0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
our bureau chief in his poll is there and she set the scene for us at the supreme court. just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are a trump supporters. i tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards done by donald trump to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying actually to, to the wife present. so this is a very uploaded atmosphere here. there's a lot at stake, and that's what people told us who traveled to you a to washington to visit us this historic day. no, i don't know one's above the law in this country. i think there's numerous laws he's broken and i think he needs to pay for him and face the music of unity. immunity charge. it should be dropped because there are certain say without uh, just completely wiping the other side or charges that are against him. yes, he should be a knew it was practically the, you know, the assumption is
our bureau chief in his poll is there and she set the scene for us at the supreme court. just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are a trump supporters. i tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards done by donald trump to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we will discuss the arizona supreme court abortion ban, u.s. aid to israel and ukraine, and wyoming republic -- republican congresswoman. washington journal, join in the conversation thursday morning on c-span, c-span now, our free mobile app, or online at c-span.org. >> the house will be in order. >> c-span celebrates 45 years of covering congress like no other. since 1979 we have been your primary source for capitol hill, providing balanced, unfiltered coverage of government, taking you to where the policies are debated and decided with the support of america's cable companies. c-span, 45 years and counting, palo -- powered by cable. >> president biden then the first lady welcomed the japanese prime minister and his wife to the white house during a ceremony on the south lawn that included u.s. and japanese delegations, u.s. military honor guards and guests, the parnas -- and the president and prime minister delivered remarks. this is the first state visit for a japanese prime minister in nine years. ♪
we will discuss the arizona supreme court abortion ban, u.s. aid to israel and ukraine, and wyoming republic -- republican congresswoman. washington journal, join in the conversation thursday morning on c-span, c-span now, our free mobile app, or online at c-span.org. >> the house will be in order. >> c-span celebrates 45 years of covering congress like no other. since 1979 we have been your primary source for capitol hill, providing balanced, unfiltered coverage of government,...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november, a slow sudden, he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he quotes a destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution. dream. of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open a like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, it's kind of a, i guess, to restore or kind of keep him in power for however long he wants to be. and brands, you know, this really i think that is true, which would really attack uh the democracy as we know, it's right now in the united states. and if the court says he does not enjoy absolute community, where will this puts donald trump? now there is a, this big fear that it will take far too long before the core tier behind me makes the decision some expect them not through before june. and that would basically mean uh that wouldn't be hold accountable an
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november, a slow sudden, he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he quotes a destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution. dream. of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open a like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, it's...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
s. supreme court today begin here. we are arguments in unity case brought by former president donald trump. justices are deciding whether he can be prosecuted for conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election . trump argues former presidents can not be prosecuted for crimes allegedly committed while in office with trump back in court today at his hush money trial in new york, he complained about not being a proceedings for this even bigger case in washington, dc. i asked our washington bureau chief and his pull to set the mood for us at the supreme court. a yeah, right, friends and you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are a trump supporters. i tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards done by donald trump to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying ac
s. supreme court today begin here. we are arguments in unity case brought by former president donald trump. justices are deciding whether he can be prosecuted for conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election . trump argues former presidents can not be prosecuted for crimes allegedly committed while in office with trump back in court today at his hush money trial in new york, he complained about not being a proceedings for this even bigger case in washington, dc. i asked...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the supreme court. first off, supreme court justice thomas should behind anything near anything like this. we all know his wife backed the insurrection and it is just disgraceful. but that court, the lower court said that he is not -- that he cannot get presidential immunity. >> there is not absolute immunity. >> absolutely not. and there shouldn't be absolute immunity when they were discussing how it is personal or presidential. nothing he is doing is presidential. there is -- i keep hearing the word unprecedented. everything is unprecedented. i'm really tired of hearing that word. to me, that is an excuse, and there is no excuse for anything this man has done. he has treated the united states like it's his own personal bank account. i am so tired of hearing from anything from him and i told my husband, my worst nightmare is when he does not get elected this time because he still didn't get a second term, is he still going to run his mouth for the next four years, four more years of campaigning until g
to the supreme court. first off, supreme court justice thomas should behind anything near anything like this. we all know his wife backed the insurrection and it is just disgraceful. but that court, the lower court said that he is not -- that he cannot get presidential immunity. >> there is not absolute immunity. >> absolutely not. and there shouldn't be absolute immunity when they were discussing how it is personal or presidential. nothing he is doing is presidential. there is -- i...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november, i suppose he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he codes a destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution. dream. of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open a like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, his kind of a i guess, to restore or kind of keep him in power for however long he wants to be and friends . you know, this really i think that is true, which would really attack the democracy as we know, it's right now in the united states. and if the court says he does not enjoy absolute immunity, wearable this puts donald trump. now there is a, this big fear that it will take far too long before the core tear behind me makes the decision some expect to not through before june. and that would basically mean uh that wouldn't be hold accountable and discount crim
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november, i suppose he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he codes a destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution. dream. of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open a like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, his kind of...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the us supreme court dean is good to see you. you know, the focus of the trump trials has been on new york until today. now it's exactly where you are set the mood for is there. yeah, right. friends and you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are a trump supporters of tribes to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards done by donald trump. to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying actually to, to the wife present. so this is a very uploaded atmosphere here. there's a lot at stake, and that's what people told us who traveled to you a to washington to witness this historic day. no, i don't know one's above the law in this country. i think there's numerous laws he's broken and i think he needs to pay for him and face the music of unity. unity charges should be dropped because there are certain to
