you gave an exhaustive list of instructions that describe the mechanism for implementing the project, and it, of course, can be a model for all other large investment projects, we propose to pay the same attention to the developments that already exist, to implement other large projects with the participation of understandable initiators, there are developments in road projects, these are well-known projects such as jobga sochi or the ring bypass around st. petersburg cat-2, there are three more sections. high-speed lines, seaports, airports. it is clear that to maintain and grow the share of exports in the world market, advanced investments will be required in the creation of new transport infrastructure, including the fleet, as well as in joint projects with friendly countries, importers of the receiving infrastructure. advanced development and such ambitious plans for infrastructure, of course, require colossal funds here. budget funds are clearly

not enough, banks today have accumulated large financial liquidity, but often this is complicated by high rates, we we understand that this is a question about inflation and we approve of the efforts that the central bank is making to contain it, but at the same time this greatly complicates the process of attracting non-budgetary financing, existing financing mechanisms and development institutions... they have really proven their effectiveness, in in particular, this is a project finance factory and the infrastructure bond program of the house of the russian federation (special project finance company), which we propose in this part, to increase the volume of the program infrastructure bonds of the russian federation up to 1 trillion rubles, which will allow directing up to 3 trillion rubles to real sectors. this issue has been studied, we propose

to carefully study it and make a decision on this matter, including on the financing of road projects; this mechanism can be turned off. as for the project financing factory, it has proven to be an extremely useful and popular tool that allows you to get long-term money from 7 to 15 years. therefore, we propose to increase the volume of this factory, raise the participation limit from existing today 500 billion to 750 billion rubles, which will allow servicing.

like this, they are big, powerful, like this, and there is enough work for everyone there, but maybe this is a financial model, i don’t know why, because it is unique to a certain extent, we are actively working here with moscow, which means that here the government and the regions got involved, uh, well, probably some kind of sample of what we managed to do, but look at it.

well, but the threat, the threat of inflation, according to the leadership of the central bank, it still hangs over us, it is, we see trends, the trends are positive. this side of the decline, i hope the regulator will have an appropriate reaction, well, let’s see, in any case, today we manage to balance and maintain the volume, which means lending to the economy to fight inflation, so far everything has been possible to do this, but well, we see the central the bank sees, of course, these trends aimed at reducing inflation, although there are still risks...

to be very careful - well, that’s how regulators act, but everyone sees the trend, and the central bank specialists also see it, and of course, of course, i think they will take all this into account. now, regarding the need to recapitalize the house for infrastructure projects, i don’t really understand something, to be honest, no, now the existing infrastructure financing program has been increased to 200 billion, which allows about 600 billion to finance projects at a reduced rate attract yes. we looked at the projects that are in the portfolio today, we believe that this is a very convenient tool, it is very useful, it allows you to attract affordable money into various projects, so we propose to increase the volumes, well, okay, now marat, now marat will say a few words, and anton germech, he is also here, yes, yes, he will also

comment, which means that now the factory is project financing, project financing, it is functioning same. budget capacity will decrease, this is a very popular mechanism, all the governors are simply queuing up for it, we have a large list, as for the project financing factory, we worked very well with the web last year, we more than 300 billion investments in housing and communal services infrastructure, schools in public transport, and of course,

if it is possible to increase the budget, let’s say up to 1 trillion or up to 500 billion, whatever it turns out to be, the mechanism is also in demand, igor ivanovich and i carried out. a whole series of meetings, which means that , as part of your instructions, we have a 4.5 trillion program for the modernization of housing and communal services, we believe that we could work here up to 1 trillion, including with a project financing factory, we and the region are very interested, big business is interested to participate in this program, who owns utility systems today, as for the creation of a new fund, the topic is interesting, but vladimirevich, it requires very serious study, legal, financial,

spp, his topics are foreign economic, its connections with the logistics of transport infrastructure. dear vladimir vladimirovich, dear alexander nikolaevich, until 2022, foreign trade routes of russian business were controlled predominantly by foreign companies,

large companies that dictated their rules of the game, monopolized the market, and this undermined the sovereignty in the transport industry of the russian federation. with the beginning of a special military operation international. logistics companies, together and under the leadership of the government of the russian federation and federal authorities, managed to quickly replace the retired capacity, we , together with the russian export center , created new foreign trade services, opened new routes, in particular, for example, the so -called dpc route from the countries of southeast asia , across the indian ocean, suet canal, around european countries, to the port of st. petersburg, to the port of novorossiysk. uh, they rolled out the north-south route, the north sea route is moving,

