gb news. >> it's 9 pm. i'm patrick christys tonight. live of our flag alone. christys tonight. live of our flag alone. england football legend peter shilton on team gb's desecration of our union flag . also exposed the albanian flag. also exposed the albanian child rapist asylum seeker that we won't deport. and the fake migrant baby con gangs target single mums to fake their way into britain. plus a gb news exclusive people waiting for days for ambulances in our broken nhs. also we've got ladies in labour look to rig the

deck and allow 3.7 million eu nationals to vote. you will not believe how much taxpayers money is given to pointless hard left academics to do research into gay porn, trans guff and decolonisation. i've got tomorrow's newspapers today with my panellist gb news star nana akua tory mp andrew rosindell and trade unionist andy mcdonald . oh, and welcome to the antiques woke show . antiques woke show. >> i just don't want to value it. i do not want to put a price on something that signifies such an awful business. get ready britain, here we go. >> get your pathetic, grubby, woke hands off our flag. next.

>> at 9:01, here's the latest news from the gb newsroom. and jk rowling has hit back tonight for being reported under scotland's new hate crime laws, after police scotland said this afternoon her social media posts on the importance of biological sex would not be treated as criminal. the harry potter author posted on x saying i hope every woman in scotland who wishes to speak up for the reality and importance of biological sex will be reassured by this announcement and i trust that all women, irrespective of profile or financial means, will be treated equally under the law. well, the new law brought in yesterday is aimed at banning hateful comments, but the harry potter author previously said the law risked silencing genuine debate on issues around gender, as well as ignoring the rights of women and girls. the prime minister backed jk rowling today , saying people should not be criminalised for stating biological fact. in other news,

today, the prime minister has told binyamin netanyahu that the attack on aid workers in gaza that killed three british nationals was appalling. rishi sunak said far too many aid workers and ordinary civilians have lost their lives in gaza, he was on a phone conversation with the israeli prime minister this evening, and it comes after lord cameron told his israeli counterpart today that major changes must be made to ensure the safety of aid workers in gaza. the israeli prime minister, benjamin netanyahu, described the killing of seven aid workers, which included the three british people, as tragic. and he said un intended they were delivering vital food supplies, travelling in two armoured cars marked with the world central kitchen logo. the aid group claims the attack was carried out despite them coordinating their movements with the israeli military sports brand. adidas will redesign its german football shirts following the number 44, causing concern over a resemblance to the ss

nazi symbol. the new kits were launched last month ahead of germany hosting the european championship, but a historian flagged similarities with the logo for the ss logo, which was nazi germany's elite military guard under hitler. the country's football association in germany say it didn't spot the similarity when the decision was approved, but it will now be changed. and gardeners are being warned this spring that some flowers that bloom at this time of the year could pose a threat to their pets, as beautiful as they are. lilies, for example , they are. lilies, for example, are poisonous to cats with the potential cause serious liver potential to cause serious liver damage, or if the petals or the leaves are eaten well. now, with spnng leaves are eaten well. now, with spring flowers blooming, the pdsa animal charity is urging people to take care after one nine month old kitten was poisoned and rushed for emergency treatment. they're saying pet owners should monitor their pets around harmful plant species, and anyone whose pets are affected should contact

their that's the news their vet. that's the news for their vet. that's the news for the latest stories, do sign up to gb news alerts. scan the qr code on your screen right now or go to gb news. komsomol's that's i >> welcome along. what a summer of sport it was shaping up to be. england and scotland battling out in germany to be european champions, then in paris, great britain coming together to defy the odds once again at the olympic games. but we're simply not allowed to be patriotic anymore, are we.7 first patriotic anymore, are we? first american brand nike broke engush american brand nike broke english hearts by changing the saint george's cross to whatever this monstrosity is. and now woke team gb have got in on the act. they've released a range of products that see the union jack altered using different shades of red, white and blue, along with a series of bizarre patterns just leave our flag alone now, a spokesperson for team gb said. rest assured, the union flag will feature proudly

on the team kit for paris, as it always does. this image doesn't replace the union flag, which we will wear with pride later this summer . okay, fine, but why are summer. okay, fine, but why are they trying to flog this tat to they trying to flog this tat to the british public? aren't we allowed to wear the union flag with pride as well? well, the answer is because the woke brigade, have respect for brigade, who have no respect for history or tradition, are being put in charge. branding and design agency called this away are responsible for the team gb relaunch. so here's how they announced it . we needed to find announced it. we needed to find announced it. we needed to find a way of refreshing the team gb colour palette in a way that is both flexible and ownable . no both flexible and ownable. no you didn't, but they go on. the result is a vibrant and varied colour palette that has the versatility to be restrained , versatility to be restrained, toned and traditional in one breath and bold and contemporary in the next. what a load of guff and don't take my word for it. gb news went to hull to get some consumer feedback. >> it disgrace why not leave it as it is? it's, you know, our traditional flag. why mess with

it like the england football shirt? just leave it alone. >> it's that is the proper flag for our country. >> and that's what should be up. >> and that's what should be up. >> well, i think it's a bit weird. they're changing it. it's the flags, the flag, isn't it? it's been there centuries, isn't it? keep it the same. >> yeah, exactly. now i'm now going bring in a british going to bring in a british sporting legend. it was absolutely livid at this. welcome to the show. former goalkeeper of england's goalkeeper and one of england's best is peter best ever players is peter shilton. peter, thank you very, very much. how do you feel about the desecration of the union flag ? oh, i think we're just flag? oh, i think we're just going to have to just double check on peter's audio there for one second. but look, i'm going to bring in my panel now and then we'll get peter back. let's get the thoughts of them, shall we? as gb news contributor, nana akua for akua conservative mp for romford, rosindell and romford, andrew rosindell and trade unionist andy macdonald. just while we work on peter there, i think what i'll do is i'll come to my panel. nana how

do you feel about the needless desecration of our union flag? >> well, it looks like if you've ever been to one of those shops, like tire rack, it looks like they've just put a load of tires, of cross them over. tires, sort of cross them over. and actually this is a and i actually think this is a mission creek. i think this is a mission creek. i think this is a mission creep. and the objective of is it's edi, i think of it is it's more edi, i think some sort of esg type scores, because if look at the because if you look at the colours, they are pinks and they're purples. i think they're trying of infiltrate the trying to sort of infiltrate the whole inclusion whole diversity and inclusion within accept within this so that we accept that are changing. that these things are changing. but bottom line is the flag but the bottom line is the flag is flag. and the reason why a is a flag. and the reason why a flag is flag represents something is because its colours. because those are its colours. so white cross with red so a white cross with red background is denmark. and the other was it norway ? other way around was it norway? no, it's denmark and the other way is england right. so way round is england right. so the actual thing about a flag, a flag is about colours. the actual thing about a flag, a flag is about colours . so if you flag is about colours. so if you start tampering with it, then it becomes something else. well, i'm informed i'm reliably informed that we now have england footballing now do have england footballing legend, peter shilton. >> second time lucky peter. thank you very much. how thank you very, very much. how do feel about the do you feel about the desecration the union flag, desecration of the union flag, i just can't believe it . we just

just can't believe it. we just seem to be changing things for the sake of it. and, you know, it's a sacred flag. it's part of the country. our history and, you know, it . you know, it. >> oh, well, obviously, having a couple of technical issues there , unfortunately, when it comes to peter shilton, andrew, i will just ask you. i mean, you're obviously a patriotic individual. how do you feel about it all? >> i'm appalled by it. i think it's outrageous that these people can change our flag without anyone agreeing to it, thinking that it's somehow smart. well it's not smart. it actually offends a lot of people. people fought and died for this country under that flag . and it's not for any national institution to decide to muck it up with all kinds of squiggles and dots and strange colours, the union flag or the union jack. both terms are correct. that's the flag of our nation , that's the flag of our nation, and it shouldn't be tampered with by the woke brigade.

>> okay ? i mean, what's your >> okay? i mean, what's your view on this as a, as a as a trade unionist lefty? >> do you choose it as a trade unionist. left it. well, i mean, i don't really see what's woke about pink and purple. well, you know, well, when the know, well, when you mix the colours red white you get colours red and white you get pink. you mix the colours pink. when you mix the colours red and blue, you get purple. it's not some kind of woke eddy thing you were suggesting. thing like you were suggesting. it's you're it's just i think people you're wrong. people mixing wrong. it's just people mixing colours. about pink colours. what's woke about pink and purple. >> what's about pink and purple? >> what is woke about? >> what is woke about? >> pink and purple. part of the rainbow that's rainbow flag, isn't it? that's the whole idea. so the they want. >> they said that the reason why they've it is because they they've done it is because they want empower people to want it to empower people to tell a diverse range stories. tell a diverse range of stories. >> red, red and blue. red >> red, red, red and blue. red and blue are part of the rainbow flag well. no. but so flag as well. no, no. but but so what's what's your point there? >> because. because and >> because. because pink and purple are part of the union jack. >> but you can point, right? >> but you can point, right? >> a and >> it's about a flag. and so every represents every colour represents something countries. >> kick off in 2012 when >> did you kick off in 2012 when they put grey the olympic uniforms? >> if i what was it. did you were making a flag

were they making a flag with grey. yes. well then wouldn't grey. yes. well then i wouldn't have liked that. >> so you kick off then? >> so did you kick off then? >> so did you kick off then? >> nobody asked me. >> well, nobody asked me. >> well, nobody asked me. >> i think british airways >> well, nobody asked me. >> i thad british airways >> well, nobody asked me. >> i thad br reverse ways >> well, nobody asked me. >> i thad br reverse their really had to reverse their decisions when they decided to get union flag from get rid of the union flag from the of the aeroplanes. that the tail of the aeroplanes. that was embarrassing them. any was embarrassing for them. any national institution should be flying i think. flying the actual flag, i think. i believe that an i don't believe that an organisation represents i don't believe that an organisoron represents i don't believe that an organisor england epresents i don't believe that an organisor england nationally britain or england nationally has the right to somehow come up with a new design that's really not acceptable, especially if it's a business as well. >> so was it adidas just coming up with? oh, well, do the up with? oh, well, we'll do the design here. right. some of these people got to it these people got to do it proving know that proving it. and we know that these people are part of that whole know. whole esg. how do you know. >> know they are how >> how do you know they are how what of esg and what part of the esg and diversity inclusion they diversity and inclusion they are? how you know that are? how do you know that they're is edi. they're part what is the edi. you know, what's inclusion. you know, what's that inclusion. but you said? but what is what you said? they're part of it. >> the point. scoring for >> esg is the point. scoring for different the different businesses. so the more more more diverse they are, the more points they get. >> and diverse >> and what's diverse about putting a bit of pink and purple on flag? well, is diverse on a flag? well, what is diverse about that? >> colours, >> the rainbow colours, they are part >> the rainbow colours, they are parwell, gb news news we've

>> well, gb news gb news we've got colours the got the rainbow colours on the gb logo, you know, gb news gb news logo, you know, gb news logo, okay. logo, right? okay, okay. >> a pin in this for >> just to put a pin in this for a second, we're going for the hat all right peter hat trick. all right peter shilton right. okay. sorry shilton yeah right. okay. sorry about patrick. you are about that patrick. you are angry flag peter. go about that patrick. you are angyeah, flag peter. go about that patrick. you are angyeah, i, flag peter. go about that patrick. you are angyeah, i, i'm flag peter. go about that patrick. you are angyeah, i, i'm also peter. go about that patrick. you are angyeah, i, i'm also angry go on. yeah, i, i'm also angry about losing the sound. >> but anyway , sorry about that. >> but anyway, sorry about that. no, i mean, you know, i'm a traditionalist. i played for england for 20 years at football. and, you know, the playing for the flag was, was everything, you know, and i think this day and age, it's not just a few colours. it's the way life's going. i think there's a lot of people who want to change this country and the way it is . this country and the way it is. and, you know, i think this is just one of the things that changing our national flag is, is, is one of those things. and i certainly feel that, you know, it's a fantastic country . it's it's a fantastic country. it's very diverse, but there's still people who want to change our history and want to change what our country represents . really.

