be one or not? be one or not.7 also, there be one or not.7 also, what's going on with this weird obsession with daubing paint over everything? just because you disagree with something, where that from? where does that come from? what's all about? and what's it all about? and speaking strange things, speaking about strange things, what on earth been going on while i've been on my holidays? ispeak while i've been on my holidays? i speak of course, of the bizarre situation when it comes to william wragg. you'll all be familiar am familiar with this, i am sure we'll now scotland are we'll now scotland yard are investigating what's been going on, to know what do on, but i want to know what do you on in our you think is going on in our society? why many grown society? why is so many grown adults seemingly so keen to adults now seemingly so keen to connect to strangers this connect to strangers in this way, sending pictures of their bits pieces and the rest bits and pieces and all the rest of very odd, if you ask me. of it very odd, if you ask me. but what does it say about our morals as a society? also, speaking labour speaking about the labour party, keir that focus keir starmer says that the focus on angela rayner's house is a smear campaign. so let me ask you, is he right and do you care about that story or not? i also want to ask you, as brexit made britain a lower status nation, that's what one former mp thinks. do you agree with him? also, do you think that the

working class have been betrayed by politicians that is a claim that's been made today. and guess what? everybody we like it when we create new things. we've got a brand new way for you to get touch with us. get in touch with us. >> we are proud to be gb news the people's channel. and as you know, always hear know, we always to love hear your there's new your views. now there's a new way in touch with us way of getting in touch with us at gbnews.com forward. slash your commenting you can your say by commenting you can be part of a live conversation and join our gb news community. you can even talk to me, bev turner or any of the members of the news family. simply go to the gb news family. simply go to gb forward slash your gb news. com forward slash your say . say. >> yes, indeed. we'll have all of that and more before 7:00. but before we do, let's cross live to polly middlehurst for tonight's latest news headlines . tonight's latest news headlines. >> michelle, thank you and good evening to you. well, the top

story tonight from the gb newsroom is that the metropolitan police in london has identified human remains found a park in south london found in a park in south london as those of 38 year old sarah mayhew. the discovery was made in new addington, croydon, on tuesday the 2nd of april. a man and a woman have since been arrested on suspicion of murder . arrested on suspicion of murder. they remain in police custody and police are saying they were both known to sarah. they're not looking anyone else in looking for anyone else in connection with her death . and connection with her death. and police also confirmed today that the man wanted in connection with the murder of a woman in bradford in yorkshire, was known to them. 25 year old habiba masoom came to britain on a student visa. he's from the oldham area and is described as an asian man of slim build. he was last seen wearing a jacket with three large horizontal stripes. he's wanted after 27 year old kulsum akhtar was fatally stabbed as she pushed her baby in a pram in broad daylight in a busy bradford shopping centre on saturday.

police now are saying they want to speak to any taxi drivers who may have driven the suspect to bradford moor park. he is likely, we understand, to have paid in cash . people are also paid in cash. people are also being warned not to approach him. assistant chief constable damian miller told gb news a short time ago patrols in the area have been increased . area have been increased. >> there has since been no confirmed sightings of masoom . confirmed sightings of masoom. however, i would like to thank again everyone who has been in touch. again everyone who has been in touch . we have had teams of touch. we have had teams of officers working through all the contacts that we've received and following up on all lines of inquiries. there are significant resources conducting cctv , vie resources conducting cctv, vie and house to house enquiries and we also have local bradford officers carrying out increased patrols in the area , which i patrols in the area, which i hope will be of some reassurance to residents and the killers of 23 year old cody fisher have been jailed for life today, with a minimum time to serve of 26 and 25 years respectively.

>> the semi—professional footballer was stabbed and killed during a fight on the dance floor of a birmingham nightclub on boxing day in 2022, a jury at birmingham crown court found 23 year old remi gordon and 22 year old cammy carpenter guilty of his murder. speaking outside court today, cody fisher's mum tracy said you never expect your child to be murdered . murdered. >> the sentence passed is somewhat a blessing that they are no longer on our streets and hopefully go somewhat to try and eradicate this awful epidemic thatis eradicate this awful epidemic that is ruining so many lives. sadly, not all have been brought to account, but they know who they are . for us as a family, they are. for us as a family, cody will still not come home and we will forever live in the shadow of his senseless murder. >> well, also the news today. 11 people have been arrested following a pro—palestinian protest at the labour party's headquarters. the group , known headquarters. the group, known as youth demand, sprayed both the inside and the outside of

the inside and the outside of the building in bright red paint. the protesters, claiming that the party are complicit in what they've described as the murder of palestinians in israel's conflict with the hamas terror group, and this comes after sir keir starmer reiterated his call just this morning for the government to pubush morning for the government to publish its advice on whether israel is violating international humanitarian law international humanitarian law in gaza . meanwhile, the labour in gaza. meanwhile, the labour leader says the nhs is on its knees and he's promised to modernise it if his party wins the next election. it's hoped that a plan to digitise the red book of health records that parents receive when a baby is born will boost vaccination rates and improve access to health care. it would see patients receive automatic notifications for appointments and health information via the nhs app, instead . sir keir nhs app, instead. sir keir starmer says the plan will make the nhs fit for the future. >> everybody has that. red book knows that it can get lost, it can get forgotten all the

details have to be re—entered. it wastes a huge amount of time and this is an example of the sort of reform that we want in the nhs. obviously everybody will know nhs is absolutely will know the nhs is absolutely on its knees if we're elected into government, if we're privileged enough to come into government, we'll have to pick the nhs up, put it on its feet. but we also need to make it fit for the future. and that's where the reform comes in. >> sir keir starmer now millions of people, tens of millions in fact, particularly the fact, particularly across the united looking united states, will be looking skyward tonight for what's expected to be the most viewed total eclipse ever. if you're watching on tv, you can see these live pictures coming to us from mexico . so the eclipse from mexico. so the eclipse hasn't started yet, but crowds clearly gathering in anticipation. there are cloudy conditions, though on the honzon conditions, though on the horizon they might eclipse the excitement itself . for some. excitement itself. for some. it's a different story though. in canada, where clear skies are set to bring near perfect viewing conditions. here in the uk, some of us will get a small

