in quotation marks, if beijing does not stop supplying russia with military and dual-use technology, chinese foreign ministry spokesman wang wenbin said that the prc opposes the baseless accusations of the united states of america regarding normal sino-russian trade, well he says normal sino-russian trade, let's hear what wang wen binh said. in the ukrainian issue, china took an objective and fair position, made active efforts to promote peace negotiations, and worked for political settlement china is neither the one who created the ukrainian crisis, nor is it a party to it. he never added fuel to the fire, never profited from the crisis and will not accept the blame game. we emphasize china's right to normal. economic and

trade relations with countries around the world, including russia. mr. valery, this visit of antony blinken, a month and a half before the start of the global peace summit, is this one of the ways to convince the chinese side, after all, to consider the arguments of the ukrainian parties and the world community in general, regarding the russian-ukrainian war, it is possible... to adjust the position of beijing, well , to adjust in quotation marks, it is meant, because, well, for beijing, as you know, there is no aggressor, there are two sides, there is some kind of crisis, they talk about it all the time, that is, they don't even say the word war, well , first of all, the position is dishonest, because in part i can agree with the assessment that we have heard now, but the statute in... where, by the way, is china ,

the people's republic of china accepted with the vote of ukrainian ukraine at the time when the seat was transferred the republic of china, now taiwan, the people's republic of china, which is now represented by this spokesman, he forgot it, that is, why such an unbalanced position of attitude, according to the consequences and sanctions regarding the violation of the un charter, this is a dishonest position of china, she did not forget. today, it is in the direction of russia, and they began to say this openly, already publicly, this is a public reaction, it is clear that the position expressed by the united states is more open, well, the position of europe is important here, german chancellor olaf scholz went to beijing , in bilateral relations are important for them, 256 billion in trade between the countries, i am not talking about 800 billion in exports to the usa and china. "if the usa

and europe take this position of china openly, publicly, choose, or you support your vassal russia in illegal aggression against another country, why tell someone fables, who will believe it, everyone knows in rotbez that the resolution was adopted, russia attacked ukraine, what china is telling, to whom it is telling it, it is telling it to putin to please putin, no, they will not fool the world, even a respectable country". a large country like china must adhere to the positions and commitments that they themselves have assumed. therefore, europe and america must say: either trade with us, or continue to play with russia, and such a situation is brewing. i i think, after the g7 discussion, after the visit of seizenpine to france, i think that this will become a public component already, and it should not lead to escalation, on the contrary, i think... that such a clear

position is shared, well, it has not been adopted yet, but it is only on the sidelines, it is being discussed behind closed doors, but when will it come out? publicly, and it will be seen that putin is a loser, and china will also be forced to change its position, of course china does not want to be under pressure, and no one likes it, and of course it is a strong country, it can respond, well , i would like china to be its minnyam... after all, which was used before, calm down, don’t get involved in any such tough confrontations, influence, increase your influence with soft power, there by economic means, it’s more profitable for china, i think they will get everything - after all, this position is more pragmatic, and they will slowly change it their approach, but that’s not all right now, right now i don’t see that they have drastically changed their approach, well, as far as there is... i understand, mr. valery,

now our western partners and putin, they are trying to convince xijin ping to stand or on that side, or that side, or not in russia ... is trying to convince not to interfere in the situation that is developing on the russian-ukrainian front, because putin is going to meet with sidzin pinim for the third time in the last year. xi was in moscow last march, putin was in china in october, and again after the so-called inauguration, he is going to fly to china, and i understand that this is not only a visit that demonstrates that putin is waiting somewhere abroad, but to make his first foreign visit to china and demonstrate to the whole world that he is, at least in in one country, he is welcomed there and not arrested, so what does putin want from sijin pina? china's position

is very serious in this situation, and putin would not be able to continue the war for long if... china took a position according to the un charter, well you see china not only in this regard, let's say, when voting not to place nuclear components in space, not to prepare such components that can be launched into space, he abstained just on the road safety, russia blocked demonstratively, all countries are in favor, russia is blocking, china is silent, well, the world will not be normal like this develop. and china will not be able to win in this game, because it is necessary to have a reputation in order to be a center of influence and develop its influence, as they want to take the first positions in the future, without reputation, without respect for the country, not only her strength

but nothing will happen to her behavior, so i think that putin is going not only because, and rather not because he needs to go somewhere... to go, that, well, you are right, that he is not arrested there, and also and the pictures will be beautiful, but all the same, he is going, vasal is going to sezoren, well, it’s just unambiguous, by the way, he is already telling china this in direct text, eh, putin is forced to swallow, what else can he say, but china is also silent accepts the following formula, that is, the formula that a vassal or subordinate country under china has already been formed. in the world, and therefore he will go to ask for this additional help, of course, will ask for more, and there are certain fears in this, i understand the united states, so that china does not actively supply

