so i think the basic idea behind it as a strategic concept is santa united states, particularly i'm told her united state both europe can some extent pass. i identified china the systemic arrival or you know, the kind of cold war language. and they're basically thinking about china these days, the last few years as a pure 0 sum game anywhere, any place, any time china game, something will be their loss. now china find a wonderful way of trying to have a breakthrough. yes, breakthrough many, not just sir. the, the actual the piece making effort, but also they try to effect public opinion in the world about china's rule in regional regional security issues. they

cannot deal with united states any more. be honest, i'm on pile one question on other question. please. much gave up. i if, and i'm not the catastrophe, so they say we can move around. we, you mentioned reputation. last you mentioned reputation was the united states as an amazing, arguable propaganda. department. i mean c, g t, n is banned in nato nations in britain. it's a band. i'm sure you'll have one with amazement as every u. s. network. as if in a totalitarian state covered the chinese spy balloon as a, as a multi $1000000.00 missiles were sent to destroy it. surely, it's a reputation of china in nato countries in the european union and in the united states as an all time low. oh, that's still true. but remember, the u. s. mentality is something very close to early

19 fifties and his hysterical, i must say that it's kind of penny on where the penny come from. i believe is a deadly combination of 2 historical trains of thinking. populate in the west. now they combine together when it, whenever they think about china, one is the fear of decline. not remember this whole spangler a philosophy about a decline, the west and united states simply being number one for so long. suddenly phasing the possibility of the gossip declining is or spangler ism then combined with a racial concept which being popular in late 19th century, that is yellow arrow. so these 2 things joined together,

really frightens the american of foreign policy elite. and is they were, they think is a real challenge, but the never use the language. i say what they trying to do. but they, they disguise spangler ism, and the yellow peril sentiment with ideological in autocracy versus a democracy. it typical cold war tactic, though, it's not even since it, but surely those policy makers in washington realize that the components of, of all their technology come from china, the treasury bills, the bond holding ok. it's reduced a china, but china still has huge invest, trying to pull the rug under the united states economy tomorrow. surely they understand that. what a question is, why china want to call the rock? china would love to free right? oh snap 40 a. but it was all whatever system american created as long as they can. but

a sadly, as they just cut short, no tech war is at the core. but don't forget, all slash wrangler is the 1st person cry wolf in the 1950s law spoke. nobody resist any more about technology. he said never left slay. remember the hey, gillian languish, masters level relationship. never less flavor till own technology. they were destroy masters ecology so nothing really new. oh me is just a, a history in there, a repetition. so, as is, have been there a long time. yeah, yeah. not sure of, you know, by their f, scott fitzgerald, the used j. a good. the great gatsby about spangler that he was a bit of a fan of his and we know what happened there, that j. gatsby. why does china then? if a, if he knows this, it knows these race, right ropes are being used against them. why does china continue to say facilitates

for lank as i am afloat in the past few days rather than through bricks? why is it, i think it's given $500000000.00 to pakistan for 500000000 dollars to facilitate i m f spending there. why does china seem to continue to support the bretton woods institutions actually? well they, when they try, they trying to support the ad result of britain was, which is called globalization free trade. remember china? so the last defender almost today, the still try to defend free trade shooting paying speech at davos a couple of years ago. you know, i never thought i will see that in my lifetime. chinese come in is deleted as a leading campaign of fries and of globalization. it is u. s. don't forget the original founder of the brazil system, not abandoned the system twice. now the 1st time that happened in the gold exchange

relationship, which is a default on the world now is the 2nd one, the abandoned globalization. so blame me, china more. that economic problem. it's kind of put a horse before the cot. i don't even logically does not make sense. yeah. but many around the world believe the devil system is predicated on a lie that it's actually have hypocrisy that the rains under class. rob's the institution. and how long will the chinese communist party continue given the sanctions regime that prevents this the dream utopia. globalization that is always spoken of in, in davis, it was only the other day with ocho of indonesia said beware of was a mastercard. and visa, well remembered, sanctioned regime was revived. actually, precisely because the u. s. want to abandon the original system on original world