the us supreme court dean is good to see you. you know, the focus of the trump trials has been on new york until today. now it's exactly where you are set the mood for is there. yeah, right. friends and you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are a trump supporters of tribes to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so it's precedent setting in new york because it's the new york supreme court. it's may not be the law in other states. maybe we need a federal law that allows other victims to testify subject to cross examination. because of course, the, you know, every defendant is entitled to cross examine accusers, but to say that you have to have every single woman alone on the stand. with reasonable doubt is all that the prosecute and all that the defense has to show with some reasonable doubt. nobody else is there when you're getting raped, so not to allow the jury to know other women had the same experience with this same defendant is really wrong. i hope we can fix it with a law. is this going to have a chilling effect on the other sexual assault victims and their willingness to come forward into final charges? absolutely. victims of sexual violence all over the united states. and maybe the world are devastated by this ruling. and it makes it much harder to come forward and be alone. when you know there are other women who have been abused in the same way by the same ma
so it's precedent setting in new york because it's the new york supreme court. it's may not be the law in other states. maybe we need a federal law that allows other victims to testify subject to cross examination. because of course, the, you know, every defendant is entitled to cross examine accusers, but to say that you have to have every single woman alone on the stand. with reasonable doubt is all that the prosecute and all that the defense has to show with some reasonable doubt. nobody...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court is off to all. it's really just a couple of 100 meters away from the capital just across the street for january 6th to place the riots which were encouraged by donald trump officer. all. so everything is really, i know, very close spots here today, and there's historic day in the history of the united states and a book for the main. if a trump uh, we use the case and also the next presidency as well. it's very unlikely that he's really uh when the case, but critics say that you know, way already a wanted why? because uh, the see the supreme court to good on and i believe that the court ruling will be further. the lights are delayed and very likely it will not happen before the election and prayers in case you read, elected people become the next president again, then we of course, would try to do any signature stopped at these cases against him and kind of make it impossible that she will be held accountable for what you did. sure. this 1st as easy as i know it's really hard because the somebody is
the supreme court is off to all. it's really just a couple of 100 meters away from the capital just across the street for january 6th to place the riots which were encouraged by donald trump officer. all. so everything is really, i know, very close spots here today, and there's historic day in the history of the united states and a book for the main. if a trump uh, we use the case and also the next presidency as well. it's very unlikely that he's really uh when the case, but critics say that...
0
0.0
Apr 15, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and go before the united states supreme court because he thinks he's superior, i guess, to the supreme court. we've got a real problem with this judge. we've got a real problem with a lot of things having to do with this trial, including the d.a. because you go right outside and people are being killed all day long and he's sitting here all day with 10 or 12 prosecutors over nothing, over nothing. over what people say shouldn't be a trial. so i just want to thank you very much. but i can't go to my son's graduation and i can't go to the united states supreme court, that i'm not in georgia or florida or north carolina campaigning like i should be. it's perfect for the radical left democrats. it's exactly what they want. it's about election interference is all it's about. thank you very much. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2024] >> this month the u.s. supreme cot ars oral argument in a case whether former president donald trump has presidential immunitygast criminal prosecution for his alleged role in attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. we'll have live cov
and go before the united states supreme court because he thinks he's superior, i guess, to the supreme court. we've got a real problem with this judge. we've got a real problem with a lot of things having to do with this trial, including the d.a. because you go right outside and people are being killed all day long and he's sitting here all day with 10 or 12 prosecutors over nothing, over nothing. over what people say shouldn't be a trial. so i just want to thank you very much. but i can't go...
54
54
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 54
favorite 0
quote 1
supreme court and this is it's unfortunate. that's a summary for you, gillian, as we move along with our show now. >> gillian: thank you. let's bring in criminal defense attorney jonna spilbor to talk more about this very important case in new york supreme court. the jury will decide whether trump is guilty or innocent. he is well aware of the fact that he is on trial before the nation and that's why we saw him do some campaigning outside the court today and why we saw him do more campaigning now inside the court. he opened by talking about the ways in which he thinks president biden has fallen short. >> it really is genius the way he is using a felony criminal trial to continue to campaign despite in particular this judge trying to shut him up and keep him off the campaign trail with all of the decisions that he has made so far that he has to be sitting at defense table, he can't go to the supreme court, etc. the gag order, the invalid, unconstitutional gag order which is the first order of business today. i don't mean to be f
supreme court and this is it's unfortunate. that's a summary for you, gillian, as we move along with our show now. >> gillian: thank you. let's bring in criminal defense attorney jonna spilbor to talk more about this very important case in new york supreme court. the jury will decide whether trump is guilty or innocent. he is well aware of the fact that he is on trial before the nation and that's why we saw him do some campaigning outside the court today and why we saw him do more...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 6
supreme court. just yesterday, the folks of the nation at the supreme court yesterday. will be back there again today. and we're hearing your thoughts on the immunity case that will be argued in three hours from now. don in california, a republican, good morning. caller: hi. good morning. thanks for the call tell supreme court should not even taken up this case. two courts who have already turned down the immunity clause. clarence thomas should be excused. his wife was involved in overthrowing the 2020 election. he shouldn't even be involved. but donald trump, this is -- you know, they're just playing his fate but i wish his base would listen to the court transcript in new york. david becker, "national inquirer," "the globe," american media enterprise, he intentionally said they intentionally produce fake news. this is what donald trump runs ground on. everybody else is fake news and all of his forcing is fake news. david becker admitted. it was all fake. fox news in -- we've got to stop these guys.
supreme court. just yesterday, the folks of the nation at the supreme court yesterday. will be back there again today. and we're hearing your thoughts on the immunity case that will be argued in three hours from now. don in california, a republican, good morning. caller: hi. good morning. thanks for the call tell supreme court should not even taken up this case. two courts who have already turned down the immunity clause. clarence thomas should be excused. his wife was involved in overthrowing...
