0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in response, petitioner raises concerns about potential abuses. but established legal safeguards provide layers of protections with the article 3 courts providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a carefully balanced framework. it protects the president but not at the high constitutional cost of blanket criminal immunity. that has been the understanding of every president from the framing, through watergate, and up to today. this court should preserve it. i welcome the court's questions. >> mr. dreeben, does the president have immunity? are you saying there is no immunity, presidential immunity, even for official acts? >> yes, justice thomas, but i think that it is important to put in perspective the position that we are offering the court today. the president, as the head of the article 2 branch, can assert as applied article 2 objections to criminal laws that interfere with an exclusive power possessed by the president, or that prevent the president from accomplishing his constitutionally assigned functions. that is the constitutional
in response, petitioner raises concerns about potential abuses. but established legal safeguards provide layers of protections with the article 3 courts providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a carefully balanced framework. it protects the president but not at the high constitutional cost of blanket criminal immunity. that has been the understanding of every president from the framing, through watergate, and up to today. this court should preserve it. i welcome the court's...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in one of the interactions between petitioner and a state official, petitioner is alleged to have said, all i need you to find me 11,000 votes. and change. i think if you look at that content, it's pretty clear that petitioner is acting in the capacity as office seeker, not as president, and we would look at that content. >> ok. but the tests, but i am just focused on the legal tests. i'm not hearing any exceptions to it. >> other than the d.c. circuit judge a's to more content consideration off-limits than i would. >> ok. and i want to understand on the core immunity or whatever word we use, it seems to me we are narrowing the ground of dispute here considerably. do we look at motives, the president's motives for his actions? i mean, for example, he has lots of war powers, as we discussed, but he might use them in order to enhance his personal interests. his election. is that a relevant consideration when we are looking at core powers? >> so, i am thinking of this more as looking at the objective of the activities as opposed to the kind of subjective motive in the sense that your hono
in one of the interactions between petitioner and a state official, petitioner is alleged to have said, all i need you to find me 11,000 votes. and change. i think if you look at that content, it's pretty clear that petitioner is acting in the capacity as office seeker, not as president, and we would look at that content. >> ok. but the tests, but i am just focused on the legal tests. i'm not hearing any exceptions to it. >> other than the d.c. circuit judge a's to more content...
0
0.0
Apr 20, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
those cows do not require that petitioner acted and obviously the petitioner committed other imes that we are seeking to ldhem accountable for. one of the root problems with titioner's conducts knew about that proceeding. said he was prepared to storm the capital, prepared to use violence. he wanted to intimidat congress. he said they can't don't if they can't breathe. he went to the capital on january 6 with that intent in mind andooaction inclung assaulting a law enforcement officer. thatidmpede the ability of the ofce toegain control of the capital. it is entirely appropriate for the government. est the statutory maximum is higherut after a recent decision on the d.c. circuit judge which helped with a particular sentencing enhancement, that is the broad case i believe the sentencing range, the gdenes range would actually be higher guidin range. someone who does not hava prior criminal history. is is the range that would yield. we have looked at the avera sentences here. i think that is the best way to gauge it. iss when the sentencing enhancement didn't apply. all of this is 26 mont
those cows do not require that petitioner acted and obviously the petitioner committed other imes that we are seeking to ldhem accountable for. one of the root problems with titioner's conducts knew about that proceeding. said he was prepared to storm the capital, prepared to use violence. he wanted to intimidat congress. he said they can't don't if they can't breathe. he went to the capital on january 6 with that intent in mind andooaction inclung assaulting a law enforcement officer....
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> in one of the interactions between petitioner and a state official, and the state official, petitioner is alleged to have said all i need you to do is to find me 11,000 votes unchanged. i think if you look at that context it is pretty clear that petitioner is acting in the capacity of office seeker, not as president >> i am focus on the legal test. i am not hearing any objections to it. >> other than i think the d.c. circuit place more content consideration off limit then i went. >> i want to understand on the court immunity, or whatever word we use, it seems to me that we are narrowing the ground of dispute here considerably. do we look at motives? the president's motives for his actions? for example, he has lots of power as we've discussed, but he might use them to enhance his election in his personal interest. it is not a relevant consideration when we look at core powers? >> i think of this more as looking at the objectives of the activity as opposed to the subjective motives in the sense that you are -- i think there is concern about seeing a electoral motive to be reelected as su
. >> in one of the interactions between petitioner and a state official, and the state official, petitioner is alleged to have said all i need you to do is to find me 11,000 votes unchanged. i think if you look at that context it is pretty clear that petitioner is acting in the capacity of office seeker, not as president >> i am focus on the legal test. i am not hearing any objections to it. >> other than i think the d.c. circuit place more content consideration off limit then...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> so sounds private. >> three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you really quickly. >> i believe that's private. i don't want us so those acts you would not dispute those the private and you wouldn't raise a claim that they were official as characterize what we would say. your honor, if i may, what we would say his official was things like meeting with the department of justice to deliberate about who's gonna be the acting attorney general, the united states. sure. again, with the american public communicating with congress about matters of all enormous thank you thank you thank you. council. and what is the consequence in terms of going forward with your acknowledgement that those are private next, as oppose
private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> so sounds private. >> three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you really quickly. >> i believe...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
two sounds private petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> sounds private three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above& a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification jim proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you write it quickly. i believe that it's private that's seems to answer a lot. >> there it does, casey and that is the genesis of the concern, right? you have to now parse out. is they have private conduct from presidential conduct and then, you know, this sort of, this how the ambiguity right, is what i'm searching for. and so if you have that ambiguity, do you take it down to the lower court and does because the lower court make factual determinations as the justice did in her questioning as to what can be deemed to be private such that it can be prosecuted. and what could be deemed in the outer per
