View movie

View thumbnails

Resources

NBC 4, Washington, D.C.NBC Sept. 11, 2001 8:31 am - 9:12 am (September 11, 2001)

This movie is available in streaming format

News from NBC 4, Washington, D.C. was recorded by the Television Archive, a non-profit archive. Video available as a loan (stream) only.

Click for next video or program guide.

Date: 2001-09-11 12:31:09 UTC
Air Time: 2001-09-11 08:31:09 EDT
Length: 0:41:41


This movie is part of the collection: September 11 Television Archive

Producer: NBC 4, Washington, D.C.
Production Company: NBC 4, Washington, D.C.
Audio/Visual: sound, color
Language: eng
Keywords: Television News; September 11 Terrorist Attacks; 911 Terrorist Attacks

Write a review
Downloaded 44,277 timesReviews
Average Rating:

Reviewer: Matt Nelson - - December 31, 2008
Subject: Mirrored
Yes, I downloaded all of the 9/11 TV archives and put them on my website in flash video:

http://www.911conspiracy.tv/9-11_TV_archive.html

Reviewer: hjrgiles - - December 3, 2008
Subject: So why have they taken down the video for this?
The no plane theory has wings so to speak. Other wise why bother to take down the poor video. Let's have some better quality for this and add chopper 4 for some comic relief.

Reviewer: Conspiranuts get a life - - December 2, 2008
Subject: devote your time to something else
The ones who actually believe that U11 and U175 did not hit the towers when you had over 7 years to research and investigate, you are brainless and have very low self esteme to accept not only lieing to yourself, but lieing to others. Go and buy "The Sun" or the "Inquirer" or similar and just stay home and read those fake fantasy stories. Those magazines are filled with bull just like what you believe happened on 9/11/01. Here are some that you would believe...Like, "Giant beetle invades Michigan town and had baby lizards growing out of its stomach." Or baby kitten gives birth to a Chevy truck on the east side of Kansas." Or wahatever the bull story is.
The Conspiranut's version of 9/11 equals those types of stories. Did you speak to the air traffic controllers, family members who had REAL phone calls come down from REAL family that "EYE-WIYNESSED" Iranian or similar looking men with knives ect. ect. I know the rest of the true story. You don't. I advise you to look it up and stop being in denial. OH, did you speak directly with coroner Wallace Miller?? No you didn't. All bodies Identified through DNA from U93 in Stoystown Pa where U93 crashed. I also know other eye-witnesses from that area also who were devistated to even learn that there are poeple out there like you. Some don't have computers to learn how conspirants have twisted the truth. The family members will tell you as well. See, you brainless conspiraloons get your fake information from other fake conspiranut sites, and build your little fantasy world. Get a life and stop inputting fake information to innocent poeple for them to read and get sucked up with and worry about. By the way, a little example of common sense... If the Gov't wanted to fake a plane crash in Pennsylvania, don't you think there would be MORE large plane parts so it would look good?? Oh, but you didn't think of that. 580 MPH poeple. Look what happens to 2 cars hitting exactly head on at 100 MPH each (200 MPH total) Not much left is there? How about 580 MPH?
90% of the plane was found in little pieces, and some a couple of feet long again not planted by the gov't. A real plane crash. Not too hard to swallow what the real truth is. Another loony story of twisted lies to the max... IT WAS NOT SHOT DOWN CONSPIRANUTS!!!

Reviewer: jennafin - - August 30, 2008
Subject: plane
I was in New York on 9/11. I saw that plane hit the tower myself. I am so sick and tired of all of you nutjobs who insist on the no plane theory. You should get back to the JFK conspiracy, or better yet get a life!

Reviewer: izzysykopth - - June 27, 2008
Subject: FRAUD!!!!!!!!
Indeed papa lazarru is correct-there is an "orb" that enters the screen at 31:43 of the video which trajectory lines up perfectly with the point of impact-if you need to see more to KNOW youve been lied to watch the video between 33:10 and 33:13 and compare to 33:39 and 33:42 NO JUMBO JET!!! anyone got a rope?

Reviewer: Natureboy82 - - June 18, 2008
Subject: Matt Laur's expression
I don't know if anyone else on here noticed, but if you look very closely at the two-shot, you see that at 20:17 in to the clip, Matt Laur's expression just begins to change after reading Richard Hack his notes he has in front of him. You have to look very closely because the camera quickly gets a shot at Richard Hack, but you can see Matt shaking his pen and paper just slightly out of the frame.

Reviewer: NAU99 - - January 6, 2008
Subject: No missile
Those of you wishing to make the "missile" argument may want to watch some of the live footage from the other networks that shows a plane flying into WTC2. Also in case you havent noticed the impact area into WTC2 is much larger than any missile.

The idea that thousands of journalists across the country all would be in on some HUGE consipracy via the US Government is comical at best - and such accusations are criminal at worst.

Reviewer: naaier - - December 16, 2007
Subject: leading the witness
I agree with PapaLazzzaru. Also look at how the camera tilts from side to side near the end and how they try to make you think it is the towers swaying but it's obviously the camera as seen when they zoom-out while still swaying.

Reviewer: PapaLazzarruisondrugs - - September 25, 2007
Subject: You are freakin' stoned dude.
What the hell are you talking about? NOBODY except YOU sees that,so lay off the crack, freak.

Reviewer: PapaLazzzaru - - September 25, 2007
Subject: Missile?
At 31:43 into the video, look closely at the top right of the screen, approximately half an inch in from the right. A fast-moving object appears, flying at an angle of approximately 45 degrees, in a direct line with the impact area on the South Tower.

The screen starts to zoom in at 31:50. At 31:53 a male voice exclaims "Oh my goodness!" We can deduce from this that impact occurred at 31:53 into the video. Before the zoom in, if we are to believe the official story, given the scale of the buildings, we should have seen the plane that was later shown flying in from the right of the screen. However, how could they have "taped" this, when their original footage did not show it? Notice, you DON'T ACTUALLY SEE the impact until they show the "replay". And these were live shots; what we saw live should have been what was replayed.

What gives?