[ jimmeka ] building cars that americans want. [ jamaul ] right here in america. hyundai is an all-american success story. ♪ this sunday, a special edition of "meet the press" from chicago. as the jobs debate heats up in washington, the unemployment rate remains at a crisis level. 9.1%. protesters take to the streets around the country to complain. >> where are the jobs? >> theresident campaigns against republicans, urging them to take action on his jobs bill. >> if congress does something then i can't run against a do-nothing congress. if congress does nothing, then it's not a matter of me running against them, i think the american people will run them out of town. >> what is the economy's impact on america's biggest cities? how must they innovate to confront their budget shortfalls? and what does this debate mean

for the president's political future? joining me, an influential voice in the democratic party, former chief of staff to president obama and now chicago's mayor, rahm emanuel. then, the republican view on the economy, taxes, and the next showdown over the debt. house budget chairman, republican congressman from wisconsin, paul ryan. then our political roundtable on the gop race for the white house, and the debate over the economy. >> is it strong enough of a republican party for its nominee to beat this president? >> oh, absolutely. absolutely. >> more of my interview this week with vice president biden on the president's re-election prospects. plus, christie is out of the running. as is sarah palin. what does it mean for the rest of the field? romney, perry and the latest entry into the top tier, herman cain. with us, senior political analyst for "time" magazine, mark halperin. writer for "vanity fair," and co-author of "all the devils are

here" about the financial crisis, bethany mclean. and two members of congress from illinois, democrat luis gutierrez, and republican aaron schock. good morning, a week in politics defined by anger and resentment over the state of the economy, and income inequality as protesters behind the occupy wall street movement bring their message to new york. and to here in chicago, the president expressed his support for their views. >> i think people are frustrated, and, you know, the protesters are giving voice to a more broad-based frustration about how our financial system works.

>> while the house republican leader was critical of their taxes. >> if you read the newspapers today, i for one am increasingly concerned about the growing mobs occupying wall street, and the other cities across the country. and believe it or not, some in this town have actually condoned the pitting of americans against americans. >> as populist anger becomes a hot political topic in the race for the white house, we have come to the city of chicago to meet up with a familiar face to a national audience, rahm emanuel. he was, of course, president obama's first white house chief of staff, after serving as a congressman from illinois' fifth congressional district. and he is now the boss, the mayor of chicago. and on this marathon day here in the windy city, he is also kicking off chicago ideas week, which brings together top speakers, and innovation and creativity in business, and

technology. mr. mayor, thanks for having us. >> thank you, david. >> thanks for being here this morning. here it is, the cover of "chicago" magazine, raul on the cover. you're five months into your term. and there's no question that the economy is a big reality that you face. how tough is the national economy being in such distress is it for you here in chicago? >> well, there's no doubt in people's lives it's difficult. we have a foreclosure issue. we also have an unemployment issue. and even for those who are working they're on the razor's edge, which means their paycheck going from the beginning of the month and end of the month and trying to make it stretch all the way through. that's why as mayor i've been focused on what i think are the three fundamentals. safe streets, strong schools, stable finances. and if we put that in order, i think people have confidence and will invest in the city and create jobs. which is why ge is adding 1,000 jobs. united airlines is adding 1300 jobs here. and just this week ford made an announcement if there's a

ratification they're going to put 1200 jobs in a plant here in the city of chicago. >> your employment rate in chicago is higher than the national average. let's look at the national average. new jobs numbers that came out over this week, over the term of the obama presidency going back to february '09, 8.2%, the high point october of 2009, over 10%. and now it's been distressingly steady here at 9.0, or 9.1%. are there government remedies that are left to really solve this? >> sure. let me take one step back and take a wide lens view and come right back down. basically about every six or seven years the american economy reinvents itself with a single edge. that was what nasa was. there was a military build up in the '80s. the internet and new economy in '90s. housing in 2000. if you look at the data, are building our infrastructure, roads, bridges, broadband for

the new economy is as essential as that single engine. while you do have high unemployment, the 9% you noted. among building trades, carpenters, iron workers, building trades that used to be in the housing industry and the office building construction, it's double that. have them rebuild our schools. have them rebuild our roads. because we have a 21st century economy sitting on a 20th century infrastructure and that should be the reinvention engine like nasa was, like the internet was at different moments in time, and we will be a stronger, more productive economy for that rebuilding of america. >> you had that opportunity for stimulus in the middle of the financial crisis. when you were in washington as chief of staff. there were political concerns about how big of a stimulus package you could get through -- >> you noticed that, huh? >> yeah. but what you're talking about now no longer enjoys political consensus. do you think this president wasted -- the crisis you talked about, to do the big things at that moment, to really be a jobs president to create the demand in the economy that you're talking about through more government spending? >> well, first of all, it's a

stimulus for the economy. but -- and everybody, you'll have other people on here. everybody has roads and bridges and stuff in their neighborhood, in their community. in chicago. take our mass transit. we're about $7 billion behind on our -- on our public transportation capital. our water system, about 75% of it, the water pipes, 100 years or older. everybody, that's an example throughout the country, number one. number two, there's also a piece the president did do. he inherited an economy that was spinning towards a depression. he entered a financial situation that had frozen up to the point where it was near collapse and an auto industry on the door of bankruptcy. one of the capacities now because he took the tough decision, the right decision, we're actually importing, as "the wall street journal" noted this week, importing auto jobs to the united states. because finally, the auto industry restructured itself. we're at the point, having stabilized the situation, now

