the cisco part of the the headline story this, our fall, michelle revelations, from russia's investigative committee claim, a hunter bigler. thank you. premium. the company's sponsored terror attacks in russia, a criminal probe against us and they to official test. now below, the case has been launched as the russians. they do not officially calls for an investigation into a long list of terrorist attacks, hardly di paiute brain. since the break. all that comes in other use per lady denies allegations of facilitating a genocide in gaza by arming israel. it's what nick, a rock you is accusing of germany all about the international court of justice where the 2nd day of hearings in the

11 not night here in moscow. hope we find you. well, this is the news our on our t introduction. we begin with breaking news. the us defense ministry has responded to an artsy inquiry about washington in direct the or otherwise funding terrorist that's the pentagon has flatly denied any responsibility. now the background to that is that the russian investigative committee has opened a criminal case against the american anita officials for allegedly sponsoring terrorism, both inside russia and abroad via the hunter of buying link ukrainian company buttress my holdings. you may recall that name, the revelations come just weeks after the crocus city hall atrocity in moscow, which killed $145.00 people. it will start moving unless it has been established that funds channel through commercial organization. and just like the color of the

oil and gas company, regional holdings and operate, and ukraine has been using this in to years to get it out. the terrace clocked in the russian federation and the on to, to eliminate pullman and political and public figures. and, and legal, economic damage work in, in cooperation with all the intelligence services and financial intelligence, income and sources, and the movement of funding amount into several 1000000 us dollars being investigated. the, as well as the involvement of specific individuals from government agencies, conflicts and commercial organizations in western countries. additionally, investigative and operational efforts are being made to trace ceilings, direct opportunity to as of the terrorist at 2 point in supervisors, organizers and supports us rushes. investigative committee is looking into millions of dollars worth of financial transactions from the west that may have gone to funding and financing terrorism, both in russia and beyond its borders. and the committee is determined already that some of the money that has made it into the hands of terrorists has come from the

company for as my holdings. now, many people may find that name to be familiar because it's the same for as my holdings that hunter bite and son of joe biden did business through and ukraine for many years. and it's also a company that's been widely accused of being a vehicle for bite and family corruption, according to the former prosecutor general of ukraine, victor shoak. and he says that the binding family bribed ukrainian officials to the tune of $1000000000.00 to remove him from his post. after he launched a criminal pro against birds, my holdings for corruption, they were being bribed. remember the fact that joe, by using them gave away $1000000000.00 in the us, the money in exchange for might or to christmas. so my firing, excuse me, let alone a case of corruption codes are as if an accurate, some like that from such a high ranking official, wasn't a suspicious enough back in 2015, joe biden publicly said that he had withheld

a 1000000000 dollar loan guarantee to ukraine until officials there had removed choking from his post. and i'm telling you, we're not getting a $1000000000.00. i said you're not getting a 1000000000, i'm going be leaving here. i think it was about 6 hours. i look as i'm leaving and 6 hours. and the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. i got fired and they put in place someone who was solid. so as the russian investigation continues to connect the dots to the united states, to ukraine in terms of who's really behind the financing of terrorism. and russia and beyond the whole picture, but in terms of who is behind the scene, specifically of the crocus city hall, terrorist attack is becoming more and more clear. well, let's welcome into our studio now. our french jew political list serial, do laughter. there are always a good day when you hear thanks for joining us. the investigation committee has

made a direct link to the crocus city hall across the public at least. what is your view on whether the oil and gas conglomerates. it's a big one at 1st, and the whole things was involved in some way in financing a tax. well, that's very much possible. i don't have that this close information, but that's very well possible. we all know that, um, on to biden and job items, it's implication in ukraine through bodies law and other devices is not to demonstrate any more. so i wouldn't see why board as much wouldn't into it. yes, the could perfectly do this. that would be perfectly uh in the way, because they, they have big revenues. they have big international contacts. and the fact that perhaps they were the ability to, to do this it's, it's, that is perhaps not all is the rims a possibility that they, they,

