0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so do you disagree with justice ketanji brown jackson who said, what you're arguing could allow the seat of the presidency to become where you can act with impunity that any criminal act couldn't habit because you have nothing to fear, no prospect. >> we believe immunity is inherent in the constitutional design. >> so that's the system we've been operating under for hundreds of years and it's not actually in the constitution. >> we believe that immunity naturally follows from the constitution the same way that civil immunity, which isn't written in the constitution naturally follows from our constitutional system. >> and that was recognized now as by the court and nixon v. fitzgerald in 1982, what is it, victory here? >> is it the supreme court embracing your argument on total immunity or is it just sending it back to the lower court and therefore, delaying the january 6 trial from happening before the 2024 election. >> we think it's very important for the future of the presidency, for the court to embrace a vigorous doctrine and if presidential immunity in the criminal context. that's w
so do you disagree with justice ketanji brown jackson who said, what you're arguing could allow the seat of the presidency to become where you can act with impunity that any criminal act couldn't habit because you have nothing to fear, no prospect. >> we believe immunity is inherent in the constitutional design. >> so that's the system we've been operating under for hundreds of years and it's not actually in the constitution. >> we believe that immunity naturally follows from...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
GBN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but so ketanji brown jackson, who was obviously one of the democrat appointees on the supreme court, she said, you know that you can't do this because if you say there's presidential immunity across the board, you're turning the oval office into a centre of criminality, even though you might disagree with them on many things. isn't that that's true, isn't it? yeah. >> well, my biggest worry is the dems realise this so they can start assassinating people you know, they, like trump will just say you'd do it as a joke, but they'd actually probably do it. but, satirical content there of course. but, yeah. but as, the judge alito here points out, using a navy seal team to assassinate a rival was implausible. well, that's not really quite strong enough, is it? you want it to be absolutely ruled out, really, don't you? but yeah. he says he says it would never actually come up and wouldn't happen. >> isn't it strange that these conversations are even being had in the democrats like to raise all these weird points, don't they, to try and get get the idea in people's heads that trump is going
but so ketanji brown jackson, who was obviously one of the democrat appointees on the supreme court, she said, you know that you can't do this because if you say there's presidential immunity across the board, you're turning the oval office into a centre of criminality, even though you might disagree with them on many things. isn't that that's true, isn't it? yeah. >> well, my biggest worry is the dems realise this so they can start assassinating people you know, they, like trump will...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jackson is very significantright? this isn't just a left-right split. that wsaw onoth sides. ism >> that's ght. and that happens ofteim when we' talking out defendant's rights that it cuts across ideological boundaries, and that the justices and they expressed it today as we just saw, are concerned turn that the law may have been interpreted to broadly and that they want to interpret the law if there's ambiguity in favor of a defendant, there's even a canon of construction the way you're supposed to interpret certain laws is in favor of the defendant. if there's that kind of ambiguity and they both were pressing on that issue. >> all so here's the thing half of jack smith's charges against trump in the election interference case use the same statute. if it gets struck down here, not only does have huge implications for the defendants in january 6, you'll hundreds of people have been charged some have said this could be disastrous for jack smith when it comes to trump himself. what do you say? >> so do think it will be
jackson is very significantright? this isn't just a left-right split. that wsaw onoth sides. ism >> that's ght. and that happens ofteim when we' talking out defendant's rights that it cuts across ideological boundaries, and that the justices and they expressed it today as we just saw, are concerned turn that the law may have been interpreted to broadly and that they want to interpret the law if there's ambiguity in favor of a defendant, there's even a canon of construction the way you're...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
was going to come up at some point, but this is how trump's attorney responded when justice congee brown jackson raised this question about president nixon what was up with a pardon for president nixon i think if everybody thought that presidents couldn't be prosecuted than what was that about? well, he was under investigation, froze private in public conduct at the time john, given that, i wonder what you made of how just over ten minutes after that trump's attorney also acknowledged that that allegation by jack smith and that indictment includes both private and official acts my reaction was that there's a very thin read there for them to draw upon ford clearly thought president ford clearly thought that nixon could be prosecuted. >> and deed. he thought he was getting confession from nixon when he issued the pardon, he actually had carried around in his, in his pocketbook are in his wallet, a site of a case that said in essence by the supreme court that acceptance of a pardon was admission of guilt. so the whole assumption back then was that presidents had no immunity. they it could n
