red wave. apparently the media is calling it a red tsunami. that's when you know things are bad. we've gone from wave to tsunami. so maybe they were right. the sea levels are rising. they don't like these jokes. aha. probably because it's so cold. "tucker" is up next. always remember, i'm watters, and this is my world. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening. welcome to "tucker carlson." the good news stories keep coming. here's one of them. so when the supreme court overturned roe v. wade this past june, democrats how old in outrage for weeks, every hour on msnbc, sounded like a plot summary from the "hand maids tale." theocrasy rising. they'll be burning witches. liberals seemed genuinely upset

and probably most are, but at some level the people who run the democratic party weren't upset at all. they were thrilled. here was an issue for them to run in the midterm elections, an issue perfectly suited to a party that had nothing to talk about. are they going to brag about joe biden? i don't think so. it's abortion, they're going to take your abortions away. that was the democratic message for the midterm elections, coming up in just a few days, but there was a problem with the messaging. so covid had just ended, and people not being entirely stupid still remembered this very same democratic party, the same people, had forced the entire population to wear paper masks like children, and then to take the shot as a condition of going outside. so women have the right to control their own bodies? hmm. they used to tell us that. then they fired thousands of nurses for refusing to submit to an experimental vaccine. so the phrase "my body my

choice" had been, as we say in the news business, overtaken by events. clearly democrats needed a new slogan, a new way to talk about abortion. unfortunately nobody could think of one. "your body, my choice"? no. that wouldn't work. it was too real. in the end, liberals dusted off the same old talking points and pretended like covid never happened. watch. >> midterm election is now less than three weeks away. in the final stretch, i've noticed, i don't know if you've noticed, frankly this gas lighting of women voters, this message that says you don't control about your own right to your own bodies, dear, it's the economy, stupid. a media narrative that women don't care about abortion, that women don't mind if the states care about their bodies. they don't care about that. they just care about the price of milk. >> tucker: a shame if states got to control people's bodies, like telling people what to wear on their faces, or what drugs they have to be injected with.

that's like the "hands made tale." theocrasy. next they'll control what you read on social media. oh, wait. ha-ha-ha! it's pretty amazing. the good thing is, it's not working. abortion politics is a total fixation of democratic donors. it's the main thing they care about. why is that, by the way? it's a religion. it's a child sacrifices cult. not everyone else feels that i what. even democrats. as the daily caller just reported, polls show that, quote, abortion is not a top priority for philadelphia voters. in fact, quote, most women support abortion limits that would have been considered unconstitutional under the roe vs. wade precedent. oh. so it looks like yelling about abortion is definitely not enough to keep democrats in control of the congress. are you surprised by that? no, of course not. you live here. so how did the highly paid

admittedly pretty smart strategists who figure out what the issues are in the democratic party so misjudge this one? they forgot that not everyone in america is as miserable as they are. in fact, there are still plenty of people in this country, believe it or not, who have happy marriages. there's still people who love their kids and their grandchildren. still people consider babies a blessing, not just an obstacle to better vacation. now some of those people, maybe a lot of those people, might consider themselves, quote, pro-choice, but they're hardly abortion. they don't think abortion is a positive good. it's not. they don't consider it liberation. they definitely don't see abortion as janet yellen recently claimed as the answer to our national economic problem. she said that. so here's how it works. janet yellen gets rich giving speeches to the companies she regulates. that's corruption, but never charged. she's still free. in fact, she's the treasury

secretary. you get poorer. the solution, more abortions. that's the message they're selling. and maybe not surprisingly it doesn't work. that's not what voters want. so what do voters want? what do they tear about? if you look at the polls, they care about the quality of their own lives. so they care about the economy and they care about crime. this is very obvious. you don't need to look at polling to know it, but every poll shows it with maximum clarity. how does the media respond to this? well, of course, doing their job. they've done everything possible to minimize both issues. the economy and crime. they've told us the economy is not in a recession. no, it's not. when, of course, by every measure it is very much in a recession. and on crime, they've told you don't even talk about it. only racists worry about crime. racists. the one thing you don't want to be called. so how should republicans respond to that?

well, we have video evidence. here's kari lake running for governor in arizona, deftly swatting away a reporter's claim that somehow people of color like crime. watch this. >> a lot of people of color -- >> a lot of people of color? a lot of people of color? how many people of color have you talked to about that? >> if you look at surveys -- >> which surveys? i'm happy to look at those. i talk to people of color. i talk to all arizonans. they're all concerned about the crime. just because your skin isn't the same color as yours doesn't mean you want your kids to be walking down the street in an unsafe neighborhood. every arizonan wants safety and security in their neighborhood. it doesn't matter what your skin color is. and if you look at stats, you will look and see that that police do not target people of color. that is a lie that's been perpetuated by the left and spread and disseminated and respread in the media. check the stats.