weapons, just to russia, well, there are, in principle, and sanctions have already been imposed on some companies that provided pictures from the field from the front, which gave space. i mean pictures, and including some dual technologies for dual purposes, the same chips, but in general, the facts of such evidence that china was supplying equipment there of some kind of equipment, there is no such thing, so in the principle is being talked about now first of all, and there are levers of influence, there are levers of influence, really, i don't think that it is necessary to put pressure on, somehow it is necessary'. ready to show the loss of such a position, and it will be done, i already said, as soon as there are successes on the part of ukraine and our partners, then china will be forced to change its position, no one wants to be with the losers, and the only thing that china considers

strategically, even and this russian war against ukraine in the context of rivalry with the united states, first of all, this is openly recorded in the documents of the united states, in documents of china. well, this is the story that, to be honest, is not very favorable for ukraine either, we have to understand that in this two-polar world, well, obviously we will have to take a position, and this position is clear, you already mentioned how the un gatekeepers, when considering the resolution on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. in space, how china sided with russia, i will remind our viewers that russia vetoed the draft resolution of the un security council against the proliferation of weapons, in particular nuclear weapons in outer space, and for the document

introduced by japan and the united states 13 out of 15 security council members voted for america, only russia spoke against it, and china abstained. jake sullivan, advisor to the president. the united states national security advisor said that russia's position in the un security council confirms the suspicions of the united states that russia is developing a new satellite that carries a nuclear device, to quote mr. sali. placing a nuclear weapon state in orbit would not only violate the outer space treaty, but would also endanger vital services of communications, science, meteorology, agriculture, trade and national security that all satellites provide to societies around the world, we have heard putin publicly state that russia has no intention of placing nuclear weapons in space, if that were the case, russia would not have vetoed this resolution. mr. valery, the fact that russia has blocked this resolution, does it mean that

putin is ready to continue playing to raise rates and provoke, well, it means to invite the american side to negotiations, just to start some negotiations with the united states of america , to start with him to talk as equals, and in particular about the future. space regarding weapons, nuclear weapons in space? well, i want to say, there is a quote, the treaty exists, so it must be implemented, so it is strange, before that the russian leader called on the united states not to do this, and when this benju was asked, why are you blocking the resolution in the development of the treaty, he said, and we mean not to put anything in space at all, well, well, that is, as always , i will cover a lie with a lie, maybe everyone will swallow it, yes,

this is a game to leave some playground, where russia wants to discuss on an equal footing, they will play along, because at one time the soviet union had already played along, when america , you remember, this initiative, under reagan, it was just, well, somewhat bluffing, because the costs are huge, then only for the first stage it is 20 '. dollars were immediately available, and the soviet union then bought into this story, soy, all these elements began, the soviet union also began to chase all this, as a result, this is one of the factors that led to the economic collapse and the fall of this country in general of the soviet union, the truth is quite artificial created, so they play along, the americans may react in a different way, they will tell about the fact that some preparation is already there, they

will not wait, they will simply launch a dozen there, as they can do, and then ask putin what you wanted there, about what did you say, but let's talk now, because that's what russia does, it slips in somewhere, and then it doesn't know how to push out everything that it has put in, that is, it's their style, they don't think about the consequences. and therefore they have a lot of such initiatives to discuss here are the serious problems of the world, nuclear problems, in order to cover up with this, well, some agreement of the united states to sit down at the same negotiating table, they generally say that all these issues of global security must be considered in a complex way, that is, roughly so, you don't want us to take out a nuclear satellite, come on... we have a free hand in ukraine, well, it's bullshit, that is, it's delusional, it won't work

that way. another point that our western partners are currently recording, in particular the minister of defense of germany, boris pistorius, he stated in an interview with ard that russia has already produces more weapons than it needs to wage war against ukraine and warned against further military ambitions of the russian dictator. let's listen to what he said. russia's military economy was streamlined, and now most of the weapons produced no longer go to the front, but end up in warehouses. one can be naive and say that he is doing it out of caution. as a skeptic, i would rather say in this case that he is doing it because he is planning something, or already has something in mind. well, that is, russia is on the path of an arms race, absolutely. identical behavior was demonstrated by the soviet union, at the end of the life of this