was going to come up at some point, but this is how trump's attorney responded when justice congee brown jackson raised this question about president nixon what was up with a pardon for president nixon i think if everybody thought that presidents couldn't be prosecuted than what was that about? well, he was under investigation, froze private in public conduct at the time john, given that, i wonder what you made of how just over ten minutes after that trump's attorney also acknowledged that that...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let's listen in writing now the us solicitor general, elizabeth prelogar and justice ketanji brown jackson are going back-and-forth criminal prosecution. the doctors can't provide the care because until they conclude can conclude that a prosecutor looking over their shoulder won't second guess that maybe it wasn't really necessary to prevent death. >> thank you. council. justice thomas this is leto we've now heard let's see an hour-and-a-half of argument on this case, and one potentially very important phrase in emtala has hardly been mentioned maybe it hasn't even been mentioned at all. >> and that is emtala was reference to the woman's quote, unquote, unborn child in an odd phrase to put in a statute that imposes a mandate to perform abortions. have you ever seen an abortion statute that uses the phrase unborn child it's not an odd phrase when you look at what congress was doing in 1989, there were well-publicized cases where women were experiencing conditions, their own health and life. >> we're not in danger, but the fetus was engraved distress it's an hospitals weren't treating them w
let's listen in writing now the us solicitor general, elizabeth prelogar and justice ketanji brown jackson are going back-and-forth criminal prosecution. the doctors can't provide the care because until they conclude can conclude that a prosecutor looking over their shoulder won't second guess that maybe it wasn't really necessary to prevent death. >> thank you. council. justice thomas this is leto we've now heard let's see an hour-and-a-half of argument on this case, and one potentially...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, jackson going over some of these arguments with jeffrey green, a lawyer for one of those defendants, and i'm back out here with paula reid and shan wu fascinating case. obviously lots of implications for all of those january 6 defendants, possibly for the former president and all of this, but now one of the things that we jumped on this as soon as we came on the air with as paul on that is clarence thomas yesterday was missing missing an action yesterday. we didn't really get a clear explanation as to what was going on. >> he is back today and a shan was noting as we're watching this, you couldn't see us. >> we're off camera at that point. >> he was pretty active there yeah, he clearly making a point. >> right. because as we said before the argument started, the biggest question before we get to the legal arguments. whereas justice clarence thomas, because as you said yesterday, not only was he absent, they didn't provide an explanation. and as the most senior associate justice on the supreme court, that raises a lot of serious questions because we are in an election she near never
, jackson going over some of these arguments with jeffrey green, a lawyer for one of those defendants, and i'm back out here with paula reid and shan wu fascinating case. obviously lots of implications for all of those january 6 defendants, possibly for the former president and all of this, but now one of the things that we jumped on this as soon as we came on the air with as paul on that is clarence thomas yesterday was missing missing an action yesterday. we didn't really get a clear...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> now i also think what justice jackson and ketanji brown jackson said about i think it's most people understand that if you commit a criminal crime, that circa ray or nixon, excuse me, that the reason why nixon needed to be part in is because most likely he was going to have criminal prosecution and go to jail. and so she got to put it out like we've seen this play out in a different way. i actually did not mind as i am a lawyer by training, but not by practice. and the intellectual exercise because i think this case has so has such implications for where we go as a country, i want every rock picked up, looked under, turned over, and making sure that they ask every question. so at the end of the day, i hope they role of the way that you're suggesting that it's not blanket immunity, that there can't be any well, they just called it quits too early without really taking the tires. as georgia, i had no idea was surrounded by so many lawyers. we actually can show everyone exactly what you were talking about, ashley, let's watch that i'm trying to understand what the addition is from turn
>> now i also think what justice jackson and ketanji brown jackson said about i think it's most people understand that if you commit a criminal crime, that circa ray or nixon, excuse me, that the reason why nixon needed to be part in is because most likely he was going to have criminal prosecution and go to jail. and so she got to put it out like we've seen this play out in a different way. i actually did not mind as i am a lawyer by training, but not by practice. and the intellectual...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