the liftoff. and i believe the investment in rebuilding america is exactly that. it's good for the economy today. and it will be good for the economy long-term. was there opportunities? he took the opportunity to deal with all three within the first six months. we're now importing auto jobs. we're -- before it was near bankruptcy. i would also argue not to get too political too fast but i can't miss the opportunity. which is some people in the remote minority wrote stories and wrote op-eds saying let it go bankrupt. the president of the united states doubled down on the american workers, auto industry not only is stronger, not only creating the jobs today, we also negotiated two fuel efficiency standards that were denied for 30 years, and now the united states went from 2% to 40% of their alternative battery production. at every level the auto industry that was first started here in the united states is strornger and bet irand more prepared for the future than it was when he was in office and 1.2 million manufacturing jobs, and manufacturing base of america, is stronger. now that's not enough. and he'll be the first to admit

it. and the next step, rebuild america from the ground up for the 21st century. >> but if you look at the president's approval rating, and you put it up on the screen, 41% approve it. his disapproval on handling the economy is up in the 60s. i asked you about his opportunity to really become a jobs president. you have talked about the fact that you advised him at times to take a more practical approach, not to double down in the ways that you say he ultimately did, what were the opportunities costs of not a big enough stimulus, of health care reform that hurt him politically, at a time when he now needs, as you say, more government spending, but he doesn't have the political capital to get it done, does he, mayor? >> no. but he -- let me say this. as you aptly pointed and that is correct, i often advised the president about doing the quick, political thing. and he looked at the long-term. and he rejected the quick, and political. because it wasn't in america's

interest. that's true of both financial reform, health care, the bigger decision. and he's never lost his fight for america. and he did make decisions that were in the long-term interest. to his credit, he wanted advice. unfiltered, give it to me what you think assessment. i gave it to him. and he made a decision, what he thought was in the interest, and i think correctly, we are a better country for financial reform. let's just take the financial area. president bush passed t.a.r.p. president obama put the stress test in. made sure that they raise private capital. passed a financial reform. not all of that is perfect. some of the real problems still to be worked out. you look at america's financial situation today and its financial industry versus europe that took a pass on it, he showed political leadership even when it wasn't popular. take the auto industry. everybody said the conventional wisdom, even sometimes discussed on "meet the press," let it go bankrupt. why have good money after bad? today we're stronger because of those leadership positions and

he hasn't lost a fight. and what you want out of a leader is somebody who hasn't lost a fight. i believe, like i do for the city of chicago, if i can get one moment in for the city of chicago, if you spend political capital on what you believe is right for the country, and not just political capital, because you know you have to reorganize and restructure, you'll be stronger coming out of that. >> i want to talk about innovation chicago in just a minute. let me do two more political questions. one is the bottom line. you may say the president is looking at the long-term. how much trouble is he in for re-election with this economy? >> look, there's no doubt there's a challenge politically, because the economy is not where the american middle-class family needs it to be for their bottom line. >> is he accountable for that? >> all of us. everybody in public life. everybody in corporate life is accountable for that result. and corporate life, you deal with it, if you're a public company with stockholders. for the president of the united states, for members of congress, also as you know, their ratings are low. they're facing challenges. you're accountable to try to get the results so the middle class can achieve the middle class

gains. not only for themselves today but for their children. but he'd be the first -- yes, all of us in public life who seek public life, you know the bottom line is, try to make sure that people have the ability to achieve their dreams. and understand that your role in government, i don't create jobs. the president doesn't create jobs. you create conditions for jobs to take hold. for the businesses to create them. that means good investment in research and development. good investment in the type of infrastructure that's necessary. make sure your educational system is turned around. which is another area where the president shows the type of leadership -- >> let's talk about environment. how about what's going on on the streets of occupy wall street, complaining about the unfairness, railing against wall street. the president has sympathized with those protesters in the street. is demonizing wall street the way to create an environment to get banks to hire? it's not a reverse tea party tack take? >> no, it's not -- here's what i think you see. and i think -- i can't speak for the president. i can speak what i think is my

view, at least, i think i would say, i think he would share. when the financial industry, or the financial sector, was on its knees, it's not popular that the whole country rallied under president bush's leadership for a $700 plus billion dollar t.a.r.p., which is financing that was needed. then there was a stress test, and there was stress to force the banks to raise the capital lending. then there was the action even when the industry today still doesn't support the financial reform. were there problems throughout all of that? sure. did we get it exactly right? no. but you look at where the united states financial industry is today versus what's going on in europe where they didn't deal with it, we're night and day. number one. number two, and that took political leadership, even when it was not popular. and second, when the industry needed that type of help, the america came to it help and assisted it to get stable.

