0
0.0
Apr 15, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
pc and go before the united states supreme court because he thinks he is superior the supreme court and we got a real problem with this, judge. ever real problem with a lot of things having to do with this trial, including the da, because you got right aside the people that make muffed in killed all day long and he's sitting here all day with that ten or 12 prosecutors over nothing over nothing >> i'll >> say over what people say should be a trial. so i just want to thank you very much now i can go to my sentence graduation within i can't go to the the united states supreme court that i'm not in georgia or florida, or north carolina. karatay, like i should be. it's perfect for the radicals left democrats, that's exactly what they want. this is about election interference. that's all it's about thanking her
pc and go before the united states supreme court because he thinks he is superior the supreme court and we got a real problem with this, judge. ever real problem with a lot of things having to do with this trial, including the da, because you got right aside the people that make muffed in killed all day long and he's sitting here all day with that ten or 12 prosecutors over nothing over nothing >> i'll >> say over what people say should be a trial. so i just want to thank you very...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the supreme court. first off, supreme court justice thomas should behind anything near anything like this. we all know his wife backed the insurrection and it is just disgraceful. but that court, the lower court said that he is not -- that he cannot get presidential immunity. >> there is not absolute immunity. >> absolutely not. and there shouldn't be absolute immunity when they were discussing how it is personal or presidential. nothing he is doing is presidential. there is -- i keep hearing the word unprecedented. everything is unprecedented. i'm really tired of hearing that word. to me, that is an excuse, and there is no excuse for anything this man has done. he has treated the united states like it's his own personal bank account. i am so tired of hearing from anything from him and i told my husband, my worst nightmare is when he does not get elected this time because he still didn't get a second term, is he still going to run his mouth for the next four years, four more years of campaigning until g
to the supreme court. first off, supreme court justice thomas should behind anything near anything like this. we all know his wife backed the insurrection and it is just disgraceful. but that court, the lower court said that he is not -- that he cannot get presidential immunity. >> there is not absolute immunity. >> absolutely not. and there shouldn't be absolute immunity when they were discussing how it is personal or presidential. nothing he is doing is presidential. there is -- i...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court. so what do i mean by that? right i mean, so look at sort of some of the big things that have happened with the supreme in the last couple of years. you might have noticed there have been some ethical questions about behavior. some of the justices, many of the most sincere issues that have arisen related behavior that was in some cases, 15 or 20 years ago. why are we only learning about it now? because there's an entire press corps that covers the supreme court that never thought this was part of their job. right. to actually look at the justices personal behavior and that it took propublica and its reporting. when we look at sort of the supreme decisions. i suspect you guys have been following some of them lately. this is a it's relatively new for the court to be in the headlines every. right. and yet is. how did that happen? well, that actually happened because quietly. but gradually over the 20th century, congress gave and the court took more and more power over stuff no one cares a
the supreme court. so what do i mean by that? right i mean, so look at sort of some of the big things that have happened with the supreme in the last couple of years. you might have noticed there have been some ethical questions about behavior. some of the justices, many of the most sincere issues that have arisen related behavior that was in some cases, 15 or 20 years ago. why are we only learning about it now? because there's an entire press corps that covers the supreme court that never...