they know how to, to do this because of that, they know how to do it. they have friends to move money and all around drive the u . s. government, the c i a m i 6. another intelligence is our training the as be and i'm good. so it gives them the opportunity to have not only the means, but the way to do it more and for them it's a very easy now to be very honest, but also i don't have to day, we put specific information about they are really implication that if the russian government board, and if the russians are sitting there, they have failed and they have links to this is because they have solid rock solid proof. ok. the u. s. congress has said before explored the question of legality of jo biden's links to ukraine. uninstalled as involvement with purpose, not basically putting the president in the clear will these new allegations though, put the focus back on the, on the answered questions in the approach. i think that the us are going to do

whatever they can to answer any questions. knowing that most probably by the end of this year, a bite on there's going to be out. so um for them i would say in the situation in which they are. uh, the best bet is just too much probably make a low profile. don't give too much information, stand on the sun, the denying system. has there been a very well how to do it and always land rush? how far everything that is coming on and just keep keeping them in the safe that in, in the safe side of it. so i really doubt that the u. s. government is going to make any uh, any move besides this one. we mentioned that there was a pentagon responding to ortiz request for clarification on its possible links to breast by denying that. and also seeing that the us does not sponsor terrorist acts, how accurate is not statements? first news, did you have the department of defense was not sponsoring terrorism?

i think that everyone would know if we will know that i is just the name of this one. is it your creation of the west? remember during this area and war, we also had the home 5 use in friends with said that most of the, which is also a tourist organization, was doing a good job and a very good job against the shot. and i saw the army. so mean going out of those words, it's just in believable that the beauty has the, the gifts to say this because the, i mean, if they were not sponsoring terrorism, then why are they funding a terrorist state? ukraine is a terrorist state by any means. they are killing civilians. they are killing journalists. they are selling people outside disputed territory if we could qual, list very theories, disputed territories, sorry. and the steel, the united states did the you the, the c i a is giving you the you finance is funding them, sending them what,

what is it? if it's not funding terrorist i'm just returning to the crocus city hall atrocity. we in fact spoke on the night when that happened. now, since that occurred, information has been coming. i intermedia intermittently and quite sparse with what we know putting it all together so far because the prove is ongoing. but 1st, we had the link or the possible link between at the attack ukraine. we know that people who carry that i for going there and other links have opened up. then we've got the sponsorship now. the terrorist attacks at by the us on the its allies, if proven. what do you think the full picture is going to look like there? well, if, if you look at all the declarations that we have so far, whether it's coming from friends, whether it's coming from the united states by trying, by any means to implicate ideas as the only code break from this one sort of that

a tourist attack. it's not only, i mean, if they are hoping to defend ukraine, just the just pointing out your point. if you do one to a, to someone, you don't speak about it. you don't say anything about it. look at the, the phone call that you had the couple of days ago between the french ministry of defense and the russian ministry of defense and the comment, or is that one made by the french ministry of foreign affairs. they said that when we do, we don't have the need to speak any more to russian positions on russian people because of, of just the darn out on the same page. they are freighting, uh, adults, uh and not up to you if that is completely different. um, my friend said that they wanted to give some information about the that'd be have to the russian government. yeah. why it did not do it before the march?

22nd. why is it doing it now? i mean, is he hoping for something is he seeking help? i need to seek your eyes the pin, gibson, pirates of one of the nose and easy hoping to get and get into the diplomatic scene again. it's, you know, that's my front, but um, yeah i, i, i'm not sure that a lot of things are, are going to come out of this and it's on the, on our shoulder, the brushing shoulders to move forward into the investigations and um, to push it real things well, thank you so much for coming into this you and giving us your view on us development today. at french, do you political, a, serial deluxe or have the pleasure of you? well, the white house has cold approved into ukrainian oil and gas company versus my financing terrorist attacks. sure. and also a good investment investigator set today to opening a pro,

visit the financing of terrorism that says, they say in both western countries, specifically including funds received by the risk by which which will come in so much that just disappears completely. i mean, it's nonsense, a rushing knows that he was isis who committed the attack in moscow. we know it was isis who committed the attack in moscow. we warmed russia of an impending terrorist attack in moscow. and all of the rest of this is noise. offer reaction to that under breaking news story. let us cross live to john, korea, god, for me, us intelligence officer on host all the whistle blowers which can be watched. right here on our t john. good to see you. we just heard if there, that's a quote nonsense response. should such a serious claim, particularly coming in the wake of most good, deadliest shooting atrocity and many deck, and should it not demand, at least

