what facebook's aims are in fact facebook doesn't know what its aims are because it's going to be the sum total of all the people who are working on these algorithms a whistleblower someone who used to work for facebook came forward last year and said i was one of the news curators at facebook a bunch of us to sit around every day and we used to remove stories from the news feed that were too conservative and now and then we inject a story that we thought was really cool. facebook founder mark zuckerberg says he's committed to giving everyone a voice he's from responding to an allegation that facebook edits conservative views out of its trending topics they can to practice types of results based on what they think you should be seeing based on what your followers are presenting now a new report claims that according to a former facebook employee the social media mega company sometimes ignores what is actually trending among its 1000000000 users if the story originated from

a conservative news source or if it's a topic causing buzz among conservatives. facebook costly manipulates or users they do it by the things that they insert into the news feeds they do it by the types of posts they allow their users to see and the fact that they actually decided to do psychological experiments on their users is something that i think a lot of people need to really fully understand and they were doing it based upon the fact that different things that people posted they want to see how other people would react to it. on how to watch why your facebook friends post can have a direct effect on your mood new research shows the more negative posts you see the more negative you could become. so if for example let's say somebody wanted to post something that was on the news feed that was a very negative story they want to see how their users would react via their likes by their stay. inspire their posts and they would show people who already had

a predilection to maybe having some depression or maybe having some other issues in their lives and they can figure that out based upon your like space upon your connections based upon where you're going and so what they want to do is take that information and then use it to basically weaponize this information against their users so that way their users could see different things that may affect their mood and may affect how they interact with others and that's something that is highly unethical it appears that some young people may have been so affected by this that they may have done harm to themselves based upon what they saw on their facebook feed and it was all because it is experiments the things that we have no standing with facebook we're not citizens of facebook we have no food on facebook it's not a democracy and this this process is not a way we can design the future we can't rely on this single company to invent our digital future.

there's there's what i call the creepy line and the google policy about a lot of these things is to get right up to the great line but not cross it google crosses the creepy line every day not only does google cross the creepy line the location of that line you keep shifting well it's an interesting word creepy right because it's a it's a word that connotes horror he didn't say dangerous he didn't say an ethical there's all sorts of words that could have fit in not slot he said creepy and a creep is someone who creeps around and follows human spies on you for unsavory purposes right that's the definition of a creep you know i don't think the typical ethical person says i'm going to push right up to the line of creepy and stop there you know they say more something like how about we don't get near enough to the creepy line so that we're ever. in gauging in. even pseudo creepy behavior because creepy is really bad you know it's

. a creepy mugger is worse than a mugger the mugger wants your money god only knows what the creepy mugger wants it's more than your money and you give google a lot of information you searching for the most private stuff on google you're searching about you know illnesses and diseases that your family have you're searching about things that might be your wife my your spouse might not want you to know about and you're going to telling google more than you would tell a family member or your spouse or a very close friend and google has so much information about you that it's scary for who are starting 3 very powerful ways in which they're impacting people's opinions. this phenomenon that we discovered a few years ago seem search engine if you lation of is a list of facts list effect is an effect that a list has on some aspects of our cognitive functioning what's higher in

a list is easier to remember for example seem is an example of a list effect but with a difference because it's the only list effect i'm aware of that is supported by a daily regimen of operant conditioning that tells us that what's at the top of search results is better and truer than what's lower in the west it's gotten to a point that fewer than 5 percent of people quit beyond page one because the stuff it on page one and typically at the top in that sort of above the fold position is the best most of the searches that we conduct are just simple routine searches what is the capital of kansas and on those simple search is over and over again the correct answer arises right at the top so we are learning over and over and over again and then that day when we look something up that we're really unsure about like where should i go on vacation which card. that i like which candidate should i

vote for and we do our little search and their results and what do we know was that top is better at the top is true or that is why it's so easy to use search results to shift people's opinions this kind of phenomenon this is really scary compared to something like fake news because it's invisible there's a manipulation occurring they can't see it it's not competitive because well for one thing google has for all intents and purposes has no competitors google controls 90 percent of search in most of the world google is only going to show you one list in one order which have a dramatic impact on the decisions people make on people's opinions beliefs and so on. the 2nd thing they do is what you might call the auto fill in if you are searching for a political candidate congressman john smith you type in congressman john smith and

