[000:00:00;00] eh, these countries felt the power of america, that america can implement difficult questions, because striking is not difficult, then what to do after striking, occupying gas is not difficult, but what to do after gas will be occupied, that is, the father of the issues that are in the constant attention of the administration of the united states of america, and without which it is not possible at all. possible to resolve any conflict in the middle east. today, vladimir putin once again repeated that the ukrainians seem to be selling weapons to the middle east, however, for some reason he mentioned the taliban, although the taliban are in afghanistan, not in the middle east, but he has problems with history, with geography, he constantly talks about the fact that those weapons that come to ukraine end up on

the middle east, and this is this fake about the fact that there are weapons... walking from ukraine in the middle east, it is quite actively replicated by the russian mass media, but no fact has been established yet, what do you think, what is the purpose in this case, putin is pursuing, so that to any conflict or to any pogrom that is happening either in russia or the conflict in the middle east, it is necessary to involve ukraine, because he wants the destruction of ukraine. and does everything so that the ukrainians are at fault for everything, pay attention, for example, in the zero years, when the war with the chechens was going on, the russians always blamed the chechens for everything, on television, in propaganda, elsewhere, just now the object of hatred has changed, in the grand scheme of things nothing has changed, they will still look for

the culprits, and this is at the beginning... it was the jews, then there were poles, jews, americans, germans, ukrainians and so on, that is, by and large, they will always find an excuse and a reason to blame someone else, and since this entire empire lives and is fueled by hatred, for them, it normal state, they just can't imagine themselves any other way, sir. igor, if we have already mentioned these pogroms that took place in dagestan, in makhachkala on october 29, what do you think was the reason for this departure of dagestanis to the airport in makhachkala, if we put aside the fact that, in principle, russian society, it is under constant pressure that they have to hate someone , they have to hate someone, for 20 years

russian television... tells about the bad ukrainians, nazis, fascists, and the bad americans, well actually, is this a consequence of the fact that this jinn, who was in a russian beach, that he simply broke free and that a plane that flew from israel fell under the handout here and they were looking for jews in order that these jews, well, i don't know, whether to kill or what they wanted to do there is not known, because the jews did not arrive. by this plane, what according to you is happening in russia, to what extent what happened in makhach kali, how widespread can it be in the entire territory of the russian federation? it's hard to say, i think that after all, let's understand that the northern caucasus is a specific, specific region, where , well, a rather powerful islamization of this

region took place, and accordingly, to a certain extent, they associate themselves with those events that happen in the gas, that is, they are involved, emotionally involved in this conflict, and in parallel with this, you are absolutely right, if we if we talk about the culture of hatred, then without a doubt, russia needs it, otherwise they simply cannot maintain society in such a state of mobilization, but at the same time , they cannot always channel this hatred, that is, from time to time this hatred flows through other channels and already there , the objects of this hatred are completely different groups, people and the like, this is not the first time, well, if we are talking about inside russia, then inside russia there are also whole groups that, in the same way,

are directed at in the same way, yes, that is. and sex minorities, including representatives of the opposition, liberals, i.e. here, jews - this is only through whom they will go, in this case. it is just possible that this is not the most pleasant case for moscow from the point of view of political consequences. mr. igor, today there was information that zelensky may visit israel next monday or tuesday, and the preparations for israel seem to be in full swing, and of course, this visit will be a visit of support for ukraine and israel, with the beginning of a big war rather difficult relations were between ukraine and israel, israel was more focused on itself and on relations with the russian federation, of course, in the current situation, the fact that

what is happening in the middle east, and putin's attempts to act as such a world leader all the time, in the middle east, what do you think are the prospects for bilateral israeli-ukrainian. relations, can they acquire, new development and gain, can we gain from this experience a little more than we have had so far, you know, i 'm skeptical, i think that under the government of bibi netanyahu, it is unlikely that we will have any major positive developments, i'm not sure this visit will add us bars in the middle east. and how the development of events in the middle east will affect in general, because this has been discussed a lot during the last month , starting from october 7, how the development in the middle east will affect the attention,

the world's attention, to what is happening on the russian-ukrainian front, is different versions, biden says that, in fact, aid should be given to both ukraine and israel, but the focus of attention... will it be shifted only to israel, and will ukraine not lose from this? the longer the conflict lasts, the more severe the consequences, the more attention will be paid to this conflict. this is an axiom. could there be another point e, war, or in a military conflict on the world map after the near east, because some say that it could be north-south korea, some say that it could be in africa, some kind of war or taiwan , you believe that what is happening in ukraine, what is happening in the middle east, what can happen in another part of the world, that these are elements of one