glimpse of a partial eclipse in the west and north, including in belfast, glasgow and liverpool from just before 8:00 tonight. we'll keep an eye on that for you. those are the latest stories. do sign up to gb news alerts. scan the qr code on your screen right now or go to gb news. com slash alerts . news. com slash alerts. >> thanks for that, polly. i'm michelle dubin, i'm with you till 7:00 tonight alongside me. i've got the columnist for the mail on sunday, peter hitchens, and the former labour adviser scarlett mccgwire. evening scarlett mccgwire. good evening to i was going to to both of you. i was going to say, you know the drill on this programme, don't you? it's not just about austria, is about you guys at home as well. and you know what? modern technology don't it? don't you just love it? >> because tonight, the >> because tonight, for the first show, first time on the show, actually, now so actually, we can now connect. so we can. not just over email we can. yes. not just over email or anything like that. oh, no. we connect line, you can we can connect on line, you can send you can post send your views, you can post your and the rest your comments and all the rest of it. keep them nice. keep them

clean, please. try and clean, please. and i'll try and read some of them out. gbnews.com where you to gbnews.com is where you go to with a slash. your say at the end of that it can connect to that. i'll be chatting to that. and i'll be chatting to you the break though you during the break though because and pay attention because i try and pay attention to they're to these two when they're talking as but join that talking as well. but join that conversation that way. of course, can or text me course, you can tweet or text me at news as well. welcome at gb news as well. welcome aboard. however choose to aboard. however you choose to join on join the conversation on tonight, very tonight, you're very, very welcome have you seen welcome indeed, so have you seen then, the latest ridiculousness? i've then, the latest ridiculousness? pve been then, the latest ridiculousness? i've been holiday for i've only been on holiday for a week. mean, where do you even week. i mean, where do you even begin, there's many stories begin, there's so many stories that could have covered. but that we could have covered. but tonight. you see, the tonight. but did you see, the pictures, the imagery of the labour headquarters as a group of, youth. so they call themselves, have gone along with red paint and daubed all over the labour party headquarters there from a group called youth demand and of course, you'll be familiar with the fact what perhaps it's all about. but they want an arms embargo now. they want an arms embargo now. they want the uk , uk weapons to stop want the uk, uk weapons to stop being sold to israel. i mean,

there's so much i want to get into on this where this weird obsession has come from about daubing things with paint because you're in a mood. it's the kind of thing my three year old child would do. chalk paints at something because he's angry. what's going on? do you think it's self—righteous ? it's self—righteous? >> yes. it's people who think that they're so good that the only thing they can do is let everybody else know how good they are. i'm really good. i think this and you should think it too. and to show how good i am, i'm going to go and spray some paint on. so that's all it is. tom lehrer, the great satirical wrote a song satirical singer, wrote a song about many ago called about this many years ago called the folk song army. we are the folk song army. one of us folk song army. every one of us cares. we're against poverty , cares. we're against poverty, war and injustice. unlike the rest you squares and rest of you squares and basically it is. it is a declaration by people that they are better than us, and they think they're actually they don't know anything. and i remember being myself on the protesting left many, many years ago. i didn't know anything and

i didn't do that. i did various other foolish things , but that's other foolish things, but that's what they do. and there isn't really very much else to say about it. >> well, we'll come on to their messaging and i'll come on to in a second what it is that they're calling for. but of course, this has all been triggered by the situation, gaza israel, situation, in gaza with israel, etc. where on this? etc. where are you on this? let's think the processing let's think about the processing methods, yeah. methods, the first point. yeah. so interesting , last so it's quite interesting, last week saw somebody on gb news, week i saw somebody on gb news, a just stop oil person saying, well, if we didn't do things like this, we wouldn't get publicity. it's very true. >> and what do we have? they daub the labour party in paint and we're talking about them. i mean, would we be talking about them otherwise and that that's what they i mean, i do agree with, with peter. i mean , it's with, with peter. i mean, it's a way to get publicity. i don't think it's a way to persuade people all, and it's incredibly bonng people all, and it's incredibly boring and it's just going to go on and on and on with whatever people feel like doing. but yeah, i mean, it's the problem

is it works. yeah. >> and i mean, regular viewers to this programme, you will know that i have quite a quite a preference that we try not to give moronic acts such as this the oxygen of publicity, because you're quite right. they do it because they want to be talked about. but i just thought this whole notion, because the situation with israel and gaza, we've had so many things now being interfered with. so of course we saw the situation in parliament when it came to who should vote and how they should vote democracy being vote and democracy being tampered because of that tampered with because of that issue. we've got all the protests the streets, all the protests on the streets, all the rest it. is an issue rest of it. this is an issue that people really in fact, i'll turn this because you turn to you on this because you said protesting, when said when i was protesting, when i a bit younger, i didn't i was a bit younger, i didn't know much. you saying that know much. and you saying that these much, these people don't know much, but younger, actually, but actually younger, actually, these back and these people would push back and say they feel is very say that what they feel is very passionate. they're seeing the situation in gaza. want the situation in gaza. they want the killing to stop, and they killing there to stop, and they feel very passionate about that. >> well, do they think the >> well, what do they think the rest of think, there's many, rest of us think, there's many, many including me, who

many people, including me, who are greatly distressed by what's going on in gaza. but i don't see any future in painting in spray painting, the headquarters of a political party. and it doesn't actually achieve anything. it is all about the people who are doing it. i do think that if people are convicted for this sort of crime, then an awful lot of effort should be taken in making sure that they do something fitting . that is to say, they fitting. that is to say, they should be made to clean it up themselves, but only, of course, and they could find out how long it takes to clean it up. and in some cases, might. they some cases, they might. they might the distress might understand the distress that to that they've caused to other people by doing it. there was a great novel by the clever novelist simon raven, in which a protester in the 60s destroyed a cambridge college lawn , and the cambridge college lawn, and the provost of the college was mostly distressed about the terrible state into which this put the gardener, who'd spent decades getting this lawn perfect and was in tears to see

his work. now obviously, the labour party headquarters isn't a beautiful cambridge lawn, but a beautiful cambridge lawn, but a lot of people go through into that building. they care about it. >> i mean, sorry it.— >> i mean, sorry to it. >> i mean, sorry to interrupt, peter. sorry to interrupt, peter, looking. peter, but i'm looking. >> we should people who do >> we should make people who do this of thing once they're this kind of thing once they're convicted, instead of fining them over or them or binding them over or whatever we should whatever we do, we should actually say, no, clean it up. i'm about how it to i'm about how long it takes to clean up. the same, i have clean up. and the same, i have to say, should done to the to say, should be done to the people spray paint my people who spray paint my trains. >> @ $— w is talking. and >> as peter is talking. and that's why i'm trying to rudely interrupt, because i'm just showing screen if showing you on the screen if you're watching just you're watching telly just so you're watching telly just so you can actually that you can actually see, if that was and mean, he's kind was my son and i mean, he's kind of proudly waving his fire extinguisher i you extinguisher around. i think you look of a pillock. i look a bit of a pillock. i wouldn't be happy when my kid got home, but the response? so, charlotte, saying. charlotte, what they're saying. charlotte charlotte. i've been on scarlet. sorry what on holiday. scarlet. sorry what they're i know i'm back. they're saying. i know i'm back. i'm back. have much i'm back. i didn't have much sleep. my flight delayed sleep. my flight was delayed because last because of that storm last night. in my defence, anyway, one these processes is saying one of these processes is saying there's and is a direct there's no. and this is a direct quote. there's never been a safer for to be

