0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i do think amy coney barrett is a really good example of this point. oral argument prediction is dynamic. you can't just do it at the beginning of the argument. justice amy coney barrett is a really good example because at one hour 55 minutes and the argument, michael dreeben, more than an hour into his argument for jack smith, talked about the allegations in the indictment about what donald trump did to the justice department, trying to pressure the justice department to send fake letters about election concerns and threatening to fire those justice department officials. i can tell you it wasn't just justice barrett. you could hear a pin drop in the room at that moment. that was a pivotal moment for the argument. it is one that caught the attention of justice amy coney barrett and i suspect the chief. given all of that, i do think that it is fair to say there is a path forward that would allow even a trial to happen but certainly andrew's solution. >> quickly before we go. i can't remember, i'm sure it happens, i haven't seen it happen. trump's lawyer
i do think amy coney barrett is a really good example of this point. oral argument prediction is dynamic. you can't just do it at the beginning of the argument. justice amy coney barrett is a really good example because at one hour 55 minutes and the argument, michael dreeben, more than an hour into his argument for jack smith, talked about the allegations in the indictment about what donald trump did to the justice department, trying to pressure the justice department to send fake letters...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let me read what amy coney barrett read in her opinion. the court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election. particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turthe temperature down, not up. for the present purposes, our differences are far more important -- less important than our unanimity. that is interesting in two direions. first of all, they are concerned how their rulings will be viewed at what is a particularly divisive moment. that is the first thing to say. >> that is absolutely correct. you were saying that another interesting thing about it is the acknowledgment of the controversy surrounding it. on a very basic sense, this was a potentially extremely divisive issue. it doesn't get more polarizing than whether or not to disqualify the front runner of a major party. >> you could read it the other way. she says, for present purposes we are agreed. there is a biggerecision on their plate, the immunity case, which they were not bound to take, but they have taken it and
let me read what amy coney barrett read in her opinion. the court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election. particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turthe temperature down, not up. for the present purposes, our differences are far more important -- less important than our unanimity. that is interesting in two direions. first of all, they are concerned how their rulings will be viewed at what is a particularly divisive...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KPIX
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
. >> reporter: conservative amy coney barrett agreed. >> it just doesn't seem like a state call. >> reporter: the colorado supreme court said trump should be removed from the state's ballots, nearly ruling he committed insurrection on january 6th, was disqualified under section three of the 14th amendment. it says no person shall be a senator or representative in congress or elector of president and vice president or hold any office who took an oath and then engage in insurrection. just as can deonte brown jackson focused on the amendments specific justice ketanji brown jackson focus on the specific words, that trump could prevail, suggesting the provision just after the civil war clearly did not apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that was barred and president was not there. and so there is an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of a colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i would expect that a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is,
. >> reporter: conservative amy coney barrett agreed. >> it just doesn't seem like a state call. >> reporter: the colorado supreme court said trump should be removed from the state's ballots, nearly ruling he committed insurrection on january 6th, was disqualified under section three of the 14th amendment. it says no person shall be a senator or representative in congress or elector of president and vice president or hold any office who took an oath and then engage in...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he might have a tough time with one of his appointees, amy coney barrett. really good to get your thoughts on that, thank you. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. let's look at some other stories making news. charities and campaigners are urging ministers to set up an inquiry into the treatment of unaccompanied children seeking asylum in the uk. the call comes after an official report said basic checks to keep children safe in asylum hotels were not carried out. the home office said the welfare of the children was an utmost priority. there will be no option of a life on benefits for young people under labour according to its shadow work and pensions secretary, liz kendall. new figures show more than 850,000 people between the age of 18 and 24 were not in work, education or training in the last three months of last year. a rare ferrari stolen 28 years ago from an ex—formula one driver in london has been recovered by police. the vehicle was shipped to japan after it was taken from gerhard berger in 1995. the car, worth £350,000, was one o
he might have a tough time with one of his appointees, amy coney barrett. really good to get your thoughts on that, thank you. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. let's look at some other stories making news. charities and campaigners are urging ministers to set up an inquiry into the treatment of unaccompanied children seeking asylum in the uk. the call comes after an official report said basic checks to keep children safe in asylum hotels were not carried out. the home...