a more dignified reply from us officials at the very least, it deserves a dignified reply. yes, we're talking about a major terrorist attack. we're talking about the desk of many, many people, many dozens of people. there's nothing flippant about this. there's no reason to be glib about this. it's a very, very serious issue. and at the very least on the western side should show respect and should offer whatever assistance it is possible to offer whatever know it comes out of this pro joe biden or the biking family. perhaps i should say, are in the center of it, whether or not they're directly implicated by fact of hunter biden's links to paris . my. do you think his father will personally respond to once russia is alleging what could he say?

i don't think he'll respond. actually. i think he'll ignore this and hope that it goes away. i can tell you that in the us with the 24 hour constant, new cycle that we have here. uh, the networks likely will work to make it go away, at least several of the, of the national networks. this might have a little bit of a life with, with fox just because it's, it tends to be more republican oriented. but i think joe biden himself is going to just keep his mouth shut and refused to answer any questions. when the massacre took place at crocus city, the us immediately said, isis was behind it. although another recent cases such as north stream the explosion that terrorism, washington kept silent. why so quickly a law for blame this time? well, i think there are 2 answers that i can give you and perhaps the truth. this is in there somewhere. on the one hand, the us position is because we have

a lot this country called the duty to warn act. if us intelligence agencies develop information about an impending terrorist attack, they are compelled by law to warn the victims in advance that an attack is coming. so that's on the one side, on the other side, a recount the story from the day after the north stream attack. i said to a former c, i a colleague of mine who's now retired. that had to be us, right? we had to be the ones to blow that up. and he said, well, of course it was us that we could never say that it was us. so like i say the truth is in there somewhere, perhaps in the middle, you know, with, with the, the isis attack or, or the a task for which isis is being blamed. or maybe that was to fulfill the duty to warn who knows north stream,

i think it's more akin to whistling past the graveyard. you just pretend that everything is fine. nothing is happening. and hope that it just goes away. and i know because of the tensions between rush in the us right now when information comes out, it's and seeing as not trustworthy, perhaps that's right. you know, it seems like not john hopkins, but, you know, putting the messenger to the side, the, the actual message, the news, the facts that may emerge in this investigation. and when that comes, when there's a clear, a silver head reading, looking at the details, looking at the possible links on this cut and have an effect on joe biden's chances in the us election. is it going to be one of the issues that that he could be asking questions about in the next 6 months? yes, that's a very good question. and i think it's very important question for american

politics, because the russian side now is going to conduct this investigation. and you have to follow the investigation wherever the facts lead you. if the facts lead you to ukraine or the facts lead you even further to the united states, then questions are going to have to be answered. and if the, if the that's or irrefutable joe biden is going to have to answer for that. now the us likes to claim that it doesn't sponsor a terrorist attacks. it doesn't sponsor terrorist organizations. well, we only have to look through history at the, for example, and in latin america in the 19 eighties and for middle eastern groups. you can make question in the immediate post the iraq invasion period, isis, and outside of the rest, their front used to be called. i'll tell you that they just changed their name. they didn't change their ideology. so not, you know, terrorism for many, at least the claim here in the united states is that terrorism has any i of the beholder. if these that's point toward terrorism and point to some sort of time

knowledge between a, the act itself. and you praise me for the act itself and probably united states and then these are going to be very serious political questions here in the united states that joe biden was going to have to answer. i'm because i'm just thinking of the, the thing that voters wants to focus on on an election year and it tends to be the economy. i money. if there isn't money trail fund coming from us taxpayer dollars to a ukrainian oil and gas conglomerate, which then was used to finance a tax on another at countries citizen and civilians and killing them. it's. it's not a very, at a big leaf i've big jump to say that that in direct funding of, of the money that i'm paying into the government coffers. well, what on earth are we doing? who are we support?