which is a project that is being implemented under your direct leadership. at the moment, we can say with confidence that sovereignty in the russian transport industry has been restored, and building rhythmic logistics between russian businesses and businesses from friendly countries is a key task for russian transport workers. the successes of the russian transport industry, however, cause irritation of authorities from states with non-violent regimes. in connection with which , time after time, we are faced with increased sanction pressure, with non-competitive actions on the part of, first of all, western companies, large ones, which put pressure on our partners, we encounter difficulties when purchasing, during construction, when repairing the fleet, when banking the fleet , with the maintenance and insurance of fleets abroad, we see that, in the context of restrictions on our work in western ports, western companies have begun attempts to return to russian transport market. to eliminate the situation of blocking russian business abroad, we believe that the next step should

be the development of a sovereign transport complex abroad, including through the creation and acquisition of transport infrastructure outside the russian federation in the interests of foreign trade. taking into account the above, vladimir vladimirovich, we ask you to consider the possibility of making decisions on the following issues: first: for security purposes and to prevent loss of control by russian logistics companies in the transport markets, it is necessary to develop a mechanism for... the activities of russian logistics operators in front of foreign operators on transport routes, international transport routes through the territories of the russian federation, including when coordinating ship calls at russian ports, subject to the provision of equal price conditions to russian transport businesses. second: vladimir vladimirovich, some of the old markets have been lost; we are entering new ones with great difficulty, this is due to difficulties with the lack of a transport infrastructure loyal to russian business, primarily for non-resource exports. we ask you to expand the task that you gave within the framework of last year’s russia-africa forum regarding the creation

of infrastructure in north africa and ask for the issue of creating port and logistics infrastructure on key international transport corridors under the control of russian companies; it is necessary to expand government support measures for the creation of such projects and for acquisition by russian companies controlling the capital of existing transport complexes abroad. as well as the state part in terms of concluding intergovernmental agreements with foreign participants with the definition of clear parameters. we believe that, first of all, such infrastructure needs to be created in the people's republic of china, india, the countries of north and east africa, and the arab emirates. the tasks of such hubs may vary depending on the location, such as exposition of russian export goods, organization of stable cargo flows parallel import, warehousing, transshipment of russian export cargo, servicing of russian vessels, creation or acquisition. russian companies and, most importantly, russian ships, even after the introduction of targeted sanctions, to ensure

direct ship calls between russian ports, their own russian ports and their own ports abroad, without the possibility of creating any restrictions from third parties. third, there is currently a process of active formation of new trade routes and new sustainable supply chains, both russian business and companies from our friendly states actively participate in these processes, but using the example of working with... the actions of russian business, acting in different directions, trying to independently enter new markets, the complexity of african partners who are also trying find ways to russian business. we believe it would be advisable to create an interdepartmental coordination center that would unite the efforts of ministries to carry out their local subordinate tasks, rec, large russian business to synchronize activities in new markets. in this regard , vladimir vladimirovich, we consider it necessary for you to do the same. the possibility of forming state interdepartmental coordinating bodies on the organization of sustainable supply chains

in new markets in key foreign regions of africa, south america, and the countries of southeast asia. we believe that the implementation of these measures will not only satisfy the growing external economic needs of foreign trade, but also fully realize transit and export potential of our state. thank you. yes. you have three points indicated. the first and second are not different from each other, in my opinion, or am i missing something? well, the first point concerned the prioritization of the activities of russian maritime operators over foreign trade, the fact is that - the fact is that currently... we are prohibited from entering the western port, but using the example of a specific company mac, swiss, swiss international maritime operator, he begins to actively work on the russian market, we are entering foreign markets into western markets prohibited, we allow a swiss company to operate in russia, we believe that this is incorrect, we need to think, we need to think about it, in

the end, you know, it is not always beneficial for us to act according to the teleon principle. this is basically the same thing, this is the activity of transport companies on the territory of the russian federation, yes, the second, second question is the need to expand government support measures when russian businesses acquire transport infrastructure abroad, primarily ports, terminals there and so on, yes yes yes,

yes, yes, yes, this is a good topic, this is a very good topic, but some of our companies do this, we do it too... the third question follows, creating some kind of single center that could coordinate this work is a good idea , yes, thank you very much, the fact is that now all ministries are working with new markets and all all large all large companies are working with new markets, but this all happens within the framework of each of the areas of responsibility or for which this or that department is responsible or

in on average once every two weeks and these questions too to consider, but this does not mean that what you said is, so to speak, irrelevant, on the contrary, and igor ivanov and i just said that of course it would be nice if the world bank and the russian export center took on such a function , not coordination, probably, but how to put it correctly, igor