>> tucker: ha-ha-ha. so great. so the report says "well, people of color are concerned about your crime policies." because of course being a white liberal all white liberals know if they know one thing that they have a right to speak for, quote, people of color. not to people of color, something they really do, but on behalf of people of color. kari lake stops right there. really, what people of color have you talk to? ha-ha-ha! all republicans running for office should watch that video. in the end, you don't need to convince people that crime is real, because they live here too. crime is everywhere. in new york crime on public transit is up more than 40%. not just pickpocketing. now, this is -- this video we're about to show you is not an aberration necessarily. it just so happens it was caught on tape, but this is exactly the right people are afraid to ride

the subway. this weekend a man was pushed on to the tracks. you can get the motive from watching this video. we know with no warning whatsoever. here it is. >> 32-year-old david martin is afraid for his safety after this random attack. he's in physical and emotional pain. he finances to replay this horrifying moment caught on camera over and over again. in this video, you can see the guy in the yellow hoody shove him on to the subway tracks. he's zeroed in on the innocent commuter, and charged right at him. martin ended up in the hospital. just grateful to be alive. >> tucker: oh, this random attack. there's a lot of random attacks on the internet, you may have noticed. are they random? really? the person who did that is not being sought as a hate criminal. you wonder why. but the point is those kinds of attacks didn't used to happen. now they're commonplace enough that you may no longer be shocked by them. but if you live there, you stay

off the subway as a result. crime in philadelphia is completely out of control. for example, last year philadelphia reported 562 murders. that is the highest homicide total since 1960 that happens to be the year the city started tracking homicide data. this year in philadelphia, crime with a gun is up 47%. why is this happening? it's not an accident. none of this is an accident. crime is rising as a direct result of policies designed to make crime rise. at the same time any effort by normal people, middle-class people, to defend themselves is immediately met with the full voracity of the state. this is an attempt to destroy the middle class. let's be honest about it. this is crime with a purpose. they don't want to have this conversation, the people who did this, and that's why they attack you personally and morally if you bring it up. so in philadelphia a lot of

these crimes can be traced to one man, s sor as-backed da. if you stop charging people with certain crimes they commit more of them. that seems like an obvious observation. again, it's more evidence this is not an accident. larry krasner is not an idiot. none of these people are stupid. they're doing it on purpose. they're trying to destroy. why are they doing that? we can't guess as to motive, but they're definitely doing it. when asked about this, how does larry krasner respond? "shutup, racist." watch. >> we're looking at philly, a superheated election cycle, where part of the republican playbook, as you well know, is to point a finger at-large diverse cities and say large diverse cities are lawless.

we see the same old playbook, which is about coded and racist messaging. it's about blaming the biggest city in pennsylvania with the most diverse population for having the same struggle that we have with gun violence everywhere. >> tucker: oh, diversity, racism, diversity, racism. shut up, shut up. here you have another white liberal deputizing himself to speak for people of color against his political opponents. have you figured how this works? are you getting tired of it yet? voters are getting tired of this, so tired of it, that even some democrats have started to figure out actually maybe voters don't want to be shot, raped or carjacked, and attack morally if they don't like it. kathy hochul in part in response for the rising crime in new york, is running last-ditch ads promising to fight crime.

oh, really, kathy hochul? probably too late for her, losing to a republican in new york. pennsylvania is almost as democratic as new york is, but the lieutenant governor now running for senate there, john fetterman, is also losing for the same reasons, we guess. his challenger is dr. mehmet os. thank you for coming on. in the case of fetterman, since he's an officeholder, he can be traced to specific policies that have increased violent crime in the state of pennsylvania. did they not think that anyone was going to notice that, when they put this man up for office? >> it's shocking when you hear krasner speak there about a city he thinks he's protecting. i've been in philadelphia a lot during this campaign. i live in philly. i went to school in west philly. you actually talk to the people there, what they say they don't want to be part of a white woke social experiment where they're

left with the consequences. fetterman, to your point, said if he had a magic wand, to do anything he wanted to, his goal would be to release murderers from life in prison. now, tucker, can you imagine having a magic wand to do anything you want? you want take care of inflation. releasing murderers from life in prison without asking the families what they think, oftentimes voting against the other members of the parole board, yet that's the position he's taken. >> tucker: so many pennsylvanians have died of fentanyl ods, that the numbers are almost beyond belief, and yet i don't think stopping fentanyl importation, punishingg