can you -- if you go around the neighborhoods of chicago, you go around anywhere in the country, go to peoria, there is stress on people's lives. they, too, need help. not a bailout. but a chance to get the economy moving for them. and that's an understandable sense of frustration on their part. and it's not just limited to the wall street. go in europe. go in asia. go other places. there is a major restructuring going on in the world's economy, major here in the united states. one of the decisions we're making today, as i say it as mayor of chicago, decisions we make over the next two to three years will have an impact on what it will be like in the next 20 to 30 years. that's the same decisions facing there. and if you can't hear the public's frustration, not just what's happening on wall street, but happening in the neighborhoods of chicago, if you can't hear it, that means you don't understand your role in public service. there is a normal given frustration because the economy is not working for folks and we

have a high unemployment. we have a high economic stress. and we have to make sure we have the right policies to address that frustration. >> let me talk about innovation, about chicago ideas week, and this economic reality that ma s makes, on a week when we lost the jobs, a real pioneer and a real innovator. these conditions make your job so much harder. how do you have to think about governing differently in this reality? and how do you think you've done it? >> well, first of all, thanks for the question. i think that i'm proud, just to take a look at chicago this week. you have the second largest marathon, 37,000 runners. you have ideas week. we just had a major international dance festival. two weeks from now the humanities festival. now, i believe in government, and what i've been doing from day one is reforming it to better serve the taxpayers of the city of chicago. we have it now with our educational system. step one, we are going to have

the longest school-day and school year in the country from the shortest. step two, where other cities and states are cutting back on early childhood, 6,000 more kids in the city of chicago will go to full kindergarten. step three, we have the first accountability from the corporate suite in the school system all the way to the classroom. everybody will be on performance pay, including principals, teachers, and the ceo of the school system. and it's the first time anywhere in the country a school system has accountability. third, second, safe streets. we've taken about 1,000 officers, from clerical positions, administrative position, unaccountable operations and put them on our streets, in our communities, where for the last nine weeks we've seen crime drop by 20%. wednesday i'm introducing a budget. we're going to have major efforts there at reforming government. meaning, just this week we kicked off recycling. well now we have a private company competing against the streets and sanitation workers in the city of chicago.

whoever has the best service, lowest price will win. it's no longer the city payroll. it's the city taxpayers that will be the priority. third we negotiated with labor, the most comprehensive wellness health care plan in the country, public or private, anywhere else. 32,000 workers will lead the heart of the wellness plan that will stabilize them after years of growing at 10%. at every level we're going to reform government, reform the bureaucracy. where do the people need the services and put our dollars where they meet government so they can lead the type of lives they want for themselves and their families. >> before you go, one more political question. the president's adviser david axelrod talked about re-election for the president ask a titanic struggle. the president called himself an underdog. what's this president got to do to get his swagger back? >> well, first of all, focus on, and he has, on day one, where the american people got to get their dreams back. they are under huge economic stress. it came to a boil in 2008. as everybody knows, and it's no comfort to anybody, a recession

from a financial meltdown is more severe than any other recession. people have to feel in their lives some improvement and some opportunity of improvement for them and for their children. that is what his focus has been on day one and i can understand. and if you don't understand and hear the frustration in people's voice, then if you're in public life you should get a different job. and i know -- >> it's not an improvement by next november he's in trouble? >> there's a contrast choice. go back to one thing. i'm going to add in chicago, not i, but when the ford plant adds that third shift, if it's ratified, that auto industry, we're going to be a better city to one of 11 companies -- factories that exports most for ford is right here in the city of chicago. there would not be an auto industry if mitt romney was president. he would have said, let it go bankrupt. we're a stronger country for it, but it can't just be in the auto industry. it cannot be in the technology sector. it cannot be in the financial sector. it's got to be a country moving

which is why i know and i believe fundamentally as mayor or as a congressman or as chief of staff, that rebuilding america's infrastructure is right today, and it's right for tomorrow. >> we're going to leave it there. thank you, mr. mayor. and coming up, president obama and vice president biden, this week both lashing out at republicans in congress, trying to paint them as the do-nothing party. joining me for a response, and the republican view on what to do about the economy, house budget chairman paul ryan. he's down from wisconsin to come here to chicago. later my interview with vice president biden. his candid take on the republicans and framing the 2012 race. as well as our political roundtable. still ahead on "meet the press." ♪ ♪ [ multiple sounds making melodic tune ] ♪

[ male announcer ] at northrop grumman, every innovation, every solution, comes together for a single purpose -- to make the world a safer place. that's the value of performance. northrop grumman. and having a partner like northern trust -- one of the nation's largest wealth managers -- makes all the difference. our goals-based investment strategies are tailored to your needs and overseen by experts who seek to maximize opportunities while minimizing risk. after all, you don't climb a mountain just to sit at the top. you lookround for other mountains to climb. ♪ expertise matters. find it at northern trust. ♪ [ female announcer ] the road is not exactly a place of intelligence. highway maintenance is underfunded, costing drivers $67 billion a year, and countless tires.

which drivers never actually check because they're busy, checking email. this is why we engineered a car that makes 2,000 decisions every second. the new audi a6 is here. the road is now an intelligent place. ♪ coming up the republican view on the economy, taxes, and the next showdown over spending. joining me house budget chairman, paul ryan. up next right after this brief commercial break. the world needs more energy. where's it going to come from? ♪ that's why right here, in australia, chevron is building one of the biggest natural gas projects in the world. enough power for a city the size of singapore for 50 years. what's it going to do to the planet? natural gas is the cleanest conventional fuel there is. we've got to be smart about this. it's a smart way to go. ♪

she won't eat eggs without hot sauce. she has kind of funny looking toes. she's always touching my hair. and she does this dancing finger thing. [ male announcer ] with advanced technology from ge, now doctors can diagnose diseases like breast cancer on a cellular level. so that women, like kristy's mom, can get personalized treatment that's as unique as she is. [ kristy ] she's definitely not like other moms. yeah, my mom is pretty weird. ♪ yeah, my mom is pretty weird. [ boy ] hey, i thought these were electric? uh, it is, yeah, it's a chevy volt. so what are you doing at a gas station? well it still takes gas to go farther. but you're not getting gas. true. not this time. uh, don't have to gas up very often. so you have to go to the bathroom? no. yes you do. thought these were electric? yes, it's a uh, a chevy volt. so what are you doing at a gas station?

