the, the, with this boy, this nature, allies of accused russia, of shattering the peace in europe. it is clear that nato has not done enough. and what russia has done, the shots is the security architecture of europe. and he's not just shots of the security tech of tech. so if you're up, it's son shop quite around wells. it's a great to pill to swallow, to recognize and falls into not to them a quarter of a century on need to is still refusing to do all of the, not just in relation to it's illegal campaign. and you could smell of, you know, rock gums on libya, how it enables us to visual amick states. now, how it piles ukraine high with arms. it's an able to make the

h is an aggressive that is something seen by many, including the global side as being the problem solids, even sky reporting for all the info grades. so it'd be a 11999 nato forces bomb to belgrade for 78 days and nights to find out what those days were like for people who survive to stay with our t as we continue our special coverage in the coming days. the monthly fee they told project was one of the most important things that i did. and

1st is present. 30 years ago, president bill clinton visited, proud to push for the expansion of nato, and his advocacy led to the inclusion of the check for public hungry and post. i'm scared now. here's an on this edition of 3060 view. we're going to discuss the continued power. the 42nd president of the united state has on global policy, whether he is beneficial or a liability. the current president on the campaign trail in the united states. let's get started. the there is the warm and fuzzy life of a former president presented to the public. and then there's the real story of what a former president is doing, not only to hold on to power, but still use it to gain a seat at the table. a $100.00 in their own bank account. the re election of bill clinton to the 2nd term was the end of the democrats being known as the workers

party. and the beginning of the transition to the workforce. government should do more. not less. the pre eminent mission of our new government is to give all americans on opportunity policies which were focused on being corporate friendly with the shade of social liberalism. taking the focus of the working class, suddenly the democrat party had been the champion of sincere desk, silver pollution. now one of the largest pieces of legislation passed under president bill clinton was the north american free trade agreement between the us, mexico and canada. and was greatly protested by labor unions. a president clinton also deregulated as well as pretty much eliminated the oversight of wall street. this was a move which of many experts actually believe led to the 2008 crash of the stock market. and the economic recession, which followed. now his wife failed 2018 presidential candidate. hillary clinton is

currently producing a new broadway show, which focuses on the suffragette movement stag producer. i will show up. but when she's not on broadway or in the media, continuing to question the results of the 2016 election or complaining about this one? can we uh yeah. can we talk about the upcoming presidential? oh no. yeah. so we have to see the voters who are upset that those are the 2 choices get over yourself. those are the 2 choices. one is old and effective and compassionate has a heart and really cares about people. and one is old and has been charged with $91.00 felony. she is working with her husband and one of the pretty much most known celebrity nonprofit's, the clinton global initiative, which a boast on its own website. more than 4000 projects and partnerships affecting people in more than a 180 countries worldwide. now the latest country to roll out the welcome mat is ukraine, or c, g, a ukraine action network was a launch last fall, and

a collaboration with ukrainian 1st lady elena zalinski. but maybe this was more of return the favor. as a clinton foundation was made a 5 year commitment by ukrainian businessman and all the guard victor pin juke in 2008, a more than $29000000.00. it is complex to find the exact amount which has been raised or where it is all gone to from the clinton global initiative. but we do know the endowment, who's in the billions. what was the effect president clinton has had on domestic economy? it's a, one of my foreign leaders continue to open up their doors and their own economic policies to the clinton global initiative. so what's dive into and discuss what power is held by for president bill clinton with our panel rating and podcast host, and director of the center for regulatory freedom at the c pack foundation, andrew langer and john jackson, who was the former chairman of the cab democratic party, thanks for joining me gentlemen. you're always start with you, john on this. so is the former president bill clinton still

a rock star within the democratic party today? like he was during his presidency? i think it depends on who you talk to. if you're talking to your older primary voters who are going to vote democratic, no matter what. absolutely not necessarily with younger progressive voters or some of the voters, or i'm certain about turning out in november that the democrats need to turn out in order to when he's very much considered part of the old guard, stablish of the party. and some of the, as far as policies from his presidency, aren't even popular with the democratic base today. that's interesting. you say this, and so i've gotta run to you and you're on this. do you feel like i'm a republican standpoint that having bill clinton out is actually helpful to basically those independents or even those more establishment? republicans, they're having a hard time voting for job that they like to see what the old time was been. remember, a nicer time between republican democrats that existed under bill clinton, and i'm not so sure that bill clinton is particularly persuasive to republicans,