our country represents. really. >> i mean, do you think that there is , you know, a determined there is, you know, a determined attempt here by certain people to, like, do away with anything that's british about it? do you think because they would say it's just a playful update on on things? hopefully we can actually flag at some actually see this flag at some point well? actually see this flag at some poiiyeah,nell? actually see this flag at some poiiyeah, yeah . i mean, i do >> yeah, yeah. i mean, i do think that, know, people , think that, you know, people, you know, in this country, the genuine sort of, you know, british people, i think they're very proud of, our traditions and our flag and everything else . but i do think there's an element that of trying to undermine , you know, the way our undermine, you know, the way our country is. and, you know, and i just feel that they're looking for anything . i mean, they're for anything. i mean, they're desecrating, you know, statues and pulling down statues. there's a lot of stuff going on, and i think this is a small part of it, but it is a start of, you know, trying to change, change our national flag, which i think majority of people in this country would just say, no, no way. you know, we've had it for

hundreds of years. and this is this is our flag. >> do you think, though , do you >> do you think, though, do you think, though, peter, that maybe some athletes maybe some of the athletes or maybe when to the saint when it came to the saint george's some of the george's flag, some of the football , they should george's flag, some of the footb actually , they should george's flag, some of the footb actually stood ey should george's flag, some of the footb actually stood up should george's flag, some of the footb actually stood up against george's flag, some of the footb i ctually stood up against george's flag, some of the footh knowy stood up against george's flag, some of the footh know thatod up against george's flag, some of the footh know that ri0|p against george's flag, some of the footh know that rio ferdinand this? i know that rio ferdinand was talking. said. it never was talking. he said. it never would have happened in day. would have happened in his day. they stood it. they wouldn't have stood for it. but haven't got that now, but we haven't got that now, have i don't know have we, i don't i don't know what players are thinking , what the players are thinking, you know? i mean, they just want to out and represent the to go out and represent the country other side of it country and the other side of it is left to the is normally left to the officials. you know. but, yeah, i think at the end of the day, it is it is down to the officials. i mean, obviously players can say, look, i'm players can can say, look, i'm not with wearing that not happy with with wearing that shirt or whatever. i mean, look at the germans. they, they just changed it straight away when they had a problem. they thought they had a problem. i know flags i don't know how many flags around the are getting around the world are getting changed, you know, national. why is it just us? >> peter, this is what i want to know. why is it just us? they obviously think we're soft. >> i think you be >> well, i think you could be right there. think we are so right there. i think we are so

tolerant everything. tolerant with everything. you know , with with freedom of know, with with freedom of speech and the values that our country have been brought up on. and i think, you know, we've got a feel well, well pleased about that. you know, our values are fantastic, but sometimes, you know, we maybe let things go a bit too far. and, there is an element of, as i said, you know, i think that, in the country that want to try and, you know, degrade our values, really and, you know, i don't know why that is, but maybe it's political. i'm not sure. >> yeah. well, look, peter, thank you very , very much. can thank you very, very much. can i just ask you just just quickly, just ask you just just quickly, just very quickly while we've got yeah. what does got you? yeah. what does the flag to like, this is flag mean to you? like, this is the people the thing when people go, oh, they've changed they've only just changed the colours they've just colours on it or they've just added you know, whether it's added a, you know, whether it's like a tribal pattern or something, you know, you represented country the represented our country at the highest heck of a highest level for a heck of a long you're proud, long time. you're a proud, patriotic long time. you're a proud, patriowho has served his right. who has served his country. does the flag in country. what does the flag in its, in original proper form its, in its original proper form mean to you? >> it means history

>> well, it means history doesn't it? you know, i mean, you go back over the years, you know, we fought wars, you know, with the union jack, you know, people died , you know, for, for people died, you know, for, for our country. and, you know, we had that pride of, of the union jack. and when as a player, you know , it was it was know, it was it was unbelievable. it was the highest honour to represent your country. and flag was part country. and the flag was part of you know, union of that. you know, the union jack. and to start, to start , jack. and to start, to start, you know, sort of trying to change it now, i just think it's an attack on, on the way we, we, we look on our country. >> well, look, peter, thank you very, very much. incredibly strong words there. absolutely great to be able to make that work with you. in the end. that is peter shilton. there yeah. so there go. he's saying that there you go. he's saying that it attack our country it is an attack on our country and attack on our values. i and an attack on our values. i mean, you andy, you you mean, you know, andy, you you you the you don't care about about the flag, you don't care about about the flagwell, i mean, you know, just >> well, i mean, you know, just looking even behind nana there, you know, we've got our own union next the

union flag here next to the patrick christys logo. patrick christys tonight logo. can shot of that? can can we get a shot of that? can we get shot that? that is we get a shot of that? that is the union flag. it's just got a bit it. so what's bit of editing on it. so what's the difference what the difference between what they've done and what you've done? >> t- w are just colours. >> those are just colours. >> those are just colours. >> that's the union >> well, no, that's the union flag an overlay. we're not. flag with an overlay. we're not. i'm looking right now. i'm looking at it right now. stop pedantic. stop being pedantic. >> know the >> right. because you know the difference, we are not difference, right? we are not representing team gb at the olympics or england, but they've still on still got the union flag on their shoulder. >> athletes still got >> the athletes still have got the their shoulder. >> i think the clear >> so i think the clear difference that, course difference is that, of course the flag depicted in the union flag is depicted in all sorts of ways by all sorts of organisations. if you of organisations. but if you are representing if representing your country, if you're a national team or a national institution, you actually use the proper flag. you don't use something which is a peculiar version of that. >> it didn't even look like it. andy, if you saw that thing, that thing that they'd made, would you work out that was meant to be the union flag? >> probably, given the meant to be the union flag? >> it's probably, given the meant to be the union flag? >> it's got)bably, given the meant to be the union flag? >> it's got nothing.iven the meant to be the union flag? >> it's got nothing. team1e meant to be the union flag? >> it's got nothing. team gb fact it's got nothing. team gb on i would like the union. yes. >> i would like the union. yes. that you know, when that looks like, you know, when you tie then it's in you buy a tie and then it's in the it looks like the packaging, it looks like it's packaging, the inner

it's in the packaging, the inner lining. see the point? >> does ted baker see the point? i'd to make that this is i'd like to make is that this is team yeah. they should be team gb. yeah. they should be representing britain. not representing britain. it's not about snazzy about coming up with some snazzy design to repackage the united kingdom britain . it is about kingdom or britain. it is about representing the and representing the country and the flag country is the union flag of our country is the union jack. >> all right. okay. lively start. some would say slightly chaotic agency chaotic branding agency this—a—way said that they were asked by the british olympic association to, quote, maintain and profile and grow the brand's profile amongst fans of all ages and backgrounds, strengthen its relationship with sponsors and commercial and make relationship with sponsors and com|it3rcial and make relationship with sponsors and com|it will. and make relationship with sponsors and com|it will be and make relationship with sponsors and com|it will be fit and make relationship with sponsors and com|it will be fit for and make relationship with sponsors and com|it will be fit for today'sake sure it will be fit for today's modern first modern digital first communication landscape . so communication landscape. so i just threw up, threw up a load of kind of just guff, just absolute guff there. anyway, look, coming up, absolute guff there. anyway, look, coming up , two stories look, coming up, two stories that laid bare our joke of an that laid bare ourjoke of an asylum system as we expose the albanian child rapist, asylum seeker, the home office can't deport and will reveal all about the migrant baby khan, where gangs target single mums to fake their way into britain. nigel farage is fired up and ready to go on that. but next, should a

3.7 million eu citizens living in the uk be given british citizenship and the right to vote? or is that an egregious betrayal of brexit? a left wing think tank is pressuring labour to do that. former leader of ukip neil hamilton goes head to head with ex—labour adviser stella sekido, and that is in stella sekido, and that is on in just sack. move

this -- this is patrick christys

tonight. now, nigel farage is with me very, very soon. on how albanian people smuggling gangs are targeting uk mums to be. they're also going to be discussing about a child rapist, asylum seeker that, believe it or not, we cannot deport. but now it's time for the head to head and it currently costs more than £1,500 to apply for british citizenship , which involves citizenship, which involves proving that you've lived in the uk for five years, that you don't have a criminal history, and passing a test about life in the uk . but if labour gets into the uk. but if labour gets into power, could that be thrown out? the of the window for millions of europeans? yes, the left wing think tank labour together as close links to keir starmer's party and they've told him to give default citizenship , give default citizenship, british citizenship to the 3.7 million eu migrants living in the uk. the proposal is seen as a way to show that migrants do contribute to the economy. but of course, by gaining citizenship, you also gain the privilege of voting in british

elections , as starmer is already elections, as starmer is already on record calling for eu citizens to be allowed full voting rights and giving the vote to millions of migrants would likely result in millions more votes for the labour party. but where do you stand on default citizenship for eu migrants? email gb views or gb news. com tweet me out gb news. and while you're there, go and vote in our poll. the results will follow very, very shortly. doing on now doing battle on this now our former labour stella former labour adviser stella sekido leader of sekido and former leader of ukip, neil hamilton. sekido and former leader of ukip, neil hamilton . right. ukip, neil hamilton. right. okay, look, neil, i'll start with you. do you think that this would be a way of labour rigging the deck ? the deck? >> of course, a labour are massively in favour of uncontrolled migration because they know that the polling data tells us that migrant groups overwhelming vote for the labour party if they get votes and the current system, i think is far too liberal as it is , we

too liberal as it is, we certainly don't want to make it even more possible for our british elections to be rigged against the interests of the british people. >> stella, labour are going to do aren't they , to try and do this, aren't they, to try and shore up position power? shore up that position of power? >> have no idea >> patrick, i have no idea whether is going to do whether labour is going to do that as you said, this is that as, as as you said, this is just a think tank and this is just a think tank and this is just suggestion. this is not just a suggestion. this is not keir this. keir starmer saying this. this is keir starmer's adviser. is not keir starmer's adviser. nobody party has nobody from the labour party has said but for me, as an eu said that. but for me, as an eu migrant who has lived in uk migrant who has lived in the uk for i really hope they for 12 years, i really hope they do that because i have do do that because i have a question to ask for ian. what does a party like his that claims to be patriotic and british have to offer to an immigrant like myself, who has lived in this country for 12 years and feels very strongly about britain and about britain being my home, about british people being my people. what does your party have to offer to me to make me feel like i'm welcome at my own home? because make no mistake , this is what make no mistake, this is what the uk is for me and for millions of other people .

millions of other people. >> okay, i suppose, neil, go on. we'll just come back to that then. >> well, if you feel that you are now fully committed to the uk, then the uk independence party obviously the party for party is obviously the party for you. that's another issue you. but that's another issue altogether the one that altogether from the one that we're discussing. 12 years is a long period of residence. and of course you're well entitled to apply for british citizenship if you've not already got it. but the current rules allow people who come from the eu or anywhere else for that matter, to apply for british citizenship. if they've lived here for five years and they have various other qualifications and settled status in the case of the eu. so, that is a basic qualification which we don't need to dilute. i mean, this labour think tanks proposal presumably would allow people to come here just for a few weeks if they're eu citizens, to apply for, for citizenship and therefore be able to vote in uk elections . that would clearly be elections. that would clearly be absurd. no other country in europe applies such a policy, so why we? already

why should we? we're already give to millions of give the votes to millions of people from other parts the people from other parts of the world. they're coming from world. if they're coming from commonwealth countries, from countries reciprocate countries that don't reciprocate , those results of british people go and live in those countries. we need to look countries. so we need to look after country once. after our own country for once. >> stella, we need to >> all right, stella, we need to look after our country. look after our own country. >> to say is, if you >> what i have to say is, if you want to look for your own want to look out for your own country, then you would want people who feel like your country country to country is their country to would feel that way. do you want immigrants to integrate or do you want don't want immigrants to what to integrate? because what i think is going on here is that people yourself. what you people like yourself. what you are looking for is a scapegoat because you don't have policies , because you don't have policies, solutions to the british people's and people's real problems. and you're looking for people who are contributing and who have made this country their home, and you're looking excuses, and you're looking for excuses, and you're looking for excuses, and you're looking for excuses, and you know, what is my issue with with politicians who claim to be patriotic and then point to be patriotic and then point to people like myself who may be foreign, who may perhaps have been born in a different country, but who have made

britain their home. is that this is all just an excuse. your real problem is that we're foreigners . your real problem is not that we're not integrating, or that we're not integrating, or that we're contributing . we're not contributing. >> i if i bought a second home in greece, could vote there? in greece, could i vote there? stella >> is it the same? did you live in 12 years? yeah. in greece for 12 years? yeah. but you have you paid but have you lived have you paid taxes is this the taxes in greece? is this the same the immigration with same with the immigration with the new immigrants that we're talking about? the eu immigrants we're already have we're talking about already have settled these not settled status. these are not people come and people who have come here and they a second home they just bought a second home or a few days or have spent a few, a few days living here. okay >> all right, neil, apparently this a way of this is just a way of scapegoating 3.7 scapegoating foreigner 3.7 million of them. >> absurd , isn't it? it's >> that's absurd, isn't it? it's all to do commitment to all to do with commitment to this people come to this country. people come to britain their home britain to make it their home and here for and have lived here for a reasonable length of time . then, reasonable length of time. then, of they have right to of course, they have a right to apply citizenship , apply for british citizenship, you not my problem you know, it's not my problem that, you're a foreigner. that, that you're a foreigner. it's your problem if you're british and feel yourself a british and feel yourself a british and feel yourself a british and you've been here for 12 years, of course you're entitled to apply for british citizenship if you've not

already it . and i would have already got it. and i would have no problem that. actually, no problem with that. actually, i we raised the five i think if we raised the five yean i think if we raised the five year, qualification to ten years, that would be far more sensible. lots of countries in the world apply tests of that kind. if you want to become a citizen of switzerland , for citizen of switzerland, for example, you find it far example, you will find it far more to become more difficult to become a citizen the united kingdom. citizen of the united kingdom. and what is all and that's what this is all about. ultimately, nation is a about. ultimately, a nation is a nafion it about. ultimately, a nation is a nation it feels itself to nation when it feels itself to be a nation. and the problem with today is we've with britain today is we've got too disparate who do too many disparate groups who do not themselves to be not really feel themselves to be british. war gaza in british. and the war in gaza in the last few months has proved that in a very dramatic way. there are people who feel far more with the middle more affinity with the middle east they do britain. east than they do to britain. yet they vote in this country. >> okay, how are you going to >> okay, so how are you going to make like this is make them feel like this is their country if you don't their own country if you don't let integrate basically? let them integrate basically? >> you're you >> so you're saying you don't want to integrate, apply want to integrate, just apply for citizenship the for british citizenship the usual that usual way, the way that already exists, i that's exists, isn't it? i mean, that's nothing with integration. nothing to do with integration. >> the integration first. >> the integration comes first. >> the integration comes first. >> but but but but >> but but but but but but but that's exactly the point. these people settled people already have settled status. people have already