two sounds private petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> sounds private three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above& a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification jim proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in response, petitioner raises concerns aboential abuses. establhelegal safeguards provide layers of protections with thele three crts providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a refully balanced framework. it protects the president, but not at the high constitutional cost of blanket criminal immunity. that has been the understandg of every psident from the framing through watergate and up to today. this court should preserve it. i welcome the court's ons. >> does the president have immunity or are you saying that there is no presidential munity even for official act >> yes, justice thomas, but it is important to puin perspective the position that we are offeri court today. the pre as the head of the arclto bnc can assert as applied article two objections to criminal laws that interfere with an excluse wer possessed by the president or that prevent the preside fm accomplishing h cstitutional he assigned functions. at is the constitutional doctrine that currently governs the separation of powers. what petitioner is asking for is a
in response, petitioner raises concerns aboential abuses. establhelegal safeguards provide layers of protections with thele three crts providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a refully balanced framework. it protects the president, but not at the high constitutional cost of blanket criminal immunity. that has been the understandg of every psident from the framing through watergate and up to today. this court should preserve it. i welcome the court's ons. >> does the president...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
>> petitioner turn to a private attorney, was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results. private, as i want to jamming, we do speed the allegation, but sounds private. >> sounds private petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations this is support a challenge. so sounds brian three private actors to attorneys including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped to implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you ready quickly. i believe that private with b now is jack ray code. so that surprise winning author, historian and professor at stanford, he also signed onto an amicus briefs is court rejecting trump's immunity claim. thank you for joining us this evening. >> it sounds like this immunity question may not be close to being resolved completely and could actually go bac
>> petitioner turn to a private attorney, was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results. private, as i want to jamming, we do speed the allegation, but sounds private. >> sounds private petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations this is support a challenge. so sounds brian three private actors to attorneys...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
petitioners effort to remain in power by fraud. those allegations of private misconduct are more than sufficient to support the indictment. joining our discussion now is judge vance and she is cohost of the podcast, hashtag sisters in law and in msnbc analyst. just when we think we've heard all the arguments already on this issue, jack smith comes through with another brief, with new ways of saying these things, that become ever more powerful every time he's forced to restate >> i think that's right, you know, this is a technical legal brief and smith is making arguments predicated on what he hopes the supreme court will do, ruling that there's no immunity, and what he's afraid the court might do, ruling that there's limited immunity in which case, smith says to the court, no matter what you decide about what immunity might exist, donald trump isn't entitled to any immunity. you should send this case back to the district court for trial because his conduct involves a purely personal conspiracy and although we are entitled to use ev
petitioners effort to remain in power by fraud. those allegations of private misconduct are more than sufficient to support the indictment. joining our discussion now is judge vance and she is cohost of the podcast, hashtag sisters in law and in msnbc analyst. just when we think we've heard all the arguments already on this issue, jack smith comes through with another brief, with new ways of saying these things, that become ever more powerful every time he's forced to restate >> i think...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> we disputed the allegations but it sounds private. >> petitioner conspired with another private attorney to get a violation which was false allegations to support a challenge. >> that also sounds private. >> three private actors and two attorneys and a political attorney implemented plan to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and co-conspirator directed that effort. >> you read it quickly, believe that is private. >> and then later he says trump's phone call with that infamous secretary of state where he says you'll find 11,780 votes i just need one more is not an official act. how big a big concessions on this. >> those are all huge concessions to the extent this does get ultimately remanded to the judge for additional findings that will fill her hand in terms of her ability to move the case forward. i don't think the supreme court is focused so much on the actual trump indictment as they are concerned about hamstringing future presidents in terms of restraints on their ability to act officially without fear of retribution by their successors. >> it sounds like
. >> we disputed the allegations but it sounds private. >> petitioner conspired with another private attorney to get a violation which was false allegations to support a challenge. >> that also sounds private. >> three private actors and two attorneys and a political attorney implemented plan to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and co-conspirator directed that effort. >> you read it quickly, believe that is private. >> and then later he...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump, petitioner versus united states. but many of the justices, if not most of them, seemed very, very focused on the precedent this case could set for future presidents, right? >> and just, just because they kept going back to that point, i think it's a it's a big win, frankly for the former president because that's one of the things his, his lawyers kept arguing. they kept saying that if you allow this to go forward this way, that other presidents could face prosecution for any acts they committed in office. and so you'll hear, justice gorsuch describing what he says he sees at play here. listen i'm not concerned about this case, but i am concerned about future uses of the criminal law to target political opponents based on accusations about their motives whether it's reelection or who knows what corrupt means in 15, 12 right? >> we don't know what that means maybe we'll find out sometime soon. but the dangerousness of accusing europe political opponent of having bad motives and if that's enough to overcome your core po
trump, petitioner versus united states. but many of the justices, if not most of them, seemed very, very focused on the precedent this case could set for future presidents, right? >> and just, just because they kept going back to that point, i think it's a it's a big win, frankly for the former president because that's one of the things his, his lawyers kept arguing. they kept saying that if you allow this to go forward this way, that other presidents could face prosecution for any acts...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of so called aggravated homosexuality. activists say them all violates their constitutional rights. petitioners say they will appeal to ruling at the supreme authorities in taiwan say, dozens of people are still missing or stranded. following the strongest earthquake to hit the on into more than 25 years. at least 9 people were killed in 1000 injured when the quake struck quad again city. on wednesday morning, emergency crews are working to clear roads and secure damaged buildings. the earthquake ship all of the taiwan. but the city of quality inn on the east coast was the worst hit. rescuers had managed to save all residents from partially collapsed buildings. and from under rubble and down departments, survivors and damaged homes are being moved to temporary shelters. now it's time to prepare for the aftershocks keith and not that i'm afraid of after shocks, and i don't know how bad the shaking will be. and then the house is already mess. okay, how do you get in that? but there's no way to get in. didn't you post quick, major roads are still blocked off in other areas. taiwan, president elect
of so called aggravated homosexuality. activists say them all violates their constitutional rights. petitioners say they will appeal to ruling at the supreme authorities in taiwan say, dozens of people are still missing or stranded. following the strongest earthquake to hit the on into more than 25 years. at least 9 people were killed in 1000 injured when the quake struck quad again city. on wednesday morning, emergency crews are working to clear roads and secure damaged buildings. the...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