or never trump republicans, per se. i think bill clinton getting try it out is really about what john says. really about showing up the establishment terry and base. right. the jump button is a real tough road. oh, going into november. i'm not the donald trump doesn't but, but in terms of making sure that he can appeal to both the very progressive wing and other folks in michigan and wisconsin or minnesota, who are concerned about uh, you know, jo biden's policies towards this real all the same time assuaging the more moderate to more pragmatic uh of the segments of the democratic party of the old school, the establishment, terry, and to the corporate office. i think you laid out really well how, how uh the, you know, the clinton gore era ushered in the new democratic era. so i think it's less about going after the so called the never trump, republicans really about making sure that they show up the widest cross section of the democratic basically into november. well, and in this case you actually have

a power couple of probably was one of the more modern day power couples because you had hillary clinton also involved. john, do you think hillary clinton's last actually affected both of their standings within the democratic party? i think so, i think hillary is, is good for raising money. she's good for making sure that your democratic super voters get involved with the election, which she's not going to bring any new boat to the table to. we're ready when you go to the coalition of our well joe biden. and that, and how did you see that andrew? because hillary herself, is that just a reminiscent for trump? does that kind of like easy game for him since he's already well practiced in going after her? i think it's interesting because, you know, you think about of hillary, clint really is an abberation when it comes to democratic nominees for president. right. i mean, you know, yeah, she was senator from new york and she was secretary of state. we could talk a little bit about her tenure secretary of state. but the reality is, you know,

she represented the last sort of machine politician in terms of running for office . yeah. she had the benefits of being a woman and a lot of democratic women voters want to see that was the reality is that the clintons of 2024 are, are very much in the vein of doing what's best for the clintons. you know, whether and the cleaning machine and the interplay between the clinton foundation of the clint global initiative, and to nail holdings and whatever other business interest that both mr. and mrs. clinton happened to have. it's really about that and yes, you know, bill clinton wants to step in there and do the things that he does as a former president of the united states. and we'll, that our but it's power that's, we'll good, very carefully. and generally in ways the benefit of clinton inc, well, is interesting, you said that ethics, i'm gonna stick with your on this question. if you're talking about the client global initiatives, that sort of thing and we'll get to the next segment. but i have to wonder, are there certain things, so that helps jo by with clinton being on the campaign. so are there certain groups,

demographics, or even states, maybe southern states, cuz joe biden does not do well in the southern states at all. that clinton still has that appeal to listen. i don't know. i think that in terms of going after those based voters in those southern states and making sure they come out, i'm not sure. clinton quite has that cash. i sure he was governor of arkansas, but he stopped being governor of arkansas in 1992. and i don't think he spent a whole a couple lot of time south of the baseball games. obviously these south of washington, dc and all that time clinton is very, very much both clintons are very, very much new york politicians, northeastern politicians, california politicians, really the cache is making sure that they go after those establishment. terry and voters within the democratic based who are, who might otherwise be concerned about joe biden, leaning more towards the progressive left. so john, we've just recently seen all 3 democratic presidents. well, the current president,

the former president altogether, do you feel like there might be any animosity right now between clinton obama considering how popular obama and his wife still are? and obviously beneficial divided being out? do you say that there's any animosity, the claims are kind of per se jealous of? i think they're, they're upset right now. they feel like the bomb is to have done more to help her. we get elected in 2020. what's the in our party, the dynamic right there. i think there's always been some tension because i the whole bottom unfolding upset on hillary. you know, a, she was supposed to be that nominee and then she did not. she was not able to repeat obama success. she's never really, at the christmas that obama did that, and that's why obama's coalition was much larger and, and why obama was able to get re elected. so i think, yeah, there's always going to be a little bit of tension there. but you know, i think that probably, uh, were even privately,

you're not really seeing much of that animosity, but we, we know it's, there was funny because publicly, unlike the democrats, republicans are not, you're not quite a see donald trump campaign with former president andrew, why is that why is that, that republicans seem to not be able to accomplish, even if there's an, a mazda 3 between them. they're not gonna appear on the same stage. why can republicans not put that aside for the greater good of the party, while democrats can as well for some, i mean, some of it is about grudge holding. and i, and, you know, you know, in terms of the democratic power structure, it's always been much, much more hierarchical. and by that, i mean, you know, they've been much better about getting people in my, in line of, you know, machine politicians and machine politics generally comes out of democratic cities and democratic states. but then the reality is, i mean listen, the reality is both political parties and politicians and both political parties have an incredible capacity to hold grudges. and i wasn't, i can't speak to what happens inside, you know,