they will give you several options that will be a prompt as it were as to what you might be looking for if you have 4 positive search suggestions for a candidate well guess what happens seem happens people whose opinions can be shifted shift because people are likely to click on one of those suggestions that's going to bring them search results obviously that favor of that candidate that is going to connect them to web pages that favor that candidate but now we know that if you allow just one negative to appear in that list it wipes out the shift completely because of phenomenon called negativity bias one negative can in some demographic groups drop 10 to 15 times as many clicks as a neutral i mean the same list turns out that google is manipulating your opinions from the very 1st character that you type into the search bar so this is an incredibly. powerful and simple means of manipulation if you are

a search engine company and you want to support one candidate or one cause or one product or one company just suppress negatives in your search suggestion all kinds of people over time will shift their opinions in that direction that where you want them to ship but you don't suppress negatives for the other candidate the other cause the other product and then 3rd very often google gives you a box so they will give you search results but they're below the box and up above is a box and the box just gives you the answer. when it comes to local search which it turns out is the most common thing people do and google 40 percent of all searches it's not so clear if i'm doing a search for a pediatrician in scranton pennsylvania what happens is google still bisects the page shows the organic meritocracy based information far down the page and pops its answer barks up at the top but it's populating the box with its own sort of

restricted set of information that it's kind of drawing from its own kind of proprietary sandbox these are just google's reviews that it's attempted to collect over the years users are habituated to assume the stuff at the top is the best but instead is just what google wants them to see and it looks the same and what happens is google is basically able to put its hand on the scale and create this direct to consumer harm because that mom searching for the pediatrician in scranton is not finding the highest rated pediatrician according to google's own algorithms and she's just getting served the google thing no matter what and that i think is leading to you know terrible outcomes in the offline world so google has at its disposal on the search engine itself at least 3 different ways of impacting your opinion and it is using them we're talking about a single company having the power to shift the opinions of literally billions of bebo without. anyone having the slightest idea that they're doing so.

they ask you guys about switching gears and asking about the sort of privacy and information we have a phone you're talking about the to i guess technically always on we have google which basically maybe knows what i'm going to ask for before i ask for it finishes my search request it knows everything that's going on in my household and should i be concerned about how much you know about me we've had this question for more than a decade google and our answer is always the same you have control over the information that we have about you you can actually have a deleted you can also search anonymously you will you get to choose not to give us this information but if you give it to us we can do a better job of making better services for you and i think that's the right answer these computer systems naturally collect this data but we also forget it after a while and we've written down why and how.

google wants you very much to habs privacy from everyone except that. the 1st thing we all should do is quit using g. mail google stories analyzes all of g. mails that we write and all the incoming e-mails that we read the ones coming from other e-mail services google tracks it all really track the g. mails that you write they track the drafts of those crazy e-mails that you decided not to send it really and the information from g. mail is then put into one's personal profile and becomes another source of information they have for sending people targeted ads tech giants are increasingly under scrutiny from politicians regulators and experts on the left and the right some are concerned about their growing power even calling the monopolies and the tension keeps building yet their wall and can. temporary life certainly isn't

shrinking we too at the news hour have worked in collaborated with facebook google and many other new media businesses and journalists who might communicate with regularly about these issues including journalists at time magazine the guardian the hill i could go on and on very using g.-mail not only that their companies are using a form of g. mail their emails are running through google servers all of their incoming and outgoing communications are being monitored by google this is happening also major universities if you enter the university of california after a certain date. you're using g. mail whether you know it or not and it was found that google was yes in fact scanning student e-mails for non educational purposes and what those not and purposes were we still don't know to this day because google still has not come clean with what they were doing with the information they still haven't certified that they have deleted that data the big challenge was when i found out that google

was scanning our students for advertising purposes and other non educational purposes i went to my state lawmakers and i tried to encourage them to introduce legislation that would ban these practices when i went to the state house who was there a lobbying against any stronger privacy protections for our kids it was google and facebook. it seems the breaks it saw go will never end the electorate voted to leave the european union but the political class and media are resisting the people's voice mean anything anymore what is the legacy of breaks that institutions confidence in leeds and the democratic process.

