told us by then what they intend to do on the immunity argument. we could be substantially more advanced in terms of whether or not former president trump will face trial and...
0
0.0
Mar 6, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because of the many, many trump cases the supreme court is hearing. this would seem pretty clear the court was going to go into this ral argument and it was also the consensus of many observers of the court.llowed each state to make this kind of determination were pretty severe. the same can of the supre court majority could be qualified inat some states. not qualified in others. even based on the same records. this is not a shocker. three liberal justices a concurring opinion can you explain what the argument was? >> sure. to use the sometimes exotic and nomenclature all nine agree with the judgment. but not the opinion. they're only five who agreed with the majority was unsigned. we know who they were because we know who they are. process of elimination of it being a majority. three liberal justices jointly authored an opinion that itially, according to what some indications with a partial dissent because somebody and noted the metadata on the document the supreme court published use the word dissenting to refer to opinions that's not what is said w
because of the many, many trump cases the supreme court is hearing. this would seem pretty clear the court was going to go into this ral argument and it was also the consensus of many observers of the court.llowed each state to make this kind of determination were pretty severe. the same can of the supre court majority could be qualified inat some states. not qualified in others. even based on the same records. this is not a shocker. three liberal justices a concurring opinion can you explain...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's now reached the supreme court. they obviously, as renato explained, don't think they can duck it. i'm curious what you think, as an election law expert, whether it was unavoidable or not, the court getting dragged in earlier. what i said was not rhetoric, the opening of some political novel. it is true that tonight the court is getting involved before any votes have been cast. bush v. gore was controversial and was unavoidable and was after all the votes were cast, counted, some recounted. whatever anyone thinks of that decision, you can't say they rushed in early. what do you think as someone who is really one of the foremost experts at the intersection of elections and the courts about how early they've had to come in here? or do you think that's not such a big concern because people won't remember it by november and people can focus on the choice they have to make? >> i think it was imperative they get involved early, and here's why. if you're a voter in colorado or maine or one of these other states, say you're
it's now reached the supreme court. they obviously, as renato explained, don't think they can duck it. i'm curious what you think, as an election law expert, whether it was unavoidable or not, the court getting dragged in earlier. what i said was not rhetoric, the opening of some political novel. it is true that tonight the court is getting involved before any votes have been cast. bush v. gore was controversial and was unavoidable and was after all the votes were cast, counted, some recounted....
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
are they going to take it to a full court or petition directly to the supreme court for the supreme court's review. i don't know. and i think it's kind of a toss-up as to whether the supreme court takes the case. and if they do take the case, all i will say is it's a much heavier lift than the colorado ballot case from president trump's side. >> really interesting. i'm glad you could come back for the special and get your very historically steeped perspective. thank you, robert. >> thanks. i was glad you were in the courtroom. it was a good day. >> interesting. it was very interesting, yes, sir. before we go, we've got to bring in andrew weissmann. we could learn a lot from all the people with experience. i did want to get your reaction to anything we just heard. >> i'm very interested on what's going to happen on monday, because that is the deadline by which, if donald trump does not indicate to the d.c. circuit that he is filing an appeal in the supreme court, the mandate, that is the green light essentially or the football is going to be handed off and back to judge chutkan. so the one a
are they going to take it to a full court or petition directly to the supreme court for the supreme court's review. i don't know. and i think it's kind of a toss-up as to whether the supreme court takes the case. and if they do take the case, all i will say is it's a much heavier lift than the colorado ballot case from president trump's side. >> really interesting. i'm glad you could come back for the special and get your very historically steeped perspective. thank you, robert. >>...
0
0.0
Jan 31, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court, 50. that means, as i just said, neal katyal has written more supreme court briefs than i have read. and so, i am more than eager to hear neal katyal's assessment of the briefs, that have been submitted so far, in the case of donald j trump versus norma anderson -- that is the name of the case, the supreme court will hear next thursday. with donald trump appealing a decision of a supreme court of colorado to ban donald trump from the presidential ballot in colorado, on the basis of section three of the 14th amendment, which bars anyone from holding federal office if they have betrayed an oath to uphold the constitution. today, the board of elections in illinois decided that they don't have the authority to ban donald trump from the ballot. they follow the advice of a retired republican judge on that point. and that judges report to the board of election, the judge said the evidence presented at the hearing on january 26 2024 proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that president trump
supreme court, 50. that means, as i just said, neal katyal has written more supreme court briefs than i have read. and so, i am more than eager to hear neal katyal's assessment of the briefs, that have been submitted so far, in the case of donald j trump versus norma anderson -- that is the name of the case, the supreme court will hear next thursday. with donald trump appealing a decision of a supreme court of colorado to ban donald trump from the presidential ballot in colorado, on the basis...
