0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jackson on the supreme court. thank you. joe biden they built the refugee program now was designated by his predecessor and brought together a coalition of world leaders to stop russian aggression in ukraine. thank you, joe biden we're standing here in the martin luther king recreation center for children. >> as family members who lost her partner let us not forget that president biden has always advocated for the rights of people to live to play, and to go to school in communities, free of gun by lins. he signed the most significant bipartisan gun safety legislation in 30 years. thank you. joe biden donald trump proudly brags about overturning roe v. wade ruling black back the clock 50 years to when women couldn't make our own healthcare decisions president biden is fighting to get our freedoms back. thank you, joe biden this is only part of the very lung list to freedoms and rights that president biden is protecting during a period of constant assault make no mistake. >> all these rights and freedom, so on the b
jackson on the supreme court. thank you. joe biden they built the refugee program now was designated by his predecessor and brought together a coalition of world leaders to stop russian aggression in ukraine. thank you, joe biden we're standing here in the martin luther king recreation center for children. >> as family members who lost her partner let us not forget that president biden has always advocated for the rights of people to live to play, and to go to school in communities, free...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, jackson and gorsuch having an alliance. i just don't think it's as all that monolithic at the same time by all means, if the democrats want to spend a lot of time having confirmation battle in the senate i'm not sure it's the highest best use dime of media exposure and arguments, but no skin off my nose. >> but what is your essential arguments? so first of all, i don't think that model >> nothing i say in the piece actually, currently you're able to get some 5-4 wins for progressive causes. >> doesn't happen. you have six, three ones at doesn't happen othis, but th n'happen under sen t myorry iseve, i ha ptsd he from 2020, i think the democrats didn'arn leons. look, what are we talking about tion rhts? how did that happen? dobbs, how did the florida desion happened day? desantis appointed five of the seven judges republins are very >> good at stacking. courts e getting their peoplen courts at stinking strategically about filling courts. democrats i'm very good at seeing the power of the supremeourt. and that's why i worry.
, jackson and gorsuch having an alliance. i just don't think it's as all that monolithic at the same time by all means, if the democrats want to spend a lot of time having confirmation battle in the senate i'm not sure it's the highest best use dime of media exposure and arguments, but no skin off my nose. >> but what is your essential arguments? so first of all, i don't think that model >> nothing i say in the piece actually, currently you're able to get some 5-4 wins for...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, jackson raising concerns about presidential power without limits, you seem to be worried about the president being chilled. i think that we would have i have a really significant opposite problem if the president wasn't chilled, i'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the oval office into the seat of criminal activity in this country and asking, why then did former president nixon need a pardon after he left office? >> what was up with the pardon for president nixon i think if everybody thought that presidents couldn't be prosecuted than what was that about? >> justice? amy coney barrett, who could be a swing vote that decides the case, getting trump's attorney to concede that some of trump's alleged actions were not part of his duties as president and would not be protected under an immunity claim. >> i want to know if you agree or disagree about the characterization of these acts is private petitioner turned to a private attorney, was willing to spread knowingly, false claims of election fraud to spearhead is challenges to the election results private, dini
, jackson raising concerns about presidential power without limits, you seem to be worried about the president being chilled. i think that we would have i have a really significant opposite problem if the president wasn't chilled, i'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the oval office into the seat of criminal activity in this country and asking, why then did former president nixon need a pardon after he left office? >> what was up with the pardon for president...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so the newest justice, ketanji brown, jackson had this warning if the court ultimately finds that presidents do have abs immunity, take a listen if someone with those kinds of powers, the most powerful person in the world with the greatest amount of authority could go into office knowing that there would be no potential penalty for committing crimes. >> i'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the oval office into the seat of criminal activity in this country. >> so gym, if a president does have absolute immunity, what incentive might the president have for following the law other than the honor system and is good grace. and wouldn't it essentially just state that the president is above the law? >> yes. is the answer that but i do agree with the points that were made earlier and i think it's important to note that the core powers of the presidency, and there are protections there for the core powers of the presidency. and i think that's an important important point that was just made. i also think it's important to note that the office of legal counsel, they've referred
so the newest justice, ketanji brown, jackson had this warning if the court ultimately finds that presidents do have abs immunity, take a listen if someone with those kinds of powers, the most powerful person in the world with the greatest amount of authority could go into office knowing that there would be no potential penalty for committing crimes. >> i'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the oval office into the seat of criminal activity in this country....