50
50
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 50
favorite 0
quote 1
supreme court had a monumental hearing on immunity. the immunity having to do with presidential him in it he. i think it was made clear, i hope it was made clear that a president has to have immunity. you don't have a president, at most he could say a ceremonial president, that's not what the founders had in mind. we want presidents that can get things done and bring people together. so i her the meeting was quite amazing. and the justices were on their game. so let's see how it all turns up but again i say presidential inanity very powerful. presidential immunity is imperative or you practically won't have a country anymore. >> sandra: looks like he was told it was a good day at the supreme court, jonathan. >> i think it was a fairly good day quite friendly. first of all it does appear you've got 4 may be 5 justices client to send the case back to perfect this record. that alone would be a tactical benefit to the former president. it would make any trial before the election much less likely. if at all possible. there is also a lot of
supreme court had a monumental hearing on immunity. the immunity having to do with presidential him in it he. i think it was made clear, i hope it was made clear that a president has to have immunity. you don't have a president, at most he could say a ceremonial president, that's not what the founders had in mind. we want presidents that can get things done and bring people together. so i her the meeting was quite amazing. and the justices were on their game. so let's see how it all turns up...
28
28
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 28
favorite 0
quote 1
this ruling could have the most impact by the supreme court, ana, presidential election since the court decided bush v. gore back in 2000 decided that election. there's really three possible outcomes here, and two of them arguably are favorable to donald trump. one potential outcome is that the supreme court rules that presidents do have absolute immunity including on the outer perimeter of their acts, and therefore, donald trump can't be prosecuted in this election case and the case is dismissed. most legal experts think that's a remote possibility. but a second potential outcome that might be favorable to mr. trump is that the court decides it disagrees with the appeals court. it finds there are some instances where a president could be deemed immune for certain official acts particularly around foreign policy and national security. then the court raises questions about whether anything that donald trump is accused of in this case would qualify as an official act. in that case it may throw the case back to judge tanya chutkan and say, judge, you need to decide which, if any of these a
this ruling could have the most impact by the supreme court, ana, presidential election since the court decided bush v. gore back in 2000 decided that election. there's really three possible outcomes here, and two of them arguably are favorable to donald trump. one potential outcome is that the supreme court rules that presidents do have absolute immunity including on the outer perimeter of their acts, and therefore, donald trump can't be prosecuted in this election case and the case is...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the first time the supreme court said we need to ask louisiana state supreme court if you can be sued so we go to louisiana. they say yes. i can be sued. we are like that's not good. and then we come back to the supreme court. and thankfully, sodomeyer's statement makes it so it will be very hard to apply the fifth circuit's logic in the decision they made about my case. >> you seem confident at the lower court level this is basically temporary. >> yes. we think that sodomeyer's statement will make it impossible to enforce what the fifth circuit did. and we feel confident we will win my case when we go to court and people should not be nervous to protest. the aclu has said they will represent people if someone trying to invoke the fifth circuit decision. but we are thankful sodomeyer's note makes it difficult to apply it. >> this is a wild case. >> in the face of all precedent and logic, and the importance of civil disobedience and protest in this country's history to create this liability standard is just, i mean, the implications of it are bizarre. >> and you get caught up. the aclu
the first time the supreme court said we need to ask louisiana state supreme court if you can be sued so we go to louisiana. they say yes. i can be sued. we are like that's not good. and then we come back to the supreme court. and thankfully, sodomeyer's statement makes it so it will be very hard to apply the fifth circuit's logic in the decision they made about my case. >> you seem confident at the lower court level this is basically temporary. >> yes. we think that sodomeyer's...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the government amended the legislation after the supreme court ruled that a previous plan could lead the human rights abuses. the prime minister insist the 1st flights carrying migrants will leave within weeks. a desperate people making a desperate crossing migrants take rubber boats across the english channel, a 32 kilometer journey to seek asylum in the u. k. britain, this conservative government has made its plan to deport the asylum seekers to rwanda. the centerpiece of a policy intended to deter people from making the crossing. in april 2022, the home secretary struck a deal with the want as for an minister to send people there while their claims were being processed. a 6500 kilometer flight from britain to central africa. the u . k. has already invested over 200000000 euros in the plan. hotels in rolanda had been converted to lodgings for migrants. still sitting empty. as the plan soon ran into legal challenges, the 1st flight scheduled to depart a military air base in june 2022 was a boarded u. k. supreme court ruled the scheme unconstitutional and saying it could lead to huma
the government amended the legislation after the supreme court ruled that a previous plan could lead the human rights abuses. the prime minister insist the 1st flights carrying migrants will leave within weeks. a desperate people making a desperate crossing migrants take rubber boats across the english channel, a 32 kilometer journey to seek asylum in the u. k. britain, this conservative government has made its plan to deport the asylum seekers to rwanda. the centerpiece of a policy intended to...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court or presidential immunity. a president has stab immunity if you don't have you just have a ceremonial president john in kate that those remarks right there from donald trump is something we've heard from him repeatedly that a president has to have immunity that he was protected because he was president at the time from his federal indictments. >> and look, this is something that is very crucial to donald trump's legal battles, particularly in these federal cases. the argument that his attorneys have consistently made and something that i know that donald trump has repeatedly complained about in private. is that he really does believe that he had immunity because he was president at the time. and this is something that he really is hoping he can continue to drill into voters minds that he essentially did nothing wrong because he was immune. of course, we're going to hear how that plays out today. and obviously there's a lot of people who argue that a president doesn't have total immunity. he can't just do anythi