status. the people have already lived they've paid lived here. they've already paid taxes. have taxes. they've already have their here. their families here. >> these are not people who just for can apply for five years they can apply for five years they can apply for citizenship. what's wrong for five years they can apply for cthat?;hip. what's wrong for five years they can apply for c that?;hi they've�*s wrong for five years they can apply for c that? ;hi they've lived ng for five years they can apply for cthat?;hi they've lived here with that? if they've lived here for years, they can apply for five years, they can apply for five years, they can apply for citizenship. if they haven't, have wait until haven't, they have to wait until they've for years they've been here for five years and apply for it. and then they can apply for it. >> so for you, it's just a >> okay. so for you, it's just a matter of making it more difficult for who have matter of making it more difficult proven who have matter of making it more difficult proven that nho have matter of making it more difficult proven that this have matter of making it more difficult proven that this is ve already proven that this is their and of that. their home and all of that. okay, get it. so you just want okay, i get it. so you just want us pay? say that us to pay? just say that you want to extra £2,000 a want us to pay an extra £2,000 a yeah want us to pay an extra £2,000 a year. just say that it's fine. >> okay? all right. >> okay? all right. >> i think the british citizenship is beyond price. >> all right. of you. thank >> all right. both of you. thank you. you very a you. thank you very much. a proper it proper head to head, as it always that's former always is here. that's former labour leader labour advisor and former leader of , hamilton. do of ukip, neil hamilton. who do you the 3.7 million you agree with? the 3.7 million eu citizens living in the be eu citizens living in the uk be given citizenship and given british citizenship and a voting shawn no voting right? shawn says no other eu countries would allow us brits to vote in their countries, so why should we let them with our electoral them play with our electoral system? says absolutely. system? thomas says absolutely. my system? thomas says absolutely. my partner hungarian and my partner is hungarian and has worked year. she has been worked every year. she has been here, learn the language and

customs and considers a uk home. most of the eu nationals i've met are similar, unlike others who come over on boats. emma says labour are just manipulating everything to steal as many votes possible at as many votes as possible at your is in, 7% of you your verdict is in, 7% of you agree eu citizens living in agree that eu citizens living in the should be given the uk should be given citizenship and a right to vote. wow. okay, 93% of you think they shouldn't all right, well, coming up as jk rowling wins a brave victory for free speech against humza yousaf hate crime laws, i will show you how scottish comedians are joining rowling's resistance. >> i'm here to make sure this comedy event runs according to scottish law, i.e. you laugh at the correct things. the brain behind the so—called hate monster was our very own andrew doyle. >> he joins me live to explain how comedians are leading the fight back against humza yousafs war on free speech. plus, i'll reveal which gb host has reveal which gb news host has come attack from none come under attack from none other rowling. but other than jk rowling. but first, it's revealed, first, as it's revealed, a rapist asylum seeker can't be deported while albanian gangs

target uk mums to be in a plot to fake their way into the country, when will our government get a grip on the migrant crisis? nigel farage unleashes on our hapless home office and that is

next. welcome back. still to come? are scots now? openly rebelling against the dystopian hate crime bill? our very own andrew doyle

joins me live in the studio to report his findings. joins me live in the studio to report his findings . but first, report his findings. but first, it's report his findings. but first, wsfime report his findings. but first, it's time for nigel farage. now albanian crime gangs have found another loophole in britain's asylum system . tiktok adverts asylum system. tiktok adverts are now targeting pregnant women prepared to have a refused asylum seekers name on their baby's birth certificate, allowing illegal migrants to escape deportation by claiming that they have a british family. an investigation by the sun found. one tiktok account calling itself consular services london, which boasted our job continues every day . we have continues every day. we have women and children register their children with your name. in the uk, this new trick is reportedly favoured by those whose asylum has been refused by the home office and are facing imminent deportation. nigel were you shocked to learn of this plot today ? plot today? >> no. not really. i mean, these are very devious people , nearly are very devious people, nearly always involved in criminality, often making very large sums of money. so they will do whatever they have to do, including paying they have to do, including paying pregnant women. you know ,

paying pregnant women. you know, cash sums to get their name put on the birth certificate, these are clever people , and we're are clever people, and we're stupid. we have a civil service who've no interest in stopping this. and a government without the courage or the moral fibre to tackle any of it, for fear horrible things might be said against them. but don't forget , against them. but don't forget, the reason they want to be on the reason they want to be on the birth certificate is because of article eight of the european convention on human rights, as passed into uk law by the human rights act of 1998, and frankly , rights act of 1998, and frankly, all of these discussions, this issue rwanda , whatever else it issue rwanda, whatever else it may be, until you cut that gordian knot of the human rights act, you will have ultimately a judiciary that will allow these people to stay. >> do you trust that the home office is on top of this? nigel? >> i don't think they care , >> i don't think they care, patrick. i really don't think they care . and to be honest,

they care. and to be honest, i don't think the conservative government really care other than it's now costing them support, which has led them into a blind panic where they start to say things. but i mean, you know, it was boris johnson bothered about how many people came into britain, not once, not once. came into britain, not once, not once . and you know this from a once. and you know this from a party that told the electorate in their manifestos of ten, 15, 17, they'd reduced net migration to tens of thousands and in 2019 said, hey guys , with brexit we said, hey guys, with brexit we get back control of their borders. you know , of our borders. you know, of our borders. you know, of our borders. and they just lied to us. they've openly lied to us for 14 years, could labour be any worse? it'll be about the same, i guess. i mean , there's same, i guess. i mean, there's absolutely no way that we would even be able to do things like dna test these babies. >> mean, if we can't even >> i mean, if we can't even perform dental checks on bearded 30 year migrants claiming to 30 year old migrants claiming to be 15 year olds who rock up on the sands of dover at some point

for their human rights, there's no going be able to no way we're going to be able to dna a baby to find out dna test a baby to find out whether or not that random albanian his but albanian bloke is his dad, but no [10 one cares. >> no one cares. >> patrick. no, they don't care. they're not interested in the make the country. they make up of the country. they don't care about massively don't care about the massively rising population. they don't care about its impacts. they don't care. that's why we need absolutely radical outright reform of the whole thing. >> so getting out of the echr, in your view, would stop albanian gangs essentially raffling off unborn babies to stay in britain, getting out of the echr , amending the human the echr, amending the human rights act in line with that would give us the ability to pass legislation that judges couldn't overrule. >> yes, that's it. and until we do that, frankly, we're all tearing our hair out over the injustice of it. how unfair it is. but until we do that, none of this will ever be solved. >> no, indeed. well, look, in response, the home office said

this. right. so immigration fraud using false birth certificates is a serious offence, which is why we have measures in place to prevent and detect it. well, it's interesting, isn't it ? because interesting, isn't it? because obviously the sun just went on tiktok and found out this tiktok and found out that this was happening. so we await to see what the measures was happening. so we await to see the what the measures was happening. so we await to see the homeat the measures was happening. so we await to see the home office measures was happening. so we await to see the home office iszasures was happening. so we await to see the home office is using. that the home office is using. but look, labour party is but look, the labour party is facing fresh split the facing a fresh split over the issue national so issue of national id cards. so former home secretary lord blunkett is encouraging starmer to the failed policy to reinstate the failed policy of yesteryear to tackle illegal immigration. he wants compulsory id cards, illegal migrants will potentially find it much harder to find illicit work in britain . to find illicit work in britain. the use of id cards in france is widely regarded as a deterrent to migrants settling there, which many of them which is why so many of them make to britain. i make the journey to britain. i mean, i mean, would mean, nigel, i mean, would this make bit make the blind bit of difference? you think? make the blind bit of diffabsolute you think? make the blind bit of diffabsolute nonsense. k? make the blind bit of diffabsolute nonsense. the number >> absolute nonsense. the number of illegal migrants that across the mediterranean currently in france is far greater than those that have crossed the english channel from calais to come into us, id cards do nothing to stop

criminality. but what they do do is give the authorities the opportunity to punish the normally law abiding. i am not convinced by this argument one little bit . and there was always little bit. and there was always that side to david blunkett, always that authoritarian side to david blunkett or is that feeling that the state should be able to control everything that you do, you know, and demand to see your papers walking down bromley high street? no, thank you. >> i mean also as well . i mean, >> i mean also as well. i mean, they would have to tell us who they would have to tell us who they are to begin with, which is part of the problem, isn't it? because the other aspect because this is the other aspect that wants engage because this is the other aspect that right? wants engage because this is the other aspect that right? fornts engage because this is the other aspect that right? for you engage because this is the other aspect that right? for you couldage because this is the other aspect that right? for you could buy with, right? for you could buy a plane ticket to heathrow airport and claim asylum when you get here for much cheaper than it costs you to employ a human trafficker to put you in the back of a lorry or a&e. the reason why they do it is because they ditch the documents the they ditch the documents in the channel they ditch the documents in the channel, they become channel, and then they become undocumented and they go to the system. that you're system. the idea that you're going up a load of

going to end up with a load of them on the beach saying, all right, okay, my name, right, okay, here's my name, give card. it'sjust give me an id card. it's just bonkers, isn't it? >> i've come from >> i know i've come from afghanistan i've from a afghanistan and i've come from a war i'm and i've war zone. i'm gay and i've converted to christianity. that's say. that's that's what they say. that's what they and that's what what they say. and that's what the lets them and the system lets them do. and there's doubt, that there's no doubt, actually, that our are hardened to our hearts are hardened to genuine refugees because of the behaviour of those that abuse the system . and we let them do the system. and we let them do it. and we're so busy pointing the finger of blame at other countries and elsewhere. the failings are all here. yeah >> and do you think that labour's policy of smashing i mean, look, i know you've been all over the rwanda plan, the rwanda files and all of that. have you got any idea what labour mean when they say smash the gangs? i mean, we the gangs? because, i mean, we are down the barrel are staring down the barrel of a labour government, it will be labour government, so it will be quite to know they quite nice to know what they mean you spend more mean is, you know, spend more money spend more money on policing, spend more money on policing, spend more money with the money on cooperation with the french, tough penalties for french, have tough penalties for those that traffic human beings.

>> but you think about it, you know, this summer when we get a good week, you know, a gang that is sending boats every day off the beaches of anywhere in northern france will be making 2 to ,3 million in a week , right? to ,3 million in a week, right? yeah. you could you could bring in the death penalty for people smuggling with prizes that big. there will always be someone to do it. smashing the gangs. yeah sounds great in theory, but in practice it won't happen . and practice it won't happen. and look, you know, i mean, now the french police are going around northern france carrying weapons because they're so fearful that many of the migrant gangs themselves are now carrying guns. you know, all the while there's a pull factor, all the while there's a draw. there's a pull factor, all the while there's a draw . and the while there's a draw. and the draw is you will get looked after in the united kingdom, you will get put up in a hotel. you will get put up in a hotel. you will be able to work in the illegal economy. your chances

are being granted asylum are seven 5% plus even if you're rejected, just say you become christian and you can stay. you've got a 1% chance of being removed . so all the while that removed. so all the while that pull factor is there. all the while , the money exists in while, the money exists in people trafficking. you can attack the gangs all you like . attack the gangs all you like. they will still do their business. >> nigel, thank you very much . >> nigel, thank you very much. as ever. that was nigel farage coming up. okay do you want your hard earned taxes being spurned , hard earned taxes being spurned, squandered on pointless research into things like gay porn ? how into things like gay porn? how about a study on comics and race in latin america ? well, it is, in latin america? well, it is, so stay tuned as i blow the lid off the billions of taxpayers cash that is being wasted on woke hard left academic projects. but next, watch out for hums hate monster. >> i'm here to make sure this comedy event runs according to scottish law, i.e. you laugh at the correct things .