there are over twelve thousand diseases in the world. some take years to diagnose and treat. how can doctors find insights in a body of medical knowledge that doubles every five years? new solutions based on ibm watson are being developed to help doctors analyze a patient's history, symptoms and the latest medical literature to make faster, more accurate diagnoses. hello. my name is watson. let's build a smarter planet. we are back live from chicago. joining me now, republican congressman from wisconsin, chairman of the house budget committee, paul ryan, who was good enough to drive down from southern wisconsin, in your district, to here in chicago. making it a big day for us. thank you. >> welcome. >> thank you very much. let's talk about news now. the state of this economy is such that the fed chairman this week, bernanke, warned that the recovery is, quote, close to faltering. bottom line here, all the

argument in washington, what of this jobs bill the president wants can actually become law? >> well, what's concerning about it is he put ideas in this jobs bill that have already proven to fail. instead of trying to get compromise, he's embracing conflict. he's running around the country campaigning on a bill that he knows won't pass. can't even get it out of the senate right now. rather than working with us on ideas that we agree on that will actually pep >> so like what? >> in his speech he said let's do business tax reform and trade agreements. great, we agree with those. let's do those. we're bringing the trade agreements up next week in the house. i think we'll pass these things. quarter million new jobs by the administration's estimates. what about business tax reform? i don't think the president seems to be willing to work with us on individual tax reform -- >> i've talked to white house officials who say we'll probably get there on lowering the corporate tax rate. the super committee -- >> i think that's the way to do it. >> you think there's news there? >> i think the super committee should do that. i think they have the wherewithal to do that and i believe that will help us create jobs. we are taxing our businesses at much higher tax rate than our

foreign competitors tax theirs and we're losing as a result of it. >> if the president agrees to lower corporate tax rates what do republicans give in terms of closing loopholes? >> my point is why didn't he put this in the jobs bill? ideas that had a bipartisan support instead of putting failed ideas that have already proven not to work. >> payroll tax cut is in there. you have agreed to that. >> bush did it, obama did it. the point is, it hasn't worked to create jobs. we want to go with ideas that work. so, with respect to your answer on loopholes, i say get rid of all the loopholes. the lower the rates you are. we shouldn't be picking winners and losers in washington, either through spending or through the tax code, both parties have been doing this, and so when we passed our budget in the spring, there was a call for doing just that and so that to me is an area where we could get some bipartisan compromise but instead what we're getting is a campaign from the white house, trying to, you know, create political ruckus. >> the -- i'll get to that in just a second. but there is a basis of some compromise, because i -- >> i would like to think so. >> you think there is. >> i'd like to think so.

let's talk about the campaign that's going on. i did speak to vice president biden earlier this week in washington, at the atlantic ideas festival. and he made it very clear what he thinks about republicans and their view of trying to help the economy, or work with this president. this is what he said. >> there are also limits on what government can do when one party decides we're going to do nothing. we're going to do nothing. nothing. let me say it again. we're going to do nothing. >> you couldn't hear what the audience was hearing. the vice president saying there's a limit on what any party can do when you have the other party willing to do nothing. absolutely nothing. that's the vice president talking. are you offering anything different, other than complete opposition to what the president wants to do? >> well, look, i suppose that's good politics. but it's not factually accurate. we've passed over a dozen pieces of legislation, jobs legislation that are sitting over in the senate. we passed a budget to pay off the debt to get the economy

going. we passed energy reform. we passed regulatory reforms. small business tax reform. we've passed so many different jobs bills throughout this year, that are sitting over in the senate. here's the deal, we have a difference of opinion with the white house on how best to create jobs. we don't think doubling down on failed stimulus policies which have already proven to fail is the right way to go, so we want to work with ideas that have proven to work. that means helping small businesses grow. that means getting certainty in our policy, regulations, taxes, debt, so that small businesses can grow. temporary stimulus. sort of sugar high economics are not what businesses are telling us they need to create jobs. >> aren't tax cuts, with no eye toward tax increases as part of spending cuts, isn't that sugar economics, as well? sugar high economics? you refuse to budge on the tax cuts? >> what we're getting from the white house are temporary tax policies, stimulus, which didn't work when president bush tried it, and spending increases with permanent tax increases. let's look at the permanent tax increases they're not talking

about. in 15 months' time the top tax rate on small businesses goes to 44.8%. now they're going to throw another tax increase on it. ear going to be taxing small businesses at about 50%. according to the treasury department, 80% of small businesses -- 80% of businesses file as individuals. 60% of the businesses in this country fail their tax rates as individuals and will get hit by this new tax that goes to 50% in 15 months. why would we do that? in canada, overseas in wisconsin we usually refer to it as lake superior. canada, they're lowering their tax rate to 15%. ireland at 12.5%. china, 25%. and we're going to be taxing our successful small businesses where more than half our jobs come from at 50%? why would we want to pass that? >> what do you do in an economy where there is no demand? when the only ideas are tax cuts and spending cuts, and we have seen, you've seen it in great britain, the debate is roiling in europe now, austerity alone, when there is not demand in the economy, does not appear to be the answer.