plan for a major global war. i share the opinion about the opposition that exists between authoritarian countries and democracies, and it is so. but the perception is that far from all democracies have understood that the confrontation continues, sometimes some democracies try to live in such a comfortable warm bath, where you can actually, not bad, make a living at the expense of autocracy, there is a bipartisan commission in the congress that came to the conclusion that the united states of america will not pass. will go to war, or there will be a conflict between, a military conflict between russia, the united states of america and

by the united states of america and china, it is predicted that it will be the year 27-35 , the chinese seem to be there too, well, they are going to fight for taiwan, there, and it dates back to the year 27, do you think it will still be possible to hold from... these conflicts, because these conflicts will have much greater consequences for the world than those that we are witnessing now and the participants that we are, well, you know, it seems to me that the situation, for such a long-term perspective, is not at all chances, to be clear, i think that the team working on the war with russia is better helped ukraine, which is already at war with russia, and then, in principle, their predictions that the americans will fight, fight there in 1937, will simply be unnecessary, the same applies

to china. thank you, mr. igor, this was igor simivolos, the director of the center for middle eastern studies, friends, we are working live on telekanaluso, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us on these platforms, please like this video , take part in our vote on youtube, today we ask you about whether are you ready for a long-term war, from russia, yes, no, please give a clear answer , or write your comments under this video, we are interested to know your opinion, then we will be in touch with a political expert, people's deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation, volodymyr tsybulko, mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, i am glad to see you on our air. congratulations, congratulations, today there was another statement from dmytro kuleba, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, about what zelensky is considering. as

an option for holding elections in the spring of 2024. in an interview with skynews, he said that we are not closing this page, the president of ukraine is considering and weighing various pros and cons. he added that holding elections during a war with russia would cause unprecedented problems. that is, the elections will obviously create problems, but zelensky's team categorically does not say. about the fact that we will not hold these elections, let's end the war, as a result, we will already look at how to distribute this power there, what do you think, why and for what the ruling team is currently promoting the topic of possible elections in 2024, well, here is a very important point, last sunday parliamentary elections were supposed to be held in ukraine, but because of the war, for some reason the idea of ​​holding parliamentary elections...

does not come to the heads of the bank heads, that is, the parliament works according to the principle of continuity of power, and this is just a reminder of that , that we have a parliamentary-presidential republic, that is, whether we have a president, whether he is or not, his term ends on march 31, and the bank is very much scratching its head, how would they cling to power for... the future, but how to get involved, elections must be held, so why then does the bank have a double standard, why uh, let's say this, the impossibility of holding parliamentary elections does not bother them, but the presidential elections bother them, because it is a question of their personal fate and their personal security, a lot out of sight, well, from zelensky's assistants. services

understand very well that they will have to work quite seriously with law enforcement agencies after completing their work at the bank. well, here is one more point, let's explain to our viewers what, if, the term of office of the verkhovna rada for people's deputies ends, then the next deputies acquire their powers, or those deputies who are there, resign their powers when a new parliament is elected, and in the version with the president, it is clearly written there that he must serve the people for five years, and to leave, that is, if zelenskyi is not elected in the spring of 24, then our country should obviously have an acting president, and the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, ruslan stefanchuk, is

that right? mr. sergey, everything is correct, but here, the main question is whether there are conditions for holding truly democratic competitive elections, there are no such conditions, and the second question is, if there would be such conditions for holding competitive elections, is zelensky confident that he will win these elections , the question is also open. therefore, despite the fact that he is one of the leaders, well, let's say, trust, for today, but this is the result of the strict control over the media, the complete elimination of the opposition from the media space, that is, in our country, the authorities have come up with such a scheme, when they pay for their telethon the whole society, only they show

the people he needs on this telethon, not representatives. of all strata of society, including the opposition, for some reason they have warmed the pro-moscow opposition in their ranks and now , no matter how much european solidarity is fighting to remove opzh deputies from all levels, it is very difficult, for example, in the kyiv regional council they managed to do it, in the kyiv city council it is it was not possible to do it, well, it was not possible to do it in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, you have to give credit, yes. look, there are no elections yet, but one candidate, potential, two, there are potential ones, it is zelensky himself, it is clear that he is interested in extending his powers while he is on... the rating and there are still no questions, but why, why this way and why exactly not otherwise, and there is another person, this is oleksiy aristovych , who announced this week that he will necessarily run for the presidency of ukraine, he even made public his mini-program, which is very