order economic order in particular. now, one china can do because china hassling, free writing for so long. therefore, sanctions will heard china quite a lot. but china tried very, very hard and us, i will say, start 10 years ago, at least russian for we start even earlier d dollarization, this one, you know, concepts or russians have done wonderful it, by the way, the central did not destroy rubel the price to everybody in the west, china will move in the same direction country. they are selling massively to u. s. and eventually will make r and b, you know, the more important international currency. so they are preparing the words and at this moment, sanction, still working well to be able to damage chinese economy. but chinese are one they know that takes a glove oh now. so to speak, less row, you know,

less, less fine. if he, if you want to, because you know, say soccer quite a lot as well with these sanctions. well, not those who have a jazz in arms companies, arguably china, obviously, you're right, you're right. arms companies are the only one. yes. china as you great relations, china's great relation to saudi arabia. we've had people on this show say, look, this talk of di dollarization. it's still in the interest of opec countries to keep the dollar rather than start trading in a say, the remnant be, or you on because in a sense the chinese currency is kind of pegged to the u. s. dollar. anyway, so why bother changing things? well, it's just a question on survival. this question. also a boy d, the one chinese language, what's called long arm punishments of other countries in many

sections. so long inter governmental now, the whole point about this, i think china try to lay, i'll try to get in more into the i am system, which is theory. you know, the person was legacy. if they cannot, they only option is to reduce the usage. i don't know whether or not a $1.10 continued to be as strong as it looks. i doubt many economies. so many historians dollar probably gonna implode by itself. was this debt problem? ah, you know, in how much money they, princeton last few years or so it is so they will, i will say american government will pay the price go a dollar in pollution. next few years, the given the disparity wealth in the united states can the american government,

the united states government can, they can go on raising interest rates are to protect the dollar regardless of the poverty and the destruction of infrastructure in investment in american industry. miller can con, it was spoken about be on his side towel to wrong a reagan all the regan, the egg agree, can no makes tried. it remembered those, they said they can race as high as a 15 percent. another rating interns, race based on the idea. you can attract all those states and reagan time, off money massively out money into the united states because these hot money calculated as badly oil shakes. everybody else cried because they want to take make money. although the interest different, right. which was you referred to as the sustain dollar strain, nor any more. ah, my sense is that because continentals of the u. s. financial system banking system,

government a finest, esa. culturally law is fight whatever government try to pull a, you know, they are reaching a kind of, i believe in a less seeks i conditions now was to sell a dollar. so i doubt they can play a regional mix one more time. i to associate project luncheon. i'll stop you there more after this break. ah ah, [000:00:00;00]

with that you found that i add them, does a lot of different research and making

a bit of an emotional punch go to below you spoke with ah, imposing democracy. not going to more democracy's culture. something is good for iraq. it's not that bad been not a state something good for russia is not good for america, for iraq. you cannot be a person. thanks. society. ah

ah, welcome back to going underground. i'm still here with professors young jin chinese international relations scholar and distinguish fellow at the simpson center. i know you say it was a long time coming, but do you think the chinese communist party was watching the defeat in afghanistan as well as the rio reaction by russia to inserted bombing of don bass? are these 2 factors, the catalysts for the st? what looks like dramatic foreign policy initiatives by children being sure. oh, well can, yes, i will say so. yes. and they really had the certain says usa shot and troy. ok. well let's see how k all the united states. to repeat this, i go a retreat after so many years, which they are, of course,

the rushing or invasion. i know chinese come and never use that word. i. as a scholar, i will use this invasion which certainly is not abide by international law. but don't forget, again, china always sees nato enlargement as a threat. not only to russia, china also, well the pressure when nature start east or expansion in 199798. nobody remember that episode, how china reacted china almost any time. yeah, but it will shine, it did when the full mouse weekend. nancy pelosi has to die. one was to do a big drill of him. you know, some people were asking, why doesn't jain era? i don't know, she jin ping visit havana, visit havana, or do something more than just a big military drill right? no, no, i don't think

