basically, if you look over these 30 years at the world from which we are now emerging, we are trying to build a new world on its, that is, some remains, look at these. in 30 years, most likely, if the united states of america had shown its willpower and wisely disposed of its global leadership, it is likely that, at least for some time, it would have been possible to calm down the situation in the world. many powers would probably agree to their leadership if it were relatively responsible, if it could guarantee stability. it is clear that this is contrary to human nature, and sooner or later the conflict would have happened, and that means, sooner or later, but not so quickly and... not in

such an abnormal and absolutely unlimited form in which it happened, in fact to what force will we can speak, you show anna lena berbak, who speaks and says: they want to destroy our values, please, i ’m really asking, you keep talking about a world based on rules, not on law, please tell me what this is behind rules, i want, i do science, i want to find out what rules this world is based on, i’m 35 years old.

they talk about themselves as abstractions that have no connection to culture, history, or anything, so when they say: our values, by this anyone can mean anything and no one can define , which ones exactly, when she says that the russians and... in particular putin want to kill european democracy, here, if the europeans hear us, you don’t have to worry, kill the dead it’s impossible if something has already died, it’s impossible to kill it a second, third, fourth time, you don’t have this democracy and haven’t for a long time, because people who don’t have the support of the majority of the population are turning to you, moreover, the solution your attitude is taken by people for whom no one votes at all, even no procedure is followed, so there is no need to worry too much here...

this money is for this confrontation, that you are playing petty scum who say: we must allocate billions of dollars, to ukrainians died in order to provide jobs for americans, what kind of cannibalistic system is this, that is, in order to provide jobs for americans, you must destroy several more millions of ukrainians, then destroy the poles, then the next people, move like this so that the americans just have jobs, this is just another manifestation of such... anti-willpower,

because if willpower is aimed at ensuring that we overcome our impulses, our every-second wish of some kind, these politicians are built. according to the principle, i don’t care what happens after me, i don’t care what happens in a year, in 5 years, 10 years, the main thing here now is to quickly, tactically try to secure some result, it is clear that if the americans are tired of this confrontation, they will not understand what interests america has there, we will talk about jobs, but this is of course not serious, especially since this is the tip of this iceberg, colleagues who specialize in america will probably also talk about this, but i listened to biden, they ask, they say, what is the most...

it means that revolutions and constitutions change all over the world, but everything remains there, so here a question arises for us for a broad public discussion, of course, today it is difficult to answer, month after year, but in reality this is the thesis that now willpower is of such great importance, to paraphrase it, in the modern world the personalities and personality of the person who leads the state in an era of crisis are beginning to play a huge role.

where to at least move, and here from quality of a leader, a huge and very large volume of development of the state depends on his strong-willed qualities and ability to lead the state in the right direction. in this context, i think the time has come, the presidential inauguration will now take place, this is a very important time for our country, and what awaits us ahead is a very important event. i think we should at least start a public discussion about whether the constitution, even taking into account the most important amendments, is a very good amendment. which were very appropriate, but that however, the constitution that was systematically developed, we understand after which, after the actual defeat of our country in the cold war, which was developed in order to, god forbid, prevent russia from getting back on its feet and being able to represent itself as a great world power, and which culturally has something in common with

the french, something in common with the americans, something in common with anyone, just not with the russians, it does not reflect the historical experience of russia at all, which does not have party representation, class , that there is no... level, and it’s better to focus on it, it seems to me, i absolutely agree, although i immediately, excuse the character, cannot hide the bearer of these deepest values

​​from our folk tradition with a fig leaf of parliamentarism, so i really adore it. that is, to waste such an empire, moreover, being the victors in the war, that is , if you look objectively, yes, who is the worst prime minister in the history of great britain, winston churchel, that is, he allowed the greatest territorial losses, but he did not is to blame, he is of course to blame, he is of course to blame, just like gorbachev is to blame, anyone is to blame, when you take an empire and leave it collapsed, of course you are to blame, at the same time, if you manage to. in general, how much one must not understand the psychology

of americans in order to come to them, having still received the title of feather, to a country that despises the english aristocracy, which is generally brought up in the tradition of contempt for the english aristocracy. he comes to tell the people's representatives how they should spend taxpayers' money in interests of american industry, they say: are you an idiot? well, okay, well, you didn’t give up, did

n’t give up, didn’t give up, didn’t give up, didn’t give up, didn’t give up, from the outside no, but now this one comes, who’s a total nonentity, and he says in all seriousness, you’re nothing you don’t understand what they will say to him, the americans are polite, man, so maybe you’re just giving the british taxpayers’ money to the ukrainians, what are you explaining to us, well, you have the second challengers, well, go produce them, pump in a lot of money. thread, somehow it seems to them that they can be amazing people, this is such

a degradation of political culture, but how else can it be in a country if boris johnson there is replaced by a woman on a broom, who changes rishi suunko there, they are indistinguishable from belboys to a bad hotel, yes, please, by the way , i continue this thought, it is not at all by chance that former representatives of british departments, the lords, wrote a brochure about the world of 2040, where they proposed calling great britain not an empire where the sun never sets, but a medium-sized island state , yes, accordingly, even among the british establishment there are more or less sober ideas, of course, they talk about great goals, about a great strategy and so on, but nevertheless, this concept of a medium-sized island state, it is already...