0
0.0
Apr 15, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
because he thinks -- supreme court, real problem with a lot of things happening -- having to do with this trial including the da because -- people are being mugged and killed all day long and i'm sitting here all they will not work 12 prosecutors over nothing. over what people say shouldn't be a trial. so i just want to thank you very much. i can go so it might -- to my sun's graduation or i can go to the united states supreme court, that are not in georgia or florida or north carolina, campaigning like i should be. it's perfect for the radical left them a cat scan that's exactly what they want. this is about election interference and that's all it's about. thank you very much. >> [indistinct question] >> neil: we always listen to see if there's anything more to add. this is a bit of news watch that donald j. trump said that it -- the judge would not allow him because of the
because he thinks -- supreme court, real problem with a lot of things happening -- having to do with this trial including the da because -- people are being mugged and killed all day long and i'm sitting here all they will not work 12 prosecutors over nothing. over what people say shouldn't be a trial. so i just want to thank you very much. i can go so it might -- to my sun's graduation or i can go to the united states supreme court, that are not in georgia or florida or north carolina,...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KPIX
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
trump wasn't at today's oral arguments at the supreme court. he was in a courtroom in lower manhattan, where he has mandated to appear for his trial for falsifying business records to hide an alleged affair. in addition, trump is facing criminal trials in georgia and florida, and in just the last 24 hours, trump was named as an unindicted coconspirator in arizona and michigan over fake electric schemes. we have team coverage of tod today's -- and jan crawford will start us off from the supreme court. >> reporter: in nearly three hours of historic arguments, the judges emphasized their decision will go beyond former president donald trump. >> whatever we decide is going to apply to all future presidents. >> reporter: no president has ever faced criminal prosecution, and some justices, while emphasizing a president is not above the law, focused on what precedent the case will set. >> the history tells us it is not going to stop. it's going to cycle back and be used against the current president or the next president, or the next president after t
trump wasn't at today's oral arguments at the supreme court. he was in a courtroom in lower manhattan, where he has mandated to appear for his trial for falsifying business records to hide an alleged affair. in addition, trump is facing criminal trials in georgia and florida, and in just the last 24 hours, trump was named as an unindicted coconspirator in arizona and michigan over fake electric schemes. we have team coverage of tod today's -- and jan crawford will start us off from the supreme...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
before the united states supreme court, because you think c is superior to the supreme court. we have a real problem with this judge, with a lot of things happening with this trial, including the da. he is sitting here all day with about 10 or 12 prosecutors over nothing. over what people say should not be a trial, so i want to thank you very much, but i cannot go to my son's graduation or i cannot go to the united states supreme court or i cannot go to georgia or florida or north carolina campaigning as i should be. it is perfect for the radical democrats. that is exactly what they want. this is about election interference.
before the united states supreme court, because you think c is superior to the supreme court. we have a real problem with this judge, with a lot of things happening with this trial, including the da. he is sitting here all day with about 10 or 12 prosecutors over nothing. over what people say should not be a trial, so i want to thank you very much, but i cannot go to my son's graduation or i cannot go to the united states supreme court or i cannot go to georgia or florida or north carolina...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so it's precedent setting in new york because it's the new york supreme court. it's may not be the law in other states. maybe we need a federal law that allows other victims to testify subject to cross examination. because of course, the, you know, every defendant is entitled to cross examine accusers, but to say that you have to have every single woman alone on the stand. with reasonable doubt is all that the prosecute and all that the defense has to show with some reasonable doubt. nobody else is there when you're getting raped, so not to allow the jury to know other women had the same experience with this same defendant is really wrong. i hope we can fix it with a law. is this going to have a chilling effect on the other sexual assault victims and their willingness to come forward into final charges? absolutely. victims of sexual violence all over the united states. and maybe the world are devastated by this ruling. and it makes it much harder to come forward and be alone. when you know there are other women who have been abused in the same way by the same ma
so it's precedent setting in new york because it's the new york supreme court. it's may not be the law in other states. maybe we need a federal law that allows other victims to testify subject to cross examination. because of course, the, you know, every defendant is entitled to cross examine accusers, but to say that you have to have every single woman alone on the stand. with reasonable doubt is all that the prosecute and all that the defense has to show with some reasonable doubt. nobody...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november spoke, he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he could destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution during, of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, it's kind of a, i guess, to restore or kind of keep him in power for however long he wants to be and brings you know, this really i think that is true, which would really attack uh the democracy as we know it right now in the united states. and if the court says he does not enjoy absolute community, where will this puts donald trump? now there is a, this big fear that it will take far too long before the core tier behind me makes the decision. some expect them not through before june. and that would basically mean uh that wouldn't be hold accountable and the strong termi
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november spoke, he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he could destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution during, of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, it's kind of a, i...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the us supreme court dean is good to see you. the, the focus of the trump trials has been on new york until today. now it's exactly where you are set the mood for is there. yeah, right. friends and you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are trump supporters of tribes to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards done by donald trump. to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying actually to, to otherwise present. so this is a very uploaded atmosphere here. there's a lot at stake, and that's what people told us who traveled to you a to washington to business this historic day. no, i don't know one's above the law in this country. i think there's numerous laws he's broken and i think he needs to pay for him and face the music of unity. that unity charges should be dropped because there are certain it
the us supreme court dean is good to see you. the, the focus of the trump trials has been on new york until today. now it's exactly where you are set the mood for is there. yeah, right. friends and you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are trump supporters of tribes to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards done by...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jimmy hoover, supreme talked abe argument at the supreme court today.
jimmy hoover, supreme talked abe argument at the supreme court today.