you know that tax hikes, and tax cuts have a neutral effect on economic growth, if you look at the clinton and the bush years. demand's got to come from somewhere. >> so, the idea that we can borrow and spend more in washington and create more demand in economic growth has already proven to fail. we just -- we've done trillions of dollars of stimulus spending already, from both administrations, it hasn't worked. and so what businesses are telling us they need is more certainty. they have no idea how much higher the taxes are going to go in 15 months. we have a slew of new regulations coming out of washington that's making it really hard for them to create jobs. and so i would say policy certainty from washington was the kind of leadership and the pro-growth agenda we've been trying to pass in the house is really what is necessary to create jobs. >> let me talk about politics and class warfare. you've seen the protests, the occupy wall street protests around the country. >> right. >> your leader in the house called them mobs. herman cain, on the presidential campaign trail, was asked about it, and this is what he said this week. >> don't blame wall street. don't blame the big banks.

if you don't have a job, and you are not rich, blame yourself. >> is that the republican message? >> look, i don't disparage anybody who protests their government for better government. i came down from wisconsin. that's a state where protests are sort of a new normal. and i think we're going to see a lot of it from now until the 2012 election. >> but the republican message condition -- >> we want to lower the barriers against americans who want to rise. we want to make it easier for people to have upper mobility, economic opportunity, and we don't want to put new barriers in place for americans who want to rise, and we want to go back to proven ideas that work to grow this economy. i would say on the class warfare, there are a few points i would simply make if you'll allow me. number one the math just doesn't work. raising all these taxes on small businesses doesn't work. it's not just taxing the movie star, the baseball player, the wall street person. you're taxing the engine of economic growth, small businesses. if you took all of the income from every millionaire in america today it would run the government for about four

months. second i had a better idea. in stead of tax increases why don't we stop subsidizing wealthy people. let's go off the corporate welfare in the tax code, in the spending, and why don't we income adjust our spending programs so we don't subsidize wealthy people as much. i think that's a better idea, get more savings in the budget, get our debt down without doing economic damage. and third i think this divisive rhetoric is divisive. i think it's trouble. sowing class envoy and social unrest is not what we do in america. >> you think that's what the president is doing? >> i think he is doing that. preying on fear, envy and anger and that is not constructing to unifying america. i think he's broken his promise as a uniter and now he's dividing people. to me that's very unproductive. >> but herman cain says don't blame wall street, don't blame the bank, if you don't a job, blame yourself. is that the republican message? >> herman's speaking for himself. i think we all want to actually see a climate of economic growth, an entrepreneurialism and we don't want to pit americans against each other. that's not who we are. that's not the kind of society

we want. >> aren't you vulnerable to the charge that republicans are just looking out for the rich? isn't that divisive? >> well, people make the charge. what i would simply say is i don't worry about people who are already rich. i'm worried about getting people to become successful. removing those barriers so that people who have never seen success before can actually become successful. and when you keep raising all these tax rates, all these regulatory barriers on successful small businesses, how are we going to get the jobs of tomorrow? this redistribution idea of pitding people against each other does not work, it's divisive, and it hardly gives us the kind of attitude we want for businesses to take risks, so they can succeed in the future. >> you're going to leave it there. chairman, thank you very much. >> thank you, david. >> coming up, a special look at the state of the race now that palin and christie are officially out. who is up? and who is down? plus, how vice president biden sees the race, and the republican party. i spoke with him this week. my interview with the vice president and our political roundtable. "time" magazine's mark halperin.

"vanity fair's" bethany mclean. and two illinois congressmen, democrat luis gutierrez and republican aaron schock. right after this break.not ex tly a place of intelligence. highway maintenance is underfunded, costing drivers $67 billion a year, and countless tires. which drivers never actually check because they're busy, checking email. this is why we engineered a car that makes 2,000 decisions every second. the new audi a6 is here. the road is now an intelligent place. ♪

there's a moment where everything comes together. where there's magic. and you now understand what nature's been hiding. ♪ at dow we understand the difference between innovation and invention. invention is important. it's the beginning. it's the spark. but innovation is where we actually create value for dow, for society, and for the world. ♪ at dow, we're constantly searching for how to use our fundamental knowledge of chemistry to solve these difficult problems. science is definitive. there is a right answer out there. [ male announcer ] the same 117 elements do the fundamental work of chemistry. ♪ the difference, the one element that is the catalyst for innovation,

the one element that changes everything is the human element. ♪

we are back live from chicago with our political roundtable. joining us this morning, democratic congressman luis gutierrez. republican congressman aaron schock. "vanity fair" contributing editor and co-author of "all the devils are here," the hidden story of the financial crisis, now out in paperback, bethany mclean. and senior political analyst for "time" magazine, mark halperin. welcome to all of you. mark flew in. everybody else is more or less local here. so we appreciate you being here. i want to talk about the economy, the president's prospects, and i spoke this week to vice president biden about all of the above. particularly this issue of how they're going to deal with republicans, with your party in this climate. this is what he said. >> your view is you talk about whether the jobs bill is going to be passed is that this president does not have a partner among republicans on capitol hill.

