arrived and said, let’s just fight, probably the situation was actually more complicated, but what arakhami did, he changed it. how to achieve a situation so that at least someone takes responsibility for the outcome of the negotiations, it is clear who makes the decision, but it is not clear, on the other hand, well, just in the article that served as the starting point for our conversation, there they are in general like this neatly, but they say that ukraine has set conditions, which guarantees from the us side of the west, which the west did not want to support, and indeed most likely it was said, are new. anything has been signed, but we don’t promise, as a result, this has started to be thrown around, and in general the issue of guaranteeing security in this conflict is very painful, because it really does arise, and what kind of it can it be, ukraine constantly refers to this ill-fated budapest memorandum of thirty years ago, so you promised us and didn’t deliver, but it’s absolutely unacceptable for us, the bilateral guarantees that are now promises... but what is it, is it an