0
0.0
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
. >> reporter: justice amy coney barrett agreeing. >> it just doesn't seem like a state call. >> reporter: chief justice john roberts warning that if the court upholds colorado, a new weapon could be introduced into the country's polarized political life -- red states going after democrats, blue states after republicans. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot, and others, for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: but looming over these arguments, the national trauma of the attack on the capitol. even though trump himself describes the day as beautiful, justice kentanji brown jackson got trump's lawyer to acknowledge the reality of what happened. >> but for an insurrection there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. and this riot that occurred -- >> so the point is a chaoti
. >> reporter: justice amy coney barrett agreeing. >> it just doesn't seem like a state call. >> reporter: chief justice john roberts warning that if the court upholds colorado, a new weapon could be introduced into the country's polarized political life -- red states going after democrats, blue states after republicans. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot, and others, for the...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
amy coney barrett, who sided with the three liberals in terms of trying to chastise the majority for going too far. said, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. the court has settled at politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up but the three liberals, democratic appointees, or not going to keep that temperature down, especially in a case like this, it involves donald trump >> yeah, interesting language there from amy coney barrett joan biskupic, laura coates. thank you both so much. >> let's get some reaction from trump world. we heard the former president speaking just moments ago, cnn's kristen holmes has been tracking the latest from west palm beach, florida. kristen trump took a victory lap here saying that he respects the supreme court. i'm wondering how this is it's being received by the trump campaign. and how they think the court might rule on the question of immunity >> yeah, of course, donald trump
amy coney barrett, who sided with the three liberals in terms of trying to chastise the majority for going too far. said, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. the court has settled at politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up but the three liberals, democratic appointees, or not going to keep that temperature down,...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
coney barrett. she was asking what happens if a doctor what reached the conclusion of good faith that an abortion was medically necessary, but prosecutors disagreed. would they be prosecuted under the idaho law asking questions like that, which sort of goes to the very heart of why this is such an issue, obviously, first and foremost, policy-wise. but also politically across the country, because these are questions being asked in courts of law in legislatures that have to do mostly with how a doctor and a patient view in this case, a very dire situation that doesn't necessarily just mean, will i save the life of a mother, but will i save? the mother's ability to have children again, if she wants to. >> yeah, exactly. that. that specific hypothetical was brought up by another justice and you've really hit on one of the key exchanges here about the fact that idaho is suggesting that really doctor's judgment may be subject to the judgment of a prosecutor. that's what amy coney barrett was getting out t
coney barrett. she was asking what happens if a doctor what reached the conclusion of good faith that an abortion was medically necessary, but prosecutors disagreed. would they be prosecuted under the idaho law asking questions like that, which sort of goes to the very heart of why this is such an issue, obviously, first and foremost, policy-wise. but also politically across the country, because these are questions being asked in courts of law in legislatures that have to do mostly with how a...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
when you look at what amy coney barrett said, she was a solo concurrent, she seemed to not only chastise the majority but chastise her other three colleagues for inflammatory language. it seems to imply that there is a lot of tension behind the scenes in this court. >> yeah, it's really interesting, katy, that you say that. a couple of weeks ago, justices sotomayor, and barrett made a joint opinion, they refer to themselves wearing the same black robe. and how justice sotomayor welcomed her kids to the supreme court, and they have movie nights, and everything is happy happy joy joy and if you read justice barrett's concurrence, she wants you to have that impression of the court. but then again, you read the concurrence by the three liberal justices which starts with a quote from chief justice roberts concurrence in the dobbs case, they say if it's not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it's not necessary to decide more. these are the cleavages we have in the court. >> why did chief justice roberts get involved here. here's such an interesting character on the court becau
when you look at what amy coney barrett said, she was a solo concurrent, she seemed to not only chastise the majority but chastise her other three colleagues for inflammatory language. it seems to imply that there is a lot of tension behind the scenes in this court. >> yeah, it's really interesting, katy, that you say that. a couple of weeks ago, justices sotomayor, and barrett made a joint opinion, they refer to themselves wearing the same black robe. and how justice sotomayor welcomed...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in the supreme court ponds to congress, right section five of the voting rights act comes to mind as exhibit number a we're waiting for that new pre-clearance formula. right. >> are you >> well-conserved, justice? amy coney, barrett, ape donald trump's third nominee, agreeing that the court went too far, maybe one to stop also at the hello patchwork but also taking time in issue with her liberal colleagues quote saying, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up but it's interesting but now is the time to take the temperature down and it politically charged environment. i want to wind now of all times, what were other cases were decided during politically charged times? >> which vigour >> no >> roe v. wade overtu
but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in the supreme court ponds to congress, right section five of the voting rights act comes to mind as exhibit number a we're waiting for that new pre-clearance formula. right. >> are you >> well-conserved, justice?...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> there was a lightning round of questions in which justice amy coney barrett, a trump appointee, got trump's attorney to concede that the indictment and lists acts by donald trump allegations of behavior that would not be covered by presidential immunity because they were private acts take a listen petitioner turned to a private attorney, was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results private, as we dispute the allegation by sounds private took sounds private. >> sinner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge so sounds private three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you ready to quickly i believe that's private joshua, what do you make of that concession? >>
. >> there was a lightning round of questions in which justice amy coney barrett, a trump appointee, got trump's attorney to concede that the indictment and lists acts by donald trump allegations of behavior that would not be covered by presidential immunity because they were private acts take a listen petitioner turned to a private attorney, was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results private, as we dispute the...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision. writing "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary of state offered sharp criticism of the decision. >> i do believe that states should be allowed under the constitution to bar insurrectionists. >> reporter: the ruling comes a day before super tuesday, the biggest primary election day of the season, when voters in 15 states including colorado head to the polls. and trump's legal hurdles continue to pile up as the supeme court weighs another decision next month. >> i hope that the justices because they will be working on some other cases, but one in particular, presidents have to be given total immunity. they have to be allowed to do their job. >> reporter: later this month, trump will also spend six weeks in court, where he is charged with falsifying business records related to hush money payments to a porn star. today trump's former cfo allen weisselberg pled guilty to two counts of perjury in the n
justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision. writing "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary of state offered sharp criticism of the decision. >> i do believe that states should be allowed under the constitution to bar insurrectionists. >> reporter: the ruling comes a day before super tuesday, the biggest primary election day of the season,...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
coney barrett. she was pretty skeptical of some of the arguments that trump's collin was making, but at the same time, she seemed to at least be open to the idea that there should be some form of immunity that would apply, that would prevent a former president having to go all the way through trial and stand in front of a jury in a case that has to do with their official actions. at one upon the, chief justice roberts, chief justice john roberts, he is one of the more -- he is one of the court's institutionist judges talking about the stature over the supreme court, he too seemed to be a bit concerned with the ruling over the d.c. circuit below him. he read from a portion of the opinion at one point and said that is not the law. we should send this case back to d.c. circuit. i think whatever iteration you get, however you get there, it may well just be a narrower form of immunity or some other rational. when you get lower court proceedings that jeopardize if not make it down right impossible idea th
coney barrett. she was pretty skeptical of some of the arguments that trump's collin was making, but at the same time, she seemed to at least be open to the idea that there should be some form of immunity that would apply, that would prevent a former president having to go all the way through trial and stand in front of a jury in a case that has to do with their official actions. at one upon the, chief justice roberts, chief justice john roberts, he is one of the more -- he is one of the...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and then justice amy coney barrett wrote a separate decision saying now is not the time to amplified this agreement with stridency. so you see this back and forth between the justices on an issue where they all say they agree. and why is that important? because even where there is agreement, unanimous agreement like we saw today, this court was fractured. and some of these more controversial cases come down the road including that one where trump is arguing he should be immune from prosecution, we can see this all play out where they don't agree on the outcome. >> norah: such important context, i was reading that too, justice writing that the court should turn the national temperature down, not up. >> good luck. >> norah: thank you. now turning to the weather with the blizzard slamming parts of california and nevada over the weekend with up to 7 feet of snow in some areas, cbs's carter evans reports from the snow and powerful winds have closed roads, knocked out power of thousands, and it's not over y yet. >> reporter: this is what nonstop snow looks like. over three days, this histo
and then justice amy coney barrett wrote a separate decision saying now is not the time to amplified this agreement with stridency. so you see this back and forth between the justices on an issue where they all say they agree. and why is that important? because even where there is agreement, unanimous agreement like we saw today, this court was fractured. and some of these more controversial cases come down the road including that one where trump is arguing he should be immune from prosecution,...