ketanji brown jackson asking the question about these competing interests on the one hand, you have someone like donald trump who was saying, listen every president has got to have immunity. otherwise, it'll be so afraid to do there actual job. i'm paraphrasing, of course. and she's saying that's one interest, but the other one is what do you do with an unbounded president who has no fear of any criminal liability and the only solution is a political one. how do you balance those two things? and ultimately, the entire discussion today was about that, but also about what should we be doing in this instance right now is this, we can resolve right now or is it a matter of taking it back to the lower court and saying, listen, you guys figure out what's an official act. you guys figure out what is a personal act. we're not going to go through a list, give you an itemized list of all the things that could be present and what could be personal. >> you figure that out now the consequence of that is, is it about the prosecution that would be impacted here today or about a prospective one in the futu
ketanji brown jackson asking the question about these competing interests on the one hand, you have someone like donald trump who was saying, listen every president has got to have immunity. otherwise, it'll be so afraid to do there actual job. i'm paraphrasing, of course. and she's saying that's one interest, but the other one is what do you do with an unbounded president who has no fear of any criminal liability and the only solution is a political one. how do you balance those two things?...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson expressed concern about the precedent that'd set for future presidents. justice sotomayor got trump's attorney to double down on an argument he made earlier this year, infamously, that a former president should be allowed constitutionally to order the assassination of a political rival. >> if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts that for which he can get immunity? >> it would depend on the hypothetical. we could see that could well be an official act. >> those kinds of powers, the most powerful person in the world, with the greatest amount of authority, could go into office knowing that there would be no potential penalty for committing crimes. i'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the oval office into, you know, the seat of criminal activity in this country. >> a lot to sift through there, joyce vance. let's just take a step back and shake your head a little bit that we're actually having a hypothetical discussion
justice ketanji brown jackson expressed concern about the precedent that'd set for future presidents. justice sotomayor got trump's attorney to double down on an argument he made earlier this year, infamously, that a former president should be allowed constitutionally to order the assassination of a political rival. >> if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts that for which...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
KGO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> reporter: justice judge ketanji brown jackson asking if there is no accountability what would stop a president from, quote, turning the oval office into the seat of criminal about activity in this country. >> if the potential for criminal liability is taken off the table, wouldn't there be a significant risk that future presidents would be emboldened to commit crimes with abandon while in office? >> reporter: but conservative justices, while not fully embracing trump's argument made the case that presidents need some protection from criminal prosecution. >> presidents have to make a lot of tough decisions about enforcing the law, and they have to make decisions about questions that are unsettled. >> did i understand you to say, if he makes a mistake, he makes a mistake, he's subject to criminal laws just like anybody else? he's in a special -- precarious position. >> reporter: much of the argument centered around what constitutes a personal act versus an official act by a president. the justices said it might take the case back down to lower court to sort it out. >> you say even if
. >> reporter: justice judge ketanji brown jackson asking if there is no accountability what would stop a president from, quote, turning the oval office into the seat of criminal about activity in this country. >> if the potential for criminal liability is taken off the table, wouldn't there be a significant risk that future presidents would be emboldened to commit crimes with abandon while in office? >> reporter: but conservative justices, while not fully embracing trump's...
0
0.0
Apr 6, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i had the privilege to meet justice brown jackson. she had not only replaced him on the bench, but in his office as well. she really made it her office. i stood there in the room, where justice stephen breyer spent 28 years thinking about important decisions that affected millions of americans. i could see the capital through the window in his office. i imagine that the view him of the important balance of power between politics and the judiciary, a separation of powers so instrumental to our democracies. while in the office and on the court, justice breyer was aware that the will of law doesn't stop at the border, it plays an international role in our world. in that first lecture, stephen breyer analyzed five areas in which he developed the development of law in other parts of the world having a direct effect on u.s. judicial decision-making. in doing so, he began his annual lecture series on exploring critical issues around the intersection of international law, justice, and foreign, looking to offer effective solutions from legal a
i had the privilege to meet justice brown jackson. she had not only replaced him on the bench, but in his office as well. she really made it her office. i stood there in the room, where justice stephen breyer spent 28 years thinking about important decisions that affected millions of americans. i could see the capital through the window in his office. i imagine that the view him of the important balance of power between politics and the judiciary, a separation of powers so instrumental to our...
