and their solidarity for the people off palestine shouting free palestine in between. they share the message of solidarity and also for some music is the best way for them to express their point of view in politics and also to connect more with the younger audience is also their listeners and sending within a nation constitution. this is what the afternoon is all about, shouting and also demanding world keys and also for them to ask to stop the passion in any forms in israel. and are they going to be the full reporting from jakarta for r t i? it seems that brooks is about to get bigger with columbia expressing its interest in joining the block as soon as possible. but countries desire to join brakes was expressed of the joint statement following a meeting between the brazilian president and the columbia and leader columbia is

not the only country in the southern hemisphere to express interest in joining the ever growing brit clock with ben as went on its way to becoming a full fledged member as well. earlier my colleague became aaron and spoke to steven group head of the african governance and diplomacy program at the south african institute of international affairs. he says, countries wants to join for x because of resentment to us and europe in germany. the country see something in bricks. they want to join this club. they want to join this place to, to amplify their voices. i don't think any countries are going to join immediately . i think that will be a decision that the heads of stifled type towards the end of the year. and we shouldn't forget the full countries joined in johannesburg last year at the summit's. a couple of countries in the end decided not to join like sergeant tina and saudi arabia has needs a join. no, not joined, but yes, a lot of countries, a few points would be over 40, have expressed interest in joining the blog. and what is it was that special,

something about breaks that, that makes it so appealing to countries. i'm looking at a well that is will say that is more equitable bricks has been supportive of efforts to reform the un security council to give developing countries more voice. the world is very different to what it looked like in 1945. i think that is sort of diversity. i think there's common ideology and common interest that that drives the countries to wants to be a part of something which seems to be clearly succeeded. i think that's part of the attraction of the countries in the, in the block that apply for the info of us dominance of the international system of europe's dominance. and so they have countries that are definitely seeking an alternative and a different way of configuring the world and setting the rules of that world. and how do you think this is going to affect those countries in the world of viewing the rise of bricks with trepidation? i was in south africa last year when the expansion of bricks was announced. and the

us in particular, another western powers. we're looking at it quite nervously. i think there's a, there's a lot of negative uh, feeling about it. i don't think it's trying to replace the g 7. the g 20. all of these blocks exist exist, but i think they will be perhaps discouragement of some countries that might have wanted to join. they may be some of the being, but i don't think really the waste is going to be able to do anything about brakes expanding because it's the free will of these countries. the russian indian ties are blossoming across many fronts, including film making. an indian cruise in moscow to shoot seems for its film, which is to come out. this september, our correspondence visited the shooting location in central moscow with behind the scenes of a field let spring partly show tape in moscow. this is a hollywood production. and if you've ever heard of connie would leave me, it's huge. it's like bully would, but it's from south india and the film where all of these trucks behind me here

just for it is living up to its name already look racist a full time. the and i was, is that, so i'm being watched 10 millions of times. the reason this guy, the j who's the biggest access in indian, sitting them all the director is been cut, cut off who and he's also a huge tool. he told me most go is playing starring role in the film multiple plays a very important part in the film. and so with the per diagnosis of the, some of those under major, you know, a total of events and ready to realize there's

a lot of things and stuff happens here in moscow. so i wanted a very new plays which most of the indian audiences have not seen before. so that's why i chose because every se, bollywood films income have proof of few movies that shocked you. but if you go south of, in the model, lot of films of being shot in moscow or anywhere. and i shift this, she says, is this delta much more collaboration between russia and india? culturally? i think it's about time. i think a lot of collaborations will happen because we have uh, russian cultures and they can name with them from, you know, the so there's a lot of indian kids wants to learn russian and the language and the culture and stuff and that it is a so so it's, it's always that it is always being that and uh, i think, i think from know on, i think slowly um, it'd be better, dies the bit better collaborations and, you know, close to collaborations and collaborations in films,