petitioner turn to a private attorney was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results. >> private shining, we dispute the allegation by the sounds private jet sounds private petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing& court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> so sounds private. >> three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above and a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates it's a presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you really quickly. >> i believe dr.. it then later he says trump's phone call with the infamous one with the georgia secretary of state brad raffensperger, where he says, you know, find 11,708 votes. >> i just need one more. was not an official act. >> how big of a concession is all of this? >> those are all huge concessions and to the extent that this does get ultimately rema
petitioner turn to a private attorney was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results. >> private shining, we dispute the allegation by the sounds private jet sounds private petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing& court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> so sounds private. >> three private actors to attorneys,...
0
0.0
Apr 12, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
as petitioners, but has this voted law brought more justice ... in relation to the people in the troops, the current people in the troops, it was in the troops that they hoped for 36 months, as a certain, well, the term of such a cut-off, when a person who has stayed in total, well, with coefficients, accumulates 36 months of being in combat operations and at the front, he must, well , at least a year rest, otherwise he will simply and professionally slouch, and... he gets tired as much , that human psychology cannot withstand all this, but the fact that this norm on demobilization was not included in this law is also, in principle, the absence of this, well, conditional gingerbread, that is, for those who have already been mobilized and for those who are going to mobilize because it is unclear, mobilization continues, but no one... sets these terms, those who are already at the front do not understand when their service will end, when they will be able to demobilize, and those whom they are trying to mobilize also do not understand how they go either for life, or to some injury or some
as petitioners, but has this voted law brought more justice ... in relation to the people in the troops, the current people in the troops, it was in the troops that they hoped for 36 months, as a certain, well, the term of such a cut-off, when a person who has stayed in total, well, with coefficients, accumulates 36 months of being in combat operations and at the front, he must, well , at least a year rest, otherwise he will simply and professionally slouch, and... he gets tired as much , that...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
with another private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> so sounds private. >> three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of president shall electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you ready to quickly i believe that dr. so of today's arguments also focused on for president richard nixon and his legal entanglements and held that precedent reflects on today and what that means. i'm joined tonight by the former counsel to form president trump, jim trusty, former federal prosecutor, elliot williams, georgetown law professor victoria nurse, and former federal prosecutors chan woo, and also someone very familiar with the legal legacy left behind by richard nixon, the former president's onetime white house counsel, john dean and john, let me start with you, given how watergate i think we all knew it was going to c
with another private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> so sounds private. >> three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of president shall electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you ready to quickly i...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
petitioner turned to a private attorney. spread false claims of election fraud to spearhead challenges to the election results. private? >> we dispute the allegation. that sounds private. >> petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing in court of a verification that contained false allegations to support a challenge. >> sounds private. >> private actors to attorneys thought mentioned about and political consultant to obstruct the certification proceedings and attorney directed that effort. >> you read it quickly. i believe that's private. >> those acts you would not dispute. those were private and you wouldn't raise the claim they were official. >> what we would say is official is meeting with the department of justice to deliberate who will be the acting attorney general of the united states. communicating with the american public, communicating with congress with matters. >> thank you. >> and what is the consequence in terms of going forward with your acknowledgement that those are private acts
petitioner turned to a private attorney. spread false claims of election fraud to spearhead challenges to the election results. private? >> we dispute the allegation. that sounds private. >> petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing in court of a verification that contained false allegations to support a challenge. >> sounds private. >> private actors to attorneys thought mentioned about and political consultant to obstruct the...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it instead underscores the unprecedented nature of petitioners alleged conduct. to the particulars of the case, jack smith wrote first, of presidents alleged criminal scheme to overturn an election and thwart the peaceful transfer of power to his lawfully elected successor is the. dramatic example of conduct that should not be immunized, even if other contact should be. second, at the core of the charged conspiracies is a private scheme with private actors to achieve a private and -- petitioner's effort to remain in power by fraud. those allegations of private misconduct are more than sufficient to support the indictment. joining our discussion of is joyce vance, former u.s. attorney and professor at the university of alabama school of law. she has cohost of the podcast "hash text sisters-in-law," and nbc legal analyst. just when we think we've heard all the arguments already on this issue, jack smith comes through with another brief with new ways of saying these things that become ever more powerful every time he is forced to restate them. >> i think that is rig
it instead underscores the unprecedented nature of petitioners alleged conduct. to the particulars of the case, jack smith wrote first, of presidents alleged criminal scheme to overturn an election and thwart the peaceful transfer of power to his lawfully elected successor is the. dramatic example of conduct that should not be immunized, even if other contact should be. second, at the core of the charged conspiracies is a private scheme with private actors to achieve a private and --...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 4
in response, the petitioner raises concerns of potential abuses. established legal safeguards provide layers of protection, with the courts providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a carefully balanced framework. it protects the president, but not at the high constitutional cost of blanket criminal immunity. that has been the understanding of every president from the framing through watergate and up to today. this court should preserve it. host: we are taking your calls on the question of former president trump's presidential immunity. beverly is first in florida. good morning. caller: good morning. president trump needs immunity and the right to have no one take his in -- his election interference away from him. he did a good job in the four years. we are all in fear of a war with president biden in place. the reason president trump did question the election for president biden is because when we went to bed the night before we were supposed to get the totals. president biden was not in the lead in georgia. it was president trump. then
in response, the petitioner raises concerns of potential abuses. established legal safeguards provide layers of protection, with the courts providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a carefully balanced framework. it protects the president, but not at the high constitutional cost of blanket criminal immunity. that has been the understanding of every president from the framing through watergate and up to today. this court should preserve it. host: we are taking your calls on the...