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
s. supreme court today begin here. we are arguments in unity case brought by former president donald trump. justices are deciding whether he can be prosecuted for conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election . trump argues former presidents can not be prosecuted for crimes allegedly committed while in office with trump back in court today at his hush money trial in new york, he complained about not being a proceedings for this even bigger case in washington, dc. i asked our washington bureau chief and his pull to set the mood for us at the supreme court. a yeah, right, friends and you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are a trump supporters. i tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards done by donald trump to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying ac
s. supreme court today begin here. we are arguments in unity case brought by former president donald trump. justices are deciding whether he can be prosecuted for conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election . trump argues former presidents can not be prosecuted for crimes allegedly committed while in office with trump back in court today at his hush money trial in new york, he complained about not being a proceedings for this even bigger case in washington, dc. i asked...
0
0.0
Apr 6, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the supreme court in particular. and that every year through the eighties, even through the nineties, under chief justice rehnquist and it continues for four years under john roberts and in thousand and nine, roberts stops he stops asking congress for anything because if you ask congress for stuff you, convey the message that actually congress give and congress can take away. and so to me, again, like the notion that the supreme court has the power of judicial review is not new. the notion that the court might abuse that power in ways that are deeply unpopular is not new. what is missing today are the bricks that actually used to keep the court not completely in line with public, but at least loosely in line with public opinion. and i think that's the real problem, that if we just look at the decisions the courts handed down, we tend to miss. i just want to add an anecdote of my own that supports what you said when chief justice warren got the court together to decide brown versus the board, he said no dissents and i
and the supreme court in particular. and that every year through the eighties, even through the nineties, under chief justice rehnquist and it continues for four years under john roberts and in thousand and nine, roberts stops he stops asking congress for anything because if you ask congress for stuff you, convey the message that actually congress give and congress can take away. and so to me, again, like the notion that the supreme court has the power of judicial review is not new. the notion...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
s. supreme court. yeah, right. brendan's, you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are trump supporters. i tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 20, the 21 day of feeding cards done by donald trump to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying actually to, to the wife present. so this is a very uploaded atmosphere here. there's a lot at stake, and that's what people told us who traveled to you. uh, to washington, to business this historic day. i don't know, i don't know one's above the law in this country. i think there's numerous laws he's broken and i think he needs to pay for him and face the music of unity. immunity charge. it should be dropped because there are certain to say without uh, just completely wiping the other side charges that are against him. um, yes, it should be a k
s. supreme court. yeah, right. brendan's, you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are trump supporters. i tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 20, the 21 day of feeding cards done by donald trump to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying actually to, to the wife present....
