house event, atiolate section 201c? the court offered a construction that it had to be because of an official a tavoid that problem. i think if there was such a well-received understanding that presidents are not included in general federal criminal law less a president is specificamed, which he is not, justice scalia would have thought of that and some member of the court would have reacted. and none did. >> let me go on to ask about what you take the partition's sion to be in thica. becauswead a lot of talk about drawing the linejuice kavanaugh, justice gorsuch suggested that we should be inking about first, we hav private vs. official. and then within official we have some thing that core acts vs. her acts as we try to figure out at what level the president is gngo have immunity. but i took theioners argument in this case not to be inviting us to engage in that kind of analysis. i thought he was arguing that alcial acts did immunity, and so i didn't understand us to be having to drill down on which official acts do.