peddlers is not part of it. why is that? >> they take the money, buy money from china. they don't say anything to china about that, by the way. the fentanyl is brought to people like pieces of candy. fetterman wants to legalize all drugs. i want heroin injection sites. he embraced a measure in oregon, enacted two years ago, and 40% increase in overdose death rates. that's to be expected, if you legalize all drugs. here's the part that catches me. 50% increase in homicides. you create a lawless environment. police aren't allowed to do their job, is which to confiscate narcotics. this is the world he's trying to create for us. by the way, if you're bothered by this, and i was bothered enough to run against him, the democratic party doesn't know about him, they're trying to get the 51st senate seat, so

they're pouring in the money. we're going to win on the issues, just like all the republicans you mentioned today, the debate we'll have tomorrow night will reinforce john fetterman's radical positions. we're going to focus on kitchen table issues, crime, drugs, both at the border, and the economy everyone is focused on, although if you're in philadelphia right now you're worried about your life and companies are leaving, big chains leaving the city, because they're done with the experiment. >> tucker: i got to ask you, and i'm sure you don't like to go go motive, it's amazing, 107,000 americans died of drug ods last year. why would anyone push an idea like that at the time like this? >> because they're more concerned about the perpetrator or the criminal than the innocent and the victims. they don't hear the stories that i've been witnessing as i campaign of moms telling me they've found their children blue and dead because they went

on facebook and signed up for an over-the-counter pain pill and ended having fentanyl in it. we confiscated seven times more fentanyl -- by the way, groups have endorsed me, because they know fetterman doesn't have their back. tucker, that's part of the problem. if you talk to the left-leaning politicians, the far left especially, they don't want the police to do their jobs. they don't anyone to do their jobs. they don't want to deal with the consequences of it, so they don't come downtown to the prayer vigils which i've attended, kensington, the largest open-air drug market in the country, that we've created with bizarre beliefs that you can give people drugs and it's okay. taking heroin is not a long-term strategy. i want to take them to detox, put them in rehab, and i'll fund that when i'm in the senate.

why wouldn't you want that? this should be a bipartisan desire to make the country stable. >> tucker: it's stunning to me. what's stunning to me, i think you're going to win this seat in a democratic seat because of what you're saying there. dr. oz, thank you. >> god bless >> tucker: if you're starting to get the sense these are not ordinary midterm electrics, you're -- elections, you're right. they could determine the course of our country. for our documentary series, we embedded for months with one campaign trying to flip control of the united states senate. the documentary is called "the candidate: blake masters," out tomorrow, and we got remarkable access to the candidate. here's a look at it. >> ladies and gentlemen, please welcome to the stage endorsed candidate for senate in arizona, blake masters. >> thank you. through your support for making your republican nominee for the

united states senate. most americans -- not most americans. all americans, we're sick. we are sick of joe biden and the democrats destroying our country. soon we're going to send a fighter to d.c. that's me. i'm the fighter. i'm the fighter. i'm going to fix it. there's one person in arizona who's done more than anyone to drag this country in the wrong direction. that's senator mark kelly. >> that's senator mark kelly. >> mark kelly, he campaigned as a moderate, but voted as a radical. >> you know, the president, has he done a good job, do you think? >> hey -- >> everything about mark kelly,

everything about this guy, is managed by consultants and handlers. >> drop an f-bomb, yay or nay? >> at least you weren't here. you're, like, here. okay, that's no. if you go here, you're, like, i got to do it. tell me i can't do something, i'm doing it. as we head into the general election, the media will want to tell you we live in a culturally-divided state. we're going to beat mark kelly, turn this country around. let's go. because, remember, we are the vast majority. thank you. here's to victory in november. god bless you. >> tucker: you just can't overstate how deeply unappealing most politicians are.

even in private they're lines are canned, because there's nothing real about them. fundamentally at the core, they're hollow. black masters is quite an exception to that sad rule. he is interesting. he thinks for himself. he for the purposes of this documentary, he gave us remarkable access to his campaign. like it or not, you will know more about blake masters. it's a great documentary, only on fox nation. rochelle just got a new covid booster, because every jab offers more protection than the last. that's why they're forcing it on kids now. how did that work out for her? we have an update on her condition. we'll be right back.

