great-granddaughter says that , that he didn’t sign anything, she ’s simply not aware, a professor at columbia university to the sources, of making this decision, since the list of members of the presidium at that time was 38 people, and only 15 were present, that is, this meeting did not have the right to make any legally significant decision, based on, in fact, a fraudulent legal decision. true, he spoke about this in the context of sevastopol, which was, when crimea was transferred, sevastopol was not part of crimea, so the transfer of sevastopol had no legal basis at all, but this also applied to the entire decision to transfer crimea by the supreme councils, that’s what our president said, vladimir putin. sevastopol has always been legally part of russia; it was a city of central subordination. not that, but they really laid a mine, here it is legally committed, a violation of all three constitutions was committed, in fact, illegal, illegality, it is obvious, but if crimea was transferred to ukraine, as a result of a crime committed, a violation of three constitutions, by bodies that we