movies and detain when i think it will all happen now. i think it's it's, i think we've just started it. and um, i'm sure it is a go to go along with. i just want to give you a sneak peak of filming. now, behind the scenes are based in sequence taking place here in moscow. this is going to be one of the main parts of the movie. so many is due to wrap up shortly and the film is going to be out in september. it's going to be translated into several languages, including english. and i don't know about you, but i am ready to book my tickets right now. so let's even scheme of voting for aussie inlaw skin. do say was r t up next part to a foreign minister survey line problems interview with russian media by the see, what is your assessment of the following official statement by the federal department of foreign affairs of switzerland, russian foreign minister,

sergey love. ralph was the 1st person with whom swift minister cassius discussed the practical details of a planned peace conference on ukraine. a genuine peace process can only take place with the participation of both. what are the conditions for such talks to take place? there's just one word of truth in this that we had a meeting. i see. we took part in the new york meeting of the un security council on palestine. i've known him for a long time. he has been rotating in the group of 7 for quite a while and served as the chair actually the elect, a new chair from the members every year. so ignacio castle was at that meeting too and asked for a one on one meeting with me. so we never concealed to the fact that we were having a meeting to pictures of the 2 of us were taken when the delegation is left. and this happens right after the demos world economic forum, where the copenhagen format was held by switzerland on its sidelines as requested

by the ukrainians. so he asked me if i saw his media stake out after the meeting. i said i didn't, and he told me and then he stated to the media that was after another ukrainian piece, formerly meeting. they came to the conclusion that there was no points inconvenient without rush. i want you to know. i said they didn't really need to meet up again to realize that given their experience. and if they didn't realize this, then why do they hold that meeting in dallas? i'm not betraying any secrets here really. and by revealing this information, i've told this to my colleagues on many occasions, even if you don't reveal us and chris went, won't be upset with us. so he said to me that he just wanted to make a smooth entry into the process in order to be able to adjusted from within because they wanted to prepare a to put conference, which is any set. it might not be possible to invite russian to the 1st part of it . so the only to the 2nd part. so i asked him what they were going to do at the 1st part of the conference, which she told me, they were going to finalize this a lensky formula as it had many things. and,

and that's the developing countries were interested in. and i told him, quite frankly, there were 3 things, units that zalinski and the west to we're after and rushes capitulation and withdrawal to its 1991 borders of the russian leadership and brought to justice will support marshal and reparations. and in between the lines, there was an obligation to be imposed on russians regarding troops that could be deployed within the 200 kilometers borders own. as for energy before the security for nuclear security and cultural cooperation with the exchange of po w's search for missing persons that you know, those are just peripheral items put in place around this ultimatum of to win the hearts of the global majority with these countries are being enticed in the following manner. all right, so you don't want to be enemies with russia. you don't want russia to pay reparations. you don't want to bring it to court. we understand how about you just take the food security issue that just supervisor what security or energy security

of these people are all just high class fraudsters. i mean high class in their own areas of responsibility areas they supervise and their relevant governments, but they are frauds at the core, the schemes they offer our fraud schemes they're doing so deliberately. but it is impossible not to see this and some of our partners, including several bricks countries that attended previous meetings. we know for sure that at every meeting, they emphasize the need for having a conversation with russian. we appreciate the signals sense from their side. but if, as the west ones, the zalesky formula is adjusted and fine tuned, and the west knows how to do that. for instance, by introducing meaningless less which was provisions about a quality security interests for well keeping the essence on changed. that is not the path that we should follow really take the chinese positions one that we respect to the formulated their own 12 items. the last february,

and recently german chancellor, all our shows paid a visit to chinese president fusion. paying right after that, shouts announced quite dest, honestly, the shooting pink supports the peace conference in switzerland. we've got a question prepared on that subject, mr. law for all, so don't st. paul, it for us yet. well, the point i wanted to get across is that according to china, the thing we need to do 1st is to get an insight into the root causes of the crisis . i mean, the cold war mentality must be dropped one where the parties see each other as adversaries were enemies. we need to have a clear cut obligation to look for solutions that would take into account security aspects and ensure that security is indivisible. this is a very different approach. now, china with going back to the recent statement is by for administer at one e and other chinese officials, china called for a conference that would be acceptable both to russia and ukraine. this effectively means it isn't the zaleski formula which should be starting with. in fact,