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november, i suppose he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he codes a destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution. dream. of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open a like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, his kind of a i guess, to restore or kind of keep him in power for however long he wants to be and friends . you know, this really i think that is true, which would really attack the democracy as we know, it's right now in the united states. and if the court says he does not enjoy absolute immunity, wearable this puts donald trump. now there is a, this big fear that it will take far too long before the core tear behind me makes the decision some expect to not through before june. and that would basically mean uh that wouldn't be hold accountable and discount crim
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november, i suppose he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he codes a destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution. dream. of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open a like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, his kind of...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KNTV
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
supreme court today as the nine justices spent nearly three hours wrangling with lawyers over questions of when or whether a former american president is immune from federal prosecution over acts while taken in office. the questions raised during oral arguments are more than academic. but instead sit at the center of a special counsel's criminal election interference case against former president trump, and whether a trial can happen before the november election. mr. trump claims absolute immunity from prosecution, something the court didn't seem inclined to go along with, yet conservatives on the court sharply questioned the special counsel's position as well. none of that stopping the new york hush money trial, which continued today for mr. trump as the key witness testified for a third day. laura jarrett has details. >> reporter: tonight, the u.s. supreme court weighing a monumental question that will decide whether the former president goes to trial for plotting to overturn the last election and win. >> i think that the supreme court has very important arguments before it today. >>
supreme court today as the nine justices spent nearly three hours wrangling with lawyers over questions of when or whether a former american president is immune from federal prosecution over acts while taken in office. the questions raised during oral arguments are more than academic. but instead sit at the center of a special counsel's criminal election interference case against former president trump, and whether a trial can happen before the november election. mr. trump claims absolute...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 6
supreme court. just yesterday, the folks of the nation at the supreme court yesterday. will be back there again today. and we're hearing your thoughts on the immunity case that will be argued in three hours from now. don in california, a republican, good morning. caller: hi. good morning. thanks for the call tell supreme court should not even taken up this case. two courts who have already turned down the immunity clause. clarence thomas should be excused. his wife was involved in overthrowing the 2020 election. he shouldn't even be involved. but donald trump, this is -- you know, they're just playing his fate but i wish his base would listen to the court transcript in new york. david becker, "national inquirer," "the globe," american media enterprise, he intentionally said they intentionally produce fake news. this is what donald trump runs ground on. everybody else is fake news and all of his forcing is fake news. david becker admitted. it was all fake. fox news in -- we've got to stop these guys.
supreme court. just yesterday, the folks of the nation at the supreme court yesterday. will be back there again today. and we're hearing your thoughts on the immunity case that will be argued in three hours from now. don in california, a republican, good morning. caller: hi. good morning. thanks for the call tell supreme court should not even taken up this case. two courts who have already turned down the immunity clause. clarence thomas should be excused. his wife was involved in overthrowing...
0
0.0
Apr 15, 2024
04/24
by
KGO
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
supreme court, but the judge saying, being a criminal defendant on trial in new york is also a big deal. he wants him here. this kind of conflict, david, was bound to happen. trump's courthouse appearances now fully woven into his political strategy, and david, his campaign is winding from one
supreme court, but the judge saying, being a criminal defendant on trial in new york is also a big deal. he wants him here. this kind of conflict, david, was bound to happen. trump's courthouse appearances now fully woven into his political strategy, and david, his campaign is winding from one
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court said no. what about the supreme court doesn't mr. biden not understand i don't get it. >> it is so offensive to tennesseans and to all americans, when joe biden will stand up and start railing against the supreme court. and say, it doesn't matter what they say. i'm going to do what i want to do. and you know, larry, people look at this and say, wire tired of two-tiers of justice, two-tiers of access. two-tiers of treatment, they know that joe biden this president, is openly defying supreme court. when the supreme court has spoken. and said mr. president, you cannot do this. and for him to say, i'll do it and way is so wrong it is one of the reasons people are tired of joe biden and his antics. larry: i thought he was the the president and defense of democracy, and defense of the constitution. i mean to me, that is an opening you know as wide as a truck, he should be criticized and held accountable. she probably violating as you have said, violating the constitution on the border, and violating constitution with his regulatory state.