a timing is right. but don't forget this through. this drill is not all the other 3 is a different drill. this is called the blah katie strategy. this could be, could be one of the future. i saw a military operation class. this is a actually provide the opportunity for them to really there, you know, a real fire exercise surrounding talent though. so don't forget, this is the 1st time this is b blockade could be one of the plans. you see? well, i mean, certainly on fox news, they talk about it work like that. but of course, the americans, atlanta, they have lots of our personnel apart from all the bases that circle you in shanghai, the u. s. bases. yeah, 16 people, 16 chinese workers killed in the central african republic ahead of the she visit to moscow. china has

a lot of infrastructure that could be bombed. we know that sy hersh revealed the destruction and perhaps the greatest infrastructure terror acts in all history, the gnawed stream pipeline, supplying energy to europe. surely china is very vulnerable in that, in america, in africa and southeast asia, to any kind of cia nord stream style attack as possible. thus, as always possible, depending on how much or you know, tension will develop between us and china. let's say, kiss china solid miserably. she against ty, one wheel united states really do a full scale author with china. i doubt it really is slight biden's, full, infamous hum slips as we would do it. i don't think you as ministry is ready, you as we know the overall strategy and even believe in deploying or if they only

thing one with allies, something called law. but a quad is really edge, rather primitive stage. i don't believe they are reaching the level of so called into operability. the co ordinate a wool on behalf of taiwan is his president. i. e, i don't think they were talking about that when president let me president's i visiting the united states, apparently just in transit on a central american to a short i. they actually discussing us yes, it's a huge issue. this is another major publication. if remover is not just transit, it's a who the question who's going to see her if he has any bulletin? well, well, nothing will be in public, will it? it won't be in public o u. s. system that you never, they're never able to keep secrets. don't forget it,

so i'm sure it's going to be public if, if you look at the level anthony blinking, that's a major measure. provocative. kevin mccarthy. yes, it's a measure one, but it does even one letter below nancy pelosi in terms of publication because nasdaq lucy at the same party with them. right. right. and so say that democratic governments and the kevin is mccarthy as the opposition part. mccarthy, of course, won't, you won't go in see zalinski and his being attacked in nato nation media. what about japan? right, right. what about, i mean, we've seen about an expansion of them in the philippines. you're saying, you know, usually the rank biden does go for it. we've seen it in the philippines for me. okay. shita in clare. what's that? what is that about as the i m f. organize is a $15600000000.00 deal, which presumably china must have known about because china invest in the i'm of sure. yeah. but the deal is not for military reasons,

right. i little will never did that deal for military reasons. ah, japan and others. now i'll fill you face to face, right in the recent new of a few basic these are all part of what american called into pacific strategy, or we knows, i know that i followed very closely. the don't forget, i said is still and relatively primitive stage. they are try to form a mis strategic encirclement. all contaminants, you know, military intentions are against china, but this little is a slow emotion, but it's there. but i doubt this is really very useful. a reservation pie one issue. it does not help. it does not help stabilize the tie one street at all. so because that could,

could you seek mila truly, if you are sitting in beijing, i, i'm under command the she to do. i have to wait until watching you slowly to finish your deployment. that's what they've been doing the past 20 years. yeah, no, no, you know the last few years they really speed up with 20 is they don't have a quarter, they'll have all the other stuff. oh cuz you know with the u. k. so what i'm trying to say is we cannot watch you to do it because we are, we have convinced this is what you going to do to make tie one, a separate political entity for ever that that is the chinese technician. yeah. despite the usaa directory, we never changed one china house. they don't even believe they are not changing. not, not mentioned chinese, there is 0. a serious communication. okay. one question now a, me, you see,

they talk about their talk completely different language. they're looking both ways . is something that bad? yeah, i was shown from the i t c. arrest warrant for vladimir putin issued on the eve of the visit or a finger moscow because the usa they would invade holland. if it is a good, good, good for a book and amelia, for sure. you know, yeah, if we can dispense with the i c. c them. what about the weapon zation of human rights? because as you know, and a given the each in the united states, you must have been aware of the propaganda campaign. we and we are actually showed on this program how the weaker or propaganda story was amplified. as you expect. the weapon is asian of human rights to go on steroids, i should say kareem gone, the i c. c. lawyers been on his show or should we expect more and more stories saying that where you live, where you're speaking to be from shanghai is assess better for you on rights