great monster country, there was also an arms race, and the soviet union tried to prove to the whole world that it could compete with the great leaders of the world, which actually led to the collapse of the soviet union , there is not only this factor, but it is one of those factors that a lot of money... was spent on armaments, can we expect a similar scenario in the case of russia? well, i don't question what the defense secretary said germany, only... i have a counter question, and where to count those shells that north korea supplies, millions, and where to count iranian drones, strike drones, that is, what does it mean for warehouses, well, if for warehouses, then why do they ask of those countries, well, it’s a bit strange, maybe something

is going to warehouses there, but i saw that a strategic bomber flew on its own and not... to everyone’s warehouse, and they won’t build it quickly now, that is, i don’t think so, what is this approach, it is widespread, yes, that is, so widespread that it exists right in russia the opportunity to not use a lot now, why do they then use rockets that arrive in ukraine, the release is literally fresh, they just made it and release it, then you put it together, they probably had... that is, i have some doubts about the scale of this stockpiling, er, nevertheless, in the future it may be, that is why i insist that it is necessary to take steps now, when russia has not yet reached such a level of really adjusting

its production, when there is nothing to replace some components, when they are still what make up... as a designer of two planes there or one of three, that is, that is why even now it is necessary to concentrate efforts as much as possible, on our part, help, not to give the opportunity to stretch it into the future, then here i see a basic problem between our strategy and of our partners, they still look somehow to the future years, well, the future years are such a story, you know, russia... as an authoritarian country with a strict police regime, they can squeeze the last juices out of their citizens there and until the last spend on militarization, we can hardly have such an approach, although then it is necessary, if our partners talk about such an approach, then they should also transfer their production to

a military system, as rear rear support, because we cannot here... here there is a lot to do under the impact of ballistics, these capacities are located, well, we need to do production, of course, but we also need to strengthen what our partners are doing, but it is not always carried out according to the plans that are predicted, so, well, only one signal from this is all i see that is needed this year make maximum concentration. resources, efforts and actions in order to prevent putin from implementing his plans, and not to analyze, by the way, rather dubious conclusions that russia is there, it will get stronger now, they actually already spend more than 7%, it is officially on war gdp, and

this, i will remind you, the soviet union collapsed when 15... lost that last year, that is, i think that things will not be very good there in the next period, if, let's say, it used to go to development, exports, for example , weapons, now russian weapons failed in ukraine, you see, india was already skeptical about airplanes, and they will already have sagging exports, that is, it does not translate into profits, it is just consumables for the front, so the economy of even the military system is not... developing, it all expenses, so the situation in russia will also worsen, it will worsen now, i mean at the end of this year, the beginning of the next, much worse than in 2-3 years, so let's go to what the minister of defense pistorius said , it should be added, i would add one more phrase: until russia can

stockpile on such a large scale, it is necessary to take proactive steps. sir valery, the european parliament on april 23 supported the extension of the agreement on duty-free trade with ukraine with additional safeguards to protect european farmers. 428 deputies voted for this decision, 131 were against, 44 were received, among the 131 deputies who were against, as many as 33 are representatives of poland, the opposition party law and justice and the head of the groups of the civic platform and the polish people's party. mykola knyazhytskyi, people's deputy of ukraine and co-chairman of the verkhovna rada group on inter-parliamentary relations. with the republic of poland believes that in the future, due to imaginary economic threats, poland may block accession to the european union. what

he writes, he writes about the fact that the polish government plans to appeal to the european council with a demand to extend the embargo on ukrainian agricultural products until june 25. if we add that to this the actual stoppage of ukrainian transit. products of the territory of poland, then a conclusion is suggested himself, despite assurances of friendship and assistance to ukraine, poland continues to wage a trade war against ukraine and may actually block the integration of our country with the eu. our task is to strengthen, change and have poland as the biggest ally in european integration, as well as to ensure that the poles do not perceive us as competitors for the european. to whom the market, and were and will continue to be lawyers of ukraine in the eu? no way, they will be objectively, not just competitors,

er, they will be one of the main ones in the negotiation process, the most difficult in negotiations on the agricultural sector, that is, it is obvious, and these will be very difficult negotiations, er, is it possible to block in this way... accession to the eu, well, accession to the european union is , after all, a whole complex of issues, but delay the discussion , yes, to make it long, yes , moreover, this is how france acted, i remember, and germany partially, in relation to products, just livestock, there were also certain discussions there, because then poland was considered as the largest country that claims to spend more from brussels. and now ukraine will be such a country it is necessary to look at it calmly in peacetime, but now, why do we perceive it so emotionally, we are,