state and local democratic party apparatus is. i know that for instance, when i was a republican party official in maryland, i used to think that the republican party and marilyn was the most screwed up republican party and in all the nation, given the amount of grudges and backbiting and back stabbing that could occur until i realized that ever republican party in every state is the most screwed up dumb republican party in the nation. i, i don't know about that. on the democrats side. i do not know they're better about getting people in line. the republicans are not quite as good at that. well, i'm gonna keep you on here because there is a picture that is circulating alon, it's about, it was actually a donald trump, and bologna is wedding. you have and you had bill and hillary, great conversation. they were good friends, even part of that point. do you think that actually helps or hurts donald trump to be that tied close to the claims? is that something that continuously they bring up that he was the democrats as well? i mean, and that's just, it was one of those things where i, when donald trump was running in 2016 and every democrat was a disclaiming any donation that they'd give it to him. i would have taken that much,

much more seriously. had they given those donations back, right. they, they kept the money which, you know, that's, that's what, that's what politicians do now. i mean, i don't think any of the salt water they, they tried this way, way back when in in 2015, 2016. certainly it was tried in terms of denying trends as an i donald trump, the nomination in 2016. it didn't work then. i don't think it's i don't think it's gonna work 8 years down the road. well, it's interesting, jack, ender, i want you to stay right there. the hey, historical fundraiser in new york city brought in more than $25000000.00 and featured for president brock obama bill clinton. do people really care about what bill clinton did one office? and if so, why is the claim global ownership still as active as ever? if it was so bad for going to discuss after the break, the face has always captured humanities imagination. i mean, let's face it,

space is cool, but only the chosen few are able to head beyond the, the earth's atmosphere. it takes years of preparation to actually take on that final frontier space training pushes the human abilities limits to the very edge. so who are the super heroes of today? let's get to know them a little better. the . welcome back. i'm going to hughes and you are watching the 360 view. i want to start the 2nd segment with the pro test which erupt it outside the campaign fundraiser. in new york city, with the 3 top democrats, president, joe biden, brock obama, and bill clinton. however, well, most of the large protest outside the radio city music hall as well as a few scattered inside the hall, were about the current role of the by the ministration and the cause of conflict. protesters also pointed out the long trail of blood,

all 3 presidents had left around the world. let's discuss with radio podcast, host, and director of the a center for regulatory freedom at the c pack foundation. andrew langer and john jackson, who was the former chairman of the cab democratic party. thank you so much for staying with me through the break. john, i'm sorry to you because it, bill clinton was easily re elected present because people were not as concerned or maybe didn't even know as much about the foreign policy, like the bombing of the medicine factor in sudan until several or years later was he more south or do you think from the public because we didn't have as much access to information with the internet like we do today? yeah, i think politics was a different game back then. you didn't have a sound bites access to the sound bites. social media that went viral. like you do today. in i big okey democrats were more viable in different states back then when you think about some of the states that bill clinton won. i think that he

was also very popular president. and so i think that it was very different error politics that we are in right now with, with just the mass communication. you get via the world wide web well and are from a republicans or even from the right side of the aisles perspective as they're watching what was going on outside of the optics that went on outside of rated savings. a call with all of the protesters, the ones that were going inside are republicans actually enjoying this protest. it's happening from within their party. something that happens often and their public inside are they capitalizing on this for an election perspective. and are they basically using the conflict type in the middle east to continue to, to chip away at a job i as popularity within its own party as well. you know, i think it comes down to, certainly this idea that republicans are, are much, much more unified on middle eastern foreign policy than perhaps they are on the central european foreign policy. but, but dig into it, but to your, to your question, to john, you know, there are couple things that were going on

a john's right, that some of this has to do and you're reading some of this has to do with the, the, the, a transmission of information in the early stages of the internet, 1996. let's not forget that bob dole was an incredibly weak candidate. perceived is very angry. and then when it comes to foreign policy at the time, right. you know, we, we were still president dealing with this a mil. you wasn't work. that the politics for the united states ends at the water's edge. that sort of, we, we generally a, were agreed on as a nation to take as to what you know the us was doing foreign policy. why? so the idea of, you know, building democracy abroad, especially in light of the, the, you know, the ending of the cold war. and that really didn't change until after $911.00 the election of george w bush and the, and folks a pastor towards that. and then of course, the 2nd goal for which i think changed a lot of people's perceptions as to how of foreign policy and use for policy can impact politics. so there was a lot going on then, and yes, we're certainly in