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jackson is very significantright? this isn't just a left-right split. that wsaw onoth sides. ism >> that's ght. and that happens ofteim when we' talking out defendant's rights that it cuts across ideological boundaries, and that the justices and they expressed it today as we just saw, are concerned turn that the law may have been interpreted to broadly and that they want to interpret the law if there's ambiguity in favor of a defendant, there's even a canon of construction the way you're supposed to interpret certain laws is in favor of the defendant. if there's that kind of ambiguity and they both were pressing on that issue. >> all so here's the thing half of jack smith's charges against trump in the election interference case use the same statute. if it gets struck down here, not only does have huge implications for the defendants in january 6, you'll hundreds of people have been charged some have said this could be disastrous for jack smith when it comes to trump himself. what do you say? >> so do think it will be
jackson is very significantright? this isn't just a left-right split. that wsaw onoth sides. ism >> that's ght. and that happens ofteim when we' talking out defendant's rights that it cuts across ideological boundaries, and that the justices and they expressed it today as we just saw, are concerned turn that the law may have been interpreted to broadly and that they want to interpret the law if there's ambiguity in favor of a defendant, there's even a canon of construction the way you're...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
was going to come up at some point, but this is how trump's attorney responded when justice congee brown jackson raised this question about president nixon what was up with a pardon for president nixon i think if everybody thought that presidents couldn't be prosecuted than what was that about? well, he was under investigation, froze private in public conduct at the time john, given that, i wonder what you made of how just over ten minutes after that trump's attorney also acknowledged that that allegation by jack smith and that indictment includes both private and official acts my reaction was that there's a very thin read there for them to draw upon ford clearly thought president ford clearly thought that nixon could be prosecuted. >> and deed. he thought he was getting confession from nixon when he issued the pardon, he actually had carried around in his, in his pocketbook are in his wallet, a site of a case that said in essence by the supreme court that acceptance of a pardon was admission of guilt. so the whole assumption back then was that presidents had no immunity. they it could n
was going to come up at some point, but this is how trump's attorney responded when justice congee brown jackson raised this question about president nixon what was up with a pardon for president nixon i think if everybody thought that presidents couldn't be prosecuted than what was that about? well, he was under investigation, froze private in public conduct at the time john, given that, i wonder what you made of how just over ten minutes after that trump's attorney also acknowledged that that...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> so do you disagree with justice ketanji brown, jackson who said what you're arguing could allow the seat of the presidency to become where you can act with impunity that any criminal act couldn't happen because you have nothing to fear, no prosecutor, we believe immunity is inherent in the constitutional design, so that's the system we've been operating under for hundreds of years and it's not actually in the constitution we believe that immunity naturally follows from the constitution the same way that civil immunity, which isn't written in the constitution naturally follows from our constitutional system. >> and that was recognized by the court and nixon be fitzgerald in 1982, what is it victory here? >> is it the supreme court embracing your argument on total immunity or is it just sending get back to the lower court and therefore, delaying the january 6 trial from happening before the 2024 election. >> we think it's very important for the future of the presidency, for the court to embrace a vigorous doctrine of presidential immunity in the criminal context. so that's what vi
. >> so do you disagree with justice ketanji brown, jackson who said what you're arguing could allow the seat of the presidency to become where you can act with impunity that any criminal act couldn't happen because you have nothing to fear, no prosecutor, we believe immunity is inherent in the constitutional design, so that's the system we've been operating under for hundreds of years and it's not actually in the constitution we believe that immunity naturally follows from the...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, jackson going over some of these arguments with jeffrey green, a lawyer for one of those defendants, and i'm back out here with paula reid and shan wu fascinating case. obviously lots of implications for all of those january 6 defendants, possibly for the former president and all of this, but now one of the things that we jumped on this as soon as we came on the air with as paul on that is clarence thomas yesterday was missing missing an action yesterday. we didn't really get a clear explanation as to what was going on. >> he is back today and a shan was noting as we're watching this, you couldn't see us. >> we're off camera at that point. >> he was pretty active there yeah, he clearly making a point. >> right. because as we said before the argument started, the biggest question before we get to the legal arguments. whereas justice clarence thomas, because as you said yesterday, not only was he absent, they didn't provide an explanation. and as the most senior associate justice on the supreme court, that raises a lot of serious questions because we are in an election she near never