his plan should be put aside, or if like our president said, they are willing to do that. then we can start discussing the basic foundations for talks from you upon which everything else will be built. as for switzerland's initiatives, the swiss are not covering our meetings with them properly. in fact, there was just one meetings at the end of january or an early february. we don't remember what exactly. and even if we forget about that, you create aspect, switzerland is not a good platform for us. it is because they are no longer a neutral party. we should, instead of being a neutral country, the holding outright adversarial stance as they signed and joined in on every sanction against russia. without exception, some countries those that are not part of the european union, wanted to add new ons to their activities on that front. however, switzerland eagerly joined in on every section imposed on the rush of more over several months ago. they have adopted a doctrine where

a strategy of national security, which says they should pursue security partnerships, not with russia, but against russia. so it's rather odd to see them presenting themselves as so hospitable, when all they hope to do is retain their relevance as mediators. because until recently, everyone was fine with meeting in geneva or in sienna. so that's that. some, you know, some of the 10 for mr. lab road. we've covered the zalinski plan and we're all pretty clear about that. no discussions here as for the used on board agreement, it doesn't work as well because we have been double cross there as well. are there any other options? are there any alternatives? any 3rd option? if we look at the situation on the ground, we can see that russia control some parts of the heart of region, but god only knows what will happen tomorrow. the situation is evolving as we speak . are we fighting until the end, or is there something else we could formulate an agreement of sorts and present that to the world. but it's just for them to do it

a little push. the president putin has already put forward his formula after the assembled process was over and after the west winds beyond supplying long range munitions and arms to crane and also started to help them. retrofits and their equipments. yes, there are western specialists retrofitting many different types of missiles and ukraine to extend their range. and after these missiles started being used to attack civilian targets. in fact, there was an episode when they use drones paths with a lot of explosives and sent them to one of our strategic airfields. when we analyzed the equipment used, we saw that the drone itself was upgraded to extend its range significantly. after that came the crime in bridge attack, then they kept attacking some estoppel hindering navigation in the black sea attacking both warships and commercial vessels. and i'm not even talking about bold garage curse and all the other terrorist attacks on the russian cities. at some point. and president putin spoke about this one,

answering the question as to how we can make our own land safe. he said, we need to move the line from which they can attack us. i believe that hark of place, an important role here. and what next? where do we move the line next? says wells. mean if we move it to hard codes, the previous border will be safe, but then other territories will be under attack. so we still have to move forward. our position is that the special military operation must continue, but we signal clearly that we are ready to negotiate and these are not empty words . however, speaking to the landscape is useless. for many reasons, his master is upset and we quoted one of them earlier. all those words about losing our head gemini, about the geo political failure of the west. in fact, it was, you'll said burrell, who stated that it would be very difficult for the west to accept such a defeat to pieces because their reputation is on the line. i personally don't

think it would cost them much in that respect. after the us fled from vietnam after they fled from of ghana, stan, or looking at how they are being driven from a rock or take syria where they're being pressured from different groups. is there a single case where the us remains involved? unless of course, the goal has been to so chaos from the very start. but if their real objective was the same as the stated one, then it means they failed. they failed across the board. they, katie, for example, a tiny nation with the americans have been in charge of it for more than 100 years since 1918. now there was rapids crime gangs running the place and some criminals came to power. the u. s. has been trying to deal with that, establish some agreements now there was ramp and crime gangs running the place and some criminal came to power. the u. s. has been trying to deal with him and establish some agreements with triple a country right in the us back yard. they've

been focusing a lot on hating, including at the human security council, but with no success so far it looks. how about they just deal with that 1st rush that has to deal with ukraine because there is a threat of posts to us almost before the americans. the threats coming from heating is at the very least drug trafficking. all these drugs are go into the us. now i want you to you to tell us about shooting things initiates save, but you've already covered that. so i'm going to ask a bro, the question, something that many people would also like to know and we all agree that it will be all, some a fresher remains in the course of independence from the west. i personally think that we should move towards not being dependent on anyone, but in the context of our relations with china. what do you see there is a risk now that we've moved away from the west of us be coming to a reliance on china? maybe we won't, but if we do, would that be a problem or not? after all, when now, best house with china?

