Skip to main content

tv   Moscow Mules  RT  May 19, 2024 5:30am-6:01am EDT

5:30 am
so i understand that you served term as prime minister us to bach yager in 1991 in 1992. yes. can you describe a little bit about what the implications have been since then? up until now? big changes. big changes because in the time you had adjust uh, turning in that time check with somebody. yeah. uh and, and neighboring countries from 40 years socialism to a democratic society market economy. a free press, big changes. so we understand that the developments over the past few days have been a month from on the biggest to us here. what can you personally say about a little back pizza? i know beneficial, particularly from that time he started as a young,
5:31 am
socially slowly edition in, in the both of post communist party is the lucky a. and to add members member solve, solve the problem and uh, and to, despite the fact that the deal was socialist ios goal, is that about the creation but to our relations were correct. and this yes, for some time is practically in the same political scan. the opposing or the government of somebody. yeah. so coming back to the assassination, it's out to you hasn't seen such a chance on politicians in lives for decades. you think the risk is going to link test? i'm blessed by i think so. i think so because of the
5:32 am
tension is not just the case of slovakia or even seem to view it up the the tension is growing in the lord because the word or security and economic architecture that to govern and still today probably is, is changing or is going through the, to the, to a change and to the, to, and to dispatch inc. millions of people. and the, if the such a big changes are coming closer and late to even happen, or in some countries even matter,
5:33 am
maybe happened or bought it to happen or the day that to you guys that leads to me to dramatic events, even like an assassination. so i think it's already so suggested in the a say that's behind the assassination attempt on a little bad piece of life. was pausing is spelled asus in general. so that includes so few. so some of the using the sale of arms to ukraine or descending age to cram what i want to know is how much is this political stance this opposition towards these bo, this is how much is it like spread or accept? you mean is that like yeah, yes. it is. want to split the 10 terms? yes. the features 5 d the one elections
5:34 am
in september last year and even in the presidents of the elections in slovakia, one month ago. again, feats us political camp as one and even the in the media opinion balls. this stands of so the government, especially especially regarding the war in new cane, fish has a big majority among solar citizens. so yes, and the positions against the pizza supported the policy and fits those government that we just we just supported and supporting the west. um says
5:35 am
the feels itself strong because the support from the west and the on and on the other hand it sees that the allow and it has not very big charles, this is the lock. yeah. and that, that leads to do such dramatic attempts just very briefly, the beginning of you. and so you said yes it is widespread. you were referring to a rule that fits those policies in position towards super incorrect or the word i think so. okay, what kind of thing? so, okay, just want to clarify because over the course of let's say the last few years back to it. so it has time and time again come into power. much like you said, he has the support needed. what i want to know is now this little bit of issues, this includes the president's ups to walk in the sex of the documents group of
5:36 am
hatred in the country as a reason for the assassination attempt. i guess the prime minister is that's the case. why do you think that is the reasons are probably more one of the reasons i see that the so called mainstream media are opposing feats. so because people's policy and fee to the government because they are supported from the west end partly the, the owners of this media are western western companies. uh huh. and that's, that's creates us a situation. is that like, yeah, the majority of this makes the media us are going against the majority of solve a of the major,
5:37 am
major majority. don't any of the opinion of salt lake citizens? yes, but is lucky, i have quite great influence. so go to the internet to media that are private, done that a cheap, they do not need to big money from, from abroad. and the that's why it's here is the to all positions of mass, the media, and this, the, then the internet meet media 10 years that's, that's create um tension in society. mm hm. so do you think this is a problem just for some buck you or is this something that affects all of your i think i think it is right. or in the, in the all,
5:38 am
you were all and receipts or at least it's, i said that the 5, these political parties that have to, um, maybe not the majority, but the drawings at often not do that for deutschland, i've day in germany, or in the, or you know, c, a, this keeps about the i the not know exact the name and to, in the netherlands. the so yes. uh, no, i don't know, trump, maybe not spotty, but at least the group and political groupings in the us. so that all of this political groupings grow inc,
5:39 am
but they are practically excluded from the, from the government. yes. in the, in the bottom line they, they come in. but in germany, i have day practically cannot be part of the government even now even this lower government on the, on the come to government countries, the same particularly is the case of o. c a and other countries. so that's why the nation not only in slovakia but in europe, is growing and probably english in so time we'll, we'll grow even more. what do you think it can be done to resolve polarization with