, jackson going over some of these arguments with jeffrey green, a lawyer for one of those defendants, and i'm back out here with paula reid and shan wu fascinating case. obviously lots of implications for all of those january 6 defendants, possibly for the former president and all of this, but now one of the things that we jumped on this as soon as we came on the air with as paul on that is clarence thomas yesterday was missing missing an action yesterday. we didn't really get a clear...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> now i also think what justice jackson and ketanji brown jackson said about i think it's most people understand that if you commit a criminal crime, that circa ray or nixon, excuse me, that the reason why nixon needed to be part in is because most likely he was going to have criminal prosecution and go to jail. and so she got to put it out like we've seen this play out in a different way. i actually did not mind as i am a lawyer by training, but not by practice. and the intellectual exercise because i think this case has so has such implications for where we go as a country, i want every rock picked up, looked under, turned over, and making sure that they ask every question. so at the end of the day, i hope they role of the way that you're suggesting that it's not blanket immunity, that there can't be any well, they just called it quits too early without really taking the tires. as georgia, i had no idea was surrounded by so many lawyers. we actually can show everyone exactly what you were talking about, ashley, let's watch that i'm trying to understand what the addition is from turn
>> now i also think what justice jackson and ketanji brown jackson said about i think it's most people understand that if you commit a criminal crime, that circa ray or nixon, excuse me, that the reason why nixon needed to be part in is because most likely he was going to have criminal prosecution and go to jail. and so she got to put it out like we've seen this play out in a different way. i actually did not mind as i am a lawyer by training, but not by practice. and the intellectual...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let's listen in writing now the us solicitor general, elizabeth prelogar and justice ketanji brown jackson are going back-and-forth criminal prosecution. the doctors can't provide the care because until they conclude can conclude that a prosecutor looking over their shoulder won't second guess that maybe it wasn't really necessary to prevent death. >> thank you. council. justice thomas this is leto we've now heard let's see an hour-and-a-half of argument on this case, and one potentially very important phrase in emtala has hardly been mentioned maybe it hasn't even been mentioned at all. >> and that is emtala was reference to the woman's quote, unquote, unborn child in an odd phrase to put in a statute that imposes a mandate to perform abortions. have you ever seen an abortion statute that uses the phrase unborn child it's not an odd phrase when you look at what congress was doing in 1989, there were well-publicized cases where women were experiencing conditions, their own health and life. >> we're not in danger, but the fetus was engraved distress it's an hospitals weren't treating them w
let's listen in writing now the us solicitor general, elizabeth prelogar and justice ketanji brown jackson are going back-and-forth criminal prosecution. the doctors can't provide the care because until they conclude can conclude that a prosecutor looking over their shoulder won't second guess that maybe it wasn't really necessary to prevent death. >> thank you. council. justice thomas this is leto we've now heard let's see an hour-and-a-half of argument on this case, and one potentially...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
ketanji brown jackson asking the question about these competing interests on the one hand, you have someone like donald trump who was saying, listen every president has got to have immunity. otherwise, it'll be so afraid to do there actual job. i'm paraphrasing, of course. and she's saying that's one interest, but the other one is what do you do with an unbounded president who has no fear of any criminal liability and the only solution is a political one. how do you balance those two things? and ultimately, the entire discussion today was about that, but also about what should we be doing in this instance right now is this, we can resolve right now or is it a matter of taking it back to the lower court and saying, listen, you guys figure out what's an official act. you guys figure out what is a personal act. we're not going to go through a list, give you an itemized list of all the things that could be present and what could be personal. >> you figure that out now the consequence of that is, is it about the prosecution that would be impacted here today or about a prospective one in the futu
ketanji brown jackson asking the question about these competing interests on the one hand, you have someone like donald trump who was saying, listen every president has got to have immunity. otherwise, it'll be so afraid to do there actual job. i'm paraphrasing, of course. and she's saying that's one interest, but the other one is what do you do with an unbounded president who has no fear of any criminal liability and the only solution is a political one. how do you balance those two things?...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown, jackson room was filled with many dignitaries just trying to hear all this. and what they heard was an argument from the justices that went more in the favor of donald trump than i think some people were anticipating. he he might have to win on the whole shebang of absolute immunity here. but the questions really showed how sympathetic they were to his position and how skeptical they were to jack smith's sayyed as articulated by government lawyer michael driven. and i'll tell you the surest sign of that nature of the questions and then the fact that john sour didn't even not even offer a rebuttal. i mean, he had a free five minutes at the end or close to that to reinforce his points. and i thinking heard most of the justices themselves make those points first of all, the kinds of, i wouldn't call them quite off ramps, but detours before& trial would be something that we weren't sure. we thought was kinda baked into the question the justices took up official acts versus private acts, just what is an issue here, jack smith, it says it doesn't matter that anythi
brown, jackson room was filled with many dignitaries just trying to hear all this. and what they heard was an argument from the justices that went more in the favor of donald trump than i think some people were anticipating. he he might have to win on the whole shebang of absolute immunity here. but the questions really showed how sympathetic they were to his position and how skeptical they were to jack smith's sayyed as articulated by government lawyer michael driven. and i'll tell you the...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
that a president tried to subvert the last election and broke the law in the process two times you brown jackson really was the one who said, look, i mean, you're talking about a chilling effect on the presidency. if you allow for prosecution look at what we're dealing with here, what kind of license and liberating effect on a president to break the law. >> do you create if you say that there are going to be already limited on i'm sorry i'm just going to erupt really quick. i i'm not sure if everyone viewing at home loss, but we've we're having some technical issues where i've completely lost being able to hear ron. ron stick with me. we're going to have hopefully work out these ground lins as happens sometimes. so stick with me, we're going to get that worked out where i was like can throw up the live picture once more of inside the courthouse is we're standing by to here. if donald trump is going to be speaking as he's heading into court let's get an a quick break. we're going to fix this up. we'll be right back. >> from the nation's capital, one of the most unforgettable nights in dc
that a president tried to subvert the last election and broke the law in the process two times you brown jackson really was the one who said, look, i mean, you're talking about a chilling effect on the presidency. if you allow for prosecution look at what we're dealing with here, what kind of license and liberating effect on a president to break the law. >> do you create if you say that there are going to be already limited on i'm sorry i'm just going to erupt really quick. i i'm not sure...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you phil jackson, state on the pat riley stayed on me, dale brown stayed on me dave maduro, my high school coach stayed on me all the coaches that i played for state on me because when you're the best player, you're expected to do everything i just told her, i said, listen, i know you're coaches little harder and you but you have to accept it because you're the best player you're just move on from that >> hey, you know, i i hate giving us do flowers. i'll tell you something he's one of the most amazing businessman i've ever been around i was at the hotel a couple of years ago. he says, i'm going to meet and as who you're meeting with. he says, i'll bring it all my people together. that's what do you mean? he says, well once a year, everybody, i do a commercial for our bring them together, says, hey, how can i make your company better? how can i make your comment it better? sag what? what did that on from >> did you just give me flowers truck. i gave flowers. >> it's his love language >> this is luck. >> to you too, or something you clearly love it, love and admire each other. you >> those
you phil jackson, state on the pat riley stayed on me, dale brown stayed on me dave maduro, my high school coach stayed on me all the coaches that i played for state on me because when you're the best player, you're expected to do everything i just told her, i said, listen, i know you're coaches little harder and you but you have to accept it because you're the best player you're just move on from that >> hey, you know, i i hate giving us do flowers. i'll tell you something he's one of...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
with the murder of the coal brown simpson and ron goldman >> let's talk >> a little bit how that divided the country to a certain degree, right? >> yeah, it really did well what a day. and certainly what a historical moment that was in so many respects. not at all forgetting the two deaths and certainly the prosecution's efforts to bring those debts. the justice as we look there at a pivotal moment both right? everyone remembers if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. and i think when you talk about the division of the country, i think johnnie cochran, the attorney, he was the person who certainly i look up tool still to this day. it was about really having a trial that deflected and talked about the racism of the lapd and really made that front and center as to why oj should be acquitted, questioning the issues with respect to the police protocols, the police practices, what they did, how they focused and targeted on him to the exclusion of other evidence, just assembling a dream team. it wasn't only johnnie cochran, you remember barry shack, you remember ron gop, you remember are nu
with the murder of the coal brown simpson and ron goldman >> let's talk >> a little bit how that divided the country to a certain degree, right? >> yeah, it really did well what a day. and certainly what a historical moment that was in so many respects. not at all forgetting the two deaths and certainly the prosecution's efforts to bring those debts. the justice as we look there at a pivotal moment both right? everyone remembers if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. and i...
0
0.0
Apr 19, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in particular, kristen brown or lawyers with us. so let's bring it back into the conversation. arthur high-dollar, we're not us to beale and joey jackson joy here at the trump defense table. are you meeting with him at the hotel at trump tower tonight to talk about tomorrow. >> what are you telling him? >> again? not they feel listened, but what are you telling him about how he his appearance should be, how he should comport himself, whether he should look at the jurors at all. and if he does how he so i don't think it matters, john, because i think he keeps his own counsel and i think that trump is used to telling and other people what to do, not being told what to do and ultimately he's going to do what he wants to do. remember that there's two sides to this. one is the in-court and what the facts and evidence will ultimately show. now that we have a jury. but the other is the other audience. and that's the audience who will be a voting public. and so i wonder how the judges he's going to deal with on tuesday when they have the hearing, the gag order issue. will the judge iss
in particular, kristen brown or lawyers with us. so let's bring it back into the conversation. arthur high-dollar, we're not us to beale and joey jackson joy here at the trump defense table. are you meeting with him at the hotel at trump tower tonight to talk about tomorrow. >> what are you telling him? >> again? not they feel listened, but what are you telling him about how he his appearance should be, how he should comport himself, whether he should look at the jurors at all. and...