the supreme court or presidential immunity. a president has stab immunity if you don't have you just have a ceremonial president john in kate that those remarks right there from donald trump is something we've heard from him repeatedly that a president has to have immunity that he was protected because he was president at the time from his federal indictments. >> and look, this is something that is very crucial to donald trump's legal battles, particularly in these federal cases. the...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
did the idea the supreme court very rarely just rolls up and down on things. it's almost not what you say, it's how you say it. and they write these long opinions explaining the nuances of these issues. it's not somebody wins and somebody loses. and i think we're going to see an opinion here where there's winners and it seemed like they barely addressed the question that they set out to address, which was, does the president enjoyed immunity? and if so, to what extent? they basically to your point, the conservatives largely it seemed like ignored that question. >> they almost made clear they didn't want to answer it. yeah. that they wanted to send it back down. they didn't want to question what's the question sent to them by the appellate court, but it's could they want to send it back to the trial court and hope it doesn't come back, but it's probably literally the most supreme court thing i know. >> i mean, that to avoid boyd making factual, definitive findings and send it back down to lower courts to sort things out, though, they could delay delay, delay. t
did the idea the supreme court very rarely just rolls up and down on things. it's almost not what you say, it's how you say it. and they write these long opinions explaining the nuances of these issues. it's not somebody wins and somebody loses. and i think we're going to see an opinion here where there's winners and it seemed like they barely addressed the question that they set out to address, which was, does the president enjoyed immunity? and if so, to what extent? they basically to your...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's the same courthouse, same supreme court. was he cautioned by the excessive prejudicial evidence the supreme court said was permitted in in the weinstein case? >> it's an interesting convergence of legal events. in the weinstein case, the court of appeals said what you can't do is bring in, in that case, testimony from other women who were victims, alleged victims. but against whom weinstein was not charged. it was an abuse to let that in. it's a good flag for judge merchan not to run too far afield. trial judges are permitted to use their discretion to admit evidence. if they go too far, they do risk this reversal. it's a warning to all of the parties in this case to tread lightly. >> one of the questions on redirect, catherine, that's just been asking is, is it true, mr. pecker, that your purpose in lob -- locking up the karen mcdougal story is to influence the election? that's trying to bring it back to the connection to the elections since during cross-examination he was certainly acknowledging he had a longstanding relat
it's the same courthouse, same supreme court. was he cautioned by the excessive prejudicial evidence the supreme court said was permitted in in the weinstein case? >> it's an interesting convergence of legal events. in the weinstein case, the court of appeals said what you can't do is bring in, in that case, testimony from other women who were victims, alleged victims. but against whom weinstein was not charged. it was an abuse to let that in. it's a good flag for judge merchan not to run...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i want to focus first on the supreme court. and the court case and the arguments that are about to be heard. >> to me. do you submitted an amicus brief to the court on this case? >> in any you argue against immunity for the president, for trump for a variety of reasons. what do you say is the most important reason? so i think the most important reason is that if there's going to be a finding of immunity, it's going to be premised upon the importance of protecting the presidency itself. that article to power but if there's any space where the courts should not incentivize a present to take bold action, it will be in efforts to stay in power. and that's exactly the facts that we have here. it's a very different fact pattern to have a president of thinking about military action, thinking about other policy considerations versus what we have here, which is post-election, bold, and unlawful action to stay in power and to protect that kind of behavior. we are only incentivize it because presidents really, they should not be having im
i want to focus first on the supreme court. and the court case and the arguments that are about to be heard. >> to me. do you submitted an amicus brief to the court on this case? >> in any you argue against immunity for the president, for trump for a variety of reasons. what do you say is the most important reason? so i think the most important reason is that if there's going to be a finding of immunity, it's going to be premised upon the importance of protecting the presidency...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court ruled nixon had to turn the tapes over when the supreme court decided that he had to turnover the tapes. richard nixon stop making the argument that somehow they were protected by immunity or executive privilege. he turned them over and those tapes contained evidence that nixon was involved in the watergate cover-up shortly after handing the tapes over, nixon was out hi shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow. >> in this case, trump argues his actions after the 2020 election. we're all part of his official duties as president, but we've had tremendous northrop determined but we worked on that. that's what i was doing jack smith disputes that, saying trump was working to overturn the legitimate results where joe biden won and he lost a supreme court victory for trump, absolute blanket immunity could help him in at least one other criminal case as well, could very well. the georgia case as to him or at least cut it down significantly. >> it has no impact in my judgment on the mar-a-lago case because everything he has been charged with occurred after janua