that's right. that's right. and, and this would be tailor made for rep james comber, the chairman of the house government operations and investigations committee. he's the one who's been leading the efforts to impeach president binding that impeachment the parts a week ago friday. but if a tie is able to be made between bereavement and these assets that mean peach of inheritance would have to start right back up again. tom, thank you for your time on your thoughts. always good to see you in killing cardiac a supply. former us intelligence officer, i'm the host of the whistle blowers, thank you. thank you. i to the rest in investigative kennedy's case was initiated by the way, by the russian parliament. members of the 2 men also urged investigators to look into the north stream at tech, and it's correlation to bite and administration officials publicly stating they at did not want the pipeline to move forward. we recall that the only other attacks that do my wants to investigate include the assassinations of journalist daria do

gonna more correspondence lovelyn to tar ski and numerous strikes on the russian city of belgrade. recount both about years ortiz from on cost, while the heinous terrorist attack on the crocker's concert hole is still under investigation. washington and its allies are already running around flying move for other isis isis. but those who learn by experience to mistrust and this thing the west has to say, look around and see if possible for flag operation executed by the ukraine's military intelligence agency called the why? because of their a long and bloody history of terror attacks on russia. they resort in the absence of battle, feel success. now let's examine this record. now in the final days of last year, the head of key is regime lighting is lensky issued an order to strike the russian

city of bel drugs. getting $24.00 civilians, including children, pretty much like what just happened in belgrade is definitely a terrorist act which was under the cover of 2 rockets. they struck using a multiple launch rockets system, this kind of width and hits indiscriminately, and they used it to strike the city center where our people were walking around just ahead of new year's eve. it was a targeted attack on civilians. of course it's a terrorist act. you can call it anything else and your brain keeps on indiscriminately showing soldiers as they have been shifting the nets for the last 9 years, actually almost 10 years in fact. but said, there are also more targeted service fact orchestrated by the board. prominent russian journalist back to this set of leaders of local governments have also be murdered. even the washington post has describe these atrocities as liquidations, why the more menu of ukraine's con desta an operations have had clear military

objectives and contributed to the country's defense, the car bomb being that killed. are you doing to, however, underscored ukraine's embrace of what officials and key for, for, to, as liquidations as a weapon of war over the bus 20 months, the s b u, and it's military counterpart that you are have carried out dozens of us as nations against russian officials and occupied territory as a legend, ukrainian collaborators military officers behind the front lines and prominent war, supporters deep inside russia, the gorly sabre done of doesn't even fly to deny it, or denounced. the fact that's his story as our quote russians, anywhere. all i will comment on is that we've been killing russians, and we will keep killing russians anywhere on the face of this world until the complete victory of ukraine. now let's stay with the head of the crating and military intelligence. we've done a 5 things like a canary. when describing his plans estimate formations against not only ordinary

russians, but against the russian infrastructure as well, to shatter their illusions of safety, there are people who plant explosives there are drones. there are indeed people who are very easy to work with on that territory. people who understand that russia should be different and we support such people. i search for destruction of anything russian seems to be the goal to id or for you creating an intelligence at any given time. the famous try me a bridge built after the free vacation home the peninsula with a homeland, as also being targeted several times for, but donna and the rest of the click and the key of regime, it's a legitimate, sorry, gets and it doesn't matter that's millions of civilians have been using it every single year after all the breach, as the logistics of 8 for supplying the enemy with the weapons to the cells in front is a legitimate goal of ukraine, from the point of view of international law laws and customs of warfare. meanwhile,

russia's domestic republic is still shelled daily with various intensity by the crate and artillery views of civilian casualties. slow with horrifying regularity. keys to the key of your game continues to show its peace deal face by showing civilian infrastructure. and i see are showing people as to the civilians, to strike on the marketplace. and the next is a heinous act of terrorism. they use the discriminant weapons that have caused the losses of so many lives, the start of rushes, special minutes, reparation. the countries intelligent service, the f as the, has prevented a more than 140 terrorist attacks from ukraine. obviously, considering the death soul, there were many others and actually led to the killing of civilians. the majority were organized by the moore, which former us intelligence officer. as goings, is