the correct things. >> andrew doyle explains how he and other comedians have joined jk rowling's resistance. that is next. plus, i'll reveal which gb news presenter has come under attack from

welcome back. coming up. i will blow the lid off the billions of taxpayers cash being spent on woke academic projects. some of them are just bonkers. and that is after 10 pm. but first, police scotland have confirmed that they've received complaints against jk rowling under the snp's new hate crime laws , but snp's new hate crime laws, but will not take action against the harry potter author . rowling, a, harry potter author. rowling, a, dared the police to arrest her after taking to social media to ridicule ten high profile trans figures their claims to be figures and their claims to be women. the controversial women. the hugely controversial new mean that you could new laws mean that you could face up to seven years in jail for, stirring up hatred for, quote, stirring up hatred about protected characteristics like , disability, sexuality like age, disability, sexuality or transgender identity and other scots are now joining

rowling's resistance. last night's comedy unleashed show in edinburgh introduced the hate monster , as they used the power monster, as they used the power of laughter to hit back at humza yousaf and the snp. >> so before you laugh a joke tonight, ask yourself the following questions one. >> does the joke avoid offensive material? two is the comedian representative of a marginalised group ? three can you be group? three can you be absolutely sure the comedian has never said or done anything problematic ? problematic? >> i'm delighted to welcome andrew doyle, who was behind that comedy event in edinburgh last night. andrew great stuff. what's the mood like on the ground in scotland where did ground in scotland and where did you that costume, well, the you get that costume, well, the costume us by, costume was made for us by, a resident of edinburgh. but i should it was based on should point out it was based on a invented by police a character invented by police scotland. hate scotland. they created the hate monster out a video, a very monster put out a video, a very patronising video in which the hate monster sort of wagged its big fingers the at the big red fingers at the at the pubucin

big red fingers at the at the public in scotland and said, you know, there's a hate monster inside and you've got inside all of us and you've got to be careful not commit to be careful not to commit a hate crime. really hate crime. it's really infantilizing, really patronising. mocked patronising. so we just mocked it getting, our, one patronising. so we just mocked it ourgetting, our, one patronising. so we just mocked it ourgetting, to our, one patronising. so we just mocked it ourgetting, to dress ur, one patronising. so we just mocked it ourgetting, to dress up one patronising. so we just mocked it ourgetting, to dress up ass patronising. so we just mocked it ourgetting, to dress up as the of our people to dress up as the monster and hector the monster and to hector the audience in the middle of a comedy gig. that was the idea. and it went well. and it went down very well. >> yeah, well, what is the general feeling about these general feeling like about these ridiculous that ridiculous new hate laws that are in in scotland, then? are coming in in scotland, then? >> i mean, certainly >> well, i mean, certainly at last event comedy last night's event at comedy unleashed edinburgh, unleashed in edinburgh, there was relief that we're was a sense of relief that we're all gathering and we're all laughing we're laughing at this stuff. we're just at way that just laughing at the way that the approached this, the police have approached this, the police have approached this, the approached the police have approached this, thevarious approached the police have approached this, thevarious people approached the police have approached this, thevarious people (variousied it, various people from various of protected characteristics it, various people from various of you otected characteristics it, various people from various of you musted characteristics it, various people from various of you must not,aracteristics it, various people from various of you must not, mockristics it, various people from various of you must not, mock or ics that you must not, mock or offend were mocking each other. it a reminder that it was just a reminder that actually, these are jokes. actually, these are just jokes. we're laugh. we're we're just having a laugh. we're just our creative just exercising our creative freedom freedom of freedom and our freedom of speech. freedom and our freedom of speech . the mood, i think, is speech. the mood, i think, is generally one of disbelief that humza yousaf and the snp have pushed through , this crazy, pushed through, this crazy, authoritarian, law . authoritarian, draconian law. irrespective of all the criticisms that have come from senior members of the police, members of the judiciary,

members of the judiciary, members of the public, the qcs, various various bodies have all said this is not workable because the police have said that they will investigate absolutely every complaint . and absolutely every complaint. and although they've said they won't target comedians, they're going to end up investigating comedians if the complaints come in, that's what they've in, because that's what they've pledged to do. >> that's it. so >> well that's it. so conceivably, and is how conceivably, and this is how ridiculous it ridiculous and unenforceable it is. had reported you is. if someone had reported you last night in the audience, the police would have had have police would have had to have investigated you, wouldn't they? >> yeah, absolutely >> yeah, that's absolutely right. would right. and whether they would have further, we'll have taken it any further, we'll come the individual come down to the individual police officer. we had, siobhan brown on the bbc brown from the snp on the bbc the other day, and she was asked very clearly about this, you know, who makes the decision, what not what to investigate and what not to how it to investigate, how to take it forward, she said. a matter forward, she said. it's a matter of individual police judgement. now, that, now, the problem with that, of course activists course, is there are activists within the force in within the police force in scotland. them at scotland. we've caught them at it the fact that it before now, the fact that they're going pursue jk they're not going to pursue jk rowling challenged rowling after she challenged them, just them, is partly, probably just cowardice because she's got a lot of power and clout behind

her. but if it if it was a complaint about us, a bunch of comedians a small room in comedians in a small room in edinburgh well edinburgh, they might well have taken it further. >> andrew, can you just >> well, andrew, can you just stay for me, stay where you are for me, please, my good man, if that's all going to all right. i'm just going to move slightly. so. jk move this on slightly. so. jk rowling has been on the warpath the gb news the last few days, and gb news host amankona been host albie amankona has been caught this caught in her crosshairs this evening. said this on evening. so alby said this on twitter. he said like most brits, i'm sympathetic to jk rowling's views on biological sex and the need for single sex provisions. but i suspect, like me, most brits would find calling a trans woman who looks like bergdorf him to be like munroe bergdorf him to be obtuse mean spirited. obtuse and mean spirited. they're not a criminal offence. or the harry potter author fired back. so if trans identified men are pretty enough as judged by you a man, women ought to agree that they're women . femaleness that they're women. femaleness has no relation whatsoever to how an individual man or how well an individual man or woman performs femininity to male standards. it's the very definition of misogyny. well, and i surely wounded albie amankona joins both me and

andrew doyle now. i mean she has she's thinking about to hogwarts, aren't she? obe oh, if only i could have gone to hogwarts. >> i would have been so excited . >> i would have been so excited. and i can tell you that little 11 year old alby inside me is so excited that rowling knows excited that jk rowling knows who don't feel wounded who i am. i don't feel wounded at because still at all, patrick, because i still think is obtuse mean think it is obtuse and mean spirited to call a trans woman who passes as a woman him deliberately. i think deliberately. now, i don't think that should be a crime. i think the law in scotland , which which the law in scotland, which which has come in is absolutely appalling. and we should not be legislating against this sort of thing , but it legislating against this sort of thing, but it is just legislating against this sort of thing , but it is just not, legislating against this sort of thing, but it is just not, in my opinion, the right thing to do to deliberately misgender someone. >> andrew, have you got any views on that? i mean, i'm assuming you're team rowling on this . this. >> i mean, the point is, when it comes to the use of pronouns and the use of all language, it's about individual choice. i'm for freedom speech, i think freedom of speech, and i think people should be able say people should be able to say absolutely i absolutely whatever they want. i think it's important to understand rowling's think it's important to understand on rowling's think it's important to understand on this>wling's think it's important to understand on this is.ing's think it's important to understand on this is. she's think it's important to underst about] this is. she's think it's important to underst about the s is. she's think it's important to underst about the preservation talking about the preservation of spaces women's of single—sex spaces women's only therefore a

only spaces, and therefore a lot of feminists and of women of feminists and a lot of women want and do use pronouns. want to use and do use pronouns. according to biological sex rather than gender identity, and therefore it doesn't matter what someone looks what they someone looks like, what they resemble what resemble, what what what characteristics or resemble, what what what chariclosely cs or resemble, what what what chariclosely they or resemble, what what what chariclosely they align or resemble, what what what chariclosely they align with how closely they align with gendered stereotypes. we're talking about biological reality and respectfully, andrew, the choice that she makes. >> i'm not talking respectfully , >> i'm not talking respectfully, andrew. i'm not about andrew. i'm not talking about single—sex not single—sex spaces. i'm not talking any of that. in talking about any of that. in fact, make that clear in fact, i make that very clear in the you actually read the tweet. if you actually read it. patrick very kindly read it. and patrick very kindly read it. and patrick very kindly read it out i actually say it out to us, i actually say that i have sympathy with and actually that actually i would say that i agree with jk rowling's position on and need on biological sex and the need for single—sex spaces, but out of courtesy, i would call a trans woman who passes her or she, as opposed to calling them him deliberately. and i would say that if you were going to call a trans woman him deliberately or a trans man, her deliberately, i would say that was obtuse and mean spirited and, you know, in a free society we can say whatever we like,

can't we? >> a lot of people do agree with that, alby. a lot of people, even germaine greer, has said that would use pronouns that she would use pronouns according certain that she would use pronouns accord but certain that she would use pronouns accord but i'm certain that she would use pronouns accord but i'm just certain that she would use pronouns accord but i'm just trying ertain that she would use pronouns accord but i'm just trying to ain cases. but i'm just trying to explain why feminists jk explain why feminists like jk rowling saying they're rowling are saying that they're going sex going to stick to biological sex when pronouns. when they use pronouns. that's their perspective. also, by the way, it comes to courtesy, way, when it comes to courtesy, some more deserving some people are more deserving of others. of of courtesy than others. of course, bergdorf in course, munroe bergdorf in particular some very particular has had some very terribly things in the terribly racist things in the past. i don't think he past. i don't think that he really much really deserves all that much courtesy, really deserves all that much coualliy, look, both of you, >> all right, look, both of you, thank very, much. great thank you very, very much. great stuff. be, you stuff. that and i'll be, you know, year old. you can be know, 11 year old. you can be very, very proud of yourself that j.k. rowling now at least knows so we knows who you are. so there we go. and can i keep go. and andrew, can i keep fighting no. you fighting the good fight? no. you can't foresee coming up a gb news exclusive. we expose the horror brits left horror stories of brits left waiting days for an ambulance horror stories of brits left waitour days for an ambulance horror stories of brits left waitour broken' an ambulance horror stories of brits left waitour broken' an ambufirst, and our broken nhs. but first, you believe how much you will not believe how much your earned cash is given your hard earned cash is given to hard left academics to pointless hard left academics to pointless hard left academics to do research into things like get this gay porn decolonisation, as well as some weird stuff from latin america. i blow the lid off the billions

and it is billions wasted on woke diversity and inclusion research. essentially, the government does not want you to know that in the middle of a cost of living crisis with the highest tax burden since world war two, your money is war two, that your money is going on guff like this, it is the dole for people with blue hair. stay tuned . hair. stay tuned. >> for that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers sponsors of weather on . gb news. weather on. gb news. >> good evening. here's your latest gb news weather update brought to you by the met office. yes, there will be some dnen office. yes, there will be some drier, brighter weather around across southern parts tomorrow, but first there's quite a bit of rain come, driven by area rain to come, driven by an area of low pressure and an associated frontal system that's sweeping up from the southwest, bringing outbreaks of rain for many, though initially tonight there dry weather there will be some dry weather across parts of northern ireland and england, the and northern england, though the outbreaks rain arriving here outbreaks of rain arriving here and eastern parts of and across eastern parts of scotland, persistent rain scotland, some persistent rain could actually bring some hill

snow the highest ground snow over the highest ground across the far north—west of scotland. there may be a touch of frost first thing tomorrow morning. otherwise wednesday gets cloudy and gets off to a mild, cloudy and rather start for many rather damp start for many outbreaks of rain, which could turn and persistent across turn heavy and persistent across parts of northern ireland and southern through the southern scotland. through the morning. will continue morning. they will continue across many northern areas into the afternoon , though, breaking the afternoon, though, breaking up a little bit across more central southern parts of central and southern parts of england and wales, turning drier a showers, but also some a few showers, but also some decent bright sunny spells in which should feel relatively which it should feel relatively warm, with highs around 16 celsius colder than celsius but markedly colder than this. further north. more unsettled weather to come as we go through thursday. watch out for outbreaks of rain for some heavy outbreaks of rain sweeping their way from west to east southern parts of east across southern parts of england, with further outbreaks of north. and of rain further north. two and more rain pushing in more persistent rain pushing in from the southwest later on, and the unsettled theme continues as we head towards the weekend, could windy, in fact, could turn very windy, in fact, by saturday, but temperatures rising 20 rising likely to get to 20 celsius by, looks like things

are heating up. >> boxt boilers as sponsors of weather on

gb news. >> it's 10 pm. i'm patrick christys tonight , we will detain christys tonight, we will detain those who come here illegally. >> and then remove them in weeks. we cannot deport an albanian child rapist . and. albanian child rapist. and. >> a gb news exclusive people waiting for days for an ambulance on our broken nhs. also exposed tens of millions of pounds of your money is being spent on hard left academic guff . like the europe that gay porn built. i've got tomorrow's newspapers today with my panellist gb news star nana akua tory mp andrew rosindell and trade unionist andy mcdonald. oh

yes , and welcome to the antiques yes, and welcome to the antiques woke show. >> i just don't want to value it. i do not want to put a price on something that signifies such an awful business. >> get ready britain, here we go your hard earned money is being fired out of a rainbow coloured cannon. next . cannon. next. >> at 10:01. the latest news from the gb news room is that police scotland said today that the author , j.k. rowling, social the author, j.k. rowling, social media posts on the importance of biological sex would not be treated as a criminal case. the harry potter author posted on x saying i hope every woman in scotland who wishes to speak up for the reality and importance

of biological sex, will be reassured by this announcement. and i trust that all women, irrespective of profile or financial means, will be treated equally under the law . well, the equally under the law. well, the new law brought in yesterday is aimed at banning hateful comments. but the harry potter author previously said the law risked silencing genuine debate on issues around gender, as well asignonng on issues around gender, as well as ignoring the rights of women and girls . the prime minister and girls. the prime minister backed jk rowling today, saying people should not be criminalised for stating simple biological fact. well, the prime minister has been speaking with the israeli prime minister tonight, benjamin netanyahu , tonight, benjamin netanyahu, after the attack on aid workers in gaza, which killed three british nationals, saying it was appalling . rishi sunak said far appalling. rishi sunak said far too many aid workers and ordinary civilians had lost their lives in gaza. he was speaking on a phone conversation with the israeli prime minister this evening, and it comes after lord david cameron told his israeli counterpart today that major changes must be made to