>> i think he does have a partner. in the bulk of the leadership. but they are seriously hamstrung. look, i can tell you, without in any way violating the confidence, i think john boehner would tell you, i think eric cantor would tell you, we had a much bigger proposal. that i was personally negotiating with them, as to how to deal with the debt crisis. and they could not sell it. i'm just telling you this straight -- i have a bad habit of saying what i believe. >> i don't want to get in the way of that now. >> look, guys, i -- this is just joe biden's impression. i truly believe, if eric cantor, joe biden, barack obama, john boehner were allowed to settle a deal in a room, we would have

had a deal -- >> that's not how it works. >> no, that's not how it works. >> so they're not strong enough leaders to get it passed. is that your view? >> my view is that their party is not the republican party that we all know. one of the worst things that has happened to us, in my view, is we need a strong republican party. we need a republican party that's united. we need a republican party you can sit down with and say, okay, this is a deal, can you deliver? can you deliver on the deal? >> is it strong enough of a republican party for its nominee to beat this president? >> oh, absolutely. absolutely. it's strong enough to beat both of us. it's strong enough -- look. look, no matter what the circumstance, at the end of the day, the american people right now are, many of them are in real trouble, and an even larger percentage have stagnant wages.

and a significant imagine orrive the american people believe that the country's not moving in the right direction. that is never a good place to be going into a re-election. whether it's your fault, or not your fault, it's almost sometimes irrelevant. but what i'm counting on, i'm counting on what i read out there, this judgment of the american people to decide, they know the hole we're in. they know how far we've come out. they're dissatisfied how fast we're going, and they're going to have to choose whether or not the path we have set the country on is the path that we should continue to go. or we should go back to liberating the economy. >> congressman schock, what do you hear from the vice president? is that political vulnerability? >> you know what? i hear a lot of negativity. and what strikes me as disingenuous is all the attack on republicans as do-nothing. as someone who is in his third year now in the united states congress, i will tell you, last year was the first year since

1974 that a democratic house failed to pass a budget. we got a majority this year, and we didn't just criticize what the president rolled out in his budget. we actually did our own budget as the republican house, that did entitlement reform. something that was the unthinkable. that bend the cost curve that put us on a projection towards balance as a country. and guess what, david, it got more votes, republicans and democrats voted for that budget, than any budget that passed the congress in the last ten years. in addition to the budget we've passed 100 bills in the house that are sitting in the senate waiting for action. and so to hear the vice president say that he doesn't have an equal partner, that somehow the house and republicans are just do-nothing is not only a political statement, it's just not factually correct >> congressman gutierrez, has the conversation stopped in washington? are we effectively in the campaign argument right now? >> i think, look, when i got to congress i wanted to change it. propose legislation to freeze every member's pay. that was one thing to change it. i think we have a new set of

congressmen that have come, really, to burn the house down. and i think that that's unfortunate. let's talk about this partnership. so we passed health care reform. they want to call it obama care. it's health care reform. we didn't get any help. we had to restructure wall street and go after wall street to make sure that our financial system was safe. we didn't get any help. when it came to our environment and energy policy, we didn't get any help. and i'm sorry, but we keep hearing -- i mean it's simple to be a republican and say, there's two answers to every question. became obama, and if not that, cut the budget, until it comes to cutting for the rich oil producers here in this country. there's no cutting. or cutting the military. look, we need to have a conversation about putting americans back to work, and we need to have that sense of urgency that there are people hurting out there. >> but this is the debate, mark halperin, that's playing out on the campaign trail now, and we're going to turn to you to get a sense of where this republican race is here at the end of this week. first, this is the way the field looks right now.

according to the new cbs news poll, it's romney, cain and perry. 17, 17, and 12. herman cain in the top tier week after week. new hampshire is the early primary state. we don't know exactly when they're going to be voting next year. romney has a more commanding lead there, 37%. cain at 12. look at perry down at 4%. christie is out of the race. palin is not going to run. where do things stand? >> the same dynamic that's existed going through christie, going through palin, going through all the people who decided not to run. the same dynamic exists in this race as existed from the beginning. mitt romney is going to be a finalist and then there's a question of who fills that vacuum. republicans want someone who is tough on the president. they want someone who can get elected and they want someone who will promise fundamental change in the economy. >> and your take here, romney is up. how do you see him at the end of the week? >> well, he's still the strongest in the field by far. he's still raising money. he's still checking off different constituencies. i think he's found his voice.

the values voters event in washington over the weekend. he's found his voice on being an anti-obama spokesman pretty effectively. what he still lacks, though, is a broad appeal that republican front-runners in the past have had. >> rick perry a draw at this point? >> he's got to define himself better than he has. he's been defined by his position on immigration in texas. by his position on social security. not by his position on jobs and the economy, which he's going to talk about on friday finally in pennsylvania. and defined by his personal story. the country doesn't really know rick perry, and so far, so far he's not been a strong a candidate as he thought he'd be. rick perry's advisers and mitt romney's advisers will be, rick perry will be back. >> herman cain? >> he is filling that vacuum. the anti-romney vacuum. as strong as romney is, he's clearly the strongest, there is a huge hunger in the party for somebody else. and until somebody steps up, decides herman cain, he's specific on the economy. he's got a tax reform plan. he's got a strong anti-obama message.