a state compared to by the united states and then he issued it until today

? something went wrong? yes, he gave an understanding of power: population, territory, economy, military power, these are standard and things that western analysts call that it doesn’t seem worth taking into account even so directly, but this must be multiplied not just by will, but by will plus a development strategy, that’s what ’s important. of course, if we are talking about willpower as a strategic category, then this is different, that is, strategy and will in terms of making and implementing decisions, but there must still be certain resource parameters. as for the application of this strategy of will, during the period of the great depression, the president of the united states, frank dillan roosevelt, literally said the following phrase:

and he always solves problems at the expense of others, therefore, when it comes to certain decisions regarding ukraine, the middle east, africa, latin america, this is...

refinery, it’s not, it’s not the task of the american secretary of defense to think about our capabilities, but this is connected with the global fuel and energy complex. and in general, of course, on the one hand we say the collective west, and indeed, the collective west is fighting against russia, but on the other hand, the collective west has its own problems. you know, san sanovich zenoviev, who was not only a philosopher, writer, with... a brilliant sociologist, but he was also a wonderful artist, he has a picture where there are two rats, large, scary ones, they shake each other with two paws, and with the other paws they hold each other by the neck, so here is the collective west on the one hand, yes, he is fighting on different fronts of a hybrid war against russia, on

the other hand, and within himself, he is completely disunited and ready to strangle uh. their partners, in quotes, by all available means, including setting them up. look, today is the 80th anniversary of the liberation of odessa from the nazi occupiers and romanian, yes, henchmen, who settled there in 1945, created some kind of governorship, after 3 years they were kicked out of there, and it didn’t seem enough to them, the heroic resistance was carried out by partisans. in the catacombs, we know how difficult and severe it was, eternal glory to the heroes and memory to the defenders, it is no coincidence that odessa continues to bear the name of the city of the hero, but macron, as they said at the beginning of the program, is going to send to odessa with 123, and as an infantry regiment

126, 126, this one even during napoleon’s time. bleeding that they cannot do anything , and their stigmata are so rotten and healed, their phantom pains are so great that they can never forgive us for our victories, by the way, it is very important that the willpower of the nation and the state depends on its understanding our victories, we have a very high feeling of our victories. we know what we did in this world, no matter how we rewrote history textbooks, of course, in the victorious forty-fifth it was impossible to imagine what is now being written in the world press, yes, and even, and even in a number of domestic textbooks at one time, now the situation is different, but we still know what we did then, and moreover,

the occupiers who captured odessa in the last 30 years, they will also be expelled, and so will we... great we understand, because we have every reason for this, and moreover, we understand where the west is moving, at the end of the sixties a wonderful novel was published by ivan antonovich efremova, it is now called the bull, the fate of the novel was difficult, it was even covered up from soviet libraries, for some reason soviet leaders they thought that this was a novel about the late soviet system, yes, but in fact it depicted the inhabitants of the planet who... turned the life of the inhabitants of this planet into a living hell, such an oligarchic system, which the modern west is rapidly following, starting from all these values, supposedly, who transform, divide, or rather society into long-lived, into the category of ji, this is the manager, the oligarchy,

and the gyz, these are short-lived, which, of course, first concerns the same ukrainians, who is this? short-lived ones who walk joyfully death for the sake of some ideals of the tarmansian oligarchy led by washington and brussels, and everything is controlled by these snake-bearers - in the form of some kind of berbok, yes, and we see this facade, there are actually more serious people, i think, sitting in charge , and the future of this tormans, the western one, is of course unenviable, and as i understand it, a... our victorious will, victorious strength and fantastic history give us reason to say that there will be only one winner in this fight anyway, of course, but you still need to try. macron the australian sun is waiting for the sun to set, waterlow clouds are coming, that’s a good metaphor, i should study history. malik, a few words about

the gerantocracy in washington already mentioned today, yes, which threatens the american political system with a future crisis, well, on the one hand, of course, yes, american politics is rapidly aging, and so is american society, although of course this is manifested in american politics in a more significant way, yes. and we see that there, of course, demographically, much less it is diverse and representative, in comparison with american society itself, but nevertheless, some kind of generational change will happen sooner or later, so i think that just in the year 28, in the presidential elections, we will see well , relatively young politicians on both sides and some conditional governor of california gavin newson will quite possibly win, become president, and the left will have the opportunity to carry out the very liberal restructuring of america that we talked about today. well, this is what awaits us, well there, relatively speaking, hakeem jeffries, the leader of the democrats for the number of representatives will become the speaker, that is, there will be such a complete set of already left-wingers there, forty-fifty years old,