the supreme court ruled nixon had to turn the tapes over when the supreme court decided that he had to turnover the tapes. richard nixon stop making the argument that somehow they were protected by immunity or executive privilege. he turned them over and those tapes contained evidence that nixon was involved in the watergate cover-up shortly after handing the tapes over, nixon was out hi shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow. >> in this case, trump argues his actions...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what is at stake at tomorrow's argument at the supreme court? >> well, this is really the culmination of an argument that donald trump has been making no government should have a practiced city that is unrestrained, that has total power. he started making this argument in the early days of his presidency when he argued that he was immune from state court proceedings, when he was sued by a former contestant on the apprentice, that he was immune from congressional oversight. he has argued that he is immune from civil liability, now criminal liability. and he said that he can do whatever he wants as president. the constitution grants him total authority and he could even shoot someone on 5th avenue and not lose his supporters. thankfully every court that has considered these arguments to date has rejeblgtsed them. they have been rejected by judges appointed by democratic presidents, republican presidents, even by donald trump. the question now is whether the supreme court will open the floodgates to what will happen if trump's argument carries the
what is at stake at tomorrow's argument at the supreme court? >> well, this is really the culmination of an argument that donald trump has been making no government should have a practiced city that is unrestrained, that has total power. he started making this argument in the early days of his presidency when he argued that he was immune from state court proceedings, when he was sued by a former contestant on the apprentice, that he was immune from congressional oversight. he has argued...
0
0.0
Apr 22, 2024
04/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>>> right now at 5:00, a battle over homeless encampments head to go the supreme court. we're live in washington this morning with a case that could rewrite the rules on policing. >>> bay area nurses taking on artificial intelligence. today hundreds will take part in a protest aimed at highlighting patient safety concerns. their demands to help care leaders. >>> also, one hurdle cleared in critical new funding for ukraine and israel as tensions escalate over pro-palestinian protests on school campuses. the unusual activity one university is taking today to help keep students safe. >>> this is "today in the bay." good morning to you on this monday. i'm marcus washington. >> and i'm laura garcia. just into our newsroom, stronger than normal rattling, a 3.0 earthquake shook the geysers around 3:20 this morning. quakes there are the byproduct of geothermal activity, but still, what a way to wake up. >>> let's get a look at the forecast. good monday morning. >> we are feeling some milder temperatures around the bay. we're right now in the mid to upper 50s, even 60 degrees in
>>> right now at 5:00, a battle over homeless encampments head to go the supreme court. we're live in washington this morning with a case that could rewrite the rules on policing. >>> bay area nurses taking on artificial intelligence. today hundreds will take part in a protest aimed at highlighting patient safety concerns. their demands to help care leaders. >>> also, one hurdle cleared in critical new funding for ukraine and israel as tensions escalate over...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
by the supreme court. and it is a testament to how reckless this supreme court has become, how unpredictable, how far out of the mainstream it has become that the special counsel felt it was incumbent upon him to create backstops, to create secondary and tertiary positions because he could not trust that a majority of this supreme court would do what every other clear, saying jurist action, not in a political contest but acting in a pure legal contest with no had to be true, that our system of government was not created to ensure that one man would lack accountability, could rise to the highest level of government in our country and that would then constitute a cloak of impunity. this is just simply not, at odds with the very concept of our country. that is king george. and so this should have been a slam dunk, the fact that even jack smith clearly is concerned that given the supreme court, it might not be a slamdunk, made me very uneasy reading this filing. >> that is such an important point. this is a th
by the supreme court. and it is a testament to how reckless this supreme court has become, how unpredictable, how far out of the mainstream it has become that the special counsel felt it was incumbent upon him to create backstops, to create secondary and tertiary positions because he could not trust that a majority of this supreme court would do what every other clear, saying jurist action, not in a political contest but acting in a pure legal contest with no had to be true, that our system of...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
everyone it's about the supreme court one of the going to be doing about immunity the supreme court is never here a case like this because no president and the history of the republic has tried to prosecute one of his predecessors. that is crossing a rubicon and it creates a terrible incentive for future presidents. because they have to always be worried. thehave to be looking over their shoulder a future presidents going to go after them. what you have is the absence of statesmanship, leadership, common sense there are no doubt presidents in the past you might've done things other people might've thought would be criminal. future presidents always i was a best interest of our country to pardon a nixon. to get past controversies and look to the future and do its best for the american people. unfortunately it is joe biden has triggered this crisis by continuing to press the special counsel investigation. that is where the fault lies on this. >> listing to some of these injustices and they have been sucked into this world. i'm listening is that private conduct is that official conduct? d
everyone it's about the supreme court one of the going to be doing about immunity the supreme court is never here a case like this because no president and the history of the republic has tried to prosecute one of his predecessors. that is crossing a rubicon and it creates a terrible incentive for future presidents. because they have to always be worried. thehave to be looking over their shoulder a future presidents going to go after them. what you have is the absence of statesmanship,...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ken dilanian live outside the supreme court. also with us, ari melber, and state attorney for palm beach county, florida, dave aronberg is with us. >> what are you expecting to hear at the court today? >> reporter: good morning. it's important to point out that the court has already made a decision that's affected the presidential election. by not agreeing to take it up when jack smith first asked them to do so on an emergency basis and by not taking it on an expedited basis, they've already created a significant delay here that means that this election case, however they rule, can't go to trial probably before the fall. now the question of whether a president has absolute immunity and then there's a second question that whether anything donald trump is accused of would constitute a presidential act. >> just making sure you're okay. is everything okay. we hear someone yelling. >> reporter: it's fine. we have a heckler here. >> i've got to say they obviously have been following the david pecker testimony. they're yelling "fake ne