0
0.0
Apr 29, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this indictment were both helpful and surprising because no one had amy coney barrett on their bingo card as the swing vote. >> i didn't and it sounded like most of you didn't, either. let me play a moment from justice alito. >> if an incumbent, who loses a very close, hotly contested election, knows that a real possibility after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off into peaceful retirement, but that the president may be criminally prosecuted by a bitter political opponents, will that not lead us into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our country as a democracy? >> he seems to be arguing in plain english that immunity is necessary because otherwise, presidents fear prosecution and will be incentivized to attempt to hold power unlawfully. what did you make of that statement? >> i thought it missed two important things. in the 200 year history of this country, it's never happened because we always thought that presidents were subject to criminal liability, and second, that there were powerful remarks made in january 2021 where they said, do
this indictment were both helpful and surprising because no one had amy coney barrett on their bingo card as the swing vote. >> i didn't and it sounded like most of you didn't, either. let me play a moment from justice alito. >> if an incumbent, who loses a very close, hotly contested election, knows that a real possibility after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off into peaceful retirement, but that the president may be criminally prosecuted by a...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the most interesting opinion was from amy coney barrett, who wrote an opinion agreeing with the three liberals, but saying, can everyone please chill out, saying, can we just like we have a controversial election coming up? let's not engage in stridency, as she said, i agree with you if there's some heated rhetoric in the concurrence, meaning the opinion put out by the three liberals. >> but i >> think it's important to understand just exactly where the disagreement sits because it's really not much of a disagreement when you dig into it. okay. all nine agreed unanimously. this is not for the states the difference is the five and the majority said, congress is in charge of this. and the other four said, well, maybe congress, but maybe other federal authorities, not even clear what that is, but that's the entire base as a sliver of a disagreement, yet it gets blown up into this almost like world war three, kind of disagreement, which i think it's just doesn't match what the actual substantive disagreements as you jump, let me read a little bit here. >> this >> is i believe amy coney ba
the most interesting opinion was from amy coney barrett, who wrote an opinion agreeing with the three liberals, but saying, can everyone please chill out, saying, can we just like we have a controversial election coming up? let's not engage in stridency, as she said, i agree with you if there's some heated rhetoric in the concurrence, meaning the opinion put out by the three liberals. >> but i >> think it's important to understand just exactly where the disagreement sits because...
0
0.0
Feb 19, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
speakers include sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. anon saturday, live coverage of a five hundred plus a group of pro-democracy antitrust conservatives and centrists serving as an alternative cpac. speakers include bill kristol, cassidy hutchinson, and former rnc chair and former lieutenant governor of maryland. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch this week live on the c-span networks, or c-span now, our free mobile video app. also head over to c-span.org for scheduling information or to watch live or on-demand anytime. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. arguably because cabinet officials are often seen as carrying policies of the president so you are seeing more impeachments for presidents than for people that are part of his cabinet. >> how is he going to see this play out on capitol hill? what physically happens as a house moves the impeachment over to the senate? >> the physical movement of the impeachment articles of the senate which we are expecting to see in the last week of
speakers include sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. anon saturday, live coverage of a five hundred plus a group of pro-democracy antitrust conservatives and centrists serving as an alternative cpac. speakers include bill kristol, cassidy hutchinson, and former rnc chair and former lieutenant governor of maryland. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch this week live on the c-span networks, or c-span now, our free mobile video app. also head over to...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let me just read exactly what amy coney barrett said. would you write with this? she's kind of the way i've been describing this kind of in her own, in her own lane and her very brief comments in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. the court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election, particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down not up and meanwhile, again, as joan discussed, you talked about the fact that the three more liberal justices evoked bush v. gore, and the very beginning of what they wrote they evoked dobbs, right? and they were kind of throwing the majority's dobbs decision in their face. if it is not necessary, this is on page 15 it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case than it is necessary to not to decide more dobbs v. jackson women's health organization. that fundamental principle of judicial restraint is practical please oldest, our republic. this court authorized to say what the law is only becau
let me just read exactly what amy coney barrett said. would you write with this? she's kind of the way i've been describing this kind of in her own, in her own lane and her very brief comments in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. the court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election, particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down not up and meanwhile, again,...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision, writing, "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary of state offered sharp criticism of the decision. >> i do believe that states should be able under our constitution to bar oath-breaking insurrectionists. >> reporter: the ruling comes a day before super tuesday, the biggest primary election day of the season, when voters in 15 states, including colorado, head to the polls. and trump's legal hurdles continue to pile up as the supreme court weighs another decision next month. >> presidents have to be given total immunity. they have to be allowed to do their job. >> reporter: later this month, trump will also spend six weeks in court, where he is charged with falsifying business records related to hush money payments to a porn star. today trump's former cfo, allen weisselberg, pled guilty to two counts of perjury in the new york civil fraud case, but he will not testify against his former boss. looking ahead to to
justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision, writing, "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary of state offered sharp criticism of the decision. >> i do believe that states should be able under our constitution to bar oath-breaking insurrectionists. >> reporter: the ruling comes a day before super tuesday, the biggest primary election day of...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
LINKTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was interesting that justice amy coney barrett also made another clarification, and that is to say that these individuals would not know if they were called in -- necessarily know when they have been called in for emergency care to evacuate a uterus it was because someone took mifepristone. and there was discussion about that, including amy coney barrett asking questions with regard to ultrasounds and matters on that note. juan: michele goodwin, could you talk about the group behind this alliance, so-called alliance of doctors, the alliance defending freedom? >> well, yes. there has been for some time now an confusion -- significant infusion of finances, of money that has gone into defeating roe v. wade, claire pare -- planned parenthood b casey, and a legacy of cases that affirmed roe v. wade. that is important for listeners to know. in the dobbs decision when justice alito in writing that opinion he seemed to suggest out of nowhere there was roe and planned parenthood v casey and otherwise there is no legacy before the court. that is not accurate. for years before roe, 30 years b
it was interesting that justice amy coney barrett also made another clarification, and that is to say that these individuals would not know if they were called in -- necessarily know when they have been called in for emergency care to evacuate a uterus it was because someone took mifepristone. and there was discussion about that, including amy coney barrett asking questions with regard to ultrasounds and matters on that note. juan: michele goodwin, could you talk about the group behind this...