this is a sticker from the water bottle phone in the stomach of a fish the brand is part of the coca-cola company which sells millions of bottles of soda every day the idea was that let's tell consumers there are the bad was there the litter box or throwing this away industry should be blamed for all this waste to company has long promised to reuse the plastic. on. the mountains of waste only grow. well i guess it makes sense that so many parts of our life would be influenced by google but guess what the federal government runs on google so if you're counting

on the federal government to regulate google realize that the federal government is using google docs they're using google tools in some cases there are even linked to g. mail so google has fused itself with our federal government in so many ways the government's motivation for using it is well google's already done it and they they have this thing that works it seems to be working pretty well for consumers to the idea behind it was one very well let's move this but some government agencies on google . you know will use google cloud for some things they lack the cognitive lags pretty soon have the necessary security on it and then it becomes a big embarrassment afterwards of trying to keep it on the media because people would rightfully point out there is a huge security risk some members of congress are calling for an investigation of google for secretly tracking i phone users all over the internet even users who thought they had blocked that kind of surveillance were you seeing. pattern

emerging over and over again so look at google street view google agreeing to pay $7000000.00 to settle what $38.00 states are street new cars collection of data from unsecured by 5 networks straight through vehicles equipped with antennas and open source software and gathered network identification information as well as data frames and polo data being transmitted over unsecured wireless networks as the cars were driving by it's a great tool for say tourists or transplants but privacy advocate kevin bankston says google is being too invasive there are a lot of people on the web who or i think. by this they find it kind of unconscionable and so absent the fact that they got caught and they were fined and they tried to cover up some of the things that they were doing and the media got wind of it nothing would have happened to them the new google how many has a massive problem and it isn't even out yet it was released to reporters for free last week to test it out one journalist discovered his device recorded everything

and uploaded it more and more people are beginning to use the smart devices in their homes there's 2 things to it that i think people need to be aware of the fact is that it's always on and always listening so it's collecting an enormous amount of data on their users the other thing is the fact that it is only giving you want to answer back to all the rose. bowl the summer reading the websites of the national geographic. shows the entire run stories was about. i think it's something it's we should be aware of what's happening with the bias being introduced because more and more people are starting to use these units and certainly children are using it and the kids don't have the ability to discern that it's a biased result according to a new report by the electronic frontier foundation schools are collecting and storing kids' names birth dates browsing histories location data and much more without proper privacy protections. they wanted to schools and they offered their

google apps for education for free to schools what they weren't telling anyone was they're actually collecting information on our kids secretly and they're using this for profiling purposes we just don't know how that information is going to utilize the against and they can be utilized against them when they apply to college to be utilized against them when they go in for a job it could be utilized against them for insurance it could be utilized against them whenever you want to buy something online and they're taking an information and they're weaponize ing it against their own kids and guess what happened nothing absolutely nothing happened when when the f.t.c. heard about it when the partner education heard about it they took no action. so google grew out of the ph d. program at stanford right they have this affinity for academics they view themselves as academic a little bit in nature their campus looks like a college campus so google provides a ton of funding for academic institutions individual academics all around the world so we found something like $300.00 papers that were funded by google in some

way that supported google's policy positions they like to say hey we have the country's foremost academic experts behind us and what they're not telling it to the public is the fact that they're actually funding these so-called independent experts he's so hot in the pen and academics where shows have time for congress about whether or not google is a monopoly he was relying on academic study to bolster his point they didn't disclose at the paper with actually funded by google. are you concerned that your company has been exerting enormous power. kirby in ways that hurt many small businesses a local extremely good and well meaning small business and down the rankings but we are in the rankings business and so for every loser there's a winner and so forth i am satisfied that the vast majority of small businesses are extremely well servicer. and as i said earlier it's going to be a sure i do believe. if anything our system moves into the small business of the

larger businesses because it gives them a hearing in a rule it would not otherwise have is the nature of the way the algorithms for. google has a blacklist and the biggest blacklist they have is called their quarantine list. now i'm guessing very few people have ever heard of this list and yet i'm telling you it not only as a tool of censorship it is by far the biggest and most dangerous list that google maintains for the purpose of controlling information the quarantine list is a list of websites that google doesn't want you to visit are there a 1000 items on this list there are millions of websites on this list will has the power to block access to websites and there are no relevant regulations there's no oversight there's no advisory group there's nothing no one even realizes that

google is doing that there was a curriculum they were who will shut down the entire internet for 40 minutes this is reported by the guardian google did not deny it they shut down half of the internet in japan and again they acknowledged it we are talking about a company with so much power who gave google the power to shut down the internet where did that come from. the adoption rate of smartphones is so profound that that is the information tool and so how people get their information what they believe what they don't use i think the project for the next. i think we are increasingly moving to an era where people are saying we need to take better care of our digital environments and we need to take better care of our digital selves and what that means is being aware of what we are putting into our computers but more importantly what are. readers in