a washington's quote. little baby. we calculated that girl was a smaller and more nimble organization where we could have more impact, or was our little baby. we gave them all new equipment in training or officers were young guys, not sylvia era. caves you be generals. well that s b u was too big to reform russia . so morgan's the many victims of the crocker safety, whole service attack. words of supports and condemnation flow from all over the world, but none from ukraine, vermont officer and margie. then after a public of the okay, more world news, germany has been pushing back against the nick arguing lawsuit lodged in the hague during a 2nd day of hearings at the international court of justice. berlin is accused of facilitating the quote commission of genocide and gals that by supplying weapons to israel, our tc percent down of nick your talk through the details earlier. this is the day

2 of the trial and on monday the court had a chance to basically hear the case made by new cromwell that accuse germany essentially of what they call a facilitating genocide in the, in gaza. now jim and he had had a chance to respond basically they have subject view, laid out by nicaragua was very one sided. they said that they just store to the realities, they distorted. how would this actual things uh, they said that this case was rushed and essentially they have pressed, openly said that it should be thrown out of the window. they also made a big case to show that they in facts have been supporting palestinians also very, very extensively. and they have been providing them with humanitarian agents who have a little bit. the german government, cassidy, assesses whether there is a clear risk that the particular item subject to licensing would be used in the commission of genocide. crimes against humanity or brave breaches of the geneva

conventions of 1949. germany does remains the largest individual donor when it comes to sending human and terry in a to palestine. but this is something that the colorado of someone preventively addressed on monday when they were making that case. and when they were speaking to the press and basically explaining why they decided to, to bring germany to the court. despite all efforts that germany does to provide humanitarian aid to palestine, it is indeed a pathetic excuse to the best seeing in children, women and men and goss on to provide for money. tabby and 8, including 2 ad drops on the one hand to furnish the weapons and committee to re equipment that i use to kill and then the 8th them. and to kill also for many to be an age. because as most recently evidenced by the missile, i tech against vehicles and vehicles, a real central kitchen on the other hand. so now everything seems to be in the

hands of the judges and of the quotes. so we are expecting them to soon come forward with a ruling and with a decision. but mind even though it's you ends highest court and it is sometimes dumped as a well, that's the world court who it's rulings are only advisory in nature so they can pull on one of the other sides to do something. old robins still doing something, for example, but that wouldn't hold any legal obligation on this. i mean, it would be advisory in nature. what's interesting about this case, ego is that we know that germany isn't the only country that owns as well. the us is another key, don't have a number one donor of weapons and thoughts too, as well. so why isn't washington being taken to the hague? well, exactly, and again, this is a very good point which nicaragua also did address to basically they have hailed bell in for being parts of these, you know, judicial proceedings on the simply saying that the us,

there's no point in bringing the united states. oh israel for that matter, to the quote because they would simply ignore anything that would, that might come out and anything that the judge might say have a list of people say, well, the, the principal provider is the united states. the 2nd providers tell me, why didn't you go to united states, the united states simply the fedex, it the jurisdiction of the court. so we can come with that. think i should. i also think with the experience we had with united states 4 years ago, even if we had jurisdiction, united states would not pay attention to the court. we fee of that countryside, germany will respect the court. and we have hopes that with what the court decides is going to be accepted. we're responsive to join me and he's going to accept what the court is going to say. so that's what that is, how i hope that is our main intent in this whole. now that's quite interesting now, isn't it because you'd expect the plaintiff ends of the defendant to be

a little bit heads with each other at least in some way. here they are very civil about isn't the point that they are, the 3 colorado is making. here is it basically so all right, we have this international like additional system. yeah. we have a system in place. so we, so we can sort things out. it was put there for a reason. so we can sort things out as civilized people using the, again, the, the system that is already that in place, and kudos to germany for actually showing up in the court and making that case. i'm basically being very civil about what they did have to say about the us and israel is that, well, it's absolutely use it uses in the case of those countries that it's an absolute waste of time. i mean, they do have a point here because back in january, in a separate case, the very same for world court ordered the israel to take every possible measure to basically avoid genocidal acts in this, in the one operation and gaza. so what did this will do.