a much different mold. yeah, i mean listen, uh well, well, the trump campaign capitalize on defense uh, within the democratic ranks. sure, the question is whether or not that will really matter to the average democrats older, you know, and are you bringing up a really good point that when expand on, right, they're talking about how when you're looking at back, then it seems like foreign policy. we were a lot more unified. i think republicans and democrats were altogether, was like whatever conflicts we were on outside of our borders party. my party lines didn't matter. we were going to support the troops, whatever they were doing. john, do you think when did, when did that change? you think? do you think that's how we see it now? because now it's this, this president goes into this for in conflict. this president got it, and that's sort of the chain that was connected between clinton, obama and biden, is all the 4 conferences. 3 of them were able to get us into. it's now become more of a political issue necessarily than a unification. almost patriotism issue i think it comes down to how popular the

counseling is. i think um, you know, be in, um was just uniformly popular of both sides the out and i peak and the error of george w bush. you have quite a few republicans who at the end of his administration, work and support of all the countries we were in. and there's, you would say that you can say the trunk is the more part of the anti uh, intervention wing of the republican party. and he often classes with what you would call the bush neo conservatives. so i think it's going to come down to how popular the conflict is and, and how, what the general public feels about about it. and i think when it comes to the gaza, which the u. s. isn't directly involved in it. is it is in directly involved in i

think that you've got folks on the list in the right who are pro palestinian and you've got folks on the left in the right who are pro israel. so sometimes it's not always simple to define it across party lines. and i think trump's actually making a play for level leading motors because it's very critical. benjamin netanyahu. he sometimes shows in the deed for the lives of palestinian people. i see him kind of making a plane for some less leading voters and inch and throwing is not really completely one side of the issue. well, it's interesting to me that but i want to stay on this thing to do, bring up as real. and one thing that i personally see is be very damaging to the clinton brand. the quinn is everything has come out about geoffrey ups to now granted to slow trickle on that. i know republicans obviously bring, i've, i've seen a lot john, how much is the i've seen files really resonate within the democratic party. do they care about potential damage to be debt again can do to not only bill clinton, but any of their candidates that are over the age of 40. i don't think we've gotten

the full story on epstein, you know, they've dropped all these names, but we don't have any context of what happened. i'm not sure wherever. going to find out contact some what slowly happened with all the names that were dropped. um, it seems like uh, anyone who might have been involved in something file is getting protected apps. oh that's, that's my opinion. so i'm not sure it's going to have an impact cuz i don't think we're getting all the information that about that. well, and that's the one thing. yeah. you hear republicans, andrew talk about, i've seen a lot, they obviously throughout bill clinton, every time they bring it throughout donald trump's name, is this something that needs to continue to be pursued politically from the fact of does this damage democrats when you're talking about epstein and bill clinton's involvement. listen, i've just to just to go back to the question you have for john. i think democrats only care about jeffrey epstein in so far as they can make the case. the donald

trump was on the you know, the teenage express or whatever we would, we would call it out to sex island so, so you know it, but beyond that they don't particularly care. i think we're publishing motors are much, much more concerned in the end about what was actually going on with the bite and white house with the bite and vice presidency and what was going on with hunter biden. and they would be much better served by sticking to that, right. listen, we do as a general principle need to get to the bottom of what was going on with jeffrey epstein. and the various leads that were traveling to his island. but in terms of the context of the politics of it, the republicans who remain focused on joe biden and the biden family, which, which incidentally, is like a mini version of clinton inc. right? i mean, i think the bite and family was aspiring to be as successful at the clinton's that you know, pairing policy and politics and money and making scads of money added. but bill clinton and hillary clinton and chelsea clinton, they are the master's and mistresses of all of this,