5:40 am
a society? can a be to 1st stop negotiations between uh yes, in the uh say the over so lock is not the most the lock. yeah. or is the market but, but a new bro to europe. especially about the war a new grain. the negotiation about the finding bees in ukraine because because the water in ukraine is and to cut the door off of political situation in, in europe as a whole. and probably even even broad. uh, so uh, in u. k. and it should be stopped. it is to correct me if i'm wrong, rubber cleats so that as in the past said,
5:41 am
is government or his policies are trying to build and to establish an independence and solve it for him. policy independence from the union independent from nature. the question here is, if this is a policy, this is what the government says. yes, it's position. is that why does the, with some media referred to a real bad faith? so as pro russian, why do you think what somebody uses that they, this classification of robot feet. so as pro ration is of the, of the point or is going for the, for the, then there are better feet. so in the realities might say partly, but they could be correct. this is this classification overall. but fetal, eh, because, because of what we see in, in the us do, in europe in union,
5:42 am
it is a, it is suppressing national somebody, any d or an a of, of member sites. and a member of stage we'll have less and less influence on, on the vital issues for future up in policy. and that's why all a body distance or countries member countries that can keep this nationalism but any d live feed. so like victor autobahn in hungary, steven the in the country. so at least now didn't government about in public space. they are, they are gazed that practically against the the me uh
5:43 am
the main line of the process and the does that so i yes. videos. sanctions from brussels against such countries like a guys supported up to the, to up to now or against the hunger hungry or at least mention, mentioned and relate to very soon probably even the newest. and the yes and, and in this situation, russia is supporting the, is going to his organs, the slogans of national and some of the any d a. and that's why that's why the feed so
5:44 am
could have been described as pro ration for addition. yes. and a name, the, the in case of the more in ukraine. yes, you feed. so and these government, this clearly openly said that the so like how would know weapons that are to ukraine. that is, the new kind you should be should be finished or stopped by negotiations noted by, by weapons. and that's all a, as in, in new ukraine, presidents lansky as a bond, abundant even negotiations, russia. so it's clear contradiction between in this case between the feats of the stands and, and the rest of the stats. you mentioned, victor, oregon,
5:45 am
hungry. and you also mentioned is the position of brussels takes against the member states. the question i want to ask you is when we take into consideration so lucky elizabeth case studies. i think we're back to it says paul, this is for an independent policy. yes. hungry. pretty much the same big or perhaps . but yes. and quite recently, survey has been instances, it's under which was visited by she's in pain, china as presidents, even the friends french president to mind them according to an extent is for to was china. it, as i was looking for some sort of alternative partners, trade coordinates. maybe the question i want to ask is easy. europe's identity in a crisis. and well that is happening on member states like so lucky a hungry candidates states like sort of yeah. are they looking to spend one sense
5:46 am
of the word become a part of the way to get a pen block but also hold onto its own identity? would you say that is if there is any way of starting from the the that the concluding part of all the other question of yes, it can be the bought a new to meet a change of the european union is the main political line that and it may be because when the when we joined europe in union, and so like, yeah, drawing the raw, the relate in 2004. but in the previous time, you're up in union. even even describe dates of that
5:47 am
the national identity of member countries will be kept. and uh, now that has changed, that has changed. so the europe in union should should of the, the change. it's a, it's, it's political line in that way that the, quote the quote to include both vs cooperation inside of europe and union and inside of europe and national ident identity of the member member countries. and then the to starting of or your question to start out of your question. yes. countries like, uh and got a potential that may be is said to be, uh, uh, if uh,
5:48 am
if uh, uh, either party to go. uh hm. oh, is this the ends of the of situation insane in germany or, or no us? yeah, we would, we changed then this countries wont uh, of course, and probably the they would like to stay in inside of europe and union, but they would have a strong influence on changing of the whole, the whole of the political line of europe in union, in in direction, as i have said previously, going back to some of the internal discussions. how do you expect the assassination attempt to influence to slovakia, internal policies or politics? we will see it as store shortly after. this is very important or to be if
5:49 am
the, this is the, the going to the positions of governmental bar. okay. and don't positional kemp who to go on as a where uh, up to now or the they, they wouldn't be modified. the leader of the opposition instead of i'll kill pollution or body in slovakia. missed the she mich guy published one week ago in the, in the paper in slovakia that he does not uh does not the value 8 the voters, both governments bodies. yes or is that the democracy is the democracy 11115 d, uh,
5:50 am