0
0.0
May 2, 2024
05/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett. now at the confirmation hearings all three trump appointees on the list to he said would overturn roe were coy when asked about how they would rule on abortion rights, describing roe as settled law. >> roe versus wade, decided in 1973, is a president of the united states supreme court. it has been reaffirmed. >> i understand the importance of the precedent set forth in roe v. wade. >> i have no agenda. to try to overrule casey. i have an agenda to stick to the rule of law and decide cases as they come. >> amy coney barrett got up there under oath and is like i have no agenda to overturn roe. sure, right, of course. donald trump's aims and intentions in nominating the three justices were always clear. >> under my administration, we will always defend the very first right in the declaration of independence and that is the right to life. >> a tremendous record including two new supreme court justices, neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh. they will be making tremendous and important decision
neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett. now at the confirmation hearings all three trump appointees on the list to he said would overturn roe were coy when asked about how they would rule on abortion rights, describing roe as settled law. >> roe versus wade, decided in 1973, is a president of the united states supreme court. it has been reaffirmed. >> i understand the importance of the precedent set forth in roe v. wade. >> i have no agenda. to try to overrule casey....
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice amy coney barrett also wrote separately, agreeing with the liberals that the majority went too far, but urging her colleagues to turn the national temperature down, not up. "our differences are far less important than our unanimity," barret wrote. "all nine justices agree on the outcome of this case. that is the message all americans should take home." >> david: so, let's get right to terry moran, live at the court for us. and this ruling today, justice amy coney barrett suggested that the supreme court turn the national temperature down, but that might be impossible, because the nation's highest court is now preparing to hear another case with potentially major consequences here in the race for president, of course, donald trump appealed that lower court decision, that court saying donald trump does not have absolute immunity in this federal election interference january 6th case. the supreme court now agreeing to take up trump's appeal, and to decide on presidential immunity, which is major. >> reporter: that's right. really big, david. and that case is now set for argument a
justice amy coney barrett also wrote separately, agreeing with the liberals that the majority went too far, but urging her colleagues to turn the national temperature down, not up. "our differences are far less important than our unanimity," barret wrote. "all nine justices agree on the outcome of this case. that is the message all americans should take home." >> david: so, let's get right to terry moran, live at the court for us. and this ruling today, justice amy...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that lack of a clear standard is exactly what both justice sonia sotomayor and amy coney barrett tried to wrestle out of the attorney representing idaho today. listen. >> this particular patient had to deliver her baby. the baby died. she had a hysterectomy, and she can no longer have children. all right. you're telling me the doctor couldn't have done the abortion earlier? >> again, it goes back to whether a doctor can in good faith medical judgment -- >> that's a lot for the doctor to risk. >> it is very case by case. >> that's the problem. >> i'm kind of shocked, actually, because i thought your own expert had said below that these kinds of cases were covered, and you're now saying they're not? >> no, i'm not saying that. that's just my point, your honor. >> you're hedging. justice sotomayor is asking whether this would be covered or not, and it's my understanding that the legislature's witnesses said those would be covered. >> those doctors said if they were exercising medical judgment they could in good faith determine that life saving care was necessary, and that's my point is it
that lack of a clear standard is exactly what both justice sonia sotomayor and amy coney barrett tried to wrestle out of the attorney representing idaho today. listen. >> this particular patient had to deliver her baby. the baby died. she had a hysterectomy, and she can no longer have children. all right. you're telling me the doctor couldn't have done the abortion earlier? >> again, it goes back to whether a doctor can in good faith medical judgment -- >> that's a lot for the...