safer time for labour to be bald. instead they are behaving like the biggest cowards imaginable . do you think that imaginable. do you think that labour are being cowardly on this ? this issue? >> i think they could be >> no, i think they could be bolder. i think to call them cowardly when? when actually they're saying we want to see they're saying we want to see the evidence, we want to see whether whether it's legal or not to sell arms. i mean, what they're trying to be actually is grown up. they're trying to show that they run a government that they can run a government rather be a party of rather than be a party of protest. mean, quite protest. i mean, it's quite important that that that they come the jeremy corbyn era come from the jeremy corbyn era to the starmer era from the to the keir starmer era from the protest era to the to the to the government era, i don't think they're being cowardly. i don't always agree with them. and on this one, i don't i mean, i think that that you don't have to know the legal advice to have seen what's going on. >> i so what do you think they should do then, because you said they could be bolder. how >> well, think i think that >> well, i think i think that they they should call for an arms in, but i just think they

should say can't go on should say we can't go on selling arms to an army to an army that is, that is behaving like this, that clearly we targeted three that targeted three cars with aid workers in it last week . and i mean, what's it last week. and i mean, what's interesting is i saw an interview with a former israeli soldier who, from breaking the silence , this is an israeli silence, this is an israeli group of former soldiers who actually talk about what it's really like. and he said , when really like. and he said, when i was in the army, we were told if in doubt, don't shoot. that's now changed. if in doubt, shoot . now changed. if in doubt, shoot. and he said, that's the problem. and, you know, we know that well over 30,000 people have been killed. and a lot of them are women and children. >> labour has got itself into a considerable mess because keir starmer has done a lot of authority grabbing by this supposed attack on the anti—semitism of the corbynites. and this has has endeared him to some parts of the labour party who are more pro—israel than

others. if he now departs from that, he'll lose them. he'll have an open split. on the other hand, he has an awful lot of members now who are muslims or who are highly sympathetic to to the the arab cause, who really do think that moment has do think that the moment has come speak out. it's very, come to speak out. it's very, very difficult to decide what to do. but then if you don't want difficult decisions, don't be in politics. and he's he i think politics. and he's he is i think he is shirking it. i'm not advising him which decision he should take. i have my own views on it which are mine, and i wouldn't dream of voting for the labour party. but the he really does demonstrate that does need to demonstrate that if he to prime minister, he wants to be prime minister, that he has the capacity that he has, he has the capacity to choose between positions, to choose between two positions, even one, even if doing so even if one, even if doing so makes him unpopular with one side. and i think he does lack the bottle to do that. and i think it's increasingly evident that trying to that he's just simply trying to avoid it. >> does he like that >> is he does he like that bottle? >> know what he's saying is, i want to see evidence. i want want to see the evidence. i want to he's a lawyer, right? to see he's a lawyer, right? i want see if the legal if the want to see if the legal if the legal opinion is that we

shouldn't be selling arms because it's illegal. that's what he's saying. i think that you can make a decision without knowing that. but i do understand. i do understand that he's saying i want to see the evidence . evidence. >> it's all there. not sitting around in the knesset in jerusalem saying, what does keir starmer think about what we should do ? what the labour party should do? what the labour party says isn't going to make any difference to what happens. it's going to make a difference to the labour party, and it's not very difficult out very difficult to work out whether you're favour of whether you're in favour of bombarding or not. i am bombarding gaza or not. i am a supporter of israel for almost as long as i can remember, against all kinds of stupid criticism , but i think the criticism, but i think the bombardment gaza is both bombardment of gaza is both crazy . i find no crazy and wrong. i find no difficulty saying difficulty in saying so whatever. and see how whatever. and i don't see how anybody actually, regarding whatever. and i don't see how anybodgoing ally, regarding whatever. and i don't see how anybodgoing oi'ii, regarding whatever. and i don't see how anybodgoing oi'ii, regard anything what's going on can say anything else. starmer won't say else. keir starmer won't say this because he has other political liabilities, which he's piled up in the course of, of becoming and remaining leader of becoming and remaining leader of the labour party. he's afraid to it. he won't take to do it. he won't take a decision. and this is a very good idea, gives us all a very

good idea, gives us all a very good indication of what sort of prime minister he would be if he became prime minister, not a very good one. >> is a bottler? >> is he a bottler? >> is he a bottler? >> no, he's not, he's he's he's not a bottler. he's trying to make a serious decision. no, the knesset care what. knesset really don't care what. what? i'm not saying that. >> so what are you waiting for? >> so what are you waiting for? >> very. >> very. >> so what are you waiting for? >> so what are you waiting for? >> because it's very important that that labour stops being a party protest. that's that's party of protest. that's that's what. that's how he sees it. that's how the decision that's how he sees the decision and the decision he sees as a lawyer. he sees as a legal one. ihappen lawyer. he sees as a legal one. i happen to disagree with him. i happen to agree with you. is, is that on october the 7th, i said, what's going to happen is they're going to kill thousands of palestinians and hamas will have won because that's what hamas always wanted. it was it was mad. we can go back to that. what keir is trying to do is he's trying to be more measured about it. >> well, that's as may be, but the truth is that the labour party is in fact a party of

protest and has its roots in all kinds of protests and resistance. it's not an establishment party. and if you want lead it, you have to want to lead it, you have to learn how to deal with the fact that large numbers people that large numbers of people will radical opinions on will have radical opinions on this. and many others, like. and you which opinion you have to decide which opinion you have to decide which opinion you can't sit there you take. you can't sit there and say, well, waiting for and say, well, i'm waiting for the what is the the evidence. what is the evidence? actually waiting evidence? he's actually waiting for here? >> well, he's made it clear >> well, he's he's made it clear he wants to know what what the legal is of whether it legal opinion is of whether it whether is or not. he whether it is legal or not. he knows that they're not going to tell him. >> he doesn't. he says he wants because he'd be devastated if the government came out and said, okay, keir, here's our here's our opinion. because that would leave him completely naked. then have a naked. he then have to make a decision. then as long as he can hide behind the government's own secrecy, really mind secrecy, i say, i really mind you telling what labour you telling me what the labour party you're not party is when you're not a member, you don't even vote. >> i was for some years, you were for some years and it is not goes on. it's not a party of protest, as you know, as you as you have written many times about a labour government . the