basically says that he does know to evaluate the citizens of so i'm lucky, a voting for, for another body that that shouldn't be changed and that wouldn't be changed or that would be easier changed if the if the brussels officer officer brussels may be on the who do not so strongly support even the present the position of bodies in slovakia. so look, is one of the, a few countries in europe that supports a peaceful resolution in ukraine, which as it would be before, yes, yes, yes, please. yes, solution. do you expect and more countries within the european block to follow this
5:51 am
stance in the future? do you think the was side with philadelphia for example? i think so. i think so. but the question these, the other countries, or the say pro peace book in europe should be stronger very quickly. because because even russian army reduce big bonds are a few grain then to reach a peaceful solution who will be more difficult and more difficult and never in the, in the history receive even i think the other countries other not only in slovakia, that if some army are read, she's reached some line that to the dude we
5:52 am
leave the line. we though, do i have on that? so i, it's russian army reach, use line to say nip at a very the in the you came a and then the okay. and or does it have very, very difficult position if russia reaches certain milestones goal? yeah, it's a, it's so we say this with good question and we're much stable, stronger position. yes. and if there is ever going to be a negotiating table, what do you think you would do in that scenario? the west, especially united states, are doing very, very stupid policy. because because they pressed the russia in china and other countries are together. and yes,
5:53 am
i remember, and the henry kissinger avery's that the communist china left calling me in the soviet union. and the that had the, the do as i had a very much is the suddenly many content. and now the and now the united states doing just opal's i policy and that, that's why your question, if or the police position of, or i so i wouldn't be, it would be not only that poses the position of russia, because the site is now practically supported by china, and by either on a more or less by, in the more or less by african countries. so the west, the challenge for the west then would be not only russia,
5:54 am
but to the wart majority. it's not necessarily a matter of, for example, in the united states versus russian or the european block versus the east. so would it be safer to say that this is as an alternative to the collective less? yes. and not only alternative to the collective worst, but the pressure for changing the global architecture, global security architecture. because the collective west. yes, the on the big with the united states would not be the only the only for all of the, of the work. uh and uh yes,
5:55 am
at least the then that would exist that at least 3 balls, whole door, united states, china, russia, the exist practically owner already now. but then dispos we'd be, we'd be more important and practically, no, no, even um and then even a man made the an important issue quoted not to be solved without, without this and this repulse and the then then the so called a collective west quote. not to dictate its condition conditions through the work many extra it's within the fields. politicians, academics,
5:56 am
they suggest the course of the best in the united states had been essentially resulting in that diminishing foreign policy. we see this was specifically speaking, i think the middle east is a good case study is how to withdraw from most of its positions. it's less that's foot holes in many parts of asia, middle east africa. and i think it's also losing, it's for the hold of europe as well. many suggest the united states has influence over the years has become tiring, this sense. and this is why they believe that the year can do need is correctly looking for alternative methods of somebody. that's what we're international relations relations with other states. very simply put the question i have, this is the filtering form for the sake of the us influencing this shift in the global architecture receipt
5:57 am
in the united states. the how the, the so called deep state is suppressing for keeping the present present architecture off of the international security international economic or the maybe even culture or the at cj or, and to that's it. i'm afraid that the because always possible that make big american body. i mean, now the democratic party, the big party is it is not the able to both. i'm of the candidate for presidential elections then joe biden. and, and the,
5:58 am
and the whole word is, is seeing this in the bass, physical in the ability to produce a candidate to be the candidate and then, and then maybe the president of the, the, for the, the economic country. so that for me, it's a saying that s, if in the united states, not the say the elected president is realizing uh, rio power, but to this is the state. thank you so much for that sentence. if that was a very pleasant conversation. thank you. by the the
5:59 am
lowest points of your desktop the dealer to a vehicle. so the motion store submitted the for the money and douglas william, which is here to stay on the show me the
6:00 am
police clash with protesters in tell of the buzz, thousands rally against is ready. prime minister netanyahu ball while the looming threat of mutiny cast a shadow over netanyahu's government. what's the prime minister netanyahu? i look you in the item. i can tell you the choice is in your hands. if you choose to follow the pos of fanatics and lead the entire nation into interface, we will be forced to quit the government, the bladder and put and state visit to china. seas bang roll out the red.

0 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on