supreme court said no. what about the supreme court doesn't mr. biden not understand i don't get it. >> it is so offensive to tennesseans and to all americans, when joe biden will stand up and start railing against the supreme court. and say, it doesn't matter what they say. i'm going to do what i want to do. and you know, larry, people look at this and say, wire tired of two-tiers of justice, two-tiers of access. two-tiers of treatment, they know that joe biden this president, is openly...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KGO
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
at the supreme court, the former president's case testing the boundaries of presidential power. trump's lawyers arguing he has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. lawyers for special counsel jack smith, who is prosecuting trump for those efforts, arguing that presidents are not above the law if they commit crimes. the justices acknowledging the case before them is not just about former president donald trump, but also about future presidents and the presidency itself. one critical question they're considering, whether a president can have immunity for an official act, but not his private conduct. abc's terry moran leads us off at the supreme court. >> reporter: at the heart of this case, donald trump's unprecedented claim. his lawyer telling the justices that presidents can never face criminal prosecution for anything they do in office that can be linked to their official duties. absolute immunity. >> without presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, there can be no presidency as we know it. >> reporter: the sheer ma
at the supreme court, the former president's case testing the boundaries of presidential power. trump's lawyers arguing he has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. lawyers for special counsel jack smith, who is prosecuting trump for those efforts, arguing that presidents are not above the law if they commit crimes. the justices acknowledging the case before them is not just about former president donald trump, but also about future...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he is the justice of the supreme court. do you know who determines who the justices government the 12 of you. you determined the al qaeda -- outcome of the case. >> that might compromise him in office. if he is walking in the white house and we think he is doing official business but he's doing hush money business, aren't there all sorts of questions like how else has he potentially compromised. >> you can say that about bill clinton whom i think was a great president? and china we had on his mind. >> i don't know if every politician is but to get to that level, yeah, there is something in your background. i don't think stormy daniels is the worst thing he did. there's probably more things he need to cover up than this. this is the issue of the moment. >> we will take a short break and i want to talk about a hostage in gonzaga. his parents have not gotten any word whether he was alive or not. finally think have a proof of life video and we will talk to them next. >> for more than six months they have the best they can in a
he is the justice of the supreme court. do you know who determines who the justices government the 12 of you. you determined the al qaeda -- outcome of the case. >> that might compromise him in office. if he is walking in the white house and we think he is doing official business but he's doing hush money business, aren't there all sorts of questions like how else has he potentially compromised. >> you can say that about bill clinton whom i think was a great president? and china we...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KGO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now, the biggest of trump's court cases today was at the supreme court, where the justices heard three hours of oral arguments over whether donald trump is immune from prosecution in the case, accusing him of plotting to overturn the 2020 election. the court's ruling will have implications not just for this november's presidential race, but for future presidents to come. joining us live now to analyze today's developments, uc law, san francisco's sullivan professor of law, david levine. professor levine, thanks for joining us. >> anytime, kristin, thanks for inviting me. >> all right. a lot to talk about. the supreme court heard trump's claim, of course, that the federal charges brought by special counsel jack smith, accusing him of plotting to overturn the 2020 election must be thrown out because he is immune, because he was president. what is that based on, nothing. it's not in the constitution. and no president has ever asserted this before, so it's, and it's been rejected soundly by two lower courts, by the trial judge in that case, as well as by three judges of the district of col
now, the biggest of trump's court cases today was at the supreme court, where the justices heard three hours of oral arguments over whether donald trump is immune from prosecution in the case, accusing him of plotting to overturn the 2020 election. the court's ruling will have implications not just for this november's presidential race, but for future presidents to come. joining us live now to analyze today's developments, uc law, san francisco's sullivan professor of law, david levine....
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
were trained to believe in the impartiality of the courts and especially the supreme court. but it's tough to do today. it doesn't look like they look like partisan hacks. i'm sorry and it's a great concern to me. a great concern to the president haitian of our democracy that we couldn't actually get a trial of someone who tried to overturn the election before the next election is preposterous. >> so in defense of justice, amy coney barrett, i will say i mean, she did get trump's attorney to concede that several all of the accusations against trump in the special counsel's indictment did not constitute official conduct. and in fact, we're personal acts. does that not at least exempt amy coney barrett from your charge of partisan hackery well well, here's my hope. my hope is i'm wrong my hope is that they dismissed the stay that they decide the case before them, that overturning the constitution cannot be an official act. and let the trial to proceed. i would love to be wrong on this, but i'm i'm very concerned about what it looks like. they're going to do justice gorsuch sai