ivanovich, monitoring the work of the business in these new areas. as for the creation of platforms, indeed, after the sanctions , the situation changed dramatically, whereas our exporters previously worked mainly on those markets that they have been developing for a long time in already developed markets, the question was to bring more exporters there, but today exporters enter very often unknown, unfamiliar markets and... world practice shows, and simple common sense, that without creating sites and logistics sites and production sites in these new markets, in general it is extremely difficult, or even impossible, to achieve success, in this regard, in the new ones in the designs of the new national

export support project, and we have provided for 12 such sites in different countries of the world. i won’t name them now, and we even offer a financing volume of 131 billion rubles, including subsidies and transport costs, but so far the ministry of finance and i have not reached agreement on these issues, but we are getting closer very quickly, yes anton, yes, that means i i think that we will find a common approach here, and regarding the operators, well... to be honest, we are also looking at the actions of this swiss company, we have operators working for us, if we take foreign operators in ports from five countries, this is...

here i would rather agree with my colleagues that the risks here are greater for now than the benefits. well, as for andrey, regarding the acquisition or creation of infrastructure abroad by our companies, we certainly need to support this process, this is 100%. those who did this feel quite confident, now we do n’t even need to name them, but the acquisitions are large and work effectively in today’s conditions . thank you, thank you very much, vladimirovich, the next topic is social partnership, association of employers, i would like

to invite andrei yuryevich khitrov, who heads the industry association of employers, an all-russian one, workers of the nuclear industry, science and everything else that is connected with atom. good afternoon, dear vladimir vladimirovich, dear alexander nikolaevich, congress delegates, guests, the most important activity of the russian union of industrialists and entrepreneurs is participation in social partnership, representing the interests of employers in social dialogue, often difficult with our social partners, trade unions, authorities, this work is carried out at the federal, regional, territorial levels, and is ensured. and coordination of social partnership in industries in organizations, we devoted most of the dialogue to this issue today, but i would still like

to separately say once again thank you to those in the government who are engaged and leading this work tatyana alekseevna golikova, anton olegovich kotyakov and of course representative of the trade union side, mikhail viktorovich shmakov, which, as vladimir vladimirovich said at the meeting, is often an inconvenient partner for... the government, but he is often a difficult partner for employers. social partnership, as an instrument of social dialogue, has proven itself highly and, as has already been said from this rostrum today, is reflected in the constitution, however, there is room for improvement. it is necessary to increase the involvement and social dialogue of employers, employees, and government officials. today, the government, in accordance with the constitution, ensures the implementation principles of social partnership in the sphere of regulation of labor relations and other directly related relations. at the same time,

mikhail viktorovich already spoke about this today, this is not the subject of the functions, powers and responsibilities of the ministry, which sometimes leads to a lack of dialogue with employers and trade unions at the industry level, on industry issues. we propose to supplement the provision.

society, first of all, with the aim of eliminating the imitation of social partnership, ensuring the involvement of socially significant organizations in social dialogue and, as a result, to ensure social stability in such organizations in the territories of their presence. alexander nikolaevich, vladimirevich, at the meeting with you he already voiced the main proposals, a wide discussion has already unfolded on these proposals and... we propose

to ensure the formation of a vertical integrated system of association of employers on uniform organizational and methodological principles at all levels of social partnership, that is, at the federal , industry and regional, establish obligations for compulsory membership of each employers' association in a parent association. we consider it necessary to provide for the introduction of mandatory membership of the largest socially significant companies in one of the associations. this proposal has probably become the most discussed, with a negative assessment of such compulsoryness, implying that we want to drive employers into some kind of association of employers, but the question is a little different: we are talking about freedom of choice, in which employer association must participate in social dialogue, or already join some kind of action, or maybe create your own with like-minded people. such

participation will contribute to systemic dialogue, systemic work and will contribute to the contribution of each organization in the development of the labor market and social policy. this requires legislative changes to be made to the federal law on employers' associations, and we ask that such changes be discussed with the government. thank you, yes thank you very much, thank you.

code, then we define social partnership as the main principles of the legal regulation of labor relations. what does this mean? this means that if one of the parties is absent, then there is a high probability that the labor rights of citizens may be violated, and the social guarantees that our citizens are entitled to, but today joining the association, will not be fulfilled.

is voluntary in nature, within the framework of the instructions that you gave last year to the rsp congress, and not so long ago in march twenty in the fourth year, we, at the government site , together with employers' associations, the largest employers, discussed these proposals, whether it is necessary to legislatively regulate mandatory entry, now we have come to the following conclusion that we need to act here...

we are working on this topic together with the federal executive authorities, we will soon formulate a proposal on how to do this...