earlier i was joined by the bbc�*s diplomatic correspondent, caroline hawley, who explained more. it was a written judgment. it was 66 pages long and people are still trying to digest all the details. but essentially, it was a highly anticipated verdict because it had been thought that this could be the very end of the legal road forjulian assange in the british courts, although he could still appeal to the european court of human rights against extradition. but instead we've got this slightly kind of mixed verdict, which amounts, i would say, to a temporary reprieve forjulian assange. the us now has three weeks to provide those assurances to the uk, to the british courts, assurances that he won't face the death penalty and assurances that he won't be prejudiced at trial because he's an american, that he will still have the same rights under the first amendment of the us constitution, rights to freedom of speech, for example, as a us citizen. so that's been the decision. so what happens next? three weeks to provide these assurances, so the ball in the us court at the moment. so if