0
0.0
Feb 19, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
speakers include supreme court justices sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. saturday, live coverage of a principles first group of anti-trump speakers serving as an alternative to cpac. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch this week, live on the c-span networks, or on c-span now our free mobile video app. head over to c-span.org for scheduling information or to watch live or on-demand any time. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. >> a healthy democracy doesn't look like this. it looks like they sprayed where americans can see democracy at work. where citizens are truly informed, a republic thrives. get informed straight from the source on c-span. unfiltered, unbiased, word for word. from the nation's capital to wherever you are. to get the opinion that matters the most. your own. th i
speakers include supreme court justices sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. saturday, live coverage of a principles first group of anti-trump speakers serving as an alternative to cpac. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch this week, live on the c-span networks, or on c-span now our free mobile video app. head over to c-span.org for scheduling information or to watch live or on-demand any time. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. >> a...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this comes down to john roberts and even more so amy coney barrett which shouldn't be a big surprise. because just last year they were the two swing votes on a case about the biden administration ban on ghost guns. both of them sided with the biden administration. so i think there is some hope that this ban could be upheld but it is a squeaker one way or other. >> what are the arguments for overturning it? >> so, the federal law here bans machine guns and it defines them as a weapon that fires automatically with a single function. when you use a ar with a bump stock, all do you is lean forward and the trigger moves back and forth far faster than any human figurer could on its own shooting off up to 800 rounds in a single minute. the question here is whether it is still technically automatic even though the shooter keeps their finger on that trigger while the trigger does the work itself. a very technical argument and one that justice barrett is clearly grappling with. she said, i'm intuitively sympathetic, that it is automatic and i've watched video how-tos and i've seen how this work
this comes down to john roberts and even more so amy coney barrett which shouldn't be a big surprise. because just last year they were the two swing votes on a case about the biden administration ban on ghost guns. both of them sided with the biden administration. so i think there is some hope that this ban could be upheld but it is a squeaker one way or other. >> what are the arguments for overturning it? >> so, the federal law here bans machine guns and it defines them as a weapon...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
coney barrett? >> so it was very interesting to watch them talk about medical care between a patient or physician without actually have a patient or physician in the conversation. you saw a bunch of attorneys and justices trying to parse out what is a medical emergency that meet the standard for a state of idaho to allow a lifesaving intervention to happen to save a woman's life. and what was remarkably refreshing was actually to hear justice amy coney barrett really reflect on the idea at some point you heard him say why are we even here? what is the case you're fighting for? where are you trying to stop the intervention to save a woman's life in the state of idaho where the doctor is ready and willing and waiting to do what needs to be done, but somehow you won't let that happen, you're denying the care. and that is what you heard in the clip just there was both justice sote mayor and justice barrett say, wait, what? you're stopping care in an emergency? that does not seem to be what we were tryin
coney barrett? >> so it was very interesting to watch them talk about medical care between a patient or physician without actually have a patient or physician in the conversation. you saw a bunch of attorneys and justices trying to parse out what is a medical emergency that meet the standard for a state of idaho to allow a lifesaving intervention to happen to save a woman's life. and what was remarkably refreshing was actually to hear justice amy coney barrett really reflect on the idea...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
first of all, the hypocrisy of him saying no to merrick gar land and pushing through amy coney barrett and you knew the kavanaugh stuff would cause big problems for people like me and bill nelson because it turned into such a controversial thing for states that were not bright blue. >> senator blumenthal, you sort of sit at this full come of dealing with a lot of consequences of decisions that the court makes. what are your first thoughts today when you saw the announcement? >> my first thought was that no person in recent histories had had a more devastating malign effect on americans civil rights and liberties, whether it is gun violence or voting rights, or women's reproductive rights than mitch mcconnell. he has enabled far right capture of the supreme court. an not just of the nation's highest court, but all of the judiciary. one-third of all of the current judges sit on the judiciary by virtue of mitch mcconnell pushing them through. so it is not just the hypocrisy of holding merrick garland for nine months and then ramming amy coney barrett through this three weeks. it is a judi
first of all, the hypocrisy of him saying no to merrick gar land and pushing through amy coney barrett and you knew the kavanaugh stuff would cause big problems for people like me and bill nelson because it turned into such a controversial thing for states that were not bright blue. >> senator blumenthal, you sort of sit at this full come of dealing with a lot of consequences of decisions that the court makes. what are your first thoughts today when you saw the announcement? >> my...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the argument that they have over whether the court went too far as amy coney barrett made it clear. that's understandable. she agrees that they they they went too far. >> on the other hand, they >> didn't go radically far. and congress is the only entity mentioned in article three that could have enforcement authority. you'd have to you'd have to really reach out to derive authority elsewhere. so i don't think you can coral necessarily about the opinion being yeah you know, radical in any way the incremental steps that they took to enforce the perception they only congress could act, i think was the right to was the right move. >> on. the other end, you know, as amy coney barrett said, the most important takeaway here is the unanimity yes. >> and that is important and whether you like the ruling or not, something, i hope people can celebrate that those justices who currently disagreed, for example, on the issue of presidential immunity and how to handle that, did come to a unit animus, a decision here. and we're able to do that. but this issue of insurrection and obviously you had i
the argument that they have over whether the court went too far as amy coney barrett made it clear. that's understandable. she agrees that they they they went too far. >> on the other hand, they >> didn't go radically far. and congress is the only entity mentioned in article three that could have enforcement authority. you'd have to you'd have to really reach out to derive authority elsewhere. so i don't think you can coral necessarily about the opinion being yeah you know, radical...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the other hand, you know, as amy coney barrett said, the most important takeaway here is the unanimity. >> yes. and that is important. what do you like the ruling or not? something? i hope people can celebrate that those justices who clearly disagreed, for example, on the issue of presidential immunity and how to handle that, did come to a unanimous decision here. and we're able to do that. >> but this >> issue of insurrection, and obviously you had i know you weren't expecting them to weigh in on that, but were you surprised at all that they didn't obviously, as you point out, saying, very narrowly on the issue of federalism here, and not weighing in on the issue of whether the former president was an insurrectionist when given the schedule in the calendar here, we may get no ruling from the court that has anything to do with his role in january 6. this might've been the only other know you're 100%, right? erin? and as always, you know, this is, this is a situation where they had no reason. once you once you decide that the state court had no authority to act whatever they did is irre
the other hand, you know, as amy coney barrett said, the most important takeaway here is the unanimity. >> yes. and that is important. what do you like the ruling or not? something? i hope people can celebrate that those justices who clearly disagreed, for example, on the issue of presidential immunity and how to handle that, did come to a unanimous decision here. and we're able to do that. >> but this >> issue of insurrection, and obviously you had i know you weren't...