ken dilanian live outside the supreme court. also with us, ari melber, and state attorney for palm beach county, florida, dave aronberg is with us. >> what are you expecting to hear at the court today? >> reporter: good morning. it's important to point out that the court has already made a decision that's affected the presidential election. by not agreeing to take it up when jack smith first asked them to do so on an emergency basis and by not taking it on an expedited basis,...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and that's what the supreme court's four. there was a debate. i mean smith was sort of all over the map on this because remember after the district court, the trial court, jack smith said, hey, supreme court, it is urgent that you take this case only you only you can fully decide this. it's such an important issue. supreme court said now you're gonna go through the normal appellate channels here, went to the court of appeals, jack smith winds, and then he says, don't take supreme court held, take it. no, no, no, no. and of course they're going to take it because it's a huge issue of constitutional law with no precedent but don't you think that also means that they don't like some significant number of the justices don't like something about how the appeals court landed on this. >> i keep thinking. they took it because there's something in that ruling that they're not comfortable yeah. >> i understand. i think that's it for the audience. the lower court ruling they could have chosen not to have taken up the case and the lower court ruling would h
and that's what the supreme court's four. there was a debate. i mean smith was sort of all over the map on this because remember after the district court, the trial court, jack smith said, hey, supreme court, it is urgent that you take this case only you only you can fully decide this. it's such an important issue. supreme court said now you're gonna go through the normal appellate channels here, went to the court of appeals, jack smith winds, and then he says, don't take supreme court held,...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was reinstated by the state supreme court earlier this month. the repeal now goes to the arizona senate where it is expected to pass. democratic governor katie hobbs said she will sign it into law. >>> "the baltimore sun" says a massive hydraulic claw has arrived to help clear debris from the site of the francis scott key bridge collapse. a large section collapsed last month when a cargo ship ran into it. six construction workers were killed. the claw will be used to remove debris at the bottom of the river. a fourth deeper channel is set to open today to allow ships stuck at the port of baltimore to get in and get out. >>> and still to come, no flight, no problem. the new rules for airlines when it comes to canceled or delayed flights. flights. bipolar 1, i got help to push back. i got help to push back. we got help to push back with lybalvi. once-daily prescription lybalvi is proven to treat manic or mixed episodes of bipolar 1 in adults to help you push back. elderly patients with dementia have increased risk of death or stroke. do not take l
it was reinstated by the state supreme court earlier this month. the repeal now goes to the arizona senate where it is expected to pass. democratic governor katie hobbs said she will sign it into law. >>> "the baltimore sun" says a massive hydraulic claw has arrived to help clear debris from the site of the francis scott key bridge collapse. a large section collapsed last month when a cargo ship ran into it. six construction workers were killed. the claw will be used to...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so joe, you better hope the supreme court helps you. and tom, keep up the good work because the person next to you called you a racist. guest: thank you. i don't know about that lawsuit so i can't comment on it. host: alex, democrat, brooklyn, new york. caller: i have been listening to your guest and i love the equation of trying to biden in the sexual accusations. i find it hilarious that none of this came up until now because the media is now pushing on what could have been disclosed about joe biden. i want to go back to the idea of the fake electors. so peter navarro, papadopoulos, stone, others went to prison for trump. one of them lost his practice and can't be a lawyer in california. chesebro is talking about the georgia case. this woman is also found to be guilty. all of the people in trump's orbits are guilty of different crimes except trump. trump is not found guilty. cohen goes to prison for literally taking money out of his house to pay for a hush money trial and yet trump is not culpable in any of this. this guy testifies an
so joe, you better hope the supreme court helps you. and tom, keep up the good work because the person next to you called you a racist. guest: thank you. i don't know about that lawsuit so i can't comment on it. host: alex, democrat, brooklyn, new york. caller: i have been listening to your guest and i love the equation of trying to biden in the sexual accusations. i find it hilarious that none of this came up until now because the media is now pushing on what could have been disclosed about...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
before the election and that federal courte case given how things went to the supreme court, the regime media is in total despair. politico opining tonight that the already slim likelihoods j donald trump will face criminal trial brought by jack smith before the election appeared tou dwindle further thursday in thtw faceas of withering scrutiny to the supreme court's conservative majority. and it was no better at fox where they need to start offering company-wide therapy pets come herai think. the take was oral argument was disaster for special counsel jack smith. at least 5-quart republican seemed eager to o the very leasg to permit trump to delay, criminal trial adding the trust does seem to hedged the mostme john roberts also seem toec think that trump enjoys some immunity from federal prosecution. a little bit about the argued cases and clerk for is justice scalia and thomas. chris, is the real reason for the left to be in despair tonight customer >> i think it was a good day for former president trump info t i supreme court court, laura. but i think that is because he's got the law
before the election and that federal courte case given how things went to the supreme court, the regime media is in total despair. politico opining tonight that the already slim likelihoods j donald trump will face criminal trial brought by jack smith before the election appeared tou dwindle further thursday in thtw faceas of withering scrutiny to the supreme court's conservative majority. and it was no better at fox where they need to start offering company-wide therapy pets come herai think....