about a labour government. the blair was not blair government was not a government protest , blair government was not a government protest, right. it government of protest, right. it was a government. and keir wants to run a government. right. but i, i mean, i think it's, i think it's, it's very simple what he's looking for. and the question is, is whether one needs to wait for it or not. and i feel that one doesn't. >> and how long do you think he'd be willing to wait then? six months for this evidence? no. >> well, he wants it to. he wants it now. i mean, that's what he keeps saying. that's what he keeps saying. that's what keeps saying. we need. what he keeps saying. we need. we need. the government has the evidence. we want it now. >> i if his phone >> well, i say, if his phone fings >> well, i say, if his phone rings tonight and it's downing street saying, we're street saying, keir, we're giving you the giving you we're giving you the government he'll be government decision, he'll be absolutely mortified. >> he would be you >> do you think he would be you guys at home. doesn't your thoughts, you think that keir thoughts, do you think that keir starmer is a bottler? do you think using this, request think he's using this, request for a way of for the detail, was a way of creating own position so creating his own position so that he's got confidence in it, or as a way of just biding time and desperately hoping to avoid requiring , to be made to do a

requiring, to be made to do a decision. your thoughts on that? i want you to get in touch with me tonight. as i said, i'll be interacting you in the interacting with you in the brick gb news .com/ your views is how you can reach me after the break. i want to ask you, do you care about this angela rayner said rayner stuff? keir starmer said it's against her, is it it's a smear against her, is it or not? and also what on earth is going on with his willie wragg stuff? have you seen it? this honeytrap stuff? what on earth does all this kind of stuff say our morals stuff say about our morals as a society? tell and i'll see society? tell me and i'll see you two.

hello there. i'm michelle dewberry. i'm with you till 7:00 tonight. alongside the columnist for the mail on sunday. peter hitchens and the former labour adviser scarlett mccgwire . i've adviser scarlett mccgwire. i've been reading some of your comments on our website gbnews.com. slash your say , reg, gbnews.com. slash your say, reg, you've just been in touch there.

you're saying why? why or why basically do we have to have this opinionated woman on? she is so , so wrong. i was trying to is so, so wrong. i was trying to work out, which who it is that you're referring to me? scarlett or maybe even peter, if he decides to identify as a woman these days, you need to be more specific , but anyway, whoever specific, but anyway, whoever this woman is, it's very opinionated. i think it'd be a bit boring, actually, if whichever woman was just sitting here without an opinion on a sort of you, without an opinion , sort of you, without an opinion, just on a cookery show, indeed. >> just isn't , james. oh. gb >> just isn't, james. oh. gb news. member. hello. he says starmer will change his views on a whim if it would make him more popular. and, carol, you tie up my nice, my next segment very nicely because you said, please , nicely because you said, please, can you all stop banging on about angela rayner? i've heard it all. it's the same, same, same. now, this is very interesting because of course, you'll familiar with this row you'll be familiar with this row all angela rayner. did she all about angela rayner. did she live house or that house live in this house or that house

or house or whatever? or the other house or whatever? was supposed to paid was she supposed to have paid capital when she sold capital gains tax when she sold this house? well, now keir starmer, been speaking starmer, he's been speaking out about today . listen to about it again today. listen to what says. what he says. >> rayner has asked >> angela rayner has been asked no of questions about this. no end of questions about this. she's answered them all. she said very happy answer said she's very happy to answer any further from the any further questions from the police any of the police or from any of the authorities. i don't to see authorities. i don't need to see the legal advice. my team has seen it, but i do know this that if you're waiting more than 24 hours for a&e, you're much more interested in why the government is absolutely laser focused is not absolutely laser focused on is they on that, which is what they should then this should be. then chasing this smear against angela rayner and how much time she spent with her husband over ten years ago . husband over ten years ago. >> well, there you go, my question to you at home is, do you care about this angela rayner thing? and do you rayner thing? and also, do you think is a smear , as keir think it is a smear, as keir starmer then perhaps seems to suggest is a smear campaign suggest it is a smear campaign to distract deflect from to distract and deflect from some goings on of the some of the goings on of the tories, which, worry, i'll tories, which, don't worry, i'll be coming on to in second, be coming on to in a second, scarlett, your thoughts? think scarlett, your thoughts? i think it's we're coming up for >> i mean, we're coming up for

an election . everybody's going an election. everybody's going for each i think. i mean , for each other, i think. i mean, and everybody's fair game. i mean, what's interesting is that lord ashcroft writes a whole biography of angela rayner, and that's the only thing he can find that possibly nobody knows that she owes £1,500 in capital gains tax. and you know, it's between, i mean, her and hmrc, the tax people are sorting it out. i mean yeah, i think i think frankly that in politics most things are fair game, and that's been trying to pull a fast one or not. >> no. >> no. >> look, this happened as he's over ten years ago. she wasn't an mp. >> she wasn't anything that doesn't matter if this was something to do with boris johnson, and it was to do with like years ago. and i was sitting here saying to you whatever it was. oh, but scarlett, it was years ago. and you would be having none of it. no i haven't gone and no i mean, i haven't gone on and on about all, all the on about all, all, all the things that boris has done wrong over the years. >> look what i've said is it's

fair game, right? it's fair game that investigate. that they investigate. >> they're just >> they're looking they're just pulling one. no, don't pulling a fast one. no, i don't think she's pulling a fast one. >> i think what i think is >> but i think what i think is that conservatives that the conservatives and the tory desperate for tory press are desperate for a scalp, they think they found scalp, and they think they found one. peter. >> it is true that angela >> well, it is true that angela rayner herself has been pretty hot on the alleged misdoings of other people. >> she was she was going on about the finances of rishi sunaks wife . she said of one sunaks wife. she said of one tory mp that she should, she should publish her tax returns. i think there were 1 or 2 other episodes where she's been very hot. on others saying they should come clean on these things, which puts her in a position where, when, where she's asked come clean. it's she's asked to come clean. it's only reasonable that should. only reasonable that she should. i angela rayner is a good i think angela rayner is a good thing. i think there should be more people in politics on both sides like her, who've actually lived. i mean, for goodness sake, most mps have never been inside a council house, let alone a public row about alone had a public row about one. be much more one. so it would be much more

