0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
defend the constitution of the united states of america. i actually made some comments a couple of them. one in particular, made some comments and seemed to suggest that maybe it doesn't think all that much of the 1st amendment. maybe it's not so important. after all, you know, they were hearing a case on whether the government, the bottom and ministration in this particular case has the right to make media companies take down information that it thinks is dangerous or doesn't agree with that comment. for example, can people post negatively about vaccinations because they don't believe in them? or should the government have a ride to go in there and say, nope, can do that. have a right to prevent them from doing so for the public. good. here's justice could tony brown, jackson, member of the us supreme court seeming to suggest that maybe maybe we ought to push freedom speech aside in, in, in some cases. so my biggest concern is that your view has the 1st amendment, ham, stringing the government in significant ways in the most important time
defend the constitution of the united states of america. i actually made some comments a couple of them. one in particular, made some comments and seemed to suggest that maybe it doesn't think all that much of the 1st amendment. maybe it's not so important. after all, you know, they were hearing a case on whether the government, the bottom and ministration in this particular case has the right to make media companies take down information that it thinks is dangerous or doesn't agree with that...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
number one, why is the supreme court saying, donald trump must be on all the ballots in the united states? number 2, why didn't do it? why did his kid hulu classified us more documents and just got 16 years in prison? why did they do it? and number 3, president of the united states now says he's a big fan of people who criticize the government. who's he talking about? are you ready? this is direct impact. the finally, it's in the decision as to whether donald trump can be excluded pushed out from the ballots. in some states is in, and we've learned that it was a 9 to nothing decision ruling that donald trump can be on. the ballad in colorado and other states, eastern justices during the oral argument, seemed very skeptical of the idea that one state could decide for the nation whether donald trump was an insurrection to us and was therefore disqualified under this 150 year old provision. so so, so let me take you through it a little bit. so what the court is saying essentially, is that if the president is to be excluded from for past actions, from an election, no matter how bad those acti
number one, why is the supreme court saying, donald trump must be on all the ballots in the united states? number 2, why didn't do it? why did his kid hulu classified us more documents and just got 16 years in prison? why did they do it? and number 3, president of the united states now says he's a big fan of people who criticize the government. who's he talking about? are you ready? this is direct impact. the finally, it's in the decision as to whether donald trump can be excluded pushed out...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the united states, actually made some comments that seem to suggest that maybe it doesn't think all that much of the 1st amendment of the constitution. yours just eschatology, brown, jackson, seeming to suggest that maybe we ought to push freedom of speech. you know, maybe it ain't that important in some cases. so my biggest concern is that your view has the 1st amendment ham stringing the government in significant ways. in the most important time periods, i mean what, what, what would you have the government do? i've heard you say a couple of times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, um, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it. is not going to get it done. i think i'm a journalist. i was trained as a journalist. it's all i know it's all i've ever done in my job drop. when i listen to this, i want to hear which one of you guys want to want to go on. it wanted to take the 1st crack of this thing. what do you think? well, she's doing the job. she's been sent there to do. huh. the empire is in serious trouble. and well, let me, let me take a step
the united states, actually made some comments that seem to suggest that maybe it doesn't think all that much of the 1st amendment of the constitution. yours just eschatology, brown, jackson, seeming to suggest that maybe we ought to push freedom of speech. you know, maybe it ain't that important in some cases. so my biggest concern is that your view has the 1st amendment ham stringing the government in significant ways. in the most important time periods, i mean what, what, what would you have...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
all right, we were talking just a moment to go about the 1st amendment of the united states of america and something else happened this week happening to do it. the 1st amendment this week, the supreme court, whose job it is by the way to interpret and in essence defend the constitution of the united states actually made some comments that seem to suggest that maybe it doesn't think of. busy that much of the 1st amendment of the constitution, yours just as good times you brown jackson, seeming to suggest that maybe we ought to push freedom of speech. you know, maybe it ain't that important in some cases. so my biggest concern is that your view has the 1st amendment, ham, stringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods. i mean what we, what would you have the government do? i've heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, um, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it is not going to get it done. i am a journalist, i was trained as a journalist. it's all i know it's all i've ever done in my job drop
all right, we were talking just a moment to go about the 1st amendment of the united states of america and something else happened this week happening to do it. the 1st amendment this week, the supreme court, whose job it is by the way to interpret and in essence defend the constitution of the united states actually made some comments that seem to suggest that maybe it doesn't think of. busy that much of the 1st amendment of the constitution, yours just as good times you brown jackson, seeming...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now there's a lot of talk in the united states, certainly on the last gentleman that uh, this is a supreme court that's bought and sold bess. donald trump's supreme court. it's a conservative court judge course they were going to put donald trump on the court on, on the balance, despite the fact that he's a quote unquote insurrection is okay. argument accepted, not, i'm not an unpopular argument, a fair argument, but here's the problem. and where i tend to side with this particular supreme court decision. i said earlier in the week on one of our newscasts, if you allow one stay to side or decide. cool is allowed to run in that state. then what will have, i fear in the future is a case where if you have 25 republican states, yep. you're going to have $25.00 states where the democrat is not allowed to run. and if you have $25.00 democrats states, you're going to have $25.00 states where the republic is not going to be allowed to run. and that will, will really create hell in this process, the high opinion, what do you, what do you said, really? i mean, it to be fair, it's one of the argument
now there's a lot of talk in the united states, certainly on the last gentleman that uh, this is a supreme court that's bought and sold bess. donald trump's supreme court. it's a conservative court judge course they were going to put donald trump on the court on, on the balance, despite the fact that he's a quote unquote insurrection is okay. argument accepted, not, i'm not an unpopular argument, a fair argument, but here's the problem. and where i tend to side with this particular supreme...