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
RUSSIA24
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
not happen because speaker mike johnson did not have a free window in his calendar to meet with these petitioners from london, but this is the result of a conversation with trump , well, yes, yes, of course, and as we know, trump not so long ago invited mike johnson, well, basically... asked him to refuse to agree on ukrainian tranches in some kind of accelerated format, well, that’s of course yes, this shows firstly what does it have to do with cameron, well, a person not elected by anyone, and there with zero reputation, with zero ratings, well, it’s certainly very strange, as you rightly noted, to see a representative of the emissary of another country who comes to america, tells the americans, so you need to spend money in ukraine, because we have invested a lot there, we have british interests there, so you have your american billions for our british... interests must be invested so that everything works out well for us. well, marjarie taylor greene, a trump supporter, back in february, very correct and apt, noted all of these statements by cameron when she suggested, in general, kissing
not happen because speaker mike johnson did not have a free window in his calendar to meet with these petitioners from london, but this is the result of a conversation with trump , well, yes, yes, of course, and as we know, trump not so long ago invited mike johnson, well, basically... asked him to refuse to agree on ukrainian tranches in some kind of accelerated format, well, that’s of course yes, this shows firstly what does it have to do with cameron, well, a person not elected by anyone,...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> petitioner conspired with another private attorney caused the filing in court to the verification signed by petitioner that can date false allegations. >> that sounds private. >> three private actors and two attorneys and political consultant help the pullman plan to submit fraudulent claims of presidential electors to obstruct the proceeding and petitioner and co-conspirator attorney directed that effort? >> you read it quickly. i believe that's private. >> bozak she would not dispute. those were private and you wouldn't raise a claim? >> is characterized. >> is characterized those were private. conservative justice amy coney barrett, she's getting donald trump's lawyer to agree that a whole bunch of things that trump was indicted for in the january 6 federal case, punter those things are things that could not possibly be construed to be the official actions of a president. now, justice barrett emerge from the arguments today is potentially the swing vote on this overall issue. maybe which is crazy given how right-wing she is. of all the conservative justices, she seemed like the
. >> petitioner conspired with another private attorney caused the filing in court to the verification signed by petitioner that can date false allegations. >> that sounds private. >> three private actors and two attorneys and political consultant help the pullman plan to submit fraudulent claims of presidential electors to obstruct the proceeding and petitioner and co-conspirator attorney directed that effort? >> you read it quickly. i believe that's private. >>...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> petitioners are for the national vaccine injury compensation program. those are through the routine administration with an excise tax levied on it whereas the requesters through the ci cpr paid for compensation of claims through appropriated funds and through administration of the program. it is also paid for most appropriated funds. >> as a physician i am also worried that in some cases health practitioners do not know where and how to report adverse effects which is critical to ensuring that all vaccine events are accounted for. i also have concerns of how these events and potential risks are reported to healthcare providers. for each of you, could you take turns in describing what your respective agency insures against any adverse effects that are reported and how those reports are managed and how this information is conveyed to the front-line individuals that are dealing with this? dr. marks. >> thank you for the question. each vaccine label whether it was the authorized vaccines or approved vaccines, it has set information on where to report advers
>> petitioners are for the national vaccine injury compensation program. those are through the routine administration with an excise tax levied on it whereas the requesters through the ci cpr paid for compensation of claims through appropriated funds and through administration of the program. it is also paid for most appropriated funds. >> as a physician i am also worried that in some cases health practitioners do not know where and how to report adverse effects which is critical to...