useful if there were more of them. who were like her. so i'm not her. i do think not against her. but i do think that in this case she's in she's she's in a bit of trouble and she'd be a lot less trouble if she'd be a lot less trouble if she'd about it. i'm she'd come clean about it. i'm also interested in sir keir starmer, great former starmer, the great former director prosecutions, director of public prosecutions, who's being terribly who's always being terribly stern about how many people he prosecuted when he was in that office. being so relaxed about this, about about prosecuting, as it were, or even or just even pursuing a problem with his own deputy, i think he's probably worried about losing her again. it's, it's politics. if by any chance, this were to cause her to leave, he then be faced with an election for deputy leader, which is the last thing he needs on top of all the other stuff he's got. but i think there's a, there's a, there's a, there's a sort of case to answer here. and i think this the stuff which my newspaper, the mail on sunday published and glenn published on sunday and glenn owen, who's a very owen, my colleague who's a very diligent careful reporter diligent and careful reporter and the stuff that he posted, these pictures of the that gave

away really the, the soft furnishings in angela rayner gave away the fact that she appeared to have been living where she said she hadn't been. i think it requires a bit more than dismissal, but it also doesn't, doesn't require a the supreme court to assemble. >> well, you know what? i'll give you guys the final say on that one. my crucial question, though, is do you actually care about any of this or not? tell me your thoughts, please, also, while was holiday, you will while i was on holiday, you will have this story. sometimes have seen this story. sometimes just think you've seen just when you think you've seen it and the and politics it all and the life and politics cannot much weirder. it cannot get much weirder. it does. it happens. it gets even stranger than it was before. of course, i'm talking about what is now being known as the westminster honeytrap , william westminster honeytrap, william wragg. i mean, you can't pick some of these names , could you? some of these names, could you? i'll leave the abbreviations of his your own his names to your own imagination. but mean, some of imagination. but i mean, some of these associated with some these names associated with some of just of these scandals are just they're right there, they're comedy right there, aren't you know aren't they? anyway, you know what's by now? over the

what's gone on by now? over the weekend, it emerged now that so many more apparently many more people apparently have been few been targeted by these few different accounts. even different accounts. there's even been during the been rumours, that during the lib dem conference a few years back, apparently this back, apparently some of this stuff going there now. i stuff was going on there now. i mean , i think the entire thing mean, i think the entire thing is absolutely bizarre. i think that mp, william wragg, that this mp, william wragg, should have the whip. should have lost the whip. i think he's done by think what he's done by providing these details, the phone numbers and all the rest of it, of colleagues the of it, of colleagues and all the rest it to potential rest of it to potential blackmailers. that's not blackmailers. if that's not a sackable i mean, would sackable offence, i mean, would you that in your you get away with that in your job?i you get away with that in your job? i don't think so. but anyway, that's not a sackable anyway, if that's not a sackable offence, i don't know what is. but notwithstanding what but notwithstanding that, what do about society more do you think about society more broadly? because there seems to be kind clamour to get be this kind of clamour to get on of these casual apps to on some of these casual apps to send pictures of your bits and pieces to other people. what's going, where's morals gone? going, where's our morals gone? >> well, it's quite funny if you're as old as i you you're as old as i am and you were because the this were in the 60s because the this really was an extremely staid and puritan society in which anybody was shown the newspapers over the last couple of weeks , over the last couple of weeks, say, in 1965, would have just

goggled at them and said, what on earth are they talking about? how can anybody be doing these things? there are so many things that they would have found bizarre, impossible bizarre, that it's impossible almost, to imagine such a society existed. but it did, and all kinds of people came along. i remember it particularly with pornography, said, well pornography, and they said, well , if we if we relax the rules on pornography, don't just publish lady lover, but let lady chatterley's lover, but let everybody but let's everybody read it. but let's have everywhere. the have pornography everywhere. the staid, puritanical, repressed have pornography everywhere. the staid, jpeople:al, repressed have pornography everywhere. the staid, [people will'epressed have pornography everywhere. the staid, [people will cure ;sed british people will cure themselves of their sexual problems. and we were a lovely, happy society where everybody is in love with each other and behaves very well, as in supposedly scandinavia. and it turned to be most total turned out to be the most total bilge. happened as a bilge. what's happened as a result of the release of pornography and the general collapse of what used to be moral standards on this kind of thing is not a liberation, but a seedy, a disreputable and rather miserable world of the sort we now see disclosure. i mean, just

imagine that the lives of the people involved. it's just so pathetic . and this has been the pathetic. and this has been the result of, of 50 or 60 years of supposed liberation. that's what i think about it. i've had enough of that kind of liberation myself. i'd like a bit of repression. >> yeah. i think it's just so odd. what? what must go through your as a public domain your head as a public domain figure? mean , it's bad enough figure? i mean, it's bad enough if you're random person, but if you're a random person, but if you're a random person, but if you're a random person, but if you're on public, mean, if you're on a public, i mean, if you're on a public, i mean, if public servant or if if you're a public servant or if you're a public domain, to, you're on a public domain, to, to send of yourself to to send bits of yourself to other people, what goes through your head? do you think that your head? how do you think that story is going to end? >> i, i find it unbelievable that a member of parliament supposed to be, you know, somebody who wants to govern the country, can can get an anonymous some somebody he doesn't know and send him a picture of himself naked or maybe only a part of him naked, andifs maybe only a part of him naked, and it's enough and then his hand. what? yes. possibly probably not. his hand. and then