0
0.0
Apr 5, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i had the privilege to meet justice brown jackson. she had not only replaced him on the bench, but in his office as well. she really made it her office. i stood there in the room, where justice stephen breyer spent 28 years thinking about important decisions that affected millions of americans. i could see the capital through the window in his office. i imagine that the view him of the important balance of power between politics and the judiciary, a separation of powers so instrumental to our democracies. while in the office and on the court, justice breyer was aware that the will of law doesn't stop at the border, it plays an international role in our world. in that first lecture, stephen breyer analyzed five areas in which he developed the development of law in other parts of the world having a direct effect on u.s. judicial decision-making. in doing so, he began his annual lecture series on exploring critical issues around the intersection of international law, justice, and foreign, looking to offer effective solutions from legal a
i had the privilege to meet justice brown jackson. she had not only replaced him on the bench, but in his office as well. she really made it her office. i stood there in the room, where justice stephen breyer spent 28 years thinking about important decisions that affected millions of americans. i could see the capital through the window in his office. i imagine that the view him of the important balance of power between politics and the judiciary, a separation of powers so instrumental to our...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
well, you have to tiny jackson brown chain saying that, you know, free speech is, is really not free speech because the government has, as a need to, if a government has a need to kind of slash speech, it should be able to squash speech. so we have a very scary element that we do have some members of, of the spring quarter white, big wood. right. but it's not a guarantee you not, not, not in today's world that. and if you look at, you know, like, like you said, if you look at why this is happening, it's because the main stream media is so distrusted and it's, and, and they, the viewership is down so much, probably because of the parent dynamic. and because of the 2020 election and be a lamb and all of all of those false barriers ever propagated, they don't have a control over the information anymore. the only and the information that the only true information is being spread on social media. so, you know, they ask that they have to shut it down. or james, here's what i'm a little confused about because i remember this thing and american civics called separation, a branches we have th
well, you have to tiny jackson brown chain saying that, you know, free speech is, is really not free speech because the government has, as a need to, if a government has a need to kind of slash speech, it should be able to squash speech. so we have a very scary element that we do have some members of, of the spring quarter white, big wood. right. but it's not a guarantee you not, not, not in today's world that. and if you look at, you know, like, like you said, if you look at why this is...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown chain saying that, you know, pretty speech is really not free speech because the government has as a need to, if a government has a need to kind of slash speech, it should be able to squash speech. so we have a very scary element that we do have some members of, of the spring quarter way big would. right. but it's not a guarantee you not, not, not in today's world that if you looked at um, you know, like like you said, if you look at why this is happening, it's because the main stream media is so distrusted and it's, and, and they, the viewership is down so much prob, probably because of the parent demick and because of the 2020 election and be a lab, and all of all of those false barriers ever propagated, they don't have a control over the information anymore. the only and the information that the only true information is being spread on social media. so, you know, they ask that they have to shut it down for james, here's what i'm a little confused about because i remember this thing and american civics called separation a branches we have the additional we have legislative, we
brown chain saying that, you know, pretty speech is really not free speech because the government has as a need to, if a government has a need to kind of slash speech, it should be able to squash speech. so we have a very scary element that we do have some members of, of the spring quarter way big would. right. but it's not a guarantee you not, not, not in today's world that if you looked at um, you know, like like you said, if you look at why this is happening, it's because the main stream...