the china is a different civilization entirely and it has different principles at its core. now that doesn't mean they don't want to benefit from their relations with us. they want to develop their economy, their social sphere, their security, just like everyone else. in that aspect. china is still a rather young country. yes, it's civilization is thousands of years old, but there came a point in its history. when it suffered greatly under colonialism, colonizers came from all over from european countries from japan. and the chinese remember that very well. it is in their nature to buy their time. never to rush to quote things yelping. a journey of a 1000 miles starts with a single step. if we're speaking about china is dominant position in the modern global economy. they've arrived at it in a very discreet way, without people noticing those 20 years ago. the global chinese factory was making

products for the west, close to toys, and then step by step over time they came to their present position. so patience is one of the remarkable qualities of the chinese people. china now has emissions that span the entire planet to that is certainly true. choosing pain has presented several initiatives, like the community of common destiny, which says that we all need to work out some common principles, the built and road initiative, and economic project with the goal of chinese expansion of any positive sense. the expansion of china is capital and industry there. logistics chains really, there is a global security initiative to which has in many ways aligned with our own principals . i've visited badging recently and i spoke to the chinese leadership. we discussed the implementation of all these initiatives. you were clearly if we look at the global context and global security, our primary goal is to ensure security in your ration because the, your atlantic model on which security had been based since the creation of the

o. s. c, which was during soviet times the same model that we relied on after the disintegration of the soviet union. i'm not going to name all the documents that we signed together to ensure our security. the west didn't want to honor these documents, so that you were atlantic security model, was embodied in nato, and the us, the games with nato. we even had the nato russia council, with the model in his present iteration, has become obsolete, which is why now we want to talk about your age and security, and it is more reasonable because this is all one continental, but there are no outside is from across the ocean participating unit, the new model will be based on uniting all the existing projects, like the e u, the c s t o c i s, and the s c o. china is built in road and it should have creates an economic foundation for future deals in terms of security. and we intend to keep the door open to the western parts of the continental to everyone. but eurasia is our common

home to our common temple. so everyone needs to act accordingly, instead of bringing the wants and desires of the americans into the new model, because they will absolutely try to interfere, but like they always do, like they're now middling in the asia pacific region and the indian ocean and other regions to go, but china is already a very powerful country machine. however, when china proposes its projects, it does not give out orders. it just says ok, this is what we can propose an economic project to build a new railway in central asia or an africa or elsewhere. and the agreement is reached based on the balance of interest. the same is true for our relations with russia. last year we saw a record growth of trading over $240000000000.00. and it is going to get even bigger and major part of our investment cooperation is high tech nuclear energy building, modern aircraft phone. and i know you asked this question because we're seeing

a lot of chinese products sold and russian. yeah, i don't see anything wrong with that. i just wanted to know your opinion about that . i don't see anything wrong with that to take chinese cars because they are competitive products and they will help us elevate our own car industry. little because you kind of grew without competition with in the soviet union. there was no competition, but people liked that. yes. i had a huge, equally car, for instance. no good. but we could have had better quality use, had there been market competition today when i look at ours, equally factory until the other car factories like guys that are they try to stay competitive, take the most reach brands and some say, well how can you call it a musk ridge, if half of the parts are made in china. so what was content is own car industry also had to start somewhere seduce the students and mister lab, ralph, going back to europe. and how would you explain the over the top hysteria that we're hearing from heads of european states,