. and then realising only afterwards . i mean, it's not as afterwards. i mean, it's not as though this is the first time we've been talking about this sort of stuff. i mean, this has been going on, unfortunately. i mean, i'm completely with you , mean, i'm completely with you, for some years, and yet he does it. and then and then again, i'm completely with you on this. and then and then he dobbs in his mates to cover himself up. and jeremy hunt says that he's brave. he's a coward. he said it was courageous. >> courageous. this is one of the things this is what i mean about the level that we operate in within this society. has in within this society. how has it point where you it got to the point where you have basically, you've chucked your colleagues the bus to your colleagues under the bus to a blackmailer. you've kind of behaved a way would behaved in a way that i would argue not really becoming of argue is not really becoming of argue is not really becoming of a public servant. how are a decent public servant. how are you, then? courageous? when you talk about it? where does that level come from? well, again , we level come from? well, again, we are in the in the area of proportion here aren't we? >> as as we are with some of the other things we've discussed

this evening is it is it really that big, is it do do we need to make a federal case? well, giving your colleagues is this man some huge, man some kind of huge, catastrophic wrongdoer, or is he just a common or garden twit? and i tend towards the twit. >> if someone gave your number angry about it. but if someone gave your number or one of your loved ones numbers or whatever to this blackmailer , how would to this blackmailer, how would you feel about that? >> be cheesed off. >> be cheesed off. >> but as again, it's not. i say, let's not assemble the supreme or or the or supreme court or the or the or mi5 . it supreme court or the or the or m15 . it just supreme court or the or the or m15. it just isn't supreme court or the or the or m15 . it just isn't big enough. m15. it just isn't big enough. >> the people. people are really, really angry. i mean, conservative mps who some of whose who's whose numbers have been given out and others, i mean, andrew pierce wrote a piece, i think it was the mail on saturday rather than your particular paper, but he wrote a whole piece about how angry people were that they could not believe that this man was being applauded. instead of saying that. and also, we've always worried about mps being to prone

blackmail. right. and, and, and this guy , you know, the smallest this guy, you know, the smallest thing, i mean, this was quite a minor thing to, to not go to the whip and say i was really stupid . i sent a dick pic to somebody i didn't know. >> goodness gracious me, you make me archewell sorry about said language. when you're having your teeth wash your mouth that i said i sent her an inappropriate you sound a little bit too familiar with some of these goings these phrases and the goings on. >> quite often it is. >> it is quite often how it is. quite interesting how often i end talking about it on gb end up talking about it on gb news because because news because. because because they are awful actually. but but but but you just you just don't understand. what went through his i would rather give his head is i would rather give this who might be anybody this person who might be anybody vie i mean might be a foreign power, might be a malevolent person. well, clearly a malevolent person. load of malevolent person. a load of phone numbers. rather than go to the whip and say, i've the chief whip and say, i've been really stupid. >> i can tell you now, dame andrea jenkins, she's one of those people that's spoken out and the rest of it. she

and all the rest of it. she wasn't happy about it at all. she that her colleagues she said that her colleagues actions unforgivable. actions were unforgivable. able, and, lot of people are and, i mean, a lot of people are divided one. like divided on this one. like i said, he's been called courageous, is it brave act? i courageous, is it a brave act? i think it's absolutely pathetic. >> think that trying to >> i think that just trying to shut it down the way other people yeah. shut people are. well, yeah. shut down tell you what does down the i'll tell you what does shut things whole, shut things down the whole, mental card. mental health card. >> really fascinating to me >> it's really fascinating to me how somebody has done how when somebody has done something you something wrong, have you ever noficed something wrong, have you ever noticed this? when someone's done something wrong? one done something wrong? yeah. one of things that slips of the first things that slips out their mouth is how out of their mouth is how they've got mental health problems. i mean, does your mental problems mean that mental health problems mean that you're longer accountable you're now no longer accountable for not in my for your actions? not in my book. does it mean that for you? tell me. get in touch with me all the usual ways, also as well, there is. i was going to sing you a song, but i weren't. there is a solar eclipse tonight if you're sitting there going, i'm so excited , i want to see it i'm so excited, i want to see it all. don't you worry about that, because we'll having live because we'll be having live clips of that as it clips and footage of that as it all progresses, look at that .

all progresses, look at that. what a treat, isn't it? who into that? is that your kind of thing, peter's making some wonderful noises alongside me. i don't know if that's pure pleasure. >> i don't know what it is. frankly, i'd love to see an eclipse. >> i think i'd be a wonderful thing. >> oh, well, i think i'm going to give peter a few moments to catch himself, compose himself, and have a little look at that. i'll

>> hello there. i'm michelle dewberry with u till seven. peter hitchens and scarlett mccgwire remain along side me. lots of you divided on our new website chat. some of you saying actually that keir starmer should indeed call out , for the should indeed call out, for the information and to get this information and to get this information published and then make the decisions from there. others of you saying just move on. quite frankly, patricia there michelle, yes, we

there says michelle, yes, we should push to get this paperwork just as labour would do day after day after day. it was on the other foot, susan says, i don't agree with angela rayner's politics or her speeches, this is all speeches, but this is all a witch hunt. can we concentrate on that are important to on things that are important to everyday people? don't care, everyday people? i don't care, she her home life . she says about her home life. well, do you keep your thoughts coming now we all know that coming in, now we all know that we are in brexit britain now. the labour mp david the former labour mp david miliband, said that being miliband, he said that being brexit britain has made britain a lower status country . so what a lower status country. so what do you think to that, peter hitchens i think it might have made mr miliband a lower status politician among the sort of people he likes to consort with, but i think it's made any difference. >> britain was already a pretty low status country before brexit. don't think it's made brexit. i don't think it's made any difference our any great difference to our standing, outside standing, most people outside this country think much this country don't think much about or of it. we about it or of it. we have a hugely inflated idea of how important are , and it can't important we are, and it can't be bad if we begin to be bad if we if we begin to shake this off and realise how we're not, and how we need to fix the things that we don't

we're not, and how we need to fix �*it'sthings that we don't we're not, and how we need to fix �*it's daftis that we don't we're not, and how we need to fix �*it's daft to hat we don't we're not, and how we need to fix �*it's daft to say we don't we're not, and how we need to fix �*it's daft to say that on't fix. it's daft to say that leaving the european union reduced our status. >> is it daft? >> is it daft? >> no, i don't think it is. i mean, i think when we were in the eu we were incredibly influential large bloc influential in a very large bloc that that we, we, we held the ring between germany and france. they neither of, of, of them wanted us to leave because, because they have so many disagreements and they're both incredibly big. and we could come in. so we had incredible influence, and we don't have it now . and the other thing that we now. and the other thing that we that we had with the states was that we had with the states was that we had with the states was that we were the bridge between europe and america, and we and we're not that. so i agree with peter that we're now just, you know, a small country on the outside, medium sized, medium sized country on the outside. but i think, i think before brexit, we must ask you , give me brexit, we must ask you, give me an instance of this influence that we had over france and germany. well, we had influence over the eu. i mean, one of the we had one one, we had a deal, we had one one, we had a deal, we had one one, we had a deal,