were trained to believe in the impartiality of the courts and especially the supreme court. but it's tough to do today. it doesn't look like they look like partisan hacks. i'm sorry and it's a great concern to me. a great concern to the president haitian of our democracy that we couldn't actually get a trial of someone who tried to overturn the election before the next election is preposterous. >> so in defense of justice, amy coney barrett, i will say i mean, she did get trump's attorney...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
by the supreme court. and it is a testament to how reckless this supreme court has become, how unpredictable, how far out of the mainstream it has become that the special counsel felt it was incumbent upon him to create backstops, to create secondary and tertiary positions because he could not trust that a majority of this supreme court would do what every other clear, saying jurist action, not in a political contest but acting in a pure legal contest with no had to be true, that our system of government was not created to ensure that one man would lack accountability, could rise to the highest level of government in our country and that would then constitute a cloak of impunity. this is just simply not, at odds with the very concept of our country. that is king george. and so this should have been a slam dunk, the fact that even jack smith clearly is concerned that given the supreme court, it might not be a slamdunk, made me very uneasy reading this filing. >> that is such an important point. this is a th
by the supreme court. and it is a testament to how reckless this supreme court has become, how unpredictable, how far out of the mainstream it has become that the special counsel felt it was incumbent upon him to create backstops, to create secondary and tertiary positions because he could not trust that a majority of this supreme court would do what every other clear, saying jurist action, not in a political contest but acting in a pure legal contest with no had to be true, that our system of...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
uh, a supreme court be appealed. it can be and what will happen is now there's going to be a whole new set of rules write a whole new trial. the women who testified it in the case may be allowed to testify . again, if they choose to do so, which you know, it's opening up a whole new bag of trauma and everything else. what i also feel is going to be really interesting is if lines the will take the stand himself. there were rumors that he was going to take the stand and the new york case and against, against his lawyers opinion. they decided to say, hey, like, let's just let this play out the way it is. but have weinstein takes the case. i think it's going to be very difficult for him to get on the stand and say, look, you know, these women wanted it and this is what happened in the hotel rooms and in my office and whatever else. and you know, the green rooms, wherever i. okay. and then it was consensual, that's a very difficult, you know, mountain decline. but that is until the next trial. and what happens until then
uh, a supreme court be appealed. it can be and what will happen is now there's going to be a whole new set of rules write a whole new trial. the women who testified it in the case may be allowed to testify . again, if they choose to do so, which you know, it's opening up a whole new bag of trauma and everything else. what i also feel is going to be really interesting is if lines the will take the stand himself. there were rumors that he was going to take the stand and the new york case and...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 4
it says he seems likely to win at least partial victory from the supreme court if his effort to avoid prosecution -- in his effort to avoid prosecution. a clear rejection of his theory of immunity would allow the january 6 trial to resume but it seemed to be the least likely outcome. a majority of justices seemed inclined to rule that presidents must have at least some protection from criminal charges but not necessarily the absolute immunity trump is seeking. the most likely outcome might be for the high court to punt, perhaps kicking the case back to lower courts. that would still be a victory for trump, who has sought to delay trial until after inauguration day in 2025. his lawyer, john sawyer, told the justices a former president could not face criminal charges even if he had a political rival assassinated unless he had been impeached and convicted by the senate. list take a look at john sawyer delivering a portion of his opening remarks yesterday. [video clip] >> without presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, there can be no presidency. for 234 years of american history
it says he seems likely to win at least partial victory from the supreme court if his effort to avoid prosecution -- in his effort to avoid prosecution. a clear rejection of his theory of immunity would allow the january 6 trial to resume but it seemed to be the least likely outcome. a majority of justices seemed inclined to rule that presidents must have at least some protection from criminal charges but not necessarily the absolute immunity trump is seeking. the most likely outcome might be...
54
54
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 54
favorite 0
quote 1
supreme court and this is it's unfortunate. that's a summary for you, gillian, as we move along with our show now. >> gillian: thank you. let's bring in criminal defense attorney jonna spilbor to talk more about this very important case in new york supreme court. the jury will decide whether trump is guilty or innocent. he is well aware of the fact that he is on trial before the nation and that's why we saw him do some campaigning outside the court today and why we saw him do more campaigning now inside the court. he opened by talking about the ways in which he thinks president biden has fallen short. >> it really is genius the way he is using a felony criminal trial to continue to campaign despite in particular this judge trying to shut him up and keep him off the campaign trail with all of the decisions that he has made so far that he has to be sitting at defense table, he can't go to the supreme court, etc. the gag order, the invalid, unconstitutional gag order which is the first order of business today. i don't mean to be f