0
0.0
Apr 14, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
♪ general brown and mrs. brown. ♪ >> mr. cook and ms. jackson. ♪ >> are you going to be campaigning for the president? ♪ >> the honorable kamala harris, vice president, and mr. doug emhoff, second gentleman of the united states. ♪ senator hagerty and mrs. haggerty. president clinton and secretary clinton. how does it feel to be back? >> great. >> [laughter] >> what do you guys think about 2024? thank you. >> thank you all. ♪ >> secretary clinton, who is your dress by? >> the honorable dr. leo brainard -- dr. lael brainard. ♪ the honorable mr. greenfield. -- the honorable linda thomas greenfield and mr. greenfield. the honorable antony blinken, secretary of state and the honorable evan m. ryan. the honorable alejandra mayorkas. ♪ -- alejandro mayorkas. the honorable roy cooper, governor of north carolina, and mrs. cooper. ms. ashley biden and ms. finnegan biden. the honorable janet yellen, secretary of the treasury, and the honorable adewale adeyemo, deputy secretary of the treasury. the honorable gina raimondo, secretary of c
♪ general brown and mrs. brown. ♪ >> mr. cook and ms. jackson. ♪ >> are you going to be campaigning for the president? ♪ >> the honorable kamala harris, vice president, and mr. doug emhoff, second gentleman of the united states. ♪ senator hagerty and mrs. haggerty. president clinton and secretary clinton. how does it feel to be back? >> great. >> [laughter] >> what do you guys think about 2024? thank you. >> thank you all. ♪ >>...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 6
>> i want to hear what questions ketanji brown jackson and elena kagan would ask because they are amazing. i think they will ask some amazing questions. i want to hear how far the lawyer representing trump is going to go, whether he will stick by his position that trump could order seal team six to murder his political opponents, could not be prosecuted for it unless he was impeached. that is an insane argument. i want to see if you will actually say that again. >> i am kind of hopeful that the trump attorney would be better than we expected. i think that we are going to see a little better decision from them as well. >> thank you for your time. host: that is the scene from outside the supreme court. both the folks in that interview mentioned the importance of timing when it comes to this case. this is adam liptak in today's new york times, longtime supreme court reporter. the headline of his piece today in the case before the justices "trump can lose in ways that seems like wins." two attractive ways for him to lose. mann, even if mr. trump categorically loses this case, each passing wee
>> i want to hear what questions ketanji brown jackson and elena kagan would ask because they are amazing. i think they will ask some amazing questions. i want to hear how far the lawyer representing trump is going to go, whether he will stick by his position that trump could order seal team six to murder his political opponents, could not be prosecuted for it unless he was impeached. that is an insane argument. i want to see if you will actually say that again. >> i am kind of...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
♪ general brown and mrs. brown. ♪ >> mr. cook and ms. jackson. ♪ >> are you going to be campaigning for the president? ♪ >> the honorable kamala harris, vice president, and mr. doug emhoff, second gentleman of the united states. ♪ senator hagerty and mrs. haggerty. mr. cook and ms. jackson. ♪ >> are you going to be campaigning for the president? >> [indiscernible] biden's campaign this year? ♪ the honorable kamala harris, vice president of the united states, and mr. doug emhoff, second gentleman of the united states. any comment on the law arizona passed? ♪ senator hagerty and mrs. hagerty. ♪ president clinton and secretary clinton. how does it feel to be back? >> great. >> [laughter] >> what do you guys think about 2024? thank you. >> thank you all. ♪ >> secretary clinton, who is your dress by? >> the honorable dr. leo brainard -- dr. lael brainard. ♪ the honorable mr. greenfield. -- the honorable linda thomas greenfield and mr. greenfield. the honorable antony blinken, secretary of state and the honorable evan m. ryan
♪ general brown and mrs. brown. ♪ >> mr. cook and ms. jackson. ♪ >> are you going to be campaigning for the president? ♪ >> the honorable kamala harris, vice president, and mr. doug emhoff, second gentleman of the united states. ♪ senator hagerty and mrs. haggerty. mr. cook and ms. jackson. ♪ >> are you going to be campaigning for the president? >> [indiscernible] biden's campaign this year? ♪ the honorable kamala harris, vice president of the united...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ketanji brown jackson, she was saying and let's look at the history. all of these presidents have managed to make tough calls and not get prosecuted because they're not violating the criminal laws. and when michael dreeben was asked about that, well, what about this decision, what about that decision, he said, but those are not criminal. there's nothing about even a drone strike that is actually violating the criminal laws, so there they really could look at the history and say, you know what? you don't need this, and nothing about our history suggests that you do need it. the sort of parade of horribles is one that, yes, the first person who's being subjected to this kind of prosecution is raising it, but you don't see a litany of problems here. >> yeah, but kavanaugh was saying it's not about this one, not necessarily about the past ones. he was talking about the future suggesting that we're maybe in a different moment today than we've been in in the past where political prosecutions might become more normal, or the intent to do it. >> including afte