we had a deal in the eu that was incredibly good. we weren't in the euro, right. we were allowed to the eu and not be in to be in the eu and not be in the euro. well says poland, we had they they've now changed the rules. had they they've now changed the rulewe've, it is the case >> we've, we, it is the case there are quite a lot of countries which have which are in the eu don't have the euro. >> it's not unique to us. no. i just want an instance no, just want an instance of no, that's, that's, that's individual i an individual treatment. i want an instance this influence instance of this, this influence over the direction of the eu and its domination france and its domination by france and germany, we supposedly germany, which we supposedly had, never see had, because i could never see any of it at all, any more any sign of it at all, any more than i could ever see any sign of special relationship of this special relationship between and united between britain and the united states. in states. when i lived in washington, dc, i for the washington, dc, i hunted for the special relationship. i went out with dogs for with packs of dogs looking for it. there no evidence of it it. there was no evidence of it at all. does not exist. at all. it does not exist. >> i didn't what was ? what's >> i didn't what was? what's your example? >> say there was >> i didn't say there was a special relationship . special relationship. >> you said we were a bridge. i said we a bridge. i, the said we were a bridge. i, the americans had other way of americans had no other way of contacting european union contacting the european union except on. except through london. come on. >> they know it >> oh come on, they know it wasn't. it was. it was. it was

very good that we were that we were in the eu and we were influential and now that we're out of it, it doesn't really matter. m atter. >> matter. >> can't give me any >> you can't give me any examples this influence that examples of this influence that we supposedly because we we supposedly had because we didn't have any, but they had influence to be sure . influence over us, to be sure. >> but they didn't have any. >> but they didn't have any. >> actually. >> actually. >> they have influence. >> they didn't have influence. >> they didn't have influence. >> we've got about >> so then we've got about another come with an example. >> they they are the whole the whole thing around, before, before about about who before ukraine, about about who was to be in the eu, what was going to be in the eu, what the rules were. i mean, we were we were right in the middle of trying to rewrite stuff and, and then we and then we pulled out. i mean, it was, it was that easy. >> if you can't come up with it because there isn't anything, it's just it's a fantasy. it is not. >> we never were. >> we never were. >> we never were. >> we always were. we were really we. you talked to a few extra minutes. >> i'm going to give her a few extra minutes in the break to come up with this, this fabulous example . everyone. i'm confident example. everyone. i'm confident in her. i'm confident she's going it . we'll see you in going to do it. we'll see you in

two she'll

hello, everyone. i'm michelle dewberry keeping you company till 7:00 tonight. alongside me. i've got the columnist for the mail on sunday, peter hitchens, and the former labour adviser scarlett mccgwire. she's still thinking her example of thinking about her example of how on earth the uk used to have loads of influence. and it's not, it's not. got that anymore. i'm going to give her a few more minutes, phone a friend. no no no no no, in the break. >> i have not got an example. but you think about it right, but if you think about it right, if you're in the room, if you're if you're in the room, if you're if you're in the room, can if you're in the room, you can influence it. if you're outside the room, there's no the room, you can't. there's no question that. right? question about that. right? >> never been in a room >> i've never been in a room where you can't influence anything so anything because you're so completely that nobody completely outvoted that nobody cares what you think. >> get outvoted >> we did not get outvoted right? i mean, we pretend that with this, with this, with this country, that we always up country, that we were always up against actually, against europe. actually, our negotiator good. against europe. actually, our negwell, r good. against europe. actually, our negwell, look, good. against europe. actually, our negwell, look, in good. against europe. actually, our negwell, look, in the good. against europe. actually, our

negwell, look, in the interests d. >> well, look, in the interests of fairness and all the rest of it, i'll let the conversation rumble so at point rumble on. so if at any point before show, you before we finish the show, you come this idea of the come up with this idea of the influence that we used to have, you feel free to chip in, you can feel free to chip in, but we get to the end of but before we get to the end of the show, look at this, everybody, i can show everybody, tonight i can show you wonderful image, you this wonderful image, actually, of actually, so eclipse of the heart. if it all goes wrong, i want to be a singer. >> what is this? maybe >> what is this? maybe >> what is this? maybe >> what is this i am showing to you? well, tonight. oh, there you? well, tonight. oh, there you go . look, you got peter you go. look, you got peter hitchens. tonight's everybody . hitchens. tonight's everybody. what a treat for us all because it is a total eclipse there. look at it. this is the image i'm showing to you live from mexico, i'm not sure, actually what the view will be from the uk. i mean, you were just. i was showing you this image before. peter. you said it was quite lovely. >> well, i think well it's lovely is not the word. >> it's exciting and astonishing because it's, it's a reversal of the normal state of things. if the normal state of things. if the sun disappears from the sky, i think it's the most astonishing thing that most of

us will go through our entire lives and never see it. >> i was going to say the next, the next one that's going to happen britain is going to be happen in britain is going to be in i a feeling in 2090. and i have a feeling that i are. that you and i are. >> it's possible that despite the hour, wonderful nhs, i may not be around that. not be around for that. >> there you >> well, there you go. >> well, there you go. >> years away, actually >> yeah, 57 years away, actually . well be the next full one we get to see of that, what is this, i think. am i changing the image? no. you can have a look at this, let's have a look at this. apparently, 7:52 pm. bst. that's when the partial eclipse will be. you can see a bit of it in glasgow, apparently. tiny little slight slice of it. i think, maybe in edinburgh , you think, maybe in edinburgh, you won't see that. no, you will not. as i said, you're not looking at. you're not. this is not the image from edinburgh or anything like that right now. this is the image from mexico . this is the image from mexico. so is this your kind of thing, scarlett? yeah, i mean, i remember being in italy when there was a when there was a partial eclipse. >> i think over here there was a

complete eclipse, but i was in the wrong country, and it was really exciting, actually . i really exciting, actually. i mean, it's i mean, peter's right. it's something that hardly ever happens. and you think, i'll tell you think, wow, i'll tell you something that hardly ever happens. >> i've only got about two minutes. got to be very minutes. you've got to be very brief. royal brief. access to the royal palaces. but for a price. palaces. but now for a price. for the price is some of about £100 150, if you want some, tea and rest of it. you can and all the rest of it. you can get into palace now. a get into balmoral palace now. a good or not? well charles good idea or not? well charles likes making doesn't it? likes making money, doesn't it? >> doesn't like balmoral, >> and he doesn't like balmoral, so he let's. so he lets people go 100, 100, £100 to visit an extra if you tea. quite extra 50. if you want tea. quite expensive tea. >> be nice i think >> yeah. be nice tea. i think you can get in for a bit cheapen you can get in for a bit cheaper. if you don't want a guided tour, i think can get guided tour, i think you can get much it's much cheaper tickets. it's a good opening them up in good idea opening them up in this way. >> peter. well, i'm sure it is. >> peter. well, i'm sure it is. >> i mean, i've nothing >> yes. i mean, i've got nothing against remember going to against it. i remember going to oslo seeing the royal palace oslo and seeing the royal palace in centre there, with its in the centre there, with its gardens no fence or wall gardens and no fence or wall around them, thinking what a wonderful it would be if wonderful thing it would be if buckingham the same. buckingham palace were the same. i that the royal family