well, in a completely different situation, the war, and here every such loss of ukraine, including its resources, i will remind you that the war, directly on salaries to support the armed forces, ukraine spends. to the ukrainian budget, we are helped by funds that go precisely to pay salaries there, but in this part we arm the production with our own resources and provide it, and every billion hryvnia lost in this way there, it obviously immediately cuts off a lot of opportunities for protection not only ukraine, but also poland, here and there these issues can only be connected at the level, let 's say consultative. of the committees of the presidents of poland and ukraine, recently serious steps have been taken by president duda in washington there to

lobby for our interests, now prime minister tusk also made it clear that this whole blockade will still go uh, as i understand it, the search for some ways, that is, the problem will be, it will not decrease. economic competition, economic problems, these are all problems, they will only ripen, but eh, well , a solution has been found, the same poland in its time has also found france and germany, well, we will find the same, the main thing is that poland does not face the problem of missiles, ballistics on warsaw, that is the most important thing for us and for them, now the priorities must be set correctly, if even somewhere to give us the opportunity to legally make money somewhere on... on certain advantages, then this will be reflected in greater security for poland, but, unfortunately, many people in domestic politics do not think like that and play on such populist

slogans, well, i hope european the approach of prime minister tusk and the fact that they will still manage to show the strength of the government in their own, that the government can close these issues and find a good formula for interaction with ukraine. in the end, if we press like this, we will reorient all the routes to other countries, and then poland will simply lose even from, well, it will simply lose from this, and accordingly, if the routes there are lost, then polish exports to ukraine will also decrease, so that's all, you know, it's a two-way street, somewhere they block us, and then we have to and poland, calculate the losses. mr. valery, one more question this week is... consular restrictions for ukrainians abroad, a lot has already been said, many things have already been commented on, and of course, those who are abroad

are obviously nervous now. someone legally, someone illegally, cannot perform actions, consular actions, in your opinion, is this decision fair in the conditions of war, is this a violation of constitutional rights, is this a decision that was simply necessary under the current conditions, and considering to the reaction we got there germany said that ukrainians whose passports will expire, they will receive temporary documents, and poland will consider the issue of the possible return of ukrainian conscripts to ukraine, and lithuania will look at the poles, how the poles will act in these conditions, taking into account your extensive diplomatic experience, what do you say about this decision, it is not an easy one, this decision is clear, and of course there are many sides to this issue, but... eh, can you

dispassionately say that well will succeed return people, mobilize and involve them in the war in ukraine, will this cause certain obstacles in the return of people to ukraine, well , what about germany's position, they say, you stay, we will issue you temporary passports, or temporary documents with which you can live, let's separate what is called flies from meatballs. that is, what happened to us. we adopted a new law, changes to the legislation on mobilization, which have not yet entered into force. according to the constitution, in principle, 60, it seems, the fifth article of the constitution regulates what rights in the period military emergency may be

limited and which. cannot be restricted, even during martial law. this position is subject to the rights that can be served, only. and now the most important thing: the law, the law, everything, no bureaucratic, subdepartmental acts, commissions, have any force here, so absolutely, calmly, we are waiting there on may 18, we would wait. then the law comes into force, and now of course it is fair, the conditions are the same for ukrainian men here, they renew, according to the changes to the legislation, renew their data military officers, the same thing is done abroad, that is, on the basis of this, it is already issued whether passports or others, consular actions are taken, the problem arose that it was

stopped. first of all, it was done illegally, sometimes they say, can it be said that way, it can be said, because it is a conclusion, well, i can from my point of view subjectively, maybe i will say, but after all, i also have a legal education, and i worked as a deputy minister, i claim that this is an illegal assignment that was received, but it is not necessary to blame everything only on the ministry of foreign affairs, because these queues you see, this is the service, and the dp document, it is not the mfa at all, it is not the ambassador at all. this is not the consulate, the embassy and consulate have set up many places, especially in poland, set up electronic queues, they don’t have these queues like this, the cdp document they said, by the way, we have technical problems and that’s all, technical problems, so this is a game without warning, suddenly found people who were taking tickets, wanted to take their passports, and then suddenly they were cut off, like in

one day, that's absolutely. abnormal approach always planned there was an announcement in consulates and embassies a week before, prepare for the situation, there will be changes from such and such a date, that is, it could be done, the ministry of foreign affairs explained, some technical transition is needed there to prepare for the implementation of the law, well, that’s it, you know, yes, i understand, everyone needs more time, shut up, but sorry, the law is not yet in force, there is already a transitional one... why was this not in the law itself, that it comes into force from the moment of publication, precisely in relation to this issue, and the others, why weren't they broken like that, the law would have it defined and no one would pay such attention now, now and now the question, and for what purpose was this done, here i will tell you, i do not have an answer, because i can see further how

this discussion is going on... the government makes the decision, which it cannot.