161
161
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 161
favorite 0
quote 2
supreme court. people like kavanaugh who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he'll step up. >> reporter: so she has been getting a lot of backlash for that, and obviously indicated there was some sort of quid pro quo because trump had appointed kavanaugh and gone through that process that kavanaugh would step up for him. she has since defended those comments, but i will also tell you when it comes to the former president himself, he has expressed concern to his lawyers, to his allies about this going to the supreme court. he believes that it is possible that some of these supreme court justices will rule against him so as not to seem, quote, unquote, pro-trump, that he believes that could even be people who -- who were appointed by him in the first place. that's something he has expressed. however, again, when i talk to his legal team, when i talk to his advisers, they do ex princess confidence when it comes to whether or not donald trump will be on the b
supreme court. people like kavanaugh who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he'll step up. >> reporter: so she has been getting a lot of backlash for that, and obviously indicated there was some sort of quid pro quo because trump had appointed kavanaugh and gone through that process that kavanaugh would step up for him. she has since defended those comments, but i will also tell you when it comes to the former president himself, he has...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but there is the supreme court. and they have other concerns, they should only have traditional concerns. they're gonna have other concerns, including the politics of this and how it's gonna play out. donald trump and his people have been sending coded messages via cable television about supreme court justices who owe him because he put them on the supreme court. how do all these pressures come to bear on how the supreme court is going to decide this? >> well, as you know, ali, i never speak about politics. and i will not today speak about the politics of this decision. at the supreme court of the united states. i will say this, the supreme court does not want to decide this case. and it will likely look for every legitimate way possible, legitimate way possible, to avoid deciding whether the former president is disqualified from the presidency. having studied the disqualification clause myself for three years now, there are very, very few, if any, off-ramps that would allow the supreme court to avoid a decision in
but there is the supreme court. and they have other concerns, they should only have traditional concerns. they're gonna have other concerns, including the politics of this and how it's gonna play out. donald trump and his people have been sending coded messages via cable television about supreme court justices who owe him because he put them on the supreme court. how do all these pressures come to bear on how the supreme court is going to decide this? >> well, as you know, ali, i never...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court consider. they consider the single question they're considering is whether and to what extent a former president his immune from criminal liability for alleged acts, official acts. so you're right. that's part of the question. >> can i i wonder your perspective? because let's say that the supreme court comes out and makes their decision on this june 1. and then judge chutkan gets the case moving, that they do actually schedule this trial before the election. but if it is scheduled, then for they september and trump's team is arguing, well, it's too close to the election that's election interference. i mean, can they in good faith make that argument given they're the ones who sought this delay in the first place. >> well, i don't think they sought delay in this case. that is by taking up the immunity. >> definitely did. they'll openly admit that they want to be delayed no question. they have said that. i just mean by taking the appeal in the immunity issue, i don't think that this was foisted on
the supreme court consider. they consider the single question they're considering is whether and to what extent a former president his immune from criminal liability for alleged acts, official acts. so you're right. that's part of the question. >> can i i wonder your perspective? because let's say that the supreme court comes out and makes their decision on this june 1. and then judge chutkan gets the case moving, that they do actually schedule this trial before the election. but if it is...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. 9-0. strong message to follow. >> dana: karl, the one thing i wanted to get your take on is my instincts are telling me this actually gives the biden team maybe a little bit more of a reason to step on the gas and to try to beat president trump on the merits rather than waiting for these left wing ideas on the judicial front to try to stop him from being the nominee. >> yeah, well, probably -- you've given them good advice because they really have, i think, been counting on these extraneous things to bring him down. look, some of these things have taken away his time and energy from the campaign but none of them have seemed to materially damaged his standing with the american electorate. this is what it's all about. getting the hearts and minds of the american people and a lot of people have looked at these things and said some of them give me pause. i want to hear more about them. but some of these seem to me to be over the top and piling on and unfair. and this was the most unfair of all
supreme court. 9-0. strong message to follow. >> dana: karl, the one thing i wanted to get your take on is my instincts are telling me this actually gives the biden team maybe a little bit more of a reason to step on the gas and to try to beat president trump on the merits rather than waiting for these left wing ideas on the judicial front to try to stop him from being the nominee. >> yeah, well, probably -- you've given them good advice because they really have, i think, been...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. >> and i'm jake tapper. the nation's highest court will review this landmark case. the division by colorado's supreme court to disqualify former president trump from the 2024 ballot based on what some call the insurrectionist ban 12349th amendment to the u.s. constitution. today the nine justices, three of them nominated by trump, are poised to have the most direct impact on a presidential election since the supreme court decided bush v. gore nearly a quarter sentry ago. now among the questions before the highest court in the land today, did trump incite an insurrection on january 6 as colorado's courts, including the state supreme court determined he did. does the rarely invoked insurrectionist ban apply to a president, to any president, and if so should trump then be barred from the presidential ballot, in the only in colorado but potentially in states across the country? we're going to begin today at the u.s. supreme court just steps away from the u.s. capitol where that january 6
supreme court. >> and i'm jake tapper. the nation's highest court will review this landmark case. the division by colorado's supreme court to disqualify former president trump from the 2024 ballot based on what some call the insurrectionist ban 12349th amendment to the u.s. constitution. today the nine justices, three of them nominated by trump, are poised to have the most direct impact on a presidential election since the supreme court decided bush v. gore nearly a quarter sentry ago....