ketanji brown jackson, she was saying and let's look at the history. all of these presidents have managed to make tough calls and not get prosecuted because they're not violating the criminal laws. and when michael dreeben was asked about that, well, what about this decision, what about that decision, he said, but those are not criminal. there's nothing about even a drone strike that is actually violating the criminal laws, so there they really could look at the history and say, you know what?...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown, jackson room was filled with many dignitaries just trying to hear all this. and what they heard was an argument from the justices that went more in the favor of donald trump than i think some people were anticipating. he he might have to win on the whole shebang of absolute immunity here. but the questions really showed how sympathetic they were to his position and how skeptical they were to jack smith's sayyed as articulated by government lawyer michael driven. and i'll tell you the surest sign of that nature of the questions and then the fact that john sour didn't even not even offer a rebuttal. i mean, he had a free five minutes at the end or close to that to reinforce his points. and i thinking heard most of the justices themselves make those points first of all, the kinds of, i wouldn't call them quite off ramps, but detours before& trial would be something that we weren't sure. we thought was kinda baked into the question the justices took up official acts versus private acts, just what is an issue here, jack smith, it says it doesn't matter that anythi
brown, jackson room was filled with many dignitaries just trying to hear all this. and what they heard was an argument from the justices that went more in the favor of donald trump than i think some people were anticipating. he he might have to win on the whole shebang of absolute immunity here. but the questions really showed how sympathetic they were to his position and how skeptical they were to jack smith's sayyed as articulated by government lawyer michael driven. and i'll tell you the...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
that a president tried to subvert the last election and broke the law in the process two times you brown jackson really was the one who said, look, i mean, you're talking about a chilling effect on the presidency. if you allow for prosecution look at what we're dealing with here, what kind of license and liberating effect on a president to break the law. >> do you create if you say that there are going to be already limited on i'm sorry i'm just going to erupt really quick. i i'm not sure if everyone viewing at home loss, but we've we're having some technical issues where i've completely lost being able to hear ron. ron stick with me. we're going to have hopefully work out these ground lins as happens sometimes. so stick with me, we're going to get that worked out where i was like can throw up the live picture once more of inside the courthouse is we're standing by to here. if donald trump is going to be speaking as he's heading into court let's get an a quick break. we're going to fix this up. we'll be right back. >> from the nation's capital, one of the most unforgettable nights in dc
that a president tried to subvert the last election and broke the law in the process two times you brown jackson really was the one who said, look, i mean, you're talking about a chilling effect on the presidency. if you allow for prosecution look at what we're dealing with here, what kind of license and liberating effect on a president to break the law. >> do you create if you say that there are going to be already limited on i'm sorry i'm just going to erupt really quick. i i'm not sure...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you phil jackson, state on the pat riley stayed on me, dale brown stayed on me dave maduro, my high school coach stayed on me all the coaches that i played for state on me because when you're the best player, you're expected to do everything i just told her, i said, listen, i know you're coaches little harder and you but you have to accept it because you're the best player you're just move on from that >> hey, you know, i i hate giving us do flowers. i'll tell you something he's one of the most amazing businessman i've ever been around i was at the hotel a couple of years ago. he says, i'm going to meet and as who you're meeting with. he says, i'll bring it all my people together. that's what do you mean? he says, well once a year, everybody, i do a commercial for our bring them together, says, hey, how can i make your company better? how can i make your comment it better? sag what? what did that on from >> did you just give me flowers truck. i gave flowers. >> it's his love language >> this is luck. >> to you too, or something you clearly love it, love and admire each other. you >> those