supreme court and this is it's unfortunate. that's a summary for you, gillian, as we move along with our show now. >> gillian: thank you. let's bring in criminal defense attorney jonna spilbor to talk more about this very important case in new york supreme court. the jury will decide whether trump is guilty or innocent. he is well aware of the fact that he is on trial before the nation and that's why we saw him do some campaigning outside the court today and why we saw him do more...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ken dilanian live outside the supreme court. also with us, ari melber, and state attorney for palm beach county, florida, dave aronberg is with us. >> what are you expecting to hear at the court today? >> reporter: good morning. it's important to point out that the court has already made a decision that's affected the presidential election. by not agreeing to take it up when jack smith first asked them to do so on an emergency basis and by not taking it on an expedited basis, they've already created a significant delay here that means that this election case, however they rule, can't go to trial probably before the fall. now the question of whether a president has absolute immunity and then there's a second question that whether anything donald trump is accused of would constitute a presidential act. >> just making sure you're okay. is everything okay. we hear someone yelling. >> reporter: it's fine. we have a heckler here. >> i've got to say they obviously have been following the david pecker testimony. they're yelling "fake ne
ken dilanian live outside the supreme court. also with us, ari melber, and state attorney for palm beach county, florida, dave aronberg is with us. >> what are you expecting to hear at the court today? >> reporter: good morning. it's important to point out that the court has already made a decision that's affected the presidential election. by not agreeing to take it up when jack smith first asked them to do so on an emergency basis and by not taking it on an expedited basis,...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court is off to all. it's really just a couple of 100 meters away from the capital just across the street for january 6th to place the riots which were encouraged by donald trump officer. all. so everything is really, i know, very close spots here today, and there's historic day in the history of the united states and a book for the main. if a trump uh, we use the case and also the next presidency as well. it's very unlikely that he's really uh when the case, but critics say that you know, way already a wanted why? because uh, the see the supreme court to good on and i believe that the court ruling will be further. the lights are delayed and very likely it will not happen before the election and prayers in case you read, elected people become the next president again, then we of course, would try to do any signature stopped at these cases against him and kind of make it impossible that she will be held accountable for what you did. sure. this 1st as easy as i know it's really hard because the somebody is
the supreme court is off to all. it's really just a couple of 100 meters away from the capital just across the street for january 6th to place the riots which were encouraged by donald trump officer. all. so everything is really, i know, very close spots here today, and there's historic day in the history of the united states and a book for the main. if a trump uh, we use the case and also the next presidency as well. it's very unlikely that he's really uh when the case, but critics say that...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gets on the supreme court itself. in 2016, which macconnell invented a rule that the senate cannot consider a supreme court nomination in an election year. that completely made up maneuver stopped president obama's nomination of merrick garland and politicized the court even further. the term presidency then saw, incredibly, three supreme court vacancies during one presidential term, allowing the most legally dubious president of the modern era, the ability to submit -- cement the court's conservative majority. for the third trump employee, amy coney barrett, mitch mcconnell entirely forgot about his rule against nominations. this conservative majority has already taken away abortion- rights with the dobbs decision and may not stop there. then, there is what we've heard from the conservative justices, yesterday. >> the only words in the constitution is that, that have to do with the president of the law is that "he shall take care that the lobby faithfully executed." correct? it's hard to imagine that a president who
gets on the supreme court itself. in 2016, which macconnell invented a rule that the senate cannot consider a supreme court nomination in an election year. that completely made up maneuver stopped president obama's nomination of merrick garland and politicized the court even further. the term presidency then saw, incredibly, three supreme court vacancies during one presidential term, allowing the most legally dubious president of the modern era, the ability to submit -- cement the court's...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court today. justices are considering whether doctors should be able to provide abortions in medical emergencies even in states with near-total bans on abortion. joining me now live is san jose state university associate professor grace howard. thank you for joining us today. >> thank you for having me. >> how do you think the outcome of the court's decision will impact abortion access in this country? is it possible that if they do rule a woman can get an abortion if it is a matter of life and death, could have potentially open the door to soft in the restrictions in the states with the strictest laws? >> it would only soften restrictions in terms of the exception that have been put in place. for example, in idaho, they have exceptions if your life is in peril but not of your help is in peril. that is something that they were debating today. the court ruled that impala does supersede state law. people in idaho would be able to have abortions if their health is in peril. they don't necessarily nee
supreme court today. justices are considering whether doctors should be able to provide abortions in medical emergencies even in states with near-total bans on abortion. joining me now live is san jose state university associate professor grace howard. thank you for joining us today. >> thank you for having me. >> how do you think the outcome of the court's decision will impact abortion access in this country? is it possible that if they do rule a woman can get an abortion if it is...