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court, over to you. first, more on this stunning decision by the supreme court to entertain donald trump's immunity claims. which justices wanted to hear this case, that is coming up next. more than just work. like when it needs to be a big soft shoulder to cry on. which is why downy does more to make clothes softer, fresher, and better. downy. breathe life into your laundry. i'm starting to think this was a bad idea. what! we could find a better gift on etsy's new gift mode. oh! can i see that? ♪ happy birthday... ♪ it's a people cake! don't panic. gift easy with gift mode, new on etsy. one in five children worldwide are faced with the reality of living without food, no family dinners, no special treats, not enough energy to play. all around the world, hunger is affecting children's physical and mental health. toddlers are suffering from acute malnutrition, which stunts their growth. kids are forced to drop out of school so they can help support their families. conflict, inflation and climate have i
supreme court, over to you. first, more on this stunning decision by the supreme court to entertain donald trump's immunity claims. which justices wanted to hear this case, that is coming up next. more than just work. like when it needs to be a big soft shoulder to cry on. which is why downy does more to make clothes softer, fresher, and better. downy. breathe life into your laundry. i'm starting to think this was a bad idea. what! we could find a better gift on etsy's new gift mode. oh! can i...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has spoken. kristen, i'm sure there with be comments and i'm sure you'll get there. >> this was an unanimous decision from this panel on the federal appeals court. there's been speculation one of the reasons it took so long it there was internal dissent. we're not seeing that as we pore through the ruling. i understand you have got some information now about the scheduling here? >> reporter: that's right. going through this with help from our extraordinary team, we now see that the court of appeals is trying to make up for some of the time they lost in the month it took them to issue the decision, setting a very aggressive schedule for sending this back down to the trial court. this case, again, the traditional next step would be asking the full circuit and then going to the supreme court. that can take quite a bit of time even if the courts don't weigh in to get answers and we know part of the trump strategy is delay. here, this case is expected to go back down to the trial court unless the supr
the supreme court has spoken. kristen, i'm sure there with be comments and i'm sure you'll get there. >> this was an unanimous decision from this panel on the federal appeals court. there's been speculation one of the reasons it took so long it there was internal dissent. we're not seeing that as we pore through the ruling. i understand you have got some information now about the scheduling here? >> reporter: that's right. going through this with help from our extraordinary team, we...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's not what the supreme court has done here. that's not what the supreme court typically does. this is a procedural legalistic decision. and essentially if i had to boil it down to one sentence, it would be it's up to congress, not the individual didn't want a big messy situation where all the states goes over there and that sort of thing. the word i circled in >> this decision is quote, patchwork. they said we don't want a patchwork or one states doing one thing, and another states don't another. >> but you know, donald trump better than most covered him for many many leaders, many years as a reporter covering him as a politician and as a figure who takes things and we'll turn them the way that he wants america and the world to see them. >> i will be shocked if donald trump doesn't, as soon as he can get out there and argue, not only that the supreme court is behind him, but he's probably going to argue, even though there's nothing in here that specifically says, as elie reportedly pointed out anything about what happened on january 6, it's just procedural about whether the st
that's not what the supreme court has done here. that's not what the supreme court typically does. this is a procedural legalistic decision. and essentially if i had to boil it down to one sentence, it would be it's up to congress, not the individual didn't want a big messy situation where all the states goes over there and that sort of thing. the word i circled in >> this decision is quote, patchwork. they said we don't want a patchwork or one states doing one thing, and another states...