you phil jackson, state on the pat riley stayed on me, dale brown stayed on me dave maduro, my high school coach stayed on me all the coaches that i played for state on me because when you're the best player, you're expected to do everything i just told her, i said, listen, i know you're coaches little harder and you but you have to accept it because you're the best player you're just move on from that >> hey, you know, i i hate giving us do flowers. i'll tell you something he's one of...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
with the murder of the coal brown simpson and ron goldman >> let's talk >> a little bit how that divided the country to a certain degree, right? >> yeah, it really did well what a day. and certainly what a historical moment that was in so many respects. not at all forgetting the two deaths and certainly the prosecution's efforts to bring those debts. the justice as we look there at a pivotal moment both right? everyone remembers if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. and i think when you talk about the division of the country, i think johnnie cochran, the attorney, he was the person who certainly i look up tool still to this day. it was about really having a trial that deflected and talked about the racism of the lapd and really made that front and center as to why oj should be acquitted, questioning the issues with respect to the police protocols, the police practices, what they did, how they focused and targeted on him to the exclusion of other evidence, just assembling a dream team. it wasn't only johnnie cochran, you remember barry shack, you remember ron gop, you remember are nu
with the murder of the coal brown simpson and ron goldman >> let's talk >> a little bit how that divided the country to a certain degree, right? >> yeah, it really did well what a day. and certainly what a historical moment that was in so many respects. not at all forgetting the two deaths and certainly the prosecution's efforts to bring those debts. the justice as we look there at a pivotal moment both right? everyone remembers if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. and i...
0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
led gun violence prevention organization august on impact on black and brown communities. megan randy is the dean and ceo at the yale school of public health and professor of medicine at the yield school of medicine and an aspen health fellow, very good. a national advocate for innovative approaches to public health, she focuses on developing, testing and disseminating digital health and prevention to prevent behavioral problems. moderating is a good friend of the institute, alan wilde, now editor-in-chief of health affairs, the leading policy journal. thank you all for being here, think our panel. before i turn things over, housekeeping notes to share. first, c-span is here covering today's event, but we are videotaping and it will be up on the health medicine society website in 24 for 48 hours. our discussion will go on 40 minutes and we will open the conversation to take questions and comments. wait for the microphone before speaking and then introduce yourself and any affiliation you may have. time is tight for the question-and-answer portion and we want as many questi
led gun violence prevention organization august on impact on black and brown communities. megan randy is the dean and ceo at the yale school of public health and professor of medicine at the yield school of medicine and an aspen health fellow, very good. a national advocate for innovative approaches to public health, she focuses on developing, testing and disseminating digital health and prevention to prevent behavioral problems. moderating is a good friend of the institute, alan wilde, now...
0
0.0
Apr 19, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in particular, kristen brown or lawyers with us. so let's bring it back into the conversation. arthur high-dollar, we're not us to beale and joey jackson joy here at the trump defense table. are you meeting with him at the hotel at trump tower tonight to talk about tomorrow. >> what are you telling him? >> again? not they feel listened, but what are you telling him about how he his appearance should be, how he should comport himself, whether he should look at the jurors at all. and if he does how he so i don't think it matters, john, because i think he keeps his own counsel and i think that trump is used to telling and other people what to do, not being told what to do and ultimately he's going to do what he wants to do. remember that there's two sides to this. one is the in-court and what the facts and evidence will ultimately show. now that we have a jury. but the other is the other audience. and that's the audience who will be a voting public. and so i wonder how the judges he's going to deal with on tuesday when they have the hearing, the gag order issue. will the judge iss
in particular, kristen brown or lawyers with us. so let's bring it back into the conversation. arthur high-dollar, we're not us to beale and joey jackson joy here at the trump defense table. are you meeting with him at the hotel at trump tower tonight to talk about tomorrow. >> what are you telling him? >> again? not they feel listened, but what are you telling him about how he his appearance should be, how he should comport himself, whether he should look at the jurors at all. and...