which brings us to talking about the clinton foundation. here. john, i've got to ask you, why does the claim foundation still exist? i mean, there has continued to be these controversies regarding projects, specifically like the one in haiti, the accusations of tax fraud, misuse of donations down there. money not actually going to the people that they fundraiser to is, is damaging. why do countries still open their doors to the clinton's concern? if probably don't have much power, much connections in the white house, as we've kind of discussed already. but they allow them to kind of have free reign of their country and raise donations that don't necessarily go to the street. i think while they don't maybe have bunch of power in government anymore, they still have a lot of social capital. they can still make things happen for people because of they're connected to people all over the world. and you know, i think i think that the foundation as is you know, a lot of positives and foundations or whatever and working the plans are unique as

they have use their foundations and get filthy rich and. and that's really what it is. a vehicle for the plans to get rich and to, well, their power, you know, their, their big on the game of power and they still will do a lot of power in different circles. and i think that's really what to put in foundation is about at the end of the day. and i think the more liberal progressive folks of the and the democratic party aren't, aren't necessarily fans of. it was interesting that it seems like the more time in any of the scandals that happened, people kind of forget about our push to the size that go well that happened 20 years ago. we have enough problems today. but andrew, there was a whistleblower hatch that came out and put in man in a memo bill clinton mixers. imagine his personal business with that of the foundation. many people within the foundation have actually tried to caution him about doing this. so you done lesson and there really is no talking to him is what this whistle blower came out and said, how much does the same as a,

why is it congress actually looking into investigating the actions of the former president, even if they have nothing to do with current policy, why are they not looking into what is happening today with the foundation as well? they've tried to do it and it didn't go anywhere. and you go back to when hillary clinton was secretary of state and the relationship between whom aberdeen we all, we all know and you know, her right hand. and a guy named jacqueline kelly, who is at her left hand, is a special envoy in the state department. and the fact that at the time that whom aberdeen and deck when kelly were both working for hillary clinton, the state department, they were also working for an entity called to nail holdings, which was a for profit lobbying organization with major corporate clients of which bill clinton was the honorary chairman, and so you had the interplay between donors to the clinton foundation, who were also clients of denial holdings, who were doing business with the state department. you have whom aberdeen and debt, whom kelly and others. and,

and so this goes before congress. i may have some investigations, but nothing really comes up. there's no accountability at the end. hillary clinton, losers, the 2016 presidential elections of congress figures. you know, what's it? why, why, why bother continuing this any further to me that was always, by the way, the greater scandal that needed to be investigated in terms of hillary clinton. it wasn't the server, it wasn't been jobs, even those were important. but it was again, it get getting town with what joe biden was doing is vice president united states, the self dealing to the benefit of one self and one's family by using their official positions. these are the things that we need to actually haven't investigated. the reason why they're not being investigated now is because hillary clinton hasn't been anywhere near and office bill clinton has been anywhere in new york government office forever. and by the way, it's getting real quick because you asked about why folks are still supporting. it's because the clinton foundation can get huge sums of corporate money, whether it's clients of 10, a, or others, and donors to other foundations, like the rockefeller foundation, etc, etc,

and connect those people with folks and power in those countries who make huge amounts of money. there's a reason why and, and i'm let me add they don't want to solve these problems because if you solve the problems in places like 80, then you can't, then you can't make money off of fundraising on them down the road. and that's where the money is. a, it's on the fundraising and the corporate interest and perpetuating the problem. so i'm going to give john the last word on this. john, what role do you think the claim should be playing within the democratic party? not only this election year, but any role moving forward. you know, he will never do this, but he should sort of step aside and raise money for the next generation of the democratic party. he can't speak for the democratic party anymore, because frankly, there's nothing to gain from it. people like bill clinton are ready going to get out and vote from joe biden. and so he needs to step aside, just continue to raise money, don't be a surrogate. you're not going to help bring new people to look or listen, just raise money for democratic victories. well,

i am grateful to both of you for allowing me to capitalize on your knowledge of the clinton's and their influence on the current political race and reminder. radio podcast, host and director of the center for regulatory freedom at c pack foundation, and john jackson, former chairman of the cab, democratic party. thank you so much for joining me. i've got on here and this has been in your 360 do. thanks for watching the the

of the big day for india and the globe as the world. new economic powerhouse begins general elections that are determine the country's leading party for the next 5 years. what's our special coverage of the race until june? first? randy and official state 3 drones were shot down by a rain in air defenses over it's for han city known for having a nuclear facility. and rachel ruble in moscow will have the stories later. but 1st question, foreign minister serve your laptop is giving a live interview to russian radio stations on foreign policy and the current international agenda. so let's listening radio to make it way out on an id so

that i can go as.