ensure the safety of aid workers in gaza. the israeli prime minister, benjamin netanyahu, described the killing of seven aid workers, three of them british people, as tragic and, he said, unintended. they were delivering vital food supplies. travelling in two armoured cars marked with the world central kitchen logo. the aid group themselves claims the attack was carried out despite them coordinating their movements with the israeli military . coordinating their movements with the israeli military. now news here at home, there's good news here at home, there's good news for house hunters. mortgage approvals have hit a 17 month high and that's coincided with a fall in house prices, according to the bank of england mortgage approvals rose to the highest level seen since market turmoil sparked by liz truss's mini—budget meanwhile, house pnces mini—budget meanwhile, house prices fell by 0.2% in march. that means the average price of a home in britain is now just over £260,000. now, if you've ever gone incognito while using the internet on google's chrome

browser , your private browser, your private information may still have been stolen by the tech giant. but now, thanks to a us court ruling , google will be forced to delete all private user data , delete all private user data, which wasn't supposed to have been tracked. and despite the case being filed in the states, the judgement also applies international, meaning it also appues international, meaning it also applies here in the uk. google dismissed the merits of the case, saying it only involved old technical data. that's the news for the latest stories , do news for the latest stories, do sign up to gb news alerts. scan the qr code on your screen right now or go to gb news. com slash alerts . alerts. >> the government does not want you to know this, but i think you to know this, but i think you have a right to know. millions and millions of pounds of your hard earned tax money is being completely and utterly wasted on pointless diversity and inclusion. rubbish that you absolutely did not consent to. there is a group called uk

research and innovation that receives £8 billion of your money. every single year. it then gives your money to so—called academics so they can do research projects into hard left, hyper woke, progressive rubbish. here are some examples. you spent £842,000 on the europe that gay porn built, 1945 to 2000. how did the growing transnational circulation of gay male erotica and porn magazines in post—war europe contribute to the development of a shared identity and sense of belonging among european gay men? i mean, i think we can all agree we have to know, don't we? you spent £759,000 on a study into comics and race in latin america. you spent £809,000 on a university of edinburgh study for a project called remediating stevenson, decolonising robert louis stevenson's pacific fiction through graphic adaptation. arts

education and community engagement. you gifted just under £1 million to the university of westminster so they could look into femm ideas decolonising sexual and gender based violence in higher education. just to round this off, about 170 7500 pounds was spent on queer music. queer theory, queer music theory at theory, queer music theory at the university of southampton , the university of southampton, which poses the pressing question , if the composer is question, if the composer is queenis question, if the composer is queer, is their music queer too? it brings me no joy at to all reveal that your hard earned money in the middle of a cost of living crisis is being used as the dole for people with blue hair. you go to work every day and pay your taxes so that somebody who probably wants to live in a warehouse commune in hackney can afford to send their kids private school, it gets kids to private school, it gets worse. arts council england receives £445 million in public funds a year. that money goes

towards funding things like femmes of colour, a show described as . a riot of described as. a riot of positivity and inclusivity, where white audience members are ianed where white audience members are invited to check their privilege at the door. the people who received are same at the door. the people who recei�*who are same at the door. the people who recei�*who scream are same at the door. the people who recei�*who scream and re same at the door. the people who recei�*who scream and cry same at the door. the people who recei�*who scream and cry about1e ones who scream and cry about government oh there's government cuts. oh no, there's a £170 million post—brexit funding shortfall piling misery on the uk creative sector. articles like this in side arts council england's devastating cuts well aware. but wait, there's more local authorities have spent a total of almost £52 million on equality, diversity and inclusion roles in the last three financial years . the civil three financial years. the civil service reportedly spent at least £250,000 on a diversity employment body called versita, 6, employment body called versita, a, quote, tech platform aimed at job seekers looking to work for employers that place diversity , employers that place diversity, inclusion and wellbeing at the top of the agenda. they claim to

work with a wide range of other government departments and pubuc government departments and public bodies to list government vacancies that keep diversity and equality at their core. i would like to thank journalist charlotte gill for doing a load of into this, but this of research into this, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. seriously, you're not believe half stuff that there is half of the stuff that there is here. how earth has here. how on earth has a conservative government that keeps banging on about woke and the wars allowed this to the culture wars allowed this to happen? you have the highest tax burden since world war two. there is a cost of living crisis . our public services are crumbling, but you and your loved ones are funding the europe that gay porn built and nonsense about comics and race in latin america. they are using the line that all left wing people do when it comes to pubuc people do when it comes to public money, and prepare for a lot of this, by the way, under a labour government. all right. they're investing it. that's what they say. they're investing it. not investing it. they're not investing it. they're hyper woke they're giving it to hyper woke deadbeat academics so they can

fire rainbow fire it out of a rainbow coloured cannon. just remember that the next time you see how much tax is taken out of your payslip, let's get the thoughts of my panel this evening i am joined by gb news contributor, the wonderful nana akua . i've the wonderful nana akua. i've also got conservative mp for romford, andrew rosindell and trade unionist andy mcdonald. nana. start with you. how nana. i'll start with you. how on earth are people getting away with this 800 grand on, you know, the old europe that gay porn bill, for goodness sake. >> well, listen, the person that managed to get £1 million, pretty much a million out of this, this committee for decolonise sexual and gender based violence. i mean, what does that even mean? what is that about? i'd love to hear an example of what that is. they've got almost £1 million for this now. years and years ago i used to work on a shopping channel. the first job ever in tv. and there this girl had the there was this girl who had the most poshest voice. she'd talk and was talking absolute and she was talking absolute rubbish, people rubbish, obviously, but people would is what would buy off her. this is what this just a load of

this is. it's just a load of claptrap and it's our money that they're well. they're spending as well. i don't know what that is. don't even know what that is. i mean, i mean, andrew, i've got to put it to you. >> i've got to put it to you. you is all going on you know, this is all going on under a conservative government. you know, this is all going on undhearconservative government. you know, this is all going on undhear oneervative government. you know, this is all going on undhear oneervativwhich zrnment. you know, this is all going on undhear oneervativwhichzrnryou1. we hear one thing, which is, you know, we're going to have a minister woke and of minister for woke and all of this a minister for common sense. got here sense. but we have got here hundreds of pounds hundreds of millions of pounds going this guff. going to this guff. >> shocked i'm appalled, >> i'm shocked and i'm appalled, frankly , no government, no frankly, no government, no matter power, should be matter who's in power, should be spending taxpayers money on that kind stuff . the british kind of stuff. the british people would never support it. so who's deciding that that amount of money? well it probably is. people lower down. but you know . yeah, absolutely. but you know. yeah, absolutely. and i hope that esther mcvey is listening to this because she's a great minister to deal with the woke stuff . and i'm no doubt the woke stuff. and i'm no doubt that she hears about this. she will take action. but this whole thing, patrick, about equality, diversity and inclusion, the whole thing needs to go from top to bottom. it's not something that the people support. it's not necessary. it's a total

waste of public money. it is. it's a scam. and i want to see the whole thing dumped . and the whole thing dumped. and that's the kind of conservative policy we need for the next general. >> it happened under your watch. that's awful. but it shouldn't. but you know. but that's good. but you know. but that's good. but nobody will trust you under. >> has. >> but it has. >> but it has. >> if was there, it wouldn't. >> if i was there, it wouldn't. but unfortunately people >> if i was there, it wouldn't. but llet rtunately people >> if i was there, it wouldn't. but llet itrnately people >> if i was there, it wouldn't. but llet it go tely people >> if i was there, it wouldn't. but llet it go through people >> if i was there, it wouldn't. but llet it go through peitle have let it go through and it shouldn't happen. >> andy, views this. >> andy, your views on this. i mean, heck of lot mean, it's a heck of a lot of nurses. we be paying for nurses. we could be paying for with stuff. with this stuff. >> well, i mean, yeah, absolutely. it just goes absolutely. i think it just goes back kind of fiscal back to that kind of fiscal mismanagement, the conservatives. in conservatives. but but just in defence don't defence of careful, i don't work for the labour party. don't for the labour party. i don't work labour party. but work for the labour party. but just defence of the re just in defence of the uk. re you for a bit of balance, you know, for a bit of balance, a of balance, you know, a bit of balance, you know, a lot the projects that they do lot of the projects that they do fund kind of future fund from this kind of future leader program are leader fellowship program are very, very useful stuff. you know, biomaterial know, stuff like biomaterial patches health, patches for failing health, you know, prevention, know, zimbabwe hiv prevention, supercharged next bioconjugates for next generation but generation cell therapies. but a lot of the stuff that they fund that can go through, you know, 85 to 90% of it is very, very useful stuff. >> did you get that >> where did you get that percentage >> where did you get that peryou age you just you just to

>> you just you just you just to throw up. well, you know, you know, of percentages are know, 70% of percentages are made you've made up, you know, but you've just i gave a scan just made that up. i gave a scan of fellowship and of the fellowship database and most science and most of it was science and technology based. most of it was science and tecithere|y based. most of it was science and tecithere are ased. of good >> there are a lot of good causes that taxpayers money can be on, but it's not the be spent on, but it's not the government's job to take money out pocket and out of the public's pocket and then out to good causes then dish it out to good causes if they to set up as if they want to set up as charities and get people to donate the money, great people can to all these causes. can donate to all these causes. but i to my constituents but i object to my constituents money being taken out of their pockets and funding all kinds. >> if only. if only we had someone. >> some of them may well be worthwhile. >> if only we had someone who was a member of parliament for the governing party us. you the governing party with us. you know who could could advocate for think know who could could advocate for would think know who could could advocate for would be think know who could could advocate for would be excellent,think that would be excellent, wouldn't wouldn't it, wouldn't it? wouldn't it, andrew? be fantastic. wouldn't it? wouldn't it, anclaw? be fantastic. wouldn't it? wouldn't it, and think be fantastic. wouldn't it? wouldn't it, and think one be fantastic. wouldn't it? wouldn't it, and think one of be fantastic. wouldn't it? wouldn't it, and think one of tother,astic. wouldn't it? wouldn't it, and think one of bother, one. >> i think one of the other, one of other aspects of this is of the other aspects of this is and again, that is seriously just tip the iceberg, i just the tip of the iceberg, i could have done four monologues just the tip of the iceberg, i cotthisiave done four monologues just the tip of the iceberg, i cotthis stuff.one four monologues just the tip of the iceberg, i cotthis stuff. all four monologues just the tip of the iceberg, i cotthis stuff. all right,1onologues on this stuff. all right, seriously, probably seriously, i could i probably will but you really will in future, but you really have looking for this. you have to go looking for this. you really looking for it really have to go looking for it and buried. and you just

and it's buried. and you just think know, how think about the, you know, how quite people are quite a few people are struggling make ends meet struggling to make ends meet in the the the country at the moment. the highest you know, highest tax burden. you know, jeremy there jeremy hunt standing there doing his all this his budget, saying all of this stuff, we haven't got the money. £7 you go. the nhs £7 billion. here you go. the nhs can billion can have £7 billion, £8 billion a to stuff a bit like a year. goes to stuff a bit like this. nana. a year. goes to stuff a bit like thisi nana. a year. goes to stuff a bit like thisi know it's literally money >> i know it's literally money for old rope. and bottom for old rope. and the bottom line that a of money line is that a lot of the money is quite privileged is going to quite privileged people are going people actually, who are going to something to to research into something to make a bit make themselves feel a bit better fact they better about the fact that they are privileged. don't are quite privileged. i don't get really don't. you get it, and i really don't. you know, i have to blame the conservative party who have presided of and presided over all of this, and then obviously we've got a labour government potentially coming the coming in. if you think the conservatives do you conservatives are bad, do you wait comes it's wait till labour comes in? it's not a woke agenda will explode. >> the mayor of london >> not. but the mayor of london do it. say it's do it. you say it's conservatives. of conservatives. the mayor of london spends lot of london also spends a lot of money of stuff. money on this kind of stuff. yeah, that's so true. yeah, but that's so that's true. he it's all of it's wrong. >> all of it. >> all of it. >> you be. would you be in favour of labour cutting back on things the europe, gay things like the europe, the gay porn bill. >> think there should be, you >> i think there should be, you know, regulation on know, a bit more regulation on the know,

the topics that it is, you know, that the is dished out that the funding is dished out on. think a lot of the on. but i think a lot of the stuff, like i said, on, you know, hiv prevention, on cell therapy research is therapy research that is incredibly stuff for incredibly useful stuff both for britain and the international community. i think we should continue funding. >> we should asked >> we should still be asked about is about it, though, because it is elsewhere and you know, what would it to go to would you like it to go to referendum research referendum every time a research proposal goes forward, we should focus before focus on home stuff before we start other people. start giving to other people. i think country in think that this country is in such a mess. have you looked at. >> what mean? all of the >> what do you mean? all of the people studied at people listed studied at uk university such mess university is in such a mess that all these silly that all these little silly little causes decolonising little causes like decolonising sexual violence little causes like decolonising se:higher violence little causes like decolonising se:higher education, violence little causes like decolonising se:higher education, the violence in higher education, the university don't even know the university don't even know the university of westminster is in this you know? this borough, do you know? so what mean home stuff? what do you mean at home stuff? the university of westminster is in that's in this borough. i think that's why research so we why the research was done. so we can know what it means. >> word. >> final word. >> final word. >> word nub >> final word on the nub of this. come romford and this. you come to romford and you constituents if they you ask my constituents if they support for these support the funding for these projects. they would all no, projects. they would all say no, including voters. including most labour voters. >> your government >> so why have your government allowed >> so why have your government all(has be stopped and people >> so why have your government all(ime be stopped and people >> so why have your government all(ime are be stopped and people >> so why have your government all(ime are speaking! and people >> so why have your government all(ime are speaking out.i people like me are speaking out. >> good good. you're >> good, good good. but you're on out. strong on your way out. another strong start to the hour. thank you

very much. there location here. all all right, all right, all right, all right, i leave it for the car i think so. leave it for the car park. implication park. i think the implication here is does it not here isn't there, is does it not help particular chance help your particular chance of getting if you are getting funding if you are tapping into the particular woke zeitgeist of day? zeitgeist of the day? and i think bigger think that's arguably the bigger issue asylum issue coming up, a bogus asylum seeker schoolgirl seeker who raped a schoolgirl cannot his cannot be stripped of his british citizenship. is the british citizenship. that is the unbelievable will unbelievable truth. and i will have the details for you have all the details for you very, shortly . but before very, very shortly. but before i show you the first tomorrow's show you the first of tomorrow's newspapers front pages, could you imagine waiting four days for an ambulance? ready for for an ambulance? get ready for a news exclusive a bombshell gb news exclusive that the dire state of that exposes the dire state of our health service. it's patrick christys tonight. we're only on

gb news. welcome back to patrick christys tonight. still to come. tonight's panel return to help me run through the very first of tomorrow's newspaper front pages. but first, the full scale crisis now gripping britain's ambulance service can tonight be laid bare . shocking new data laid bare. shocking new data obtained exclusively by gb news reveals patients waiting for days for an ambulance when they dial 999. one patient in england, suffering from psychiatric problems, waited more than 103 hours. that's four days, seven hours and 54 minutes for help to arrive . last night, for help to arrive. last night, a whistleblower who works in the trust told us it's never been as bad as this. rising numbers of people are now giving up on local services and dialling 999.