0
0.0
May 25, 2024
05/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
at night, oing through supreme court filingsknow reqr supreme court review, that kind of thing. and just ther dominating justices personal lives is thatr byzantin■we world of rationing d controls androls that everybody else in the lived in. you know, i have a picture in the book of justice wiley rutledge's rationing card. ration incurred just like everybody else. there are letters from harlan fiskeone is to a friend where he talks about how cold it is the house because of the rationing of of home oil. he and his wife go to local civil defense meetings where they're where the local neighborhood warden them what to don event a bombing raid and he comes home and writes his sons that he's convinced that if there is a bombing raid we're just going to have to sit and take because there's no plan that he sees that's going to do . and there's actually, you know, there were inother major citieso make bombing raids more nment buildings, including the supreme court, were blacked out at night. the monuments were blacked out, the private buildings were blacked out. and so there are newspap
at night, oing through supreme court filingsknow reqr supreme court review, that kind of thing. and just ther dominating justices personal lives is thatr byzantin■we world of rationing d controls androls that everybody else in the lived in. you know, i have a picture in the book of justice wiley rutledge's rationing card. ration incurred just like everybody else. there are letters from harlan fiskeone is to a friend where he talks about how cold it is the house because of the rationing of of...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. you and i used to teach a lot at american universities. you mentioned marbury, the notion that the court is trying to find maybe some kind of political moment. it seems to be that part of the problem, why there is such a discussion off-ramp, is because of where the court is at this particular moment in american history. because of the decline of public thinking in the supreme court, and how this supreme court actually doesn't have as much capitalism might have had in prior moments. how do you view it as part of the story? >> i don't know how you restore the credibility or legitimacy of the supreme court. we are going to intervene and stop the manual counting of ballots in the first time in american history because there might not be the exact same interpretive rules being used in one county or another. thereby handing the presidency to george w. bush. in a case where a state supreme is now through excruciating and prolonged fact-finding, there is a candidate disqualified by section th
supreme court. you and i used to teach a lot at american universities. you mentioned marbury, the notion that the court is trying to find maybe some kind of political moment. it seems to be that part of the problem, why there is such a discussion off-ramp, is because of where the court is at this particular moment in american history. because of the decline of public thinking in the supreme court, and how this supreme court actually doesn't have as much capitalism might have had in prior...
0
0.0
May 24, 2024
05/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that includes the supreme court. that includes samuel alito. >> in his latest new york times column published before yesterday's new york tis report about the second flag signifying support for trumps attempt to illegally overturn the last election flying over a home owned by supreme court justice samuel alito, [ inaudible ] wrote there is no question justice alito is a genuine republican partisan who is more than willing to share views that echo narratives aired throughout conservative media. it is not that far-fetched to think of supreme court justice might have internalized the extreme views of the insurrectionist right. there is every reason, and then some to think that a leader believe many of the same things that any other republican of his age and ideological disposition might also believe, especially when his social world seems to consist of similarly like-minded, goal oriented partisans. joining our discussion now is host of the podcast, in clear and present danger. >> your column really made me think of sam
that includes the supreme court. that includes samuel alito. >> in his latest new york times column published before yesterday's new york tis report about the second flag signifying support for trumps attempt to illegally overturn the last election flying over a home owned by supreme court justice samuel alito, [ inaudible ] wrote there is no question justice alito is a genuine republican partisan who is more than willing to share views that echo narratives aired throughout conservative...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court declined to do that. of course the case went to the appeals court where they rendered a unanimous skating decision, rejecting trump's argument that he had absolute presidential immunity then after the supreme court received a request to pause that decision, they took two weeks before releasing the fact that they are going to hear arguments in late april, which means we probably won't get a decision until late june, and we would need at least two months before that trial starts. so jake, this makes it unlikely, though not impossible that jack smith will be able to bring that case. and while this has been a bad day, it could be a bad week for for jack smith because on friday i'll be down in florida or judge overseeing the other federal prosecution, the mar-a-lago classified documents case, which has penciled in for late may. >> she he is expected to weigh in on scheduling and it is widely expected that that case will also be delayed. again, unclear if he'll be able to bring either one of these cases before
the supreme court declined to do that. of course the case went to the appeals court where they rendered a unanimous skating decision, rejecting trump's argument that he had absolute presidential immunity then after the supreme court received a request to pause that decision, they took two weeks before releasing the fact that they are going to hear arguments in late april, which means we probably won't get a decision until late june, and we would need at least two months before that trial...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court. >> the colorado supreme court? >> to the united states supreme court. so the colorado decision is on hold. he's expected to appear on the primary ballot. we need clarity for all 50 states about this issue. >> because it's been popping up elsewhere, maine, maybe oregon. >> new hampshire, minnesota, michigan. and while most states opted to keep him on the ballot, they left the door open to relitigate this. so the supreme court is under a lot of pressure. trump has filed his appeal officially. they're asking the court, did the colorado supreme court err in ordering trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot? the republican party was a little more articulate. they want to know does section three apply to presidents. that's an important question, because even within colorado, the supreme court was split there because the word does not appear. we need clarity on that. the republican party of colorado asked another important question, which is okay, if this applies to presidents, who enforces it? is it the s
court. >> the colorado supreme court? >> to the united states supreme court. so the colorado decision is on hold. he's expected to appear on the primary ballot. we need clarity for all 50 states about this issue. >> because it's been popping up elsewhere, maine, maybe oregon. >> new hampshire, minnesota, michigan. and while most states opted to keep him on the ballot, they left the door open to relitigate this. so the supreme court is under a lot of pressure. trump has...