- [narrator] if your business kept on employees through the pandemic, getrefunds.com can qualify you for a payroll tax refund of up to $26,000 per employee, even if you got ppp. and all it takes is eight minutes to find out. then we'll work with you to fill out your forms and submit the application. that easy. getrefunds.com has helped businesses like yours claim over $1 billion in payroll tax refunds. but it's only available for a limited time. go to getrefunds.com powered by innovation refunds.

♪ ♪ >> tucker: well, it's just a year and a half ago that the director of the cdc rochelle walensky who claims to be a physician went on msnbc to stay the covid shot stops the transition of covid! >> our data from the cdc today suggests, you know, that

vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. >> tucker: vaccinated people do not carry the virus. they don't get sick, said the head of the cdc. to prove it, walensky took the shot, the booster. this week she tested positive for covid, but grateful for the protection the vaccine provided. why are we telling you this story? for two reasons. one in order to preserve the credibility of our agencies, rochelle walensky should apologize for the misinformation she spread throughout the american media, a. b, this doesn't work. we should not be pushing it on kids. if rochelle walensky wants to get 11 boosters, that's up to her, but kids should not be required to get this as a precondition of being educated in this country. that's insane. well, the congressional black

caucus says it's mission is to, quote, to ensure that african americans and other marginalized communities in the u.s. have the opportunity to achieve the american dream. okay. that sounds positive. ha-ha-ha! in fact, the congressional black caucus is completely corrupt, as everyone in washington knows, but it's a way to elect democrats. they don't care about african americans or those in marginalized communities. they're currently backing a white democrat over jennifer ruth green running for congress in indiana and jennifer ruth green joins us tonight. thank you so much for coming on. you would think you're african american, the congressional black caucus i guess would be on your side, it's a race-specific group, but why aren't they backing? >> thank you very much for having me, mr. carlson. the hypocrisy is incredibly clear. we see this is about power and about policy.

this is about process. this is not about progress. these are the liberal it is who want to have -- elites who want to have power and focused on retaining it. their decision to back my opponent is hypocritical at best, because largely with you think about the fact that i understand the black cultural experience better than any white man ever will, i understand the growth that needs to occur, i understand what needs to happen, and i'm committed as a black woman, asian american woman, to progressing minorities in our country, i seem like the clear choice, but because they want power over politics, the hypocrisy continues to be loud. >> tucker: well, maybe you know how corrupt they are. maybe that's why they don't want to back you. >> absolutely. absolutely. as i'm sitting in our district, we have a third of our people in gary, indiana, who are sub poverty level. a third of the people in gary, indiana, live in food deserts.

he's are people that are hamburger. the economy that the congressman has voted for has put them in a place where they have to choose between gas and groceries. he's are african americans clearly hurting. he has zero regard for them. they are supposed on trying -- the cdc specifically -- focused on trying to continue to elect him because overall they believe he's doing a good job. i can tell you this, mr. carlson, there's a line a mile and a half long of cars that sit outside my headquarters, people who need to get to the food pantry, who need help, and this is the mechanic a that the congressional black caucus wants to act as if it is helping black people, and it's clearly not in indiana's congressional first district. >> tucker: i've been to gary, indiana, one of the toughest places i've been in my life in this and any other country. it's overwhelming african

american. it's really bad, i would say. what has the democratic party ever done for gary, indiana? >> we have amazing people that live in gary, indiana. >> tucker: yeah, i believe it. >> amazing friends, people that love god, love others, want to serve both. i'm proud to have gary, indiana, in our district. when i think about the pilot of the people hurting pause of these economic choices, this is a plan that has no action behind it. the congressman has no plan, but butif you go to my website thers a plan to help figure out economic processes to move forward. i'm disappointed in the hypocrisy that the congressional black caucus continues to provide, because they don't have a plan, and they would rather continue to crush people because it's all about, again, their power and the liberal elites versus regular america, people who want to stay in power, although they are doing absolutely nothing to make progress on the mission they talk about. >> tucker: well, of course. if they cared, they'd be talking about gary, indiana, not

ukraine. but they don't care, and that's obvious. jennifer-ruth green, thank you. we pretty much stopped playing video of joe biden breaking down in public, saying bizarre things, garbled sentences, but the clip we're about to show you we couldn't resist because it's too unbelievable. stay tuned for that. meanwhile the media are casually preparing americans for nuclear war like it's no big deal. you know, inflation, nuclear war, just a thing a country faces. really? we'll give you an update on where we are in that war next.