it's leaving us overwhelmed and unable to get the real, life threatening emergencies in time. i've no doubt lives are at risk. each and every day. elsewhere, our investigation uncovered a case of a five hour wait for a patient who had had a stroke, a 2.5 hour wait for someone suffering a cardiac arrest, an unconscious patient who waited 22 hours for their ambulance and then regained consciousness before help was able to arrive. so will labour be able to fix britain's broken emergency services? and who is to blame in all of this right now? to debate this, i'm joined by former labour mp ivor caplin and tory mp andrew rosindell . shapps. mp andrew rosindell. shapps. thank you very much. great to have you on the show, ivor . have you on the show, ivor. look, a labour going to be able to do anything about this. what is plan? you know? is their plan? do you know? >> i think what we need to >> well, i think what we need to do is we need to have a proper look at what the tories have been doing in last 14 been doing in these last 14 years with health service, years with the health service, because kind of remember, because i can kind of remember, patrick, someone said that

patrick, that someone said that they were going to be 14 new hospitals in 2019 as part of the general election that year. >> that was a man called boris johnson. now, this hasn't happened. johnson. now, this hasn't happened . what they've been happened. what they've been doing is they've been adding to various projects and then calling them part of that 40. and all the time that you start that process in hospital, in the nhs, what you land up getting is an inferior project, a product . an inferior project, a product. >> so you're so you're so, so more money for the nhs is what you think would fix this. >> either there needs to be more and proper money with and proper money dealt with properly, of and also to properly, of course, and also to just go on the how much more just go on the how much more just out of interest, how much more money either. unfortunately, don't unfortunately, i don't hold those bottomless pit. i don't i don't know those numbers . okay, don't know those numbers. okay, tonight patrick and i and, you know, i've said this to you before, we're not going to get those sort of numbers until we get closer to a general election, and everyone knows that. but the one thing i wanted

to ambulance if to say. ambulance service. if i can briefly, i think the ambulance service do a great job and just sometimes it goes wrong. like to wrong. and what i would like to know is this wrong now? is know is, is this wrong now? is it wrong a year ago? is it wrong two years ago? again, can we find these details out? >> all right. okay, okay. andrew, look, what i want to know is this why have we got people like nhs fatcats pocketing up to £300,000 a year? they don't ever seem to be hauled before a inquiry to answer for this kind of stuff. it is always people like you or your government, isn't it? >> look, the national health service is a state run monopoly and whatever you do with it, however much money you spend on it and by the way, ivor should know this. the government have actually spent an extra 45% on the national health service since 2018. we're spending more on the nhs today than ever before, but there are still problems with it because it is a monopoly, because it's a

centralised bureaucracy, because the management isn't working as it should. there is a lot wrong with the health service, but the british people want a national health service and rightly so. there should be a health service thatis there should be a health service that is there for everyone. but at the moment we're seeing failures and we've heard about the service . i don't the ambulance service. i don't think as a constituency mp that happened constituency . happened in my constituency. see, i would be absolutely furious. the public pay for a service that they're not getting and it does need reform . it does and it does need reform. it does need change. so what i would like to suggest is that we have fresh thinking about the future of nhs , rather than it being of the nhs, rather than it being a political football between labour conservative. who's labour and conservative. who's going to spend more money? that isn't answer . we need a isn't the only answer. we need a new of managing health new way of managing health services this country. yeah. >> and ivor, why should the pubuc >> and ivor, why should the public have why should the pubuc public have why should the public have why should the public have any faith that more money is going to sort this out? i mean, we've got the nhs looking to spend hundreds of millions it the looking to spend hundreds of millinet it the looking to spend hundreds of millinet zero it the looking to spend hundreds of millinet zero health it the looking to spend hundreds of millinet zero health service it the looking to spend hundreds of millinet zero health service in:he first net zero health service in the world, for example.

meanwhile, we've got people waiting a flipping ambulance. >> first thing and >> well, first thing to say and andrew is right about those figures that he's just used. but of course, covid made a huge difference in the budget used by the nhs in 2020 and 2021, and we won't be repeating that. one would have to say in the next 4 or 5 years. but if labour wins the general election, whenever that election is called, then then what we will have to do is to have a proper look at the whole of the health service to some extent. andrew rosindell, amazingly, is right here that what should do is have what labour should do is have a look at whole and look at the whole system and then decisions about then make decisions about funding, etc. and i think funding, etc. etc. and i think that's what we do because that's what we will do because we're going to have to do that because of the situation that the government finds itself in, in terms of the financial position that the economy is in 14 years, andrew, 14 years in charge of the nhs, someone waiting four days for an ambulance. >> and there are quite a few other cases of this as well, is

a difficult thing for the tories to get around. >> look, i'm not going to defend the that is the problems that the nhs is facing in any government would have issues , certainly have the same issues, certainly because of the pandemic. the health services indeed the whole country was thrown off course and we need to get everything back on track. but the problem is don't have the money that is we don't have the money that we would all like. so we borrowed 400 billion to pay for the lockdowns and the pandemic. a lot of money and we're in huge debt, the biggest debt we've ever been in our history. so it's longer the case, as it's no longer the case, as labour tried to always claim that it's about spending more money. what it's is about money. what it's about is about running a service more efficiently, and we've got a duty to look at this afresh, look at better ways of running health services across the country, and not be ideological about it. and the problem is with the labour party, they don't like anything unless it's state controlled and it's all publicly funded. we have to be broader than that. we have to look at other countries and see how they manage their health

services , are state services, which are not state monopolies like one. we can monopolies like our one. we can do better. and i believe the conservatives need to look at this afresh. >> andrew, for goodness sake . >> andrew, for goodness sake. you know, that's a sort of, a speech from 1978 or 1979. that's not a speech of 2024. and what might be happening in the economy that we're going to inherit, if we are lucky enough to win a general election. when you and your colleagues are brave enough to go to the public of the united kingdom and ask them if they want a general election , which, you know, election, which, you know, please tell news viewers this please tell gb news viewers this evening where is his extra money coming from that we haven't got ? coming from that we haven't got? >> if labour's coming in, spending so much more on the health service, where are you finding it from? because if we haven't got where are you haven't got it, where are you going to? >> i haven't any of that. i >> i haven't said any of that. i haven't said anything about that. to have an that. you don't seem to have an answer any of it. answer to any of it. >> andrew. >> andrew. >> what i've said quite consistently on gb news is that there will be nothing about actual finances until labour can

get to see the situation. >> so we're going to wait until you're in power before we know what you're going to do. is that right? >> this is something that happensin >> this is something that happens in every general election, and you have to wait until you can see all books until you can see all the books and that, and then take and see that, and then take decisions the whole of decisions around the whole of what you inherit as a government. okay. what you inherit as a govso ment. okay. what you inherit as a govso very:. okay. what you inherit as a govso very different position. >> so very different position. >> so very different position. >> fine. i mean that that does mean it doesn't sound like we're going any actual spending going to get any actual spending plans labour until are plans from labour until they are in people say in government. some people say that's people that's fair enough. other people will will be nice. will say it will be nice. it will say it will be nice. it will be nice to know. but all right, both of you. thank right, okay, both of you. thank you. right. we are with you. all right. we are with respect. we we are going to respect. we are. we are going to have there. i'm have to park it there. i'm sorry. i'm trying to cut you sorry. i'm not trying to cut you off. go off. we're gonna have to go right. labour right. former labour minister. i have in there. and tory have a couple in there. and tory mp andrew rosindell. look. thank you much. commenting mp andrew rosindell. look. thank yotthe much. commenting mp andrew rosindell. look. thank yotthe m|day commenting mp andrew rosindell. look. thank yotthe m|day wait commenting mp andrew rosindell. look. thank yotthe m|day wait case,nenting on the four day wait case, a spokesperson south western spokesperson for south western ambulance service nhs foundation trust. mouthful, said trust. that's a mouthful, said we sorry that were unable we are sorry that we were unable to response, to provide a timely response, timely to some patients during this response times timely to some patients during this the response times timely to some patients during this the middle'esponse times timely to some patients during this the middle ofponse times timely to some patients during this the middle of januarynes timely to some patients during this the middle of january 2023 from the middle of january 2023 onward recovered a more onward have recovered to a more stable department of stable position. a department of

health care health and social care spokesperson we are spokesperson said. we are committed people get committed to ensuring people get the emergency care they need under urgent recovery under the urgent care recovery plan £200 million plan. we provided £200 million to ambulance capacity and to expand ambulance capacity and improve response times. we've already seen significant improvements in response times, with average category two responses february over 28% responses in february over 28% faster the same point the faster than the same point the previous year. coming up. how's the antiques roadshow morphed into the antiques woke show ? into the antiques woke show? >> well, i just don't want to value it. i do not want to put a price on something that signifies such an awful business as well. >> find out what all that was about very, very soon. but next, we bring you the very first of tomorrow's newspaper pages tomorrow's newspaper front pages . thick and . they're landing in thick and fast speak, fast as we speak,

welcome back. it's time to bring you the very first look at tomorrow's newspaper front pages . let's do it. start with a

fantastic story on the front of the metro. i'm a bit of an idiot . a clumsy husband has blown £1,000 battling himself to buy an auction painting. he's bidding against himself. this guy bidding against himself. fantastic. okay, we go to the eye. uk demands answers after israeli strike killed seven aid workers. three british nationals, including a former royal marine, are among the seven dead in an attack by the idf. we go to the guardian charity's holac gaza aid after drone attack killed seven staff. three britons among the dead after repeated air strikes on the convoy. we go to the telegraph . pm demands answers telegraph. pm demands answers after israel air strike killed briton sunak. appalled by aid workers deaths and calls for an urgent investigation. they've also got stories there on royal mail probes , barcode stamps that mail probes, barcode stamps that show us counterfeit. all right, they're also they're talking

about smells of the homeless. could bring fines. apparently, the government is embroiled in a row over whether homeless people could be arrested because they smell . so there's that, isn't smell. so there's that, isn't there? presumably the answer to thatis there? presumably the answer to that is no. but anyway, i'm joined by my press pack. gb news contributor nana akua conservative mp for romford, andrew rosindell trade andrew rosindell and trade unionist andy mcdonald, look, we've on yet we've not touched on this yet today am just going to go today and i am just going to go as sweepstake, really on as a quick sweepstake, really on your this, this your views on this, this issue about minister is about the prime minister is demanding after israel demanding answers after israel airstrike kills britons, andrew, if it's all right, i we'll start with you on this. apparently rishi sunak has told benjamin netanyahu he was appalled the netanyahu he was appalled by the killings of three british citizens , he said the situation citizens, he said the situation in gaza is intolerable . i mean, in gaza is intolerable. i mean, as bad as this is, do you think we're at risk of turning our back on israel at all? >> well, i hope not. i'm appalled at what's happening. i'm appalled at all the killings right from the start. you know, remember how this started. and ever since then, a lot of people

have died, i think, unnecessarily. and now we, our own british people are out there helping and they've lost their lives. it's tragic for everybody. but the only way to solve this is for the cause of the original violence to be deau the original violence to be dealt with. and so therefore israel has a right to defend itself. but at the same time, the international community, we need to ensure that pressure is put on those that are funding hamas to stop it. that has to stop. and until that stops, until the terrorism stops, i don't think israel is going to give up . so there will be more give up. so there will be more deaths, sadly. yeah. >> i mean, andy, i'll just go to you on this. so keir starmers time's up, he said, he said it's outrageous, unacceptable and horrifying says this war horrifying and says this war must stop far many must stop now. far too many innocent people have died in this conflict. do you think there's a sense that now the brits have been killed, that i don't know somebody might change, i suppose, when it comes