our devices are putting into us we are sharing information with them increasingly sensitive information the amount of data that they had on us 15 years ago is relatively small now is amazingly complex and they never forget any other. posters or to brag i remember well your 1st visit to capitol hill back in 2000 and. you spoke to the senate republican force which chair you said back then that facebook would always prefer. is that still your objective. senator yes there will always be a version of facebook that is free it is our mission to try to help connect everyone around the world into bring the world closer together in order to do that we believe that we need to offer a service that everyone can afford and we're committed to doing that. sustain a business model and what use are your service. center we run out it's. the end of the day there is no free lunch especially when it comes to social media

and the internet the entire in common is literally based off of surveillance and that's something that we really need think long and hard is that a sustainable business model to protect our privacy and protect our families and protect our kids moving forward what we need to think about is how can we continue with a light touch deregulated approach but one where people have the information they need to know what's being done and whether they consent to it or not and so that's why i think we need to have a really big focus on transparency on privacy on a level playing field across the board so that people understand what's happening and they can make decisions in a way that they're not able to very clearly right now. it isn't obvious that regulators are fast enough to keep up with the tech world they're going to be 5 years behind the game that's like a 100 years that's like wrestling with victorian england to know it seems to me that it would be better in. anyways if there were multiple competing search engines

and if there were multiple facebook's because at least then we'd have a diversity of ethical conundrums instead of this totalitarian conundrum that we have right now my concern at this point is that i don't think a lot of people and government really fully understand the extent of the problem i don't think they really understand what they're up against i mean these are massive massive technological changes and they're all happening in parallel we have no idea what the consequences of that are going to be so my concern fundamentally is that these machines will reflect us ethically and that should be frightening because i wouldn't say that our ethical house is particularly in order so they're going to magnify what we are. that's making the presumption that the thing that we're building will be a good thing and i don't think that it will be a good thing because it will reflect us if they have this kind of power then democracy is an illusion the free and fair election doesn't exist there have to be

in place numerous safeguards to make sure not only that they don't exercise these powers but that they can't exercise these powers the internet blocks to all of us it does not belong to google or facebook i mean we have empirical evidence that google's participating in self-serving bias in a way that directly harms consumers as a society as a democracy any time you have concentration at the levels they are in the information sector it should be concerning because they really are now more powerful than governments they are form of regulator but they are our private regulator with no democratic accountability i can't believe in a system in which the power is separate from the people we're talking about innocent pretty arrogant people in my opinion who think of themselves as gods of sort and who really want to have a complete whole own. humanity and these are basically big mind control machines

and mind control machines they're really good at controlling minds it's going to be harder and harder to fight them if we don't do so i would say you know as soon as possible though the more we give them the sooner we are all hanged. i don't believe our species counts are vive unless we fix this we cannot have a society in which if 2 people wish to communicate the only way that can happen is if it's financed by a 3rd person who wishes to manipulate them. through traditional notion of totalitarianism was resting on the premise or the idea that a government would try to achieve total control over your life and they would do it by using the might and muscle of government to do so under compulsion well today we essentially have a totalitarian force in the world and that is these large tech companies but guess

what they didn't use stormtroopers they didn't use the gulag they didn't use the arrest of political prisoners to accomplish it we all opted in to do it ourselves we volunteered for this arrangement and we live in a world today where these tech giants a level of control and an ability to manipulate us that stalin mao hitler and mussolini could only have dreamed of the power and we're essentially trusting these large tech companies to make the right a good decision for us i for 1 am not prepared to cede that level of power to these individuals. in the meantime is the company's fault she really. didn't.

the most. there are no official statistics in india consenting children who have been lost or separated from their parents some are to estimate that every 8 minutes in the country a child goes missing a. lot of. money

on. the national human rights commission stated that $46.00 minors go missing every year one of the police quoted. the united nations children's fund has described the situation as genocide and various sources suggest that in india there are several 1000000 missing women and children. she. says.

6 hours of marathon talks between the presidents of russia and the result of a new plan for northern syria get underway. u.k. m.p.'s reject. the timetable triggering until the face of the withdrawal all the awaits the e.u.'s decision over a deadline. plus facebook launches a crusade against foreign interference in the 2020 us election with a new package of counter measures including flagging state run media accounts. with you on the go just download the. device in the meantime coming up in

a few moments time looking at the long term impact which innsbruck surprises.