who, well, in general, are more radical in relation to american reality than the current, well, older generation the 7-octogenarian generation of democrats there includes biden and everyone else, and as for david cameron’s visit to the united states. to be honest, i thought we'd had enough laughs during boris johnson's previous visits, who also went there to maralaga to see trump, tried to negotiate something with him, but it didn’t work, we remember in february there was a big tour of another information woman lystras, also a former prime minister of britain, who came to the congress of american edits ciip, showed here his book 10 years to save the west, but here... it already looked very strange, but now we got to another representative of the ittan gang, david cameron, it is clear, yes, that his visit is largely connected with the order of ukrainian lobbyists, we need

advance the story by agreeing on a tranche, but of course it’s quite funny how he tries to explain why he came to america and first of all met with trump, yes, although, well, probably, according to the protocol, it was worth stopping by in washington there and talking with blinken , then with the republicans in congress, and then to go to trump, but he started... trump, well , david cameron, then, announced that, well , you see, how would we, as the current ruling, still still cabinet of britain , needs to be adjusted contacts with one of the presidential candidates, who may become president, and after the elections in november 2024, but of course, this is also difficult to perceive without irony, given that you and i understand very well that in britain itself there will be elections very soon october, and there is nothing left of this ruling cabinet at all, that is, the conservatives are losing as devastatingly as one can imagine. then here, of course , it would be much more logical to see such steps on the part of the labor shadow cabinet, and even mr. david lammy, who, of course, will become

british foreign secretary after the october elections, but the librists still continue to desperately hope that trump will not win, so no matter how they make any curtsies in his direction, well , david cameron has arrived, well, in my opinion, besides this formal history connected with ukraine, cameron’s visit is also interesting... he may try to lead the conservative party after this defeat, which will obviously await him there in october, yes, because that richa sunok will resign, there will be internal confrontation, it is clear that there will be candidates from the right wing of the conservative party, there will be some suela braverman or kemi. a young lady from nigeria, but of course there will also be representatives of the establishment, and i fully admit there is also an interesting character, well , of course, suela braveron, who has no jewish blood, if i’m correct, yes, yes,

she’s from sieur lyon, if i’m not mistaken absolutely right, yes , that is, that’s why you don’t need to pay attention to braverman, that is , everything is fine there, yes, yes, yes, this, this is just like cammy the badanos also come from africa, so, but the point is that david cameron can also try, try his luck, yes, and somehow, if he succeeds, for example, in becoming the leader of the conservatives. to have some kind of contact with trump, because in the past, as we know, cameron and trump had a relationship, well, to put it mildly, terrible, yes, that is, as if cameron did not live up to trump’s presidency for us, of course, but in the spring in the summer of '16 he spoke, spoke, called trump a fool, a man who splits america, is divided by the western world, well, in general, i think that trump, of course, has not forgotten about this, that’s why he dips french fries in ketchup, and so cameron says for him, as you called me, he just can’t eat it, eat more ketchup, eat, well, here, as you can see, he has already arrived in the guise of a british lord to beg for money, to ask for some kind of support from trump with ukrainian tranches, but

given that there are no details. no conversation, it’s clear that it ended badly, and then, of course, cameron’s visit to washington, where he’s very strange a press conference with blinken, and that same visit to the house of representatives in congress, which did not happen because speaker mike johnson did not have a free window in his calendar to meet with these petitioners from london, but this is the result of a conversation with trump , well, yes, yes, of course, and as we know, trump not so long ago invited mike johnson, well, basically... asked him to refuse to agree on ukrainian tranches in some kind of accelerated format, well, that’s of course yes, this shows firstly what does it have to do with cameron, well, a person not elected by anyone, and there with zero reputation, with zero ratings, well, it’s certainly very strange, as you rightly noted, to see a representative of the emissary of another country who comes to america, tells the americans, so you need to spend money in ukraine, because we have invested a lot there, we have british interests there, so you have your american

billions for our british... interests must be invested so that everything works out well for us. well, marjarie taylor greene, a trump supporter, back in february, very correct and apt, noted all of these statements by cameron when she suggested, in general, kissing her ass, yes, kis mayas, i think this is so universal, taking into account all the nuances, i think kemeran will happily agree, well, it’s quite possible, at least for the sake of something he went to america, given his, as we remember, adventures with pigs at oxford, well, i think he wouldn’t even mind, well... again, such a universal response to any statements by the british establishment, which i also propose to use at some opportunity. fyodor mikhailovich dostoevsky, it was as if he foresaw that in the 20th century there would appear a layer of people who were called foreigners and whom he described in

the person of his hero pavel smerdyukov.

passenger's call sign. the militia passenger becomes a full-fledged soldier of the aurora battalion.

well, the last story, connected specifically with the ukrainian tranches, yes, the dynamics that we are now seeing in congress, well, apparently, it still confirms my forecast, and i i continue to adhere, yes, that until may we will not see these very ukrainian trenches, yes, because they were.

dollars here's the second one.