to our approach to this particular conflict, i think from a diplomatic perspective, yes. >> because i think if three brits and seven aid workers were killed in any other middle eastern country, there would be serious, serious, serious consequences. it just so happens this is israel, which is seen this is in israel, which is seen as westerns, the as the kind of westerns, the westerns in the middle westerns base in the middle east. really something east. i think really something will have to change. the idf have been kind of toeing the line with what of the line with what with some of the actions been doing actions they've been doing recently kind of recently with the kind of offensive southern offensive planned on southern rafah. i think this rafah. and i think this will genuinely , you know, kind of genuinely, you know, kind of change the tone the change the tone between the prime both britain prime ministers of both britain and israel. >> there's something they summoned israeli summoned the, israeli ambassador, nana, i'll come to you on this now. so israeli security officials have said that this is intelligence that this was is an intelligence failure . it's a mistake. i'm not failure. it's a mistake. i'm not sure there's much of an indication that it's anything other than a mistake, really, i mean, ultimately , is this still mean, ultimately, is this still hamas's fault? i mean, the i think it is. this hasn't started in the first place, and it wouldn't happen, i suppose. >> i think it is. it's really tragic that people have lost

their you know, it's their lives, you know, it's awful. but ultimately in awful. but ultimately they're in awful. but ultimately they're in a mistakes happen awful. but ultimately they're in a war mistakes happen awful. but ultimately they're in a war zone. mistakes happen awful. but ultimately they're in a war zone. that's kes happen awful. but ultimately they're in a war zone. that's what appen awful. but ultimately they're in a war zone. that's what warzn in a war zone. that's what war is. you've got people fighting. there are rockets and missiles and could have and everything. they could have even driven over a landmine or something whilst something like that whilst delivering the aid. so are delivering the aid. so there are huge and they would have huge risks and they would have known risks. it's known about these risks. it's absolutely terrible that the mistake happened, but that mistake has happened, but that is and i think it's really is war. and i think it's really i think it's really hamas's fault amnesty to stop firing the rockets , the people funding him, rockets, the people funding him, release the hostages, release the hostages and this will be the hostages and this will be the end of the war. the israelis have said that. so i don't know why they don't get on with it. >> right, let's just shift >> all right, let's just shift it on to, i just a ridiculous story. this absolutely ridiculous story. this absolutely ridiculccoming of failed stories coming out of our failed home keep home office, they just keep flooding appears we flooding in as it appears we can't get rid of an albanian asylum who raped asylum seeker who raped a schoolgirl. so gjin gjergji came over here in the year 2000, claiming to flee war torn kosovo. but after getting convicted of rape 17 years later, it emerged he'd lied

about being kosovan to win refugee status. the home office apparently attempted to revoke his british citizenship, but lefty lawyers decided that would be unfair because evidence of his false identity was initially ignored way back in 2005. yeah, nana. i mean, if we seriously, if we can't deport a illegal lying child rapist. what what hope have we got? >> patrick? it beggars belief. and actually , reading a bit and actually, reading a bit further down, he says, well, i like it here. so, you know, i've got my life now and i've got my family. i bet he does. i bet he does. i'm. i think it's embarrassing the way we've we've behaved the behaved and the rest of the world watching this, which world are watching this, which is all coming here, is why they're all coming here, because they realise that once they here, can then be they get here, they can then be funded challenge us. funded legally to challenge us. if we try and get them. if we try and get rid of them. and reason, there is a and for some reason, there is a there is an industry around this even. lot these people there is an industry around this eve british lot these people there is an industry around this eve british people these people there is an industry around this eve british people who .e people there is an industry around this eve british people who are aople are british people who are facilitating thing . facilitating this whole thing. yeah. and there's a lot of money. >> it is difficult. i wonder how

you feel about this, andrew, because think that the because i think that the government an government does get an unnecessary stick for unnecessary level of stick for this, people don't this, because what people don't seem understand is and i look seem to understand is and i look i it out a fair bit, but, i dish it out a fair bit, but, you know, you guys wanted to get this guy gone . right. and this guy gone. all right. and then there this, like, kind then there is this, like, kind of underlayer of let's just probably deep state. probably call it the deep state. i'm going to go down that i'm not going to go down that rabbit necessarily. rabbit hole necessarily. but this people, there's rabbit hole necessarily. but thisa people, there's rabbit hole necessarily. but thisa lot people, there's rabbit hole necessarily. but thisa lot you3eople, there's rabbit hole necessarily. but thisa lot you can le, there's rabbit hole necessarily. but thisa lot you can do there's rabbit hole necessarily. but thisa lot you can do .1ere's rabbit hole necessarily. but thisa lot you can do . you s rabbit hole necessarily. but thisa lot you can do . you know, not a lot you can do. you know, you've and said, want you've gone and said, we want this i mean, the this guy out. i mean, the similar thing with similar thing happened with abdul tried to get rid abdul ezedi. he tried to get rid of all of a of him twice. and then all of a sudden, know, judges or sudden, you know, judges or lawyers guy lawyers decide that this guy must stay. is there anything our government in this government can do in this situation? yeah. >> we to things >> we need to change things radically in this country for too now, civil servants too long now, the civil servants in office in in the home office in particular, they seem to have gathered and gathered all the power and ministers finish having very ministers finish up having very little . and when they do little power. and when they do try and exercise power, they get thrown . look at dominic thrown out. look at dominic raab, look what tried to raab, look at what they tried to do priti patel. suella do to priti patel. suella braverman did try to sort braverman really did try to sort some of this out, but she then lost her job, didn't the prime lost herjob, didn't the prime minister make the final

decision, whether it's dominic raab, of course. well he shouldn't shouldn't shouldn't have shouldn't have let but the reality let him go. but the reality is that there problem with the that there is a problem with the british establishment. we need to change it. we need to get back actual people we back to the actual people we elect making the decisions. >> but why has it taken you guys so to till now you're so long to only till now you're going. you're saying this? >> not defending . think >> i'm not defending. i think there be change. there needs to be change. we've seen the british establishment. >> you're a member of parliament. that is that that parliament. that is that is that is objectively establishment. >> the same thing. >> it's not the same thing. >> it's not the same thing. >> you're not a member of >> so you're not a member of government. civil servants aren't a member government, aren't a member of government, civil so what's so if civil servants. so what's so if you're not a member of government, you're part you're not a member of gothe|ment, you're part you're not a member of gothe establishment. 're part you're not a member of gothe establishment. so part you're not a member of gothe establishment. so if part you're not a member of gothe establishment. so if you rt of the establishment. so if you just ministers and just members, just ministers and secretaries are part secretaries of states are part of by your of the establishment, by your definition, structure. >> there's a structure place >> there's a structure in place which have to live which all ministers have to live with. then, of course, we with. and then, of course, we have judicial system and the have the judicial system and the echr. and ultimately they have so power as well. so we so much power as well. so we need to be sovereign over our laws. >> you've also got the trade unions though. so the pcs, which are the head of that, that particular organisation, that's

the, he said that they're going to use their power to try and get rid of, overturn the government. so he said that was it. mark serwotka or mark, is it paul or mark? don't know, he paul or mark? i don't know, he said you're the one quoting it, i don't know. >> you asked what do you >> you asked me, what do you what do you what do you just out of interest. would of interest. i mean, would you agree that we should be deporting this? deporting people like this? >> probably. >> yeah, probably. but, you know, i'm solicitor. i'm know, i'm not a solicitor. i'm not barrister. if the not a barrister. if the immigration ruled the immigration tribunal ruled the concern it's someone concern that. yeah, it's someone like is a concern, but like this is a concern, but you've the law you've got to follow the law around it. >> there's industry around it. >> total industry around this. yeah. there's a lot of money yeah. and there's a lot of money being and i being made out of it. and what i want security for the want to see is security for the british i don't want british people. i don't want that person in this that kind of person in this country. and should country. and there should be a mechanism people mechanism to get these people out if they're committing crimes, shouldn't here. crimes, they shouldn't be here. >> one, isn't it? >> it's another one, isn't it? about message does this >> it's another one, isn't it? about really?nessage does this >> it's another one, isn't it? about really? izssage does this >> it's another one, isn't it? about really? i mean, does this >> it's another one, isn't it? about really? i mean, you. this >> it's another one, isn't it? about really? i mean, you know, send, really? i mean, you know, i clearly the moment we i mean, clearly at the moment we just really deport anyone, i mean, clearly at the moment we ju seems. really deport anyone, i mean, clearly at the moment we ju seems. iaally deport anyone, i mean, clearly at the moment we ju seems. i mean,3port anyone, i mean, clearly at the moment we ju seems. i mean,3portcan't ne, it seems. i mean, you can't deport this guy. anyway, a spokesman the home office spokesman for the home office said routinely said we do not routinely karl grey. routinely grey. we do not routinely comment individual comment on individual cases. brilliant well, guys, brilliant well, well guys, anyway, heck anyway, we've still got a heck of a bring you in

of a lot to bring you in tonight's for starters, tonight's show. for starters, rishi scolded rishi sunak got scolded for showing humour. showing a sense of humour. >> no. >> no. >> why not? >> why not? >> why not? >> why is that funny? >> why is that funny? >> sorry. why are you laughing? >> sorry. why are you laughing? >> yeah. look, i'll go into more detail on that, but. yes. now, apparently our prime minister just laughing. his news. was it fair find out when show you fair to find out when i show you the clip in tonight's the full clip in tonight's greatest britain union jack? but first, tomorrow's first, more of tomorrow's front pages and why pages hot off the press. and why the to falling the wheels seem to be falling off over the bbc's antiques roadshow . patrick christys. roadshow. patrick christys. tonight we're on .

gb news. okay. all right. it's time to bnng okay. all right. it's time to bring you more of tomorrow's newspaper front pages. let's do it . i've got the express for it. i've got the express for you. three britons killed on gaza. mercy mission. look, this is leading on most national newspapers, of course, it's an israeli airstrike in gaza that

appears to have killed at least three brits. the sun. sps hero killed in gaza airstrike again. the times outcry at aid worker deaths. three britons among seven killed in israeli airstrike . sunak tells netanyahu airstrike. sunak tells netanyahu that gaza toll is increasingly intolerable. there's also a story on the times pro building voters could lay foundations for labour majority . sir keir labour majority. sir keir starmer is targeting voters who are pro house building in an attack on nimbyism, apparently . attack on nimbyism, apparently. and we go to the daily mail now. three uk forces veterans killed by israeli airstrike . this is on by israeli airstrike. this is on the front. i think i'm right in saying every single national newspaper, actually. they also have picture story which is have a picture story which is jk rowling and it's a column by sarah the women of britain sarah vine. the women of britain are you. so there we are behind you. jk so there we go . so, i'm joined again by my go. so, i'm joined again by my press pack. we've got gb news presenter nana akua. we've got conservative mp for romford, andrew rosindell and trade unionist now unionist andy macdonald. now look, covered all of the

look, we have covered all of the stories that are on every single front already throughout front page already throughout the of this show. the course of this show. so after that two women, after suggesting that two women, sorry, two, two women that they repatriate their own grandfathers african robe woke antiques roadshow expert ronnie archer morgan has returned with some more insufferable claptrap. what shapps ivory bangle here? >> it's not about trading in ivory, it's about trading in human life. yes and it's probably one of the most difficult things that i've ever had to talk about. i just don't want to value it. i do not want to put a price on something that signifies such an awful business. i just love you for bringing it to the roadshow. and thank you so much for making me so sad . so sad. >> it's not our fault she wasn't taking part in the slave trade. she just came and she bought it like 36 years ago for £3 off someone. and now getting

someone. and now she's getting mugged by that guy. mugged off on sally by that guy. when to the british when it comes to the british museum, in museum, are reportedly in private with four foreign private talks with four foreign governments over returning artefacts after receiving repatriation requests. nana your reaction to that episode of the antiques woke show? >> well , poor antiques woke show? >> well, poor woman, she was made to feel so bad for bringing that in. she had no idea what it was. didn't know what it is. was. she didn't know what it is. i this ridiculous, i just find this ridiculous, okay? antiques dealer, i just find this ridiculous, ok.he's antiques dealer, i just find this ridiculous, ok.he's . antiques dealer, i just find this ridiculous, ok.he's. he antiques dealer, i just find this ridiculous, ok.he's. he mightques dealer, i just find this ridiculous, ok.he's. he might ases dealer, i just find this ridiculous, ok.he's. he might as wellaler, i just find this ridiculous, ok.he's. he might as well start so he's. he might as well start to look for another job. really? because lot because there's a lot of artefacts that represent things because there's a lot of athistory,hat represent things because there's a lot of art history, like epresent things because there's a lot of art history, like the�*sent things because there's a lot of athistory, like the slave hings because there's a lot of art history, like the slave trade in history, like the slave trade and other types of slave trade. and in fact, the african slave trade, the chattel trade. slave trade, the chattel trade. slave trade wasn't the first one. there was loads before that. in 1500 bc, there were slave trades of northern and central africa, and the africans were enslaving each other before that. the egyptians, mean, need we go egyptians, i mean, need we go on? white are enslaved on? white people are enslaved each literally no each other. there's literally no race that has not enslaved each other or someone. and in fact , other or someone. and in fact, it's still going on now. so he's he literally he should he should take a look at some of the stuff