0
0.0
Jan 22, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
chief justice john roberts and amy coney barrett, ketanji brown jackson, elena kagan and ayna soto mayor sided with the adnistration. alito, brettted in favor of texas. ♪ announcer: tuesday night, watch campaign 2024■ñcoverage oe presidential primary unfiltered and uninterrupted. we will bring a primary results as they come in, candidate speeches and take your calls and get reactions on social media. watch 8 p.m. tuesday night on c-span, c-span now, our free mobile app, or online. c-span, unfiltered view of politics. ♪ announcer: listening to programs on c-span or c-span radio app just got easier. tell your smart speaker app" and listen to washington journal daily, with important congressional hearings and other public affairs events throughout the day and weekdays at 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. eastern catch washington today for a fast-paced report of the stories of the day. listen to c-span any time. tell your smart speaker, "play c-span radio." c-span, powered by cable. ♪ announcer: c-span is your unfiltered view of government. funded by these television companies and more, including c
chief justice john roberts and amy coney barrett, ketanji brown jackson, elena kagan and ayna soto mayor sided with the adnistration. alito, brettted in favor of texas. ♪ announcer: tuesday night, watch campaign 2024■ñcoverage oe presidential primary unfiltered and uninterrupted. we will bring a primary results as they come in, candidate speeches and take your calls and get reactions on social media. watch 8 p.m. tuesday night on c-span, c-span now, our free mobile app, or online. c-span,...
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
speakers include sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. on saturday, live coverage of principal first, a group of pro-democracy anti-trump conservatives and centrist serving as an alternative to cpac good speakers include bill kristol, former white house aide to mark meadows and former rnc had share in the former lieutenant governor of maryland. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch next week, live on the c-span networks or on c-span now our free mobile video app. also, head over to c-span.org for scheduling information or to watch live or on-demand any time. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we are funded by these television companies and more. including cox. >> this syndrome is extremely rare. >> hi. >> but friends don't have to be. >> this is joe. >> when you are connected, you are not alone. >> cox supports c-span as a public service, along with these other television providers, giving you a front row seat to democracy. >> next, vice pr
speakers include sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. on saturday, live coverage of principal first, a group of pro-democracy anti-trump conservatives and centrist serving as an alternative to cpac good speakers include bill kristol, former white house aide to mark meadows and former rnc had share in the former lieutenant governor of maryland. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch next week, live on the c-span networks or on c-span now our free mobile...
0
0.0
Mar 6, 2024
03/24
by
RUSSIA1
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
amid the tense political climate, judge amy coney barrett also called on americans to see unity in the unanimous decision. in such circumstances, the utterances of members. trump will have an old friend visiting next week, right-wing prime minister viktor orban, who has turned his country into a model of illiberal democracy, urban is said to be heading to a private meeting in trump's club in florida, and they'll have plenty to discuss, such as their sympathy for russian president vladimir putin, whom orban has courted publicly and trump has praised for his, quote, strong grip on russia. let's give a shout out to the ex's ex-niece. president, who is also a clinical psychologist, mary trump. have you ever been surprised or true that your uncle showed such sympathy for people like orban, ilsi, or putin. one of the things that should concern everyone about donald is that he has never developed. further than the type of person he was in his youth. and this is not at all surprising, because he grew up in a family where everything was subordinated to authority, and thanks to the fact that my
amid the tense political climate, judge amy coney barrett also called on americans to see unity in the unanimous decision. in such circumstances, the utterances of members. trump will have an old friend visiting next week, right-wing prime minister viktor orban, who has turned his country into a model of illiberal democracy, urban is said to be heading to a private meeting in trump's club in florida, and they'll have plenty to discuss, such as their sympathy for russian president vladimir...
0
0.0
Jan 23, 2024
01/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what is up with amy coney barrett? is she a liberal? amy coney barrett now making sure she can fight texas and keep the border open? now you mention polling, the top issue. 81% of republicans believe this is the top issue. half of democrats believe this is a top issue, immigration. after that, you have inflation and you have jobs and the economy, top-rated issues for the american party. joe biden is failing at the top three issues americans care about. at 7% is abortion, what joe biden is running on. not a good strategy. >> kayleigh: one party has done something about it. hr 2 is what republicans passed, adding border agents to southern border. you see the list. when you say republicans have not taken action, this bill could be passed today by the u.s. season. >> molly: you and sean have raised great points regarding fentanyl and fentanyl overdoses, hit hard in new hampshire, where voters are at the polls talking about this. new hampshire is a border state, 58 miles with northern border in canada. there is 10-fold increase in crossings
what is up with amy coney barrett? is she a liberal? amy coney barrett now making sure she can fight texas and keep the border open? now you mention polling, the top issue. 81% of republicans believe this is the top issue. half of democrats believe this is a top issue, immigration. after that, you have inflation and you have jobs and the economy, top-rated issues for the american party. joe biden is failing at the top three issues americans care about. at 7% is abortion, what joe biden is...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
BLOOMBERG
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
annabelle: we know that neil gorsuch and amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh were trump appointees. i'm curious what that split on the decision was. >> while it was unanimous in terms of the overall decision, it sounded like somewhat of a dissent almost from the three liberal judges but then amy coney barrett joined them for that basically saying they thought this decision went a little too far in its reasoning, in its rationale. in the long run, that does not mean a whole lot. some are asking whether this -- are we determining anything for this in terms of implications for another big election case the supreme court is deciding now that have said it will hear arguments in april and will decide after that which is a very big deal whether donald trump is immune from prosecution because he was president. actions undertaken while he was president. i'm not sure the legal scholars think there is a whole lot to be read into that particular decision. how they might decide that from today's ruling. haidi: our bloomberg political news director in washington. we will keep you updated on the u
annabelle: we know that neil gorsuch and amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh were trump appointees. i'm curious what that split on the decision was. >> while it was unanimous in terms of the overall decision, it sounded like somewhat of a dissent almost from the three liberal judges but then amy coney barrett joined them for that basically saying they thought this decision went a little too far in its reasoning, in its rationale. in the long run, that does not mean a whole lot. some are...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i mean do think amy coney barrett and kavanaugh are they were bought in. uh, for sure. kavanaugh is for sure. i don't know enough amy coney barrett to know whether she lives a bubble of her own views and has just the bubble just happens to be exactly the kind of bubble that federalist society folks were looking for and liked and wanted get onto the court. but i know for sure that kavanaugh knew exactly what he was doing. kavanaugh did this stuff for president bush, and that's how we got to know leonard leo is organizing the outside money influence over those appointments. and if you want to know the power of this, even early on, you remember a woman named harriet miers. harriet miers, white house counsel for, president bush. she was very conservative. she was female at a time when it would done them some good to put another female judge on the court. and she was very conservative and she knew him personally as white house counsel. she's around him every day up goes her name as the nominee. and the president had to effect a humiliating withdrawal of name because of the p