and he's promising that fundamental change. his problem is electability p it's very hard for him to get over that hurdle. >> let's talk about the political economy. here was "the wall street journal" headline this week as these occupy wall street protests are here in chicago, they're in new york, they've been in los angeles. this is how the "journal" puts it. democrats populist puzzle. the democratic party grappling with the promise and peril of the anti-corporate populism in the occupy wall street movement seeking to tap its energy without opening the party to charges of class warfare. i won't play this particular sound bite from the vice president, but from our interview this week but he said, look, there is this broken trust between the middle class, and between the haves on wall street, who are much healthier in this economy. how do you see it? >> there's a lot to protest. you can pick your economic statistic to show that we've degenerated into a society of haves and have-nots. there's no question about that. the problem is our economy has been broken for a long time. the credit bubble just masked problems that have been growing for decades. we need a way to tackle this

over the long-term. and you can look at the protesters and say they're chaotic, they're disorganized, and the great irony, is washington really much better? and a lot of this populism, whether it's bank bashing or taxing millionaires, it distracts from the fact that we have a really hard road ahead. we need a long-term plan for the economy that we want that's going to work for wide swaths of people. it's not going to be easy. so little tweaky sounding sound bites are unsatisfying. >> you made a point about the banks this week. we've got to decide what we want our banks to be. we've got bank fees that are driving people crazy and the bankers say wait a minute, you passed financial regulation that made it more restrictive for us to make money here, we're still going to try to make money because that's what we do. we have to make a decision, in your view. >> right. if you're mad at the banks and you want a different financial system, let's talk about having a different financial system. let's not do the sort of mixed message of business as usual, plus -- plus populist bank bashing. in the end it's like a twinkie. it sounds good at the time, it

tastes really good but it's ultimately really unhealthy. it doesn't get us anywhere. >> why is demonizing wall street the right approach right now? it mate be a political strategy if the president could harness it. is it really the right thing to do for the economy? >> here's what i think with all due respect to everybody's opinion. there were $700 billion in t.a.r.p. i was there. the money got to the banks. they were on their knees. i don't remember anybody from goldman sachs or jpmorgan chase saying don't do it, luis, don't do it. we really don't want the money. no, i saw the secretary of the treasury come down there, each and every day, begging and imploring us. you know what? they got their money. and what did we get? we got a bill for $5, if you want to access your money. so let me just say, it's not bashing. it's looking at the reality. and i think that's part of the frustration and the anger of people who can't send their kids to school. who can't send them to college. who don't have a job. who are losing their mortgages. so all i want to say is, i take on my own secretary geithner

this week and i said, mr. secretary, we put $50 billion -- we gave the banks $70 billion. guess what? they got their money. we spent $50 billion so people could modify their mortgages and reduce their payments. guess what? 2% of that money went out to consumers in america. so, yeah, people are angry because government is dysfunctional, and it's not working. >> but here's reality, the protest congressman schock are also about the fact that the middle class is not getting any better. >> you're exactly right. >> middle-class wages are stagnating. what is your party doing to deal with that disparity? >> first of all i'd like to say bethany made an excellent point. everyone's focusing on whether you support the protesters or don't support the protesterses. why are they protesting? because we have failed to implement economic policy that allows more opportunity for americans and for the pie economically in this country to growth. what we have to have is pro-growth policies. to your point, what are republicans doing in the house? we've been doing a whole host of things. first of all, passing a budget that deals with entitlement reform that bends the cost curve so there's more confidence in washington, d.c. that we're going to deal with our debt

crisis as a country. second, passing over 100 bills that are waiting for action in the senate. things are regulatory reform, rein in some of the epa changes. one just this week on cement companies that would put nearly 20,000 americans out of work that are currently working, if the epa is not stopped in the regulatory change. >> mark halperin, let me ask a political question as well an both sides of the aisle. the president is calling himself an underdog. the vice president has spelled out the vulnerability. david axelrod, the communications adviser said this will be a titanic struggle for re-election. i asked mayor emanuel, what does he do to get this swagger back? this is not the guy who talked about, yes, we can, and had people crying when he was elected because there was such great expectation. people feel left down. >> it's fault to say he's going to go for the base and reject the middle. he needs to go for both. he needs the base to be energized. he needs more of the business community, including in the

banking sector, to be at least open to his re-election. he must wait for a republican opponent. the -- these are two well-meaning public servants, but they're talking past each other as this conversation in washington is likely to be, except for that super committee you talked about rahm emanuel. there needs to be some dialogue. because we can'tait till 2013 to address the concerns of both the tea party and the occupy wall street. >> we'll take a break here. i also want to follow up on whether religion is a new issue in the gop primary. we'll do that. we'll take a break here. but i want to talk to you about press pass and our two "meet the press" conversations that you can find on our blog presspass.msnbc.com. first, author michael lewis, whose book "moneyball" is now a hit movie starring brad pitt. we talk to him about the film, but also about his new book "boomerang" on the global financial crisis. plus i sit down with documentary filmmaker ken burns, we discuss his new pbs film on prohibition.