i do think that the royal family is much behind walls. is too much hidden behind walls. i they should i don't think they should lose their saying their privacy. i'm not saying clarence house the king clarence house where the king actually should be thrown actually lives, should be thrown open private apartments open all the private apartments in there's no in windsor, but there's no reason shouldn't see reason why we shouldn't see these balmoral these things. whether balmoral is it's is the thing i don't know. it's supposed to all been designed supposed to be all been designed by albert, whom it was by prince albert, of whom it was said he had a lot of taste, all of bad. of it bad. >> lots of turrets. >> lots of turrets. >> would you go at home? tell me, is how you would spend me, is that how you would spend your i think got your money? i think i've got about a minute or so left. so i'm going to hand the floor over to mccgwire you've to scarlett mccgwire if you've just scarlett was just tuned in. scarlett was agreeing fact that agreeing with the fact that brexit has made us a lower status nation. she was saying that before we had all that before brexit we had all this and influence. so this power and influence. so peter an example. peter asked for an example. i what, i, what i said was what, what i, what i said was that that beforehand that that france now france and germany were now france and germany were now france germany the two france and germany are the two big ones europe. big ones in europe. >> and beforehand we were in there could there with them and we could actually we could, we could, we could the could influence what the european did. we european commission did. we could influence the europe could influence the way europe we outside it. we're we are now outside it. we're outside one of the three, you know, blocs, which know, the three big blocs, which are the, the

are russia, china, the, the states for big blocs in europe and, and so we're a medium sized country. >> well, i'll let you guys decide whether or not she answered that question. rb oh , answered that question. rb oh, lovely. on twitter, you tell me not to give up my day job because you don't think i'd earn much, singing you've never heard me karaoke machine with a me on a karaoke machine with a music. i'll tell it's music. i'll tell you, it's a different league. someone here, james i don't think you'll james says, i don't think you'll read out, make read this out, you make a comment well scarlett comment about how well scarlett and getting and peter are getting on. perhaps, catch up perhaps, you two could catch up after show. apparently, after the show. apparently, you're hilarious and you're both hilarious and fantastic watch and listen fantastic to watch and listen to. james very much to. and james is very much enjoyed the interesting entertainment. debate entertainment. the debate tonight . lots of people saying tonight. lots of people saying that there's people that spray painted labour should be arrested. well, i can tell you some of them have good is what i say to that. anyway. look, it's all i've got for, scarlett. all i've got time for, scarlett. thank thank thank you. peter, thank you. thank you. peter, thank you. thank at home. farage up thank you. at home. farage up next. tonight's >> a brighter outlook with boxt solar , the sponsors of weather solar, the sponsors of weather on gb news.

>> good evening. here's your latest gb news weather brought to you by the met office. most of us will see some heavy rain and some strong winds as we go through tonight into tomorrow in association with a relatively deep area of low pressure. now, this feature has been named by meteor because it's going meteor france because it's going to impactful weather to bring some impactful weather there. it's not so there. in the uk, it's not so stormy, but nonetheless there'll be strong winds, be some strong winds, particularly coastal particularly around coastal parts, spell heavy parts, and also a spell of heavy rain feeding across parts of rain feeding in across parts of northern england and across scotland as we through the scotland as we go through the early of tuesday because early hours of tuesday because of blustery, wet and cloudy of the blustery, wet and cloudy weather, temperatures for many of us aren't going drop much, of us aren't going to drop much, most places holding up in the mid high figures, so mid to high single figures, so a relatively mild start tomorrow morning, but quite a cloudy and a wet and a windy start for a wet one and a windy start for most of us. the heaviest rain will across eastern parts of will be across eastern parts of scotland. some scotland. could cause some problems, on the problems, particularly on the roads. also some heavy for roads. also some heavy rain for northern england. all of northern england. but all of this gradually clear away this does gradually clear away towards northeast, towards the northeast, with something a bit following something a bit drier following in behind, also a scattering in behind, but also a scattering

of . now temperatures of showers. now temperatures will be down degrees will be down several degrees compared today , highs of just compared to today, highs of just 13, perhaps 14 celsius 13, perhaps even 14 celsius towards southeast . a chilly towards the southeast. a chilly but bright start for many of us on wednesday. however the fine weather doesn't last. wet weather doesn't last. more wet weather doesn't last. more wet weather push its way weather is going to push its way in the west, and we're in from the west, and we're going to see strengthening going to see winds strengthening again that rain could again and again. that rain could cause problems, cause some problems, particularly southwest and particularly over southwest and parts at parts of scotland. at the moment, looks like moment, thursday looks like a dner moment, thursday looks like a drier day for many of us, and that drier theme looks it that drier theme looks like it will continue friday across that drier theme looks like it willsouthiue friday across that drier theme looks like it willsouth before friday across that drier theme looks like it willsouth before more ay across that drier theme looks like it willsouth before more rain ross the south before more rain arrives further north. >> it looks like things are heating up boxt boilers sponsors of weather on gb news

news. >> good evening. we will show you the total solar eclipse live

from mexico within the next houn from mexico within the next hour. only 1 from mexico within the next hour. only1 in from mexico within the next hour. only 1 in 4 from mexico within the next hour. only1 in 4 muslims in hour. only 1 in 4 muslims in britain say hamas were guilty. on october the 7th of those atrocities. i find that really quite extraordinary. and william wragg has been in the news. the victim apparently , of a honey victim apparently, of a honey trap. i will tell you why i do not believe william wragg to be a victim at all. frankly, just an idiot, and probably quite a dangerous one. but before all of that, let's get the news with polly middlehurst. >> nigel, thanks very much indeed. and good evening to you. well, the top story from the gb newsroom tonight is that west yorkshire police have confirmed that a nationwide is now that a nationwide manhunt is now underway for a man wanted in connection with the murder of a woman in bradford, and they confirmed at a press conference this afternoon . the suspect is this afternoon. the suspect is known them. 25 year old habib known to them. 25 year old habib masoom came to britain on a student visa and is believed to be from the oldham area . he's