what is your take on this so briana, i respect jim. we were colleagues at doj. i disagree on the presidential records act itself as a defense in this case for two main reasons. the first reason is the facts. there is zero evidence from donald trump, from anyone around him that he ever actually designated these records as personal and i think notably, none of his lawyers have ever represented to a court that he actually designated these documents as personal. and i heard jim say, well, there's not a procedure for that, but you have to do something. there would be some evidence of that, and then separately, i think there's a legal problem with it, which is first of all, a president cannot designate any records he wants as personally cannot designate highly sensitive military documents, national security documents, as personal, and take them. and finally, even if he could eat, doesn't trump no pun intended. it doesn't overcome the criminal law against retaining sensitive national security information. so even if this gets to be a defense at trial, i think there's n