0
0.0
Apr 29, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
future and current development petitioners and leaders. what your thinking was and whether you think something is to be relevant past 2025. ambassador green: last part first. i hope so. those of you who know me well know i tell endless stories about it, but my years as a teacher in kenya was life altering. i was in a village where we didn't have proper running water. i didn't have a telephone. i didn't have electricity in our house. anything like that. but it also brought home to me the universality of the human spirit and how much people want the same things all around the world. it's personal to me. this is the way i look at the world. and that's what i was able to bring. i think back the first speech that gave at usaid, it was titled the 14th street speech. as i walked in the purpose of all foreign assistance has to be ending its need to exist. first people are rattled, then they pause for 30 seconds. then that's why they are here. that's what we believe in. i still do. i think that -- i want to take on poverty, but i want to help other
future and current development petitioners and leaders. what your thinking was and whether you think something is to be relevant past 2025. ambassador green: last part first. i hope so. those of you who know me well know i tell endless stories about it, but my years as a teacher in kenya was life altering. i was in a village where we didn't have proper running water. i didn't have a telephone. i didn't have electricity in our house. anything like that. but it also brought home to me the...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
none of petitioners' interpretations fit with the text, and sohehave tried to make this case be about the broader debate for access to abortion in cases of unwanted pregnancy. but that'not what this case is about at all. idaho's ban on abortion is enforceae virtually all of itapications, but in the narrow circumstances involving grave medical emergencies, idaho cannot criminalize the essential care that emtala requires. i welcome the court's questions. justice thomas: general, are you aware of any other spending clause legislation that preempts criminal law? genel elogar: with respect torinal law in particular, justice thomas, i'm not immediately thinking of relevant cases. we have a whole string cite of cases in our brief at page 46 that refle tes where the court has recognized the prmpve force of spending clause legislation, including in situations where the funding strictions apply to private parties, so that could include the coventry health case, for example. lead-deadwood is another example of this. but i'm not immediately recalling how that would apply in criminal law. of cours
none of petitioners' interpretations fit with the text, and sohehave tried to make this case be about the broader debate for access to abortion in cases of unwanted pregnancy. but that'not what this case is about at all. idaho's ban on abortion is enforceae virtually all of itapications, but in the narrow circumstances involving grave medical emergencies, idaho cannot criminalize the essential care that emtala requires. i welcome the court's questions. justice thomas: general, are you aware of...
4
4.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 4
favorite 0
quote 3
petitioner, however, claims that a former president has permanent criminal immunity for his official acts unless he was first impeached and convicted. his novel theory would immunize presidents for treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election and perpetuate himself in power. such presidential immunity has no foundation in the constitution. the framers knew too well the dangers of a king who could do to wrong. they devised a system to check abuses of power, especially the use of official power for private gain. here, the executive branch is enforcing congressional statute and seeking accountability for petitioners' alleged misuse of official power to convert democracy. that is a compelling public interest. in response, petitioner raises concerns about potential abuses, but established legal safeguards provide layers of protection with the article three court providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a carefully balanced framework. it protects the president, but not at the high constitutional cost of linkage criminal immu
petitioner, however, claims that a former president has permanent criminal immunity for his official acts unless he was first impeached and convicted. his novel theory would immunize presidents for treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election and perpetuate himself in power. such presidential immunity has no foundation in the constitution. the framers knew too well the dangers of a king who could do to wrong. they devised a system to check...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
petitioner, however, claims that a former president has permanent criminal immunity for his official act and less he was first impeached and convicted, the theory would immunize former president's from criminal liability for bribery, treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election to perpetuate himself in power. such presidential immunity has no foundation in the constitution. the framers knew too well the dangers of a king who could do no wrong. they therefore devised a system to check abuses of power, especially the use of official power for private gain. here, the executive branch is sourcing congressional statutes and seeking petitioner's alleged misuse of official power to subvert democracy. that is a compelling public interest. in response, petitioner raises concerns about attentional abuses but established legal safeguards, provide layers of protections with the article three courts providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a carefully balanced framework. it protects the president but not at the high constitutional
petitioner, however, claims that a former president has permanent criminal immunity for his official act and less he was first impeached and convicted, the theory would immunize former president's from criminal liability for bribery, treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election to perpetuate himself in power. such presidential immunity has no foundation in the constitution. the framers knew too well the dangers of a king who could do no...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
petitioner, however, claims that a former president has permanent criminal immunity for his official acts unless he was first impeached and convicted. his novel theory would immunize presidents for treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election and perpetuate himself in power. such presidential immunity has no foundation in the constitution. the framers knew too well the dangers of a king who could do to wrong. they devised a system to check abuses of power, especially the use of official power for private gain. here, the executive branch is enforcing congressional statute and seeking accountability for petitioners' alleged misuse of official power to convert democracy. that is a compelling public interest. in response, petitioner raises concerns about potential abuses, but established legal safeguards provide layers of protection with the article three court providing the ultimate check. the existing system is a carefully balanced framework. it protects the president, but not at the high constitutional cost of linkage criminal immu
petitioner, however, claims that a former president has permanent criminal immunity for his official acts unless he was first impeached and convicted. his novel theory would immunize presidents for treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election and perpetuate himself in power. such presidential immunity has no foundation in the constitution. the framers knew too well the dangers of a king who could do to wrong. they devised a system to check...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