his thoughts on civil discourse and politics, and, of course, baseball. we'll be right back here with o trends and takeways. we're back with our roundtable after this. we know why we're he. ♪ to connect our forces to what they need, when they need it. ♪ to help troops see danger, before it sees them. ♪ to answer the call of the brave and bring them safely home. [ female announcer ] around the globe, the people of boeing are working together, to support and protect all who serve. that's why we're here. ♪ every time a local business opens its doors or creates another laptop bag or hires another employee, it's not just good for business. it's good for the entire community. at bank of america, we know the impact that local businesses have on communities. that's why we extended $7.8 billion

to small businesses across the country so far this year. because the more we help them, the more we help make opportunity possible.

what's in the mail? well, it just might surprise you. because this is how people and business connect. feeling safe and secure that important letters and information don't get lost in thin air. or disappear with a click. but are delivered. from person to person. and, sometimes, even face to face. have a great day. you too. for some of the best ways to connect and protect... it's all in the mail. learn more at usps.com/mail. we're back in chicago with our roundtable. let's go to our trend tracker. the top stories that are trending this morning. perry campaigning in iowa. trying to get his campaign back on track right up there. those protesters, anti-war protesters, really, who almost closed down -- did close down

the smithsonian for a period of time, both stories getting some traction. mark halperin quickly, the other issue here is the issue of mormonism in the race, with mitt romney. rick perry had a pastor introducing him. pastor jeffers, who talked about the need for a real christian in the race. and he talked about mormonism being a cult in the view of evangelical christians. is this issue finally coming up in the race? >> big issue in 2008. the romney campaign knows he's going to take hits on a range of issues, including this one. he's never been comfortable talking about his faith. clearly less of an issue than last time. i don't think he can get the nomination without confrontation on this issue. >> and you think perry has to step up and create some distance here? >> he created a little distance. but not enough. he's not talked to reporters about his view on that. clearly they're going to be allies of rick perry who raise this question for rick perry's accountability. the question for romney is how he handles it. >> we're looking at the primary calendar. when the voting actually shorts

and all the shouting stops and the voting begins. it's so unsettled. we think talking to folks that we could see the iowa caucuses on january 3rd. we know florida's moved up to january 21st. south carolina the 21st, nevada now on the 14th. when is new hampshire? >> i think they'll have to go january. if they go back to december, and force iowa into december they risk undermining what they want, which is their big influence in the process. i think the secretary of state there has unilateral authority here will find a date in early january that will work out. it's still not ideal right up against new year's. but better than voting in this calendar year. >> why do you think it's tough for republicans to arrive at a consensus choice if you look at this top tier, romney, cain, perry. what's going on? >> i think republicans are flushing out who the strongest candidate will be to win. i don't think competition is a bad thing. i'm reminded of the democratic primary last time when obama and hillary clinton went back and forth. i think at the end of the day that was a good thing for democrats. >> who's toughest to beat obama in your judgment? >> you know, i haven't chosen a candidate yet. i like the idea of them competing and seeing.

i thi when you have over half of the country saying they're looking at somebody new, the long e that conversation takes place among our candidates, the more people are going to get engaged. i think at the end of the day what's important our party get behind whomever that candidate is. >> the president of the united states is getting ready, and i have a lot of faith in him. i'm happy to come back here. i hope you can come back here after the election when he's re-elected president of the united states. i think people are going to see his complete record. >> we're going to leave it there. thanks to all of you very much. also want to thank the terrific folks here at the museum of contemporary arts for hosting us in chicago this morning. a programming note before we go. this friday afternoon we're going to be doing a special live edition of our presspass conversation with our partners at facebook as a leadout to our republican presidential debate in new hampshire. that's the weekend before their primary, whenever they figure out exactly when that will be. we will talk about all the presidential debates, strategies and highlights with a special panel including the moderator of

so many of those historical debates, jim lehrer. you can watch and participate, you can participate in the conversation on our "meet the press" facebook page. facebook./meetthepress. we'll be back in washington next week. we'll have an exclusive debate between tim pawlenty and perry supporter bobby jindal. if it's sunday, it's "meet the press." that is helping business rethink how to do business. in here, inventory can be taught to learn. ♪ in here, machines have a voice... ♪ [ male announcer ] in here, medical history follows you... even when you're away from home. it's the at&t network -- a network of possibilities, creating and integrating solutions, helping business, and the world...work. rethink possible. ♪ [ female announcer ] the road is not exactly a place of intelligence. highway maintenance is underfunded, costing drivers $67 billion a year,

and countless tires. which drivers never actually check because they're busy, checking email. this is why we engineered a car that makes 2,000 decisions every second. the new audi a6 is here. the road is now an intelligent place. ♪ her tuffet, the road is now an intelligent place. eating fried foods. when that spider sat down beside her, she'd be too unhealthy to run away.

you can help your kids eat healthy and stay active... the more you know. , you're always looking ahead...

to what's next... to what's possible confident... that taking action now, is the way to create... a better tomorrow. that's why we're announcing, that with the planned merger with t-mobile, at&t will begin bringing five thousand jobs to america from overseas. we will invest eight billion dollars more... and deploy the next generation of wireless broadband to nearly everyone in america. this investment will create as many as ninety-six thousand american jobs. here at at&t, we believe in the future. we're not hesitating. we're investing in america now. why? well, we know it's good business. because america... has always been... and always will be... a smart investment. at&t.