>> tucker: so if you're in the media, you sit down and interview a president in his first term, you don't typically ask him to run for re-election, because they all do, because that's who they are, running for election is the whole point of going into politics. and yet biden sat down with msnbc the other day and they asked him are you going to run again, and the implications

maybe you've got such cognitive decline that you can't run again. to prove, yes, i'm completely demented, i'm a mannequin at this point, joe biden nodded off in the middle. interview. we're not making this up. watch. >> i have not made that formal decision, but it's my intention, my intention to run again. we have time to make that decision. >> dr. biden is for it? >> dr. biden thinks that -- my wife thinks that -- that i -- that we're doing something very important. >> tucker: whoa. he literally nodded out in the middle of an answer about whether he was running again. before he nodded out, he said, "oh, yeah, i'm probably going to run again." take three steps back. only a guy who's supremely

confident in the effectiveness of voter fraud could be confident in that. then because everything with joe biden can in fact get weirder, he blithely announced he could drop dead at anytime. he actually said that. watch this. >> am i slowing down? everything talks about the new 70s is the new -- the 50s. i'm a great respecter of faith. i could get deceased tomorrow. i could you know, drop-dead tomorrow. >> yeah, i could drop dead tomorrow. 81 million votes he got, without even campaigning, from his basement in delaware. 81 million votes. you have to believe that or else you're an insurrectionist.

it's not even real, but it is real. we could have a nuclear war, not a big deal, just a nuclear war, haven't had one in 80 years. "newsweek" recently wrote a piece, "these foods are essential for nuclear war survival in the united states." bet you don't think about when you're at the grocery store? 60 years after the cuban missile crisis, the nuclear dangers are far worse. why is this not a headline in every paper every morning? at least a few democrats seem concerned about this. according to the "washington post," 30 house democrats sent a letter to biden urging him to shift his strategy with ukraine and pursue direct negotiations with russia. well, yeah. but liz cheney, who loves wars, because they make her feel powerful, remains completely unfazed about the prospect of, well, destruction the world. here she was yesterday. >> the idea that somehow the party is now no longer going to

support the ukrainian people -- you know, for somebody who has a picture of ronald reagan on the awesome his office in the capitol, the notion that now kevin mccarthy is going to make his herd of the pro-putin wing of my party is a stunning thing. it's dangerous. he knows better. the fact that he's willing to go down the path that america will no longer stand for freedom tells you he's willing to sacrifice everything for his own political gain. >> tucker: oh, yeah. the ukrainian people, not some corrupt oligarch in a tracksuit. we're helping the ukrainian people, making sure the war goes on as long as possible, until we get to nuclear war. it's anyone more loathsome than liz cheney? daniel davis, a senior fellow with defense priorities, joins us tonight. thank you very much for coming on. the way that people are talking about the prospect of the use of

nuclear weapons in ukraine, i never thought i would live to see people throw it out parenthetically. this is not the military you served in, is it? "oh, a nuclear war, no big deal"? >> no. when i served, that's what we needed to avoid at all costs. that's what the whole idea of mutually assured destruction, was supposed to assure it didn't, because that governments, whether it was the hated soviets or the united states, all bitterly against each other, we all understood where you can't go, keeping everybody safe. we've lost that somehow. the current administration, as i wrote about in 1945, a couple days ago, they're pursuing a policy that logically can't be accomplished without putting us at grave risk of a nuclear war, because they say on the one hand we're going to help ukraine, no matter what it takes, as long as takes, but, on the other hand, we understand that if russia

actually -- if that policy succeeded, and russia in danger of being pushed out, defeated on the battlefield, then the chance that putin resorts to nuclear weapons is extremely high. we simply can't go down that path. there's nothing in ukraine worth losing one american city. >> tucker: what's so striking is we're not having a national conversation about this, because people like liz cheney, who, by the way, has never been in a fistfight in her entire sad life, denounces anyone with questions about it as pro-putin. have you ever seen this zombielike state in the country we're moving toward, and nobody is talking about it. >> anybody talking about a sane policy keeping america safe is a putin apologist. our government is supposed to exist to make sure that our

country is safe, secure, and prosperous. if we're pursuing policies that put that at risk, we need to pursue new policies. i hate the ukraine people going through this, but we have to end the war. that's our primary objective. >> tucker: the primary objective is to help the united states, you would think. i appreciate you reminding us of that. lieutenant ocolonel daniel davis with defense priorities, thank you. >> tucker: msnbc hosted a focus group with voters, and tried to browbeat them over the insurrection of january 6th. he-he-he! it's so moving. brian kilmeade joins us next.