i mean do think amy coney barrett and kavanaugh are they were bought in. uh, for sure. kavanaugh is for sure. i don't know enough amy coney barrett to know whether she lives a bubble of her own views and has just the bubble just happens to be exactly the kind of bubble that federalist society folks were looking for and liked and wanted get onto the court. but i know for sure that kavanaugh knew exactly what he was doing. kavanaugh did this stuff for president bush, and that's how we got to know...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
coney barrett. this is an incredibly important time to show people who are maybe not thought of as having similar points of view but who agree on the strength of our country, the reasons why we need to defend it, and the reasons why we n a pathway to work together. >> host: i can to folks you can find those resources at civic learning week.org. that's civic learning week.org. also a to point out that these that also offers a civics education resource called c-span in the classroom. you can find more information about that on c-span.org/classroom. free resources for teachers, students anddi the public as wel featuring c-span program in public affairs coverage that's religious history, current events and the constitution as well as lesson plans and of the resources for educators. so that's c-span.org/classroom. now let's go to ralph in washington, d.c. good morning, ralph. , good morning. i want to congratulate this laid on her efforts. we definitely need it. i am 70 and a place on civics and then stu
coney barrett. this is an incredibly important time to show people who are maybe not thought of as having similar points of view but who agree on the strength of our country, the reasons why we need to defend it, and the reasons why we n a pathway to work together. >> host: i can to folks you can find those resources at civic learning week.org. that's civic learning week.org. also a to point out that these that also offers a civics education resource called c-span in the classroom. you...
0
0.0
Feb 24, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
coney barrett. we will cor at here on c-span starting at 2:30 p.m. eastern and also c-span now whicisur app and online at c-span.org. you want to stick around and watch that as well. let's start taking calls. ben is in atlanta georgia, he is a democrat. caller: i did watch c-span yesterday. i am from maryland. can you give me a quick answer, do you support donald trump? it is not about you, but it is a basic question. will you support donald trump as president? gov. cox: i get asked this question a lot. i have not voted for a president of either major party for about 12 years. i think both major parties are really disappointing us right now. caller: a man from your political party has sworn allegiance with who will not say anything about vladimir putin. donald trump, he is more interested fighting -- no man has cheated on his wife -- the man has cheated on his wife. i did not like ronald reagan, but he was a good man. i did not agree with the george bush, but george bush was a good man. his father w
coney barrett. we will cor at here on c-span starting at 2:30 p.m. eastern and also c-span now whicisur app and online at c-span.org. you want to stick around and watch that as well. let's start taking calls. ben is in atlanta georgia, he is a democrat. caller: i did watch c-span yesterday. i am from maryland. can you give me a quick answer, do you support donald trump? it is not about you, but it is a basic question. will you support donald trump as president? gov. cox: i get asked this...
0
0.0
May 8, 2024
05/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but amy coney barrett is a lot smarter than aileen cannon. but look, this is an illustration of when a case goes before a federal judge, federal judges have enormous power. the federal judge is in charge of that case. and so, this story that this case will not come to trial before the election, this story was written the day the case was assigned to judge aileen cannon. it was. >> well, the bottom line is -- we were talking about this during the break. i'll bring it on to the air. the thing is when alvin brag first filed his case, a lot of mockery of the case. oh, that case makes no sense. why bring it. it turns out it is the case, it is the only case upon which people can now judge whether or not donald trump is a criminal. >> exactly. the one case in which donald trump is being held accountable before the election. period. full stop. the others are not going to make it to trial. and certainly not going to make it to verdict. it's not going to happen. and alvin bragg, he -- people were dogging him. and then, oh, this is a weak case. or this
but amy coney barrett is a lot smarter than aileen cannon. but look, this is an illustration of when a case goes before a federal judge, federal judges have enormous power. the federal judge is in charge of that case. and so, this story that this case will not come to trial before the election, this story was written the day the case was assigned to judge aileen cannon. it was. >> well, the bottom line is -- we were talking about this during the break. i'll bring it on to the air. the...
0
0.0
Mar 7, 2024
03/24
by
LINKTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
coney barrett? >> three liberal justices were pretty outraged by what majority did and included some rather indignant rhetoric. i think entirely appropriate, certainly in line with the court's usual operations. fulton the majority for reaching out and going way over the line and answering a question that did not need to be answered. also doing so quite an ambiguous way. it leaves a lot of questions over for the future. their opinion read like a dissent. i happened to sort of look under the hood of this file and looked at the metadata. the supreme court scrubbed the metadata. there was an indication this was styled as a dissenting opinion and at some point late in the process it was changed to a concurrent. justice amy coney barrett agreed the liberals that the majority would too far, but she decided to engage in some tone policing. she said there is strident see in the liberals opinion. this is the time to turn the national temperature down, not up. so i'm not going to join them and i am not going t
coney barrett? >> three liberal justices were pretty outraged by what majority did and included some rather indignant rhetoric. i think entirely appropriate, certainly in line with the court's usual operations. fulton the majority for reaching out and going way over the line and answering a question that did not need to be answered. also doing so quite an ambiguous way. it leaves a lot of questions over for the future. their opinion read like a dissent. i happened to sort of look under...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of course, there is this concurrence from amy coney barrett, the other conservative on the court, who writes a kind of plaintiff very short concurring opinion which demonstrates what she clearly had hoped for was that this court would be unanimous, that the five members would restrain themselves from going further than the three concurring justices wanted to and that they could have spoken with one voice in a way that, as she would describe it, will bring the temperature down. it's clear to me that from her concurrence she was disappointed that the five, other five conservative justices, the five male conservative justices, were somehow unable to exercise the restraint that might have resulted in a true unanimous judgment and opinion in this case. i think this is very revealing to us about what is going on on that court. i think when the historical record is written, when seats are added to the supreme court as they invariably will be, this will be part of the record of what was happening and what even justices on the court were prepared to say is the overreach of the conservatives on
of course, there is this concurrence from amy coney barrett, the other conservative on the court, who writes a kind of plaintiff very short concurring opinion which demonstrates what she clearly had hoped for was that this court would be unanimous, that the five members would restrain themselves from going further than the three concurring justices wanted to and that they could have spoken with one voice in a way that, as she would describe it, will bring the temperature down. it's clear to me...