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court today. did you get a sense from the line of questioning there is a view that some level of presidential immunity might be required? >> the first thing i noticed was the gravity of the day. it felt a lot like the january 6 hearings where you just had to get it right. we knew on the committee we had to get the facts right. you could feel from the justices today they really wanted to not just create a rule for today but create a rule for future misconduct as well. there is competing interests going on. you can see it from the justices. one of a ruling that would have a chilling effect on the president being able to act in practice. on the other side, whether a president really should think about not violent criminal statutes. that is really what's going on here today. it will be interesting to see what the court comes down within its ruling. caitriona: given the gravity you are talking about, there seem to be a suggestion the whole issue needs a deeper examination and perhaps needs to go back t
supreme court today. did you get a sense from the line of questioning there is a view that some level of presidential immunity might be required? >> the first thing i noticed was the gravity of the day. it felt a lot like the january 6 hearings where you just had to get it right. we knew on the committee we had to get the facts right. you could feel from the justices today they really wanted to not just create a rule for today but create a rule for future misconduct as well. there is...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
before the election and that federal court case given how things went today at the supreme court already slim likelihood that donald trump will face a criminal trial brought by special counsel jack smith before the election appeared to dwindle further thursday in the face of withering scrutiny from the supreme court's conservative majority. and the mood was no better by the way over at vioxx where they will need to start offering company wide therapy pets. disaster for the special counsel jack smith. at least five of the court's republicans seemed eager at the very least to trump delay federal criminal trial adding that the justice who seemed to hedge the most, john roberts, also seemed to think that trump enjoys at least some immunity from criminal prosecution joining us now. chris landau. chris, is there real reason for the left to be in despair tonight? >> i think it was a good day for former president trump in the supreme court, laura. but i think that's just because he's got the law and common sense on his side. i mean, this is -- the question as you just read is whether a president
before the election and that federal court case given how things went today at the supreme court already slim likelihood that donald trump will face a criminal trial brought by special counsel jack smith before the election appeared to dwindle further thursday in the face of withering scrutiny from the supreme court's conservative majority. and the mood was no better by the way over at vioxx where they will need to start offering company wide therapy pets. disaster for the special counsel jack...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so we may be seeing trial courts dealing with this issue circuits supreme court saying going the supreme court saying we you guys gave it this test a year ago. we're back. well, notable to hear you say craziness of trump's absolute immunity claim, elliott, what did you what do you make of what jeff? no, i think you're absolutely right right. i think the court in sort of recognizing i think trump's team in conceding that some things might be official acts and some things are not really opened the door to the supreme court to say, well, we can't decide what's an official act and what isn't. we're just going to send it back down to lower courts to figure out now to be clear, the supreme court could have resolved on this issue back in december, and we're not even talking about that hearing at which remember, judge florence pan talked about the drone strike by seal team six or whatever, long before that, the supreme court have this issue because jack smith's team took it to the supreme court, said, we would like you to expedite this ruling. can you please rule on this issue and they chose not
so we may be seeing trial courts dealing with this issue circuits supreme court saying going the supreme court saying we you guys gave it this test a year ago. we're back. well, notable to hear you say craziness of trump's absolute immunity claim, elliott, what did you what do you make of what jeff? no, i think you're absolutely right right. i think the court in sort of recognizing i think trump's team in conceding that some things might be official acts and some things are not really opened...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to make any kind of spectacle around the supreme court. they don't view that as a quote, unquote campaign stop the way that they have really treated so many other it's, trial appearances all right. >> fair enough. >> kristen holmes for us. kristen. thank you very much. let's now if you get a question to the former president will come back, talk to you about it? all right. we also want to get to this new video, overnight clashes with police in riot gear at emerson college in boston during pro-palestine demonstrations. and house speaker mike johnson was booed for the full 18 minutes that he spoke in front of a crowd of students at columbia university yesterday good man. did he take action i am here today joining my colleagues and calling on president shafik to resign if she could not immediately bring order to this chaos enjoy your free speech. >> there were also intents clashes at usc and ut austin between students and police our panel is back now. i'm miked up key mike johnson going to columbia. he was booed for the full 18 minutes, right?
to make any kind of spectacle around the supreme court. they don't view that as a quote, unquote campaign stop the way that they have really treated so many other it's, trial appearances all right. >> fair enough. >> kristen holmes for us. kristen. thank you very much. let's now if you get a question to the former president will come back, talk to you about it? all right. we also want to get to this new video, overnight clashes with police in riot gear at emerson college in boston...