mike, now she's an unofficial litigant petitioner before the court. >> i would say te coo liz cheney come i would say to liz cheney and these other watchdog lou republican politicians, this is so much bigger than donald trump. this is about the presidency.an if you can indict it president of the united states for his official acts, not his personal x, his official acts, we are going to destroy the presidency, and therefore disprove the mic destroyed the president. can the justice department charge president obama forca picapital murder for his extrajudicial drone strike of two american citizens, including a minor? ann thd the seven justice depart charge illegal mass parole of migrants into the country and resulting crimes? do the democrats really want to go down this path? >> laura: senator i think of chief justice roberts who was kind of institutionalist. he likes to stand for the executive branch, and i think othersr th on the court do as w. again, this could be put an end to all of these cases. but i'm concerned that there also might be through the court running this fear of their
mike, now she's an unofficial litigant petitioner before the court. >> i would say te coo liz cheney come i would say to liz cheney and these other watchdog lou republican politicians, this is so much bigger than donald trump. this is about the presidency.an if you can indict it president of the united states for his official acts, not his personal x, his official acts, we are going to destroy the presidency, and therefore disprove the mic destroyed the president. can the justice...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it sounds private petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing blinken chord of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> sounds bright. >> three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed that effort you ready to quickly i believe that it's private that's really significant. >> so a revision for what we've heard in the past. so the chief justice really laid out the next issue, which is that he and the other justices don't believe that the lower courts spent enough time when they rejected trump's argument, trying to suss out what exactly is an official act? what was he doing in his private capacity? so off it seems like we're we're going here. is that the court will likely set up some kind of test or parameters or the court will lay out how you figure that out, but then it sends the entire case b
it sounds private petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing blinken chord of a verification signed by petitioner that contain false allegations to support a challenge. >> sounds bright. >> three private actors to attorneys, including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and a coconspirator attorney directed...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> medicine petitioners have to collect 7200 signatures to get the city council to reconsider. city leaders will then have the choice of repealing the ordinance, or putting it on the november ballot to let voters decide, the california apartments association told us. it's not part of the petition, but it opposes rent control. new at 11 transit leaders in san mateo county are trying to cut off an alarming trend. rising attacks on bus drivers have samtrans cracking down, the transit agency says assaults on bus drivers more than tripled last year, compared to 2022. only 14 total. but it is concerning enough that samtrans is making changes. this past week, the board of directors approved a new code of conduct that could ban people for life if they attack a driver. >> we want to make sure that we are communicating with our public what our expectations are so that we can mitigate or minimize any of these kinds of instances nationwide, the federal government says attacks on transit workers quadrupled since 2009. >> pretty soon, uber eats customers in phoenix, arizona, will have a new
. >> medicine petitioners have to collect 7200 signatures to get the city council to reconsider. city leaders will then have the choice of repealing the ordinance, or putting it on the november ballot to let voters decide, the california apartments association told us. it's not part of the petition, but it opposes rent control. new at 11 transit leaders in san mateo county are trying to cut off an alarming trend. rising attacks on bus drivers have samtrans cracking down, the transit...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
mechanisms to contest the results in an election and outside the record, but i think of public knowledge, petitioner and his allies filed dozens of electoral challenges. >> trump lost those legal challenges to the 2020 election. end of june is the last we would hear from them. the latest we would hear from them. could be any time before that. >> dana: what are the top three things that could happen here? >> well, if the justices rule in favor of donald trump, we may not see a trial in washington, d.c. at all for attempts to try to overturn the 2020 election. if they rule against donald trump in some way, special counsel jack smith will move forward with his prosecution. the question is when that is going to happen because the judge paused the case in washington, d.c. while this went to the supreme court. so they need at least 2 1/2 months to get the engines back on to get things moving. the third thing, of course, it may go back down to the appeals level or trial level if the justices have some sort of piecemeal decision that further would delay things past the election and that's what trump's team
mechanisms to contest the results in an election and outside the record, but i think of public knowledge, petitioner and his allies filed dozens of electoral challenges. >> trump lost those legal challenges to the 2020 election. end of june is the last we would hear from them. the latest we would hear from them. could be any time before that. >> dana: what are the top three things that could happen here? >> well, if the justices rule in favor of donald trump, we may not see a...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
instead underscores the unprecedented nature of petitioners alleged conduct. this is, obviously it is written in a legal brief. i think it is an important, powerful message point that should be continued to be repeated. he is facing this despite what sherilyn just said, the supreme court should be arguing this because of his actions lisa, talk to me a little bit about that, why that was so important to include or whether you agree. >> it was hugely important to include in part because that is a principal argument on which donald trump has relied, that in our nations history, we have never seen a prosecution like this and you know that some of the superlatives that come out of his mouth, the hyperbole's, he is very fond of speaking in never before have we seen this or people always say, right? one of the things that he has incorporated into his legal filings is we have never seen anything like this before. so i think it was important for the special counsel to counter that and say we haven't seen this because nobody has acted in office like you have. and to you
instead underscores the unprecedented nature of petitioners alleged conduct. this is, obviously it is written in a legal brief. i think it is an important, powerful message point that should be continued to be repeated. he is facing this despite what sherilyn just said, the supreme court should be arguing this because of his actions lisa, talk to me a little bit about that, why that was so important to include or whether you agree. >> it was hugely important to include in part because...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
petitioner turned to a private attorney, willing to spread false claims of election fraud to spearhead his challenges to the election result. >> we dispute the allegation, but that sounds private. >> conspired with another private attorney. >> that also sounds private. >> three private actors, two ordinary reason attorneys including those mentioned above and a political consultant implemented a plan to about instruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and coconspirator directed that effort. >> i believe that is private. >> so those acts you would not dispute. they are private and you walledn't raise a claim? >> as characterized those were private acts. not official acts. that is conservative justice amy coney barrett. she is getting donald trump's lawyer to agree that a whole bunch of things that trump was indicted for in the january 6th federal case, a whole bunch of those things are things that could not possibly be construed to be the official actions of a president. now, justice barrett emerged from the arguments today as potentially the swing vote on this overall issue. m