hello, i'm franklin graham. we're in election season and many politicians are promising that they're telling the truth. i can tell you there is one who always tells the truth. that is the lord jesus christ. he said, "i'm the way, the truth and the life, "and no man comes to the father except through me." there aren't many ways to god. there is only one, and that's through jesus christ. god sent jesus to earth to save us from our sins. he took our sins to the cross. he shed his blood and died, was buried, and god raised him to life on the third day. if you have never trusted him, if you have never put your faith in the embodiment of truth,

the lord jesus christ, you can do that right now. just pray this prayer with me. just say, "god i'm a sinner, i'm sorry, forgive me. "i want to turn from my sins, "i believe that jesus christ is your son. "i want to trust him as my savior, "and follow him as my lord. "from this day forward. if you prayed that prayer, call that number right now. god bless you!

>> tucker: so the problem with inviting civilians on to your tv show is they don't read the crypt necessary -- script

necessarily, as msnbc reporter had a panel discussion with trump voters from pittsburgh. hilarity ensued. watch this. >> doug m mastriano was photographed in the restricted area. >> which area? unlocking doors for people. >> they opened the gates. >> so it shouldn't be disqualifying for an elected official if they participate in january 6th? >> he didn't strike anybody, hurt anybody. >> the only one that died was a protester there, not a capitol police officer. >> unarmed female veteran. >> that's the only one who died. >> a police officer did die. >> no. that was a stroke. that's not on site. >> that's not caused by that. he shouldn't have been a police officer. >> so what do you make overall of january 6th? i mean, watching that footage, it was disturbing. i mean, there were people

throwing excrement at the walls. >> looked like antifa. >> like the black lives matter riots. >> tucker: these are trump voters, so they're stupid. actually the reporter is legit stupid, when says she see the insurrection. insurrection? they don't know what she's talking about, because it's so stupid. brian kilmeade is the new book, "freedom fighter," now in paper back. before we get to that msnbc atrocity. >> tucker, i've had a lot of

introductions. >> tucker: it was heartfelt. >> what i try to do, i think it's perfect with your soundbites, i'm surprised they aired that, by the way. when you have that -- you know what, i'm going to come back, there's a problem with the tape. i had a problem sending it to the office. i don't think we should air this. you know why, always try to add stuff, the news, trying to take down the statue of lincoln that federal dallas dedicated because black lives matter. they ripped it off the pedestal, because i guess america is a bad place. what was so interesting, if you think about january 6th, as i read the text and watched it, is opposite day. for years, we watched trump supporters get beat up. we watched antifa destroy the place in masks. we watched black lives matter wreck cities and attack cops.

we've never seen that from trump supporters. to watch january 6th, i'm not going to soft peddle what happened, but that was a horrific day. what about the combination of all those other days that led up to that, that had everyone shaking their head, am i watching this, a trump scene of them attacking the capitol and law enforcement? there's questions there that still need to be answered, especially with the focus group we just witnessed. the first successful democrat would say i'm outraged about january 6th, and i'm outraged at what happened in new york city streets in the middle of a pandemic. i'm outraged that all the statues came down, the confeetti of andrew jackson in front of the white house, nooses around its neck, taking off abram lincoln's name off schools, tearing up our founding fathers because they didn't march in the same way we did in 2020, instead of judging people by the

generations they lived in. i'm outraged that they're ripping apart the foundation of the country, and not happy as heck to be here trying to make it better. i did not witness these riots trying to make the country better. that's why i always will go back to history, and say what did they do during troubling times? they seemed to cherish the country. even if they got violent in times of our past, and certainly civil war is an example of that, they always said, glad to be here, let's make it better, this is my vision, but we're the most successful multicultural country in the history of the planet, warts and all, and it's time to stop running from our past. i don't ever say january 6th is okay. for those people trying to say, you never acknowledged the problems before, how dare you demand me condemn everything now. >> tucker: and stop lying to us and berating us, you know, as if you occupy some position of moral authority. you don't. brian kilmeade, nicely put. congratulations, by the way, on

your book, coming in paper back. >> thank you. >> tucker: well worth it. more news just ahead..

>> months ago blake masters running for senate in arizona, the documentary is "amazing" and it's out on fox nation in the morning. see you tomorrow. here is sean. >> hello america. welcome to "hannity" the midterms are days away. we are in beautiful scottsdale, arizona where we will be joined by republican senate candidate blake masters. any fans here? candidate cary who has opened a three-point lead against democrat gutless katie