short, very funny, for everything good against everything bad, in principle, well you as a person who has experience in preparation, including pre-election programs of presidents, you, you, can assess aristovych's potential, his program, and why he has announced this again now, given that the security service of ukraine is investigating the arrester's activities, the secretary of the national security council oleksiy danilo stated this, he said that that the service is working on the arrestee, but quick results should not be expected. first of all, if the service is working, then it should interrogate those persons who appointed arestovych to the post of freelance adviser, whether these persons have already been interrogated, this is the first, second, the political leader and presidential candidate, this is not, the speaking head

from tv or from youtube, it is a party network, it is political sponsors, it is public associations that support one or another candidate, which of these resources, media resources, or what resources, apart from parasitizing on media resources, does the bank have today, arrestees, the fact is that when the bankers are terribly offended that the opposition called them authoritarians, now a native of the bank and an arrestee call them authoritarians, this is very reminiscent of the post-stalin period, when she could not, for example, from the prisoners of the stalinist concentration camps a figure would appear who would lead the soviet union, uh, the soviet union could only be led by a figure from stalin's closest circle , so when they played with winston

churchill, they forgot a little that they almost molded winston churchill stalin and now, under the skirts of stalin pops up, well neo stalin, pops up, aristovych, one can even say that he is a little khrushchev, a new khrushchev, because in terms of style, he, he, he is very funny, because khrushchev used to amuse stalin and hopak danced, and told jokes there, well aristovych is also behaving a little like khrushchev now, the only thing is that he has now combined khrushchev. well, and some such, well, style, for example, of the people's labor union, once a part of the opponents of the bolsheviks, the russian nationalists fled, in europe and in france they molded such a people's labor union, a nationalist association, therefore, but, arestovich, in his own

, well, statements and, creative submissions, or can we say, even aesthetic... preferences, he is rather a russian nationalist, not a ukrainian one, that's what the comedy is, that is, they are simultaneously trying to trick us under the guise of of zelensky's opponent, a russian nationalist, it's funny, but against the background of such trembling of aristovych, even zelensky looks like a completely respectable politician, that's the point of this. technology, danilov, by the way, was asked about the fact that, does he understand that arestovych was actually created and legitimized by president zelenskyi's team, to which the secretary of the national security council said, we are not the president's office, i do not interfere in the work of the president's office, i do not i am recruiting there and i don’t

know where these advisers come from, well, such a rather sharp statement from danilov, considering how did danilov get there too...' well, there are many questions for danilov in the current situation, mr. sergey, i remember the soviet reprise, such that here we play, here we don't play, and here we wrap the fish, and it reminds me a lot of this ambiguous banking, very similar to the story with the investigation, the case of the same, kulinich. when it is suddenly announced, even at the level of the national security council, that we have a network named after sivkovich, there are searches at 30 locations, so immediate assistants... hetmantsev, not a single hair of him is involved in this investigation

fell, the same now with arestovych, that arestovych is such a banking opponent, he is mixing things up with various substances, zelsky personally, so wait, what financial resources and organizational resources arestovych can rely on in the event of running for the presidential elections, except bank account, he has no other resource, none. and i sometimes get the impression that zelenskyi is being intimidated by arestovych so that he listens a little, well, to the same thing, for example, yermak or someone else. as you said, mr. volodymyr, it is pro-russian nationalist, arestovych, taking into account what has been happening in ukraine over the last two years, with the beginning of the great war, in ukraine, do you think there is still a pro-russian electorate left, that is,

whether there are many voters, because we know that in the east, south, somewhere and in general in ukraine, somewhere he was previously estimated at 25, somewhere at one time he was oriented, the party of regions was oriented, well, it somehow took 34 in the elections , it seems to be a percentage, then, then viktor medvedchuk from opzh traveled to this electorate, there oppositional form, now, do you think there is the potential that would allow the arrestee, if not to become the president of ukraine, to create her own russian bloc, and with this russian bloc to enter the verkhovna rada, it all depends on whether they are ready former party networks, well opzzh, to join, or, for example, a party network of the same sharia, that is... it is not enough to have an ideology or, speaking head, you need to have organizational structures in order