violations. i o. china always has, you know, we, we know jana has said, very serious human rights problems. it's that we're issue in the sheen gen really qualified as american defied as a genocide. that's a not, as i don't agree to. i think the policy itself is wise. not really either, i will say i would criticize both sides, but who is a weaponized human race? that's my question. mainly the western part of the world, that's my sense. now become a major instrument for great power to remember during the original cold war. there is the human race issue, harrison agreement, all of that. you never hear the american leaders house using

chinese companies 40 instead of people remember china? ah, yeah. but i mean, arguably the global south doesn't have any language. the global side knows about abu ghraib and the prison on guantanamo that still open so i can agree that that kind of yeah. element really the idea that the very idea. 5 is trying to separate cummins funding from p r c itself. it's a, it's not historical. they don't offer what they talking about. b is not realistic. in any case, this is invented by people at palm pare. don't forget very much so it's become a common language now. the u. s. is either you as the leaders are using ab some european politicians use is absurd. a using human rice issue as a major instrument, full, great power haunted her. i emphasized great politics, great love ology. you need to be pragmatic. you disagree with ideology regimes that

you know, character mine. but let's sit down to make a deal to see the ultimate issue is peace, all war. this is something many forgotten. europeans certainly, ah, the space are, they are not aware that their mission to have them to jump on american union, actual interpretation of taiwan ish. cuz remember, there was always a 2 size interpretation. if you follow the history of the taiwan questions. says that a recent nixon and henry kissinger, well, if the, if the united states is declined, we'll europe die before he and i did the states as a power house of the, of the economy. i mean, i should say europe is paying for this russian war. it still buying russian assure, and obviously china is laying for the we're all by, by asking the sanctions a, don't know where the china was and weapons. do you think china will send weapons to russia? i don't think they will send straight so forward. no, i don't,

the russian either going to russia do is no, no, no river is always loss of illegal do use ah, how can you define, do, are you in this ascending weapons to the russians? so do or use is always possible. it's according to the bilateral treaties trade treaty between china and russia. we continue, do you expect close to nuclear weapons cooperation, already american think tanks are alarmed by the fact raw sat him and the china talking about close cooperation of nuclear weapons. ah, yeah. i saw the on their alarm, they remember before they asked china less have a nuclear talk. now today, the situation, as i say, is into a period of mccarthy's, almost like a mccully. there is a black wife 0. some eli proposal a made by china and they have to say, what's the conspiracy behind it?

you know what, what's driving that? i don't know why i'm currently was howard bells no. senator kennedy's school in a nuclear program. if you want to refer to that, i'm very happy because i'm still a research fellow that we are working on that i'm the one tried to, to track to, you know, if we cannot do truck one, let's talk about nuclear issues. but so far, american side are less and they hinged their attitude before they push. china is okay. so and we are really in the situation where communication become almost impossible. centers was full gray power relations. professors jang jink, thank you. and that's it for the show. remember, will be bringing you brand new episodes every saturday monday. so stay tuned. meanwhile, you can keep in touch, why all our social media?

it's not censored in your country and had to our channel going. undergoing tv on rumble dot com to watch new and old episodes going on the ground. so you sat, ah ah, speculation swirl about an eminent ukrainian spring counter offensive. it is reported, washington is pushing the zalinski regime. use our regaining loss territory to strengthen its position during future negotiations. it would seem the russians have their own plans. and i'm rick sanchez. and i'm here to plead with you. whatever you do, you do not watch my your show seriously. why watch something that's so different, my little opinion that you won't get anywhere else work of it please, or do have the state department, the c i a weapons makers,

multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. i change and whatever you do, don't watch my show stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show was called direct impact. but again, you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change the main thing. ah,

with ah ah fresh flashing flare up in israel despite the government agreeing to postpone a controversial judicial reform off the massive protest. think of the country at the 3 civilians are wounded in the lake, ukrainian shelling of done yet residential areas following good day time attack conducted by key of the army with us apply time on the new signal and what is the us doing their grading more and more new mil to realize just the