he's using, maybe he's using he's using, and maybe he's using things are made by current things that are made by current day slaves. >> i mean, do day slaves. >> andrew. i mean, do you think this the poor this is just i mean, the poor woman wanted valued. this is just i mean, the poor womalook wanted valued. this is just i mean, the poor womalook , wanted valued. this is just i mean, the poor womalook , throughoutalued. this is just i mean, the poor womalook , throughout history well, look, throughout history there's terrible things well, look, throughout history there occurred arrible things well, look, throughout history there occurred throughout|s well, look, throughout history there occurred throughout the world. >> and as nana has said, lots of countries have committed atrocities. and of course, britain led the way in getting rid of slavery. we don't get much credit for that, but it was actually britain that the actually britain that led the way getting rid of that. so way in getting rid of that. so i don't think it's right that we should look at artefacts and antiques and judge them on their origins. they're historical, they're not current. i mean, if they're not current. i mean, if the artefact that he was looking at was, was made by slaves today, he might have a point. >> well, he's probably got some stuff made by today, but stuff made by slaves today, but but things that are coming out of these are their of history, these are by their nature, therefore nature, historical and therefore it's not anyone's to blame. >> it's about just valuing something for the object that it is. >> i mean, is.— >> i mean, you is. >> i mean, you said that antiques shouldn't be judged on their origins. what should they

be judged on then, if not their or|gins? origins? >> antiques? yeah but the value is based on their origin. >> not really . yeah. well, yeah >> not really. yeah. well, yeah it is. it's about there. you know, there is. >> you don't make an emotional judgement about the antique. you simply judge it. you simply judge it or value it. yeah. >> you're if you if you, >> but if you're if you if you, if you came with antiques, if you came with, you know, hitler's to a jewish hitler's pistol to a jewish antiques dealer, they'd probably hitler's pistol to a jewish antiyous dealer, they'd probably hitler's pistol to a jewish antiyou know,er, they'd probably hitler's pistol to a jewish antiyou know, quite y'd probably hitler's pistol to a jewish antiyou know, quite upsetybably hitler's pistol to a jewish antiyou know, quite upset andly be, you know, quite upset and quite emotional. think quite emotional. i think bringing, something bringing, you know, something that's trade to, that's from the slave trade to, you someone with african you know, someone with african heritage not unreasonable for heritage is not unreasonable for them to be upset. >> well, why would that be? look, let's look it here. >> it's not unreasonable. -—— but african people saw their >> but african people saw their own to slaves. so own people to become slaves. so whatever the whatever he's upset about, the bottom he's an antique. bottom line is he's an antique. i that's what was, by i think that's what that was, by the antiques dealer, an the way, an antiques dealer, an african. that's his job. so if yourjob is african. that's his job. so if your job is to value african. that's his job. so if yourjob is to value historical your job is to value historical things, then when you get something you don't like and there's different slave there's loads of different slave trades gone on trades that have gone on throughout then you're trades that have gone on throreallyt then you're trades that have gone on throreally going then you're trades that have gone on thro really going to then you're trades that have gone on thro really going to have you're trades that have gone on throreally going to have much not really going to have much work is work because history is literally wars. >> think anyone's >> i don't think anyone's suggesting cancel antiques. >> i don't think anyone's suggjust|g cancel antiques. >> i don't think anyone's suggjust not cancel antiques. >> i don't think anyone's suggjust not like ancel antiques. >> i don't think anyone's suggjust not like he'sl antiques. >> i don't think anyone's suggjust not like he's allowed s. >> i don't think anyone's su be ust not like he's allowed s. >> i don't think anyone's su be emotional. he's allowed s. >> i don't think anyone's su be emotional. he's allowed s. to be emotional. he's allowed allowed he has his

opinion. >> that's fine. he shouldn't be an antiques dealer. >> that's fine. he shouldn't be an antiques dealer . they should an antiques dealer. they should get this getting a bit too >> this is getting a bit too far. you think it's far. do you not think it's getting bit the top? no. getting a bit over the top? no. let's. worry about what's getting a bit over the top? no. let's. on worry about what's getting a bit over the top? no. let's. on today.y about what's going on today. >> not slavery. >> it's not slavery. >> it's not slavery. >> up hundreds of years of >> dig up hundreds of years of history and then condemn everybody for whatever be everybody for whatever it may be that he was looking at that they own, he was looking at the value. sure. and he didn't he do what he was meant he didn't do what he was meant to he meant value an to do. he meant to value an artefact to make her feel bad to do. he meant to value an art

jackass. all right, here we go. as scramble to remember who as they scramble to remember who they've nominated. nana. who is your greatest britain? my greatest fatima whitbread. because her stance on the >> because of her stance on the union flag, but also because she's such a great ambassador for children who need foster care. she's amazing . care. she's amazing. >> okay. all right. so she's come out and saying that they shouldn't have changed the union flag. this is team gb saying that they'd , well, they'd that they'd, well, they'd essentially a different essentially employed a different company, company , company, a design company, hadnt company, a design company, hadn't they, to to modernise hadn't they, to try to modernise it diversify the flag . it and diversify the union flag. and she's come out against that. >> come out against and >> she's come out against it and quite strongly think quite strongly. and i think she's an incredible ambassador. so. okay andy. go on. oh sorry. >> okay andy. go on. oh sorry. rossendale. yeah. sorry >> what did you call it? >> what did you call it? >> stone cold silence . >> stone cold silence. >> stone cold silence. >> the today's the 42nd anniversary of the start of the falklands war. so i'd like to nominate major general jeremy thompson, who led three commando of the royal marines, a great man who helped to liberate the falkland islands . and i think

falkland islands. and i think that he should be honoured today by becoming gb news greatest briton. >> all right. i tell you what. two, two strong ones there. got another under. >> so i've got gone with amy oakton. she's the bbc radio tees presenter who , you know, held presenter who, you know, held rishi account. you know rishi sunak to account. you know local often you know local journalism often you know because reach plc is kind of because of reach plc is kind of gone toilet recently. gone into the toilet recently. you you see you know, you see nottinghamshire know, nottinghamshire live, you know, whatever all whatever live. they're all rubbish. very good rubbish. but this is very good local holding elected rubbish. but this is very good local to holding elected rubbish. but this is very good local to account.ding elected rubbish. but this is very good local to account. we] elected rubbish. but this is very good local to account. we see cted rubbish. but this is very good local to account. we see wed officials to account. we see we can i think, hear and see it. >> when will there be a general election? >> of course . >> of course. >> of course. >> well, i've answered that question many times in the last few weeks. >> so when be general >> so when will be the general election? give us a date on bbc >> can you give us a date on bbc radio morning, prime minister? >> no, no. why not? is that >> no, no. why not? why is that funny? sorry. why are you laughing? there's way funny? sorry. why are you laugwe g? there's way funny? sorry. why are you laugwe announce there's way funny? sorry. why are you laugwe announce general way that we announce general elections, and it would done elections, and it would be done in and official way. in the formal and official way. >> she's not entitled that. she doesn't a right. mean, doesn't have a right. i mean, he's well, was he's he's not. well, it was he's right, isn't he? i mean, he gets the the handsome the lecture now. the handsome chap lecture chap who delivers the lecture and next to it and stands outside next to it for while, then

for quite a while, and then rishi sunak out and tells rishi sunak comes out and tells you general well, it was you when a general well, it was based on it was asked the prime minister questions. minister your questions. >> it out on twitter minister your questions. >> x it out on twitter minister your questions. >> x and it out on twitter minister your questions. >> x and lotsut on twitter minister your questions. >> x and lots ofon twitter minister your questions. >> x and lots of people er minister your questions. >> x and lots of people were slash x and lots of people were asking general election asking when the general election was be. so think she was going to be. so i think she was going to be. so i think she was her job. and, you was doing her job. and, you know, we do miss the, you know, seldom we do miss the, you know, seldom we do miss the, you know, man. i hope know, the handsome man. i hope to i'm sure we might do we >> well i'm sure we might do we might right. okay. might do anyway. right. okay. today's the greatest today's winner of the greatest britain is fatima whitbread. there go. right. okay, there we go. right. okay, so it's union jackass time now. nana. take it away. >> got be, antiques >> it's got to be, antiques dealer ronnie morgan dealer ronnie archer morgan because handle because he couldn't handle history . and, you know, i just history. and, you know, i just think that the way he made that woman bad for bringing woman feel so bad for bringing in i in something that she. i felt i just felt awful for her. >> she obviously didn't have a clue what it was before you know it, everyone's looking at you going like, well, sell going like, well, did you sell slaves , marjorie, know, and slaves, marjorie, you know, and go who is your go on, andrew, who is your union? jack? >> it's 50th anniversary of >> it's the 50th anniversary of the of the local the introduction of the local government the introduction of the local gov historic: the introduction of the local gov historic counties the introduction of the local govhistoric counties michael our historic counties by michael heseltine, of course, who seemed to make lots of mistakes in his political career. but this is one of the worst because places

like essex were ripped apart and other counties and i think that our historic counties are really important and michael heseltine, i'm afraid, showed no regard for them. and he said he he'd do it again, hasn't he. >> he's doubled down. he wished he'd gone further. >> our historic identity and >> so our historic identity and i'd do it again. >> taken away, ripped apart . i'd do it again. >> taken away, ripped apart. i mean it's caused so much confusion over so many years, people losing their identities and local government being muddled up. and three definitions of counties. we need to restore the historic counties and actually cherish our identity . oh, okay. identity. oh, okay. >> you make i said, well, you make a cracking case. you really do sell it. going under. who's yours, slightly less yours, mine, slightly less controversial this week it's robert on his his robert jenrick mp on his his racist profiling policy that he's put forward. he wants , data he's put forward. he wants, data to be collected on the crime, the nationality and visa status of migrants because they he wants it to inform visa policies going forward . i think if you're going forward. i think if you're to profile visa applications based on other people, that's

wrong. >> can i can i just say, one of the reasons he's doing that is because i actually started a campaign to want this. so am i racist? >> well, do you want other people's crimes to dictate, you know, applications ? know, dictate visa applications? >> the british public have a right to know whether or not an asylum seeker or someone with a pending application has pending visa application has committed a crime. >> there's a difference >> in this. there's a difference between and then informing >> in this. there's a difference betv1policies. and then informing >> in this. there's a difference betv1 policies. and know, nforming >> in this. there's a difference betv1policies. and know, iforming >> in this. there's a difference betv1 policies. and know, if tening visa policies. you know, if ten albanians here albanians commit a crime here and harsher on visa and then they go harsher on visa applications for albanians, that is racist . that's is objectively racist. that's profiling. no, that is profiling. no, that is profiling. that is profiling . profiling. that is profiling. >> but profiling is sometimes necessary. >> well, what what's sometimes profiling is not always necessary. no, it's not, it's never necessary . never necessary. >> we should have done. we should. >> it is never necessary. >> it is never necessary. >> green eyes, today's union jackass, is ronnie archer. morgan. we really shouldn't have done it. we should have done a whole section on that anyway. thank thank you, thank you. thank you, thank you, thank you. headune thank you, thank you, thank you. headline is next. i'll see you tomorrow at nine. >> brighter outlook with boxt >> a brighter outlook with boxt solar, sponsors of weather on .

solar, sponsors of weather on. gb news. >> good evening. here's your latest gb news weather update brought to you by the met office. yes, there will be some dnen office. yes, there will be some drier, brighter weather around across southern parts tomorrow. but first, there's quite a bit of rain to come, driven by an area of low pressure and an associated frontal system that's sweeping up from the southwest, bringing outbreaks of rain for many, though initially tonight there some dry weather there will be some dry weather across parts of northern ireland and northern england, though the outbreaks rain arriving here outbreaks of rain arriving here and eastern of and across eastern parts of scotland, persistent rain scotland, some persistent rain could actually bring some hill snow highest ground snow over the highest ground across the far northwest of scotland. there be a touch scotland. there may be a touch of first thing tomorrow of frost first thing tomorrow morning. otherwise wednesday gets off to a mild, cloudy and rather damp start for many outbreaks of rain, which could turn heavy and persistent across parts northern and parts of northern ireland and southern the southern scotland. through the morning. continue to morning. they will continue to across many northern areas into the afternoon, though, breaking up a little bit across more central and southern parts of

england and wales. turning dnen england and wales. turning drier. few but also drier. a few showers, but also some decent bright sunny spells in which should feel in which it should feel relatively warm, with highs around 16 celsius but markedly colder than this further north. more unsettled weather to come as go through thursday, watch as we go through thursday, watch out heavy outbreaks out for some heavy outbreaks of rain their way from rain sweeping their way from west east across southern west to east across southern parts england, further parts of england, with further outbreaks of rain further north too, and more persistent rain pushing the southwest pushing in from the southwest later and unsettled later on. and the unsettled theme as we head theme continues as we head towards the weekend. could turn very windy, in fact, by saturday, but temperatures rising, get to 20 rising, likely to get to 20 celsius by by that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers sponsors of weather on

gb news. >> at 11:00. here with gb news and the latest news headlines, police scotland said today that j.k. rowling's social media posts on the new laws in scotland about hate crime and the importance of biological sex wouldn't be treated as criminal. the harry potter author posted on x saying, i hope every woman in scotland who wishes to speak up for the reality and importance of biological sex will be reassured by this announcement. and i trust that all women, irrespective of profile or financial means, will be treated equally under the law. well, the new law brought in yesterday aimed at banning hateful comments, but the harry potter author previously said it