0
0.0
Feb 23, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
people have been concerned that the future of ivf has been at risk since amy coney barrett joined the court. >> that's right, before amy coney barrett became a judge she publicly supported a group that allowed in vitro fertilization, ivf could become criminalized. here's how that works legally, stephanie. once the dobbs decision is handed down, and every state is free to send rules around abortion, states like alabama adopted fetal personhood. bills. bills that said life began at the moment of conception. but the embryos that are used and ivf are post fertilization. they're postconception. they are fertilized, are permitted to grow for a few days, then they are frozen for future use. so you can see how this works. in states that have fetal personhood, life begins at conception, anything that is done to one of these embryos could possibly be carrying not just civil consequences, which is what has at stake in the case of the alabama supreme court decided, but they could carry criminal consequences. that is the setup here. >> carol lee, this supreme court decision and alabama, how risky
people have been concerned that the future of ivf has been at risk since amy coney barrett joined the court. >> that's right, before amy coney barrett became a judge she publicly supported a group that allowed in vitro fertilization, ivf could become criminalized. here's how that works legally, stephanie. once the dobbs decision is handed down, and every state is free to send rules around abortion, states like alabama adopted fetal personhood. bills. bills that said life began at the...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
amy coney barrett and sonia sotomayor will weighing in on health risks versus death. can a doctor in idaho treat a woman in idaho is a health risk. idaho is saying no. idaho's law says she has to be on death door in order to be treated. idaho argued that their law is sufficient, doctors can make their objectsive decisions on whether or not they want to treat a woman she doesn't have to be on death door. amy coney barrett was interesting to watch today, she asked whether or not pros durts might disagree with the doctor's decision, the lawyer for idaho said yes, they could. a stunning moment said to the lawyer from idaho, i'm stunned by some of the answers you're giving here and a bit concerned about whether or not prosecutors might put doctors in jail for doing something that was a good faith effort to save the woman and the baby. >> what do you make of the arguments we heard today. >> it's always difficult to predict, i heard some skepticism from justice barrett, maybe even from justice kavanaugh and chief justice roberts, i don't know if we'll see this traditional co
amy coney barrett and sonia sotomayor will weighing in on health risks versus death. can a doctor in idaho treat a woman in idaho is a health risk. idaho is saying no. idaho's law says she has to be on death door in order to be treated. idaho argued that their law is sufficient, doctors can make their objectsive decisions on whether or not they want to treat a woman she doesn't have to be on death door. amy coney barrett was interesting to watch today, she asked whether or not pros durts might...
0
0.0
May 2, 2024
05/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> [ laughter ] amy coney barrett got up there on her own and said i have no agenda to overturn roe. sure. right here of course. of course, donald trump's aims his integers and nominating the three judges were always clear. >> under my administration, we will always defend the very first right in the declaration of independence, and that is the right to life. >> the tremendous record, including two great supreme court justices, neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh. they will be making tremendous and important decisions on abortion. >> the president also is opposed to roe v wade. that is on the ballot, as well, in the court. and so that is also at stake right now. and so the election is all. >> why isn't it on the ballot? >> because -- it is not on the ballot. >> i don't think so. there is nothing happening there. clear there is nothing happening there. donald trump, 2020, nothing happened there. the guy who told us all along. you're getting roe v wade overturned, we are getting antiabortion justices. when he get it, all there, nothing happened. and then in june of 2022, donald trump's s
. >> [ laughter ] amy coney barrett got up there on her own and said i have no agenda to overturn roe. sure. right here of course. of course, donald trump's aims his integers and nominating the three judges were always clear. >> under my administration, we will always defend the very first right in the declaration of independence, and that is the right to life. >> the tremendous record, including two great supreme court justices, neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh. they will be...
0
0.0
Feb 24, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
host: i want to make a little plug that conversation with justice sotay and amy coney barrett we will cover that on c-span srtg at 2:30.m eastern it will also be on c-span now and online at c-span.org. you will want to stick around and watch that as well. but start taking calls. the end is up first, a democrat. caller: hey governor i did watch a little bit of c-span with you and the governor from maryland. can you give me a quick answer. do you support donald trump? that's just a basic question. will you support him as president? guest: i get asked this question a lot. i have not voted for president of either major party and 12 years. i think both parties are disappointing us now. caller: your political party has sworn allegiance with and will not say anything against vladimir putin. he is more -- this man has cheated on his wife. ronald reagan, he was a good man. george bush was a good man and his father was a good man. how can your party support him when you know he is a bad man? my mother told me never to be on the side of ron. host: we will get the governor to respond? guest: as i
host: i want to make a little plug that conversation with justice sotay and amy coney barrett we will cover that on c-span srtg at 2:30.m eastern it will also be on c-span now and online at c-span.org. you will want to stick around and watch that as well. but start taking calls. the end is up first, a democrat. caller: hey governor i did watch a little bit of c-span with you and the governor from maryland. can you give me a quick answer. do you support donald trump? that's just a basic...