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's the conservative judiciary of the supreme court. certainly there are state republicans on the supreme court responsible or people appointed by republicans responsible for this decision, four men and one woman. what does this do to the political dynamics in an election year given the way abortion whenever it is litigated at the ballot box rebounds to people in favor of choice, what does this do for the broader dynamics going into november? >> well, i think the first thing we've got to be concerned about is the health care for women in the state. it's been hard already since roe was overturned. i've spoken to, you know, doctors who provide women health care who haveid left the state already. they've moved to nevada. they've moved onto other states. soto the options for women that going to get worse with what's happened today. we doh have an opportunity her in november to codify the right for womenod to make this choicen their own, to get the politics out oft it. hope that passes. i expect it will. i'm going toes be fighting for , and
it's the conservative judiciary of the supreme court. certainly there are state republicans on the supreme court responsible or people appointed by republicans responsible for this decision, four men and one woman. what does this do to the political dynamics in an election year given the way abortion whenever it is litigated at the ballot box rebounds to people in favor of choice, what does this do for the broader dynamics going into november? >> well, i think the first thing we've got to...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. trump's immunity hearing before the nine justices is raising alarm bells in legal and political circles. not only does it show just how far the four times indicted on 88 counts the former president will go to avoid accountability for attempting to overturn a free and fair election, the hearing also exposed how some justices appeared willing to consider partial immunity so that future presidents could make tough their decisions without fear of prosecution. case in point, trump's lawyer, arguing, again, that the president should be able to get away with murder if it is an "official act." >> if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person, and he orders the military, or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity? >> it would depend on the hypothetical. we see that well back could be an official act. >> the justices were more concerned about allowing presidents to commit crimes with impunity. >>'s novel theory would immuni
supreme court. trump's immunity hearing before the nine justices is raising alarm bells in legal and political circles. not only does it show just how far the four times indicted on 88 counts the former president will go to avoid accountability for attempting to overturn a free and fair election, the hearing also exposed how some justices appeared willing to consider partial immunity so that future presidents could make tough their decisions without fear of prosecution. case in point, trump's...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the question presented in any supreme court case is, what is the issue that the supreme court is going to decide? they could have defined that narrowly here, in a way that would have been circumscribed to the facts alleged in the indictment. instead, the question was whether, and if so, to what extent, former presidents are entitled to immunity for their official acts where there are criminal charges against them. that is a broad question. you saw a number of the conservative justices sort of reaching beyond the facts of the indictment to try and pose a series of ever-escalating hypotheticals. at one point, justice alito even saying, i don't want to talk about this particular case. the question i would ask is, why not? this is the case before you. one of the most simple and democracy-enhancing things this court could have done would be to say, there may be circumstances in which presidents are entitled to immunity, but this indictment, as alleged here, doesn't constitute one of those scenarios, and we as a court can always revisit it if and when the facts present themselves to us that
the question presented in any supreme court case is, what is the issue that the supreme court is going to decide? they could have defined that narrowly here, in a way that would have been circumscribed to the facts alleged in the indictment. instead, the question was whether, and if so, to what extent, former presidents are entitled to immunity for their official acts where there are criminal charges against them. that is a broad question. you saw a number of the conservative justices sort of...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court arguments are _ put forward so far? the supreme court arguments are finished. i put forward so far? the supreme i court arguments are finished. now put forward so far? the supreme - court arguments are finished. now it is up to— court arguments are finished. now it is up to the _ court arguments are finished. now it is up to the supreme curd court as to whether— is up to the supreme curd court as to whether they will offer a decision. yesterday's argument did not accept — decision. yesterday's argument did not accept the arguments. they are not accept the arguments. they are not moving — not accept the arguments. they are not moving on any particular hurry. it not moving on any particular hurry. it may— not moving on any particular hurry. it may he _ not moving on any particular hurry. it may be that trump actually wins lry it may be that trump actually wins by losing _ it may be that trump actually wins by losing this case. no one thinks that the _ by losing this case. no one thinks that the president gets immunity for private _ that the president ge
the supreme court arguments are _ put forward so far? the supreme court arguments are finished. i put forward so far? the supreme i court arguments are finished. now put forward so far? the supreme - court arguments are finished. now it is up to— court arguments are finished. now it is up to the _ court arguments are finished. now it is up to the supreme curd court as to whether— is up to the supreme curd court as to whether they will offer a decision. yesterday's argument did not accept...
0
0.0
Apr 22, 2024
04/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. it's surrounding tent encampments on city streets. the hear begins in a matter of hours. it's potential impact on the bay area homeless crisis. >>> bringing home the bacon. next on the "today" show, kevin bacon returns to the utah high school where he filmed "foot loose" 40 years ago. >> the young woman said to me, you know, my grandfather went to school here when you were doing the movie. your grandfather? as if going through the 40th anniversary wasn't enough. check yourself, buddy. >> that's ahead on the "today" show starting at 7:00, right after us here on "today in the bay." >>> 6:57 this morning. welcome back. we are moving you forward with a look at our top stories on "today in the bay." >> the supreme court is set to hear arguments today on what could amount to be the most consequential ruling on the rights of the unhoused in decades. the justices will consider a challenge to the rulings from a california-based appeals court that found punishing people for sleeping outside when shelter space is limited equates to cruel and unu
supreme court. it's surrounding tent encampments on city streets. the hear begins in a matter of hours. it's potential impact on the bay area homeless crisis. >>> bringing home the bacon. next on the "today" show, kevin bacon returns to the utah high school where he filmed "foot loose" 40 years ago. >> the young woman said to me, you know, my grandfather went to school here when you were doing the movie. your grandfather? as if going through the 40th...