saying that russia is about to attack them exposed to i could say that this is just paranoia and to be done with it to, but i feel this is more of a cunning plan or what your opinion leaders badly needed is to squeeze money out of their parliaments. order to keep the war going. the us, as you can see as lost some of it z o in that respect. we will see how the drama in the us is going to unfold with respect to the bills on the floor, some of which concern ukraine. but if we look into who is most active, most energetic when it comes to pumping ukraine with weapons. that is certainly the europeans always look at all of shelves, believes he's leading the charge for in terms of providing help to ukraine. we're a manual mat cronin the world longer. we're the smaller nations select the baltic states for the check republic. so with the boldest states, yes, the limit 12 states. now these are certainly things to consider. first of all, the you personified bubble rails sholtes were still of wonder line. they were so

blatantly so transparent, so fixated on cutting off all ties when they made their statements saying that russia is an enemy to be crushed. the crane must be saved. and now if they change anything about their rhetoric, their political careers will end, their own political opposition will make quick work of them. and secondly, the reason they want the money is because they will have to explain to their people . so why there can no longer be any cheaper gas or cheaper oil. why the prices are on the rise? why as a result of the sanctions, their countries are undergoing the industrialization why german factories have to move their production to the us or china. a recent example of the latter, it was when all f shoals visited china, accompanied by germany's business leaders. the reason they came was not to agree on some mutually profitable projects, which negotiate the movements of their manufacturing to china. really, even if everyone comes down and we freeze the conflicts,

you have to understand that these guys are having elections and a few months times. and in many you countries, there will be national elections. and their opposition is going to use this chance to demonstrate the economic and social outcome of europe's policies. in any case, the opposition is not going to miss that opportunity. we will. but if you're a pain leaders suddenly stop telling tall tales about our so called plans to attack nato. then well, right now, they're hoping to scare the voters and continue with the same policies. but what amazes me is that at the start, when the special military operation 1st began, some people in the us and europe said that's how they accepted ukraine into nato. cotton would not have been bold enough to attack it. and now they say ukraine must not be defeated because if it is a booting is going to immediately strike against nato. some logic, right? all the want to do was scare people, terrify them into a medians. i don't know how to comment on all that really. there is this commander from norway who's saying europe must prepare for and military confrontation with

russia in the arctic. they expect us to attack everywhere. vladimir putin said many times, that there is no sense for us to attack them. if they would like to bring the needle boarders closer to ours, we will not allow it to do this in ukraine. i don't know what will happen to western ukraine. many politicians express their own ideas about it, but russian ukraine, that originally was russians that wants to be part of russia that wants to speak. russians wants to educate children, and russian wants to bring flowers to monuments commemorating people who shouldn't blood for this land. when it was russian or soviet, during the great patriotic war, this is not up to discussion. in my opinion, the, the,

the, [000:00:00;00] the, this didn't door to door or 2 to just don't want to use it. i will talk to me soon . so media, central, i'm gonna send you the settings from we some great things. i'm really from it on the computer. no, yes, it personally, solely able to run it. so the sale we do name is e,

as in which the v as the permission to complete it looks like you should get us the books and the switches switches to another one. i thought a soup inducing that to, to see about the various fields of the new jews because as then choose for many centuries the way that they made best. acute did once bullshit games oppressed and nobody can know it seems that the bodies on smoking by the same, the, [000:00:00;00]

the known in vietnam, the vietnam war last, it's almost 2 decades and dragged in numerous countries. not any times with nouns, but then you can just say a number. what is all i'm empty. the hundreds of thousands of american troops was sent to the country to bank the south vietnamese on a boat that not but the american soldiers. miller did resist as most solicitation bowed down entire villages and spread dangerous chemicals. and lee. by all right, did the americans ever fully acknowledge what they did on the vietnamese veterans ready to forgive you?

yes, that's the way it's too late. but yes, the, the g 7 release has a new plan to help you. crane by curbing rushes energy revenues. but the figures show higher pin dependence on russian. ellen g chad that demands us troops leaving the air base and the country that's in a letter by the african nations air force chief. it becomes the 2nd nation in the civil region to give the boot to u. s. military after new chair to the same pico newton seat taking place here, most candidates are going to be one of the main talks of the movie. and our