to participate in the elections fully, and finances, finance can be obtained from the bank and for bankua to collect really, well, part of the electorate loyal to the uocp, part of the sharia electorate, because the sharia electorate has nowhere to go now, only under arrest, and a part of the opzh, of course, everything else, it is from seven to 13%, it will depend on how the hostilities end, what, if it is a draw, conditionally speaking, then all this pro-russian scumbag, it will lean against the wall and it will begin to manifest its certain worldview position, if it will impress... such a victory for ukraine, so to speak, and for democracy,

then part of these people won't even risk it, well to demonstrate and manifest one's inner nature, it will quietly disperse in some gray electoral zones , and we will still try, well, to join someone who wants to have at least some guaranteed representation in the parliament, today, mr. volodymyr, except for kuleba and the arresting officer, whom everyone is discussing , in social networks, at least, there were a lot of statements from the mouth of vladimir putin, and pseudo-historical statements, let's start statements about the beginning of a full-scale invasion, what what did he say again, well, he keeps saying it, but let's listen again. we had no second choice. thank you very much, thank you, because before making a decision,

the machine will open, you need to think, and is it possible to do without it? no, unfortunately, this could not be done, why? because we have already been attacked, but now you are talking about the fact that these are our, as it were, new, but old territories, our historical territories, people lived there in these territories, our all subsequent events have shown, colleagues... they only said about it publicly, they considered themselves part of russia initially, but they were attacked in 2014 , well, putin said another nonsense about ukraine, he repeated more correctly, about the fact that ukraine was not part of the russian empire, it was formed only under soviet power, well, it is him all the time repeats, although it must be said that the concept of ukraine is used in the geographical sense of the 17th century, and before the formation of the ussr there was a ukrainian people 's republic and 5 years before the formation of the ussr in

the 17th year, so, as you think, its permanent . an attempt to retell the story his way all the time and we see that he interrupts the applause there in the hall, how long will these historical myths exist in russia, which putin has been creating for the past 10 years, well , the whole comedy is that for a longer time putin was called a legist, that is a person who relies on the law, or at least leaning on the law, a person with an alleged legal education , that is, he is a lawyer, supposedly, but he is looking for justification in this war not on the legal plane, because there is no legal justification for this war, in history it is still it looks funnier,

that is, this is evidence of complete helplessness, intellectual, moral, ethical, and ultimately statist, because putin, talking about the fact that he had no opportunity not to attack, forgot that he attacked in violation of international law, that he, that russia was conducting operations against ukraine and trade war in violation of international law even before this bloody war, until 2014, the desire to project force on ukraine always came from moscow, and here the time will come when some of the major statesmen of the era of kuchma and yanukovych will still have to be questioned about how they passed interviews before appointments to positions with whom they came to moscow, that is, the majority of officials, there was a time when most officials had to demonstrate loyalty to moscow, and

now in the verkhovna rada , the monobial yuriy boyko appears as a reliable partner, i want to remind you that it is not boyko from medvedchuk was flown to moscow, let’s say, to receive a letter or letter of direction, or a label, that’s what the comedy is, and this thinking remains, it’s just that history has changed, historical circumstances have changed, and putin is waiting for zelensky to come and ask he is allowed to rule ukraine, well, either they are waiting for the tsar who was assassinated in crimea to be resuscitated, and either , or, again, yanukovych will be brought in, or murayev will change the government in ukraine. we will put an end to this, mr. volodymyr, thank you for the conversation, it was volodymyr tsibulko, political expert, people's deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation, friends, we are working live on

the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those , who is now on youtube, please like this video because i see a lot of people watching our broadcast, likes are not many unfortunately, please do it because this video will be trending on youtube, i hope you support this video with your votes and participate in our voting, during the program we conduct a survey, we ask you whether you are ready for a long-term war with russia, yes 56. voted at the moment and 44% no, that is , a little more than half are ready for a long-term war, but 44% of those , who are watching now live on youtube, are not ready to long-term war with russia. friends, i will put an end to this, i will meet with you on monday at 20:00, from monday , november 6, the verdict will be issued in

a two-hour format, starting from the 20th. and until the 22nd, that's why i say goodbye until monday, goodbye, congratulations, it's news time at eter espresso, kateryna shirokpoyas works with you. head of the european commission , ursula funderlein. arrived in kyiv, she and the president will discuss the path of ukraine's accession to the eu and financial support. the european union will continue to make russia pay for its aggression, ursