0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
neil gorsuch did just completely shred the government's argument. important not only for the 300 plus that have been charged under this statute but two of the four counts in the d.c. case that jack smith has brought against donald trump are this exact statute. >> harris: this idea of walking outside the bounds of what we normally see in legal proceedings is also happening in new york. we've never seen a case up against donald trump in new york, either. >> we've never seen that but remember there are so many other important crimes that should be on trial right now in new york and they are not being prosecuted. they aren't being pursued because a lot of the resources of the new york district attorney's office under alvin bragg are being focused on donald trump and trying to bring him down. again, novel legal theories with extensions of the statute of limitation and it is going to eventually all these things are going to fall apart on appeal. >> harris: we'll have to see if it happens before november 5th. that might be politically what democrats are wo
neil gorsuch did just completely shred the government's argument. important not only for the 300 plus that have been charged under this statute but two of the four counts in the d.c. case that jack smith has brought against donald trump are this exact statute. >> harris: this idea of walking outside the bounds of what we normally see in legal proceedings is also happening in new york. we've never seen a case up against donald trump in new york, either. >> we've never seen that but...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch and bret tolman, and right on crime. mike, start with you. i will jen psaki it for a moment and circle back to a prosecutor i mentioned in the angle, matthew colangelo. watch. >> why matthew colangelo, why would he give the opening? >> one thing alvin bragg has done well, pick prosecutors who are experienced and have interest about donald trump. matthew colangelo is an example of someone who helped to -- the donald trump and he knows his way around a courtroom. >> laura: mike, he mentions nothing of the fact matthew colangelo, one of the top officials at doj and worked for leticia james. no involvement at all, not ap appearance of involvement from this administration? >> yeah, so matthew colangelo is the -- was senior political appointee in the biden justice department, acting number three on the parachute team and number two to the number three. before that he worked for the obama justice department, the obama white house for tom perez, for eric holder, this guy is the f forrest gump again president trump and pops up ev
gorsuch and bret tolman, and right on crime. mike, start with you. i will jen psaki it for a moment and circle back to a prosecutor i mentioned in the angle, matthew colangelo. watch. >> why matthew colangelo, why would he give the opening? >> one thing alvin bragg has done well, pick prosecutors who are experienced and have interest about donald trump. matthew colangelo is an example of someone who helped to -- the donald trump and he knows his way around a courtroom. >>...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
listen to justice neil gorsuch yesterday. >> would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify? would a heckler in today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address? would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? >> dana: the best explaining legal arguments and where justices are going to the rest of us not lawyers. what should we know? >> before i became a.g. a wrote a 19-page memo on this toying. a lot of people were raising this when i was confirmed. i did it as a private citizen and i sadekar eid much too far and has to be restricted to the repairment of evidence. it can't be used the way they are using it. it is very comprehensive. now several courts have agreed and i think the supreme court is going to rule that way. >> bill: if that's the case you have hundreds of january 6th defendants who are in jail and the whole idea about this obstruction charge is borne out of the enron disaster. jack smith has a count against the former president for obstruction. what would be the end result of that? >> he will try to differentiate that. things li
listen to justice neil gorsuch yesterday. >> would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify? would a heckler in today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address? would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? >> dana: the best explaining legal arguments and where justices are going to the rest of us not lawyers. what should we know? >> before i became a.g. a wrote a 19-page memo on this toying. a lot of people were raising this...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
during oral arguments at the supreme court yesterday, justict neil gorsuch spoke brilliantly about the dual standards of justice, specifically inreferencing how left-wing protesters seem to always get away with it neverge being chard like the j6 mike 6 if any rs. >> access to a federal courthouse qualify for what a heckler in today's audience qualify for the state of the union address? would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? and for 20 years in federal prison? >> laura: well, we all know thcause answer, don't we smirke, because congressman jamaal brow, who pulled the fire alarm when the house was in session wass of charged with nothing burger misdemeanor by. the d.c. attorney's office, yeah, that is just as pure as nownst voters need to understand the i legal assault against donald trump in new york andof georgia and d.c., it will become a regular part of american politics unless, lessen democrats are made to suffer ato the polls. until then, if you are a concert, conservative, you dare to stand up for the middle class or donate to someone who is in your stand against the was
during oral arguments at the supreme court yesterday, justict neil gorsuch spoke brilliantly about the dual standards of justice, specifically inreferencing how left-wing protesters seem to always get away with it neverge being chard like the j6 mike 6 if any rs. >> access to a federal courthouse qualify for what a heckler in today's audience qualify for the state of the union address? would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? and for 20 years in federal prison? >> laura:...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
during oral arguments at the supreme court yesterday justice neil gorsuch spoke about the dual standards of justice. specifically referencing how left wing protesters seem to always get away with it. never being charged like the j-6ers for disrupt ago congressional proceeding. >> would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify would a heckler at today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address. would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify? for 20 years in federal prison? >> laura: well, we all know the answer, don't we? no, because congressman jamal brown, who pulled that fire alarm when the house was in session, was charged with a nothing burger misdemeanor by the d.c. attorney's office. yeah. that's justice voters need to understand that the legal assault against donald trump in new york and georgia and in d.c. it will become a regular part of american politics unless, unless democrats are made to suffer at the polls. until then, if you're a conservative or some type of traditionalist, you dare to stand up for the middle class or donate t
during oral arguments at the supreme court yesterday justice neil gorsuch spoke about the dual standards of justice. specifically referencing how left wing protesters seem to always get away with it. never being charged like the j-6ers for disrupt ago congressional proceeding. >> would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify would a heckler at today's audience qualify or at the state of the union address. would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify?...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch. and it was his questions followed up by amy coney barrett, ketanji brown jackson, they'll reference back to them. what was your take away? >> i was struck by i thought the extreme positions of both sides. we have donald trump arguing absolute immunity for all official from criminal prosecution from all official acts and you had the department of justice arguing zero immunity. i thought to myself how can a president function if they have no immunity whatsoever from criminal prosecution for their official acts? brett kavanaugh, who i worked for, when he was going through his confirmation process, i thought he raised some very interesting points. he talked about how troubled he was for the trajectory of the american presidency. if they were to side with the department of justices approach which is this zero immunity, this pastor, so i was also struck by the dojs argument of don't worry about it because prosecutions are not politically motivated. we take both about that kind of stuff and
gorsuch. and it was his questions followed up by amy coney barrett, ketanji brown jackson, they'll reference back to them. what was your take away? >> i was struck by i thought the extreme positions of both sides. we have donald trump arguing absolute immunity for all official from criminal prosecution from all official acts and you had the department of justice arguing zero immunity. i thought to myself how can a president function if they have no immunity whatsoever from criminal...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
gorsuch, as the justice put it, we are writing a rule for the ages. the question at hand can a u.s. president be prosecuted for his actions in office? is there absolute immunity? is there limiteds immunity?d imi can obama be charged, for example, for killing in a drone overke which happened overseas ? can george w bush be charged? with allegedly lying to congress about iraq? if a far left prosecutor decides to cook up charges, and could joe biden be chargedoo for killing a family in afghanistan during deadly withdrawal? >> now, here's how trump's legal team put it earliehere ir today. >> listen. the implications of the court's becision here extend far beyond the facts of this case. ge w >> could president george w bush have been sent to prison for obstructing an official proceeding or allegedly lying to congress to induce war in iraq? >> could president obamabe be charged with murder forr killing u.s. citizens abroad by drone strike? >> all right. ultimately, the constitutional judges on the court seem to favor limited immunity over absolute . in but
gorsuch, as the justice put it, we are writing a rule for the ages. the question at hand can a u.s. president be prosecuted for his actions in office? is there absolute immunity? is there limiteds immunity?d imi can obama be charged, for example, for killing in a drone overke which happened overseas ? can george w bush be charged? with allegedly lying to congress about iraq? if a far left prosecutor decides to cook up charges, and could joe biden be chargedoo for killing a family in afghanistan...