i n't really think they went wrong in blasingame when the engaged in the same termination with respect to what's official and what isn't. there we agree with most of what that opinion says. >> for some official acts that are not within the article to -- the article ii exclusive power so official acts but not within the article to exclivpower, even for those, i assume you would think that a clr atement has to be required, clear statement in the ate covering the president if the official acts are going to be criminalized. >> obviously, at the highest possible level when it comes to the unrestricted wl wers in this indictment -- >> i'm assuming the exclusive powers are walled off and can't be prosecuted. there e lot of official powers that are not exclusive to thprident under article two authority. r those, i understood you to say at a minimum, there would need to be a clear statement in the statute referencing the president so that thprident is on notice and can conduct himself or herself accordingly. >> that's correct and that would be consistt. >> can i follow up on that? you can see t