petitioner turned to a private attorney, willing to spread false claims of election fraud to spearhead his challenges to the election result. >> we dispute the allegation, but that sounds private. >> conspired with another private attorney. >> that also sounds private. >> three private actors, two ordinary reason attorneys including those mentioned above and a political consultant implemented a plan to about instruct the certification proceeding and petitioner and...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the 90 people justices, he was known as the petitioner, asking them to grant him immunity from criminal prosecution. we can now add one more title to that list, unindicted co- conspirator. that is the title trump has been given in two cases brought against loyalists who allegedly participated in the effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election. the latest indictment comes out of arizona, attorney general christmas press charges against 18 people for their roles in that state speak electeds scheme. they include rudy giuliani, mark meadows, and other prominent trump allies and literally lawyers. the indictment alleges those 18 defendants "schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency to keep unindicted co-conspirator number one, donald trump, and office against the will of arizona's voters." that was dropped in the middle of a very busy newsweek for the president and his attorneys. at. trump's week began with opening statements on monday in his criminal trial in new york which was followed by the prosecution calling it's first witness. david pecker, over the course of fo
to the 90 people justices, he was known as the petitioner, asking them to grant him immunity from criminal prosecution. we can now add one more title to that list, unindicted co- conspirator. that is the title trump has been given in two cases brought against loyalists who allegedly participated in the effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election. the latest indictment comes out of arizona, attorney general christmas press charges against 18 people for their roles in that state speak...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
commander grimes, how is the cicp structured to ensure accessibility and fairness to petitioner's and how does this compare to vicp or even the traditional litigation system? >> thank you for that question. in the cicp we administer the program by statute . an individual we call a requester files a request for benefits and then must submit medical records to the cicp to show that there is compelling evidence to support it was directly caused by the user administration of a covered countermeasure. a covered countermeasure could be a covid-19 vaccine. it could be a smallpox vaccine. >> we will stay focused on covid-19. that's what our obligation is in this subcommittee. do you feel it is more appropriate to have commissioners for covid-19 fees to be paid by the manufacturer or the taxpayer? >> petitioner's are for the injury compensation program and those are through the routine administration with an excise tax levied on it were as the requesters for the cicp are paid for compensation of claims through appropriated funds and administration of the program is also paid for those appropri
commander grimes, how is the cicp structured to ensure accessibility and fairness to petitioner's and how does this compare to vicp or even the traditional litigation system? >> thank you for that question. in the cicp we administer the program by statute . an individual we call a requester files a request for benefits and then must submit medical records to the cicp to show that there is compelling evidence to support it was directly caused by the user administration of a covered...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that presidents are immune from criminal liability, it instead underscores the unprecedented nature of petitioner's alleged conduct." this is written in a legal brief, i think it is an important and powerful message point that should continue to be repeated. he is facing this, despite what sherrilyn just said. because of his actions. lisa, talk to me about that and why that was important lewd or whether you would create -- would agree it was important? >> it was, that a critical argument that trump has relied on. in our nations history, we have never seen a prosecution like this. and you know some of the hyperbole that come out of his mouth, he is fond of in, never before have we seen this. -- one of the things he is incorporated into his legal filings is, we have never seen anything like this before. it was important for the special counsel to counter that and say, we have not seen this because no one has acted in office like you have. to your point about the coming an important messaging tool, i have talked about how the political and legal appear to be collapsing in trump various cases. things t
that presidents are immune from criminal liability, it instead underscores the unprecedented nature of petitioner's alleged conduct." this is written in a legal brief, i think it is an important and powerful message point that should continue to be repeated. he is facing this, despite what sherrilyn just said. because of his actions. lisa, talk to me about that and why that was important lewd or whether you would create -- would agree it was important? >> it was, that a critical...
0
0.0
Apr 12, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
commander grimes, how is the cicp structured to ensure fairness to petitioners and how does this compare to the traditional litigation system? >> thank you for that question. we administer the program by statute. we call the requester, they file a request for benefits and then must submit article records to show that there is compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence to support that it was direct caused by the user administration of the covered countermeasure which could be the covid-19 that seen. could be a smallpox vaccine. >> let's stay focused on the covid-19 vaccine because that's what our obligation is in the select subcommittee. you feel it's more appropriate to have petitioners for covid- 19 claims to be paid by the vaccine manufacturer or by the american taxpayer? >> stationers are for the national vaccine injury compensation program and those are through the routine administer ration with an excise tax levied on it whereas requesters for the cicp are paid for compensated claims through appropriated funds and administration claims of the program is also paid f
commander grimes, how is the cicp structured to ensure fairness to petitioners and how does this compare to the traditional litigation system? >> thank you for that question. we administer the program by statute. we call the requester, they file a request for benefits and then must submit article records to show that there is compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence to support that it was direct caused by the user administration of the covered countermeasure which...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> i want to know if you agree or disagree about the characterization of these acts is private petitioner turned to a private attorney, was willing to spread knowingly, false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results private, dining we dispute the allegation, but sounds private. >> other justices it seemed wary of opening the door to prosecuting feature president's after leaving office, i'm not concerned about this case, but i am concerned about future uses of the criminal law to target political opponents based on accusations about their motives will that not lead us into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our country is a democracy. and we can look around the world and find countries where we have seen this process, where the loser gets thrown in jail. >> the justices appear poised to send this case back down to the lower courts for additional litigation. this point is unclear how long it will take the supreme court to make public its decision and how long additional litigation could take. >> so as of now, it's not clear if the former presiden
. >> i want to know if you agree or disagree about the characterization of these acts is private petitioner turned to a private attorney, was willing to spread knowingly, false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results private, dining we dispute the allegation, but sounds private. >> other justices it seemed wary of opening the door to prosecuting feature president's after leaving office, i'm not concerned about this case, but i am concerned about...
0
0.0
Apr 6, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in a number of the amicus briefs about instances in which the government and the private party say petitioners here and the government coordinating efforts. how would you respond to that? >> i think the position where -- we are offering here and that the position the court will consider next month and the mercy case are entirely consistent. we acknowledge that if the government actually coerces the platforms and takes over there editorial decision-making, the platform could be deemed a state actor and would be subject to first amendment scrutiny. we vigorously disputes that is actually happening in the federal government has engaged in a kind of coercive conduct and we dispute the legal standards that were applied in that case. there is no inherent tension here. the federal government can act and criticize the social media platform content moderation decisions using the bully pulpit to express views and at the state disagreed with how they were exercising their content moderation, they could have done the same by criticizing them are urging them or influence them to adopt a separate standard.
in a number of the amicus briefs about instances in which the government and the private party say petitioners here and the government coordinating efforts. how would you respond to that? >> i think the position where -- we are offering here and that the position the court will consider next month and the mercy case are entirely consistent. we acknowledge that if the government actually coerces the platforms and takes over there editorial decision-making, the platform could be deemed a...
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
RUSSIA1
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
not happen because speaker mike johnson did not have a free window on his calendar to meet with these petitioners from london, but this is the result of a conversation with trump. well, yes, yes, of course, and as we know, trump not so long ago invited mike johnson to his place, well, in general, he forced him to refuse to coordinate, that’s how... in some accelerated format, ukrainian tranches, well, of course yes, this firstly shows what attitude is towards cameron, well, a person not elected by anyone, and there with zero reputation, with zero ratings, that’s certainly very strange, as you rightly noted, to see a representative of an emissary of another country who comes to america telling the americans: you need to spend money in ukraine, because we have invested very much there, we have british interests there, here are your american billions for ours british interests must invest in making sure we do well. well, marjarie taylor greene, a trump supporter, back in february, was very correct and apt, she noted all these statements by cameron when he offered to basically kiss her ass, kitty
not happen because speaker mike johnson did not have a free window on his calendar to meet with these petitioners from london, but this is the result of a conversation with trump. well, yes, yes, of course, and as we know, trump not so long ago invited mike johnson to his place, well, in general, he forced him to refuse to coordinate, that’s how... in some accelerated format, ukrainian tranches, well, of course yes, this firstly shows what attitude is towards cameron, well, a person not...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice jackson: general, let me ask you to respond to a couple of things petitioners' counsel said and just give you the opportunity to respond. he suggested or said that you haven't identified a circumstance in which something that emtala requires idaho wouldn't allow. and i -- i didn't get a chance tosk him, but i took -- i took him to sort of mean that the way that idaho's statute operates, it basically allowfoa doctor to say, well, in my view, you know, th hlth-threatening circumstance could eventually lead to death, and so i'gog to do it. , to the extent that doctors are still able to do that, guess, he's saying there's no preemption. but is it true that there really isn't in operation a difference between the tw--he emtala and what ihoas required here? general prelogar: no. that is gravely mistaken on threlels. it's inconsistent with the actual text of the idaho law. it's inconsistent with medical reality. and it's inconsistent with what's happinon the ground. and this is a really important point, so let me try to unpack this. on theexitself, idaho's law only allows termination i
justice jackson: general, let me ask you to respond to a couple of things petitioners' counsel said and just give you the opportunity to respond. he suggested or said that you haven't identified a circumstance in which something that emtala requires idaho wouldn't allow. and i -- i didn't get a chance tosk him, but i took -- i took him to sort of mean that the way that idaho's statute operates, it basically allowfoa doctor to say, well, in my view, you know, th hlth-threatening circumstance...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of electors to obstruct the proceeding and the petitioner and co-conspirator attorney directed that effort. >> quickly i believe that is private. >> so those acts you would not dispute. those are private and you would not raise the claim? >> is characterized. >> is characterized those were private acts, not official acts. that is conservative justice amy coney barrett at the supreme court. she is getting from slayer to agree that a whole bunch of things trump was indicted for, all bunch of those things could not possibly be construed to be official actions of a president. now, justice barrett emerged from the arguments today as potentially the swing vote on this overall issue, maybe, which is crazy given how right- wing she is. out of all of the conservative justices she seemed like the one trying to work out a workable answer, like she might be persuadable by either camp. i think chief justice roberts was hard to read. justice barrett gave more indication than any other conservative justice that she might be thinking about where she will co
helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of electors to obstruct the proceeding and the petitioner and co-conspirator attorney directed that effort. >> quickly i believe that is private. >> so those acts you would not dispute. those are private and you would not raise the claim? >> is characterized. >> is characterized those were private acts, not official acts. that is conservative justice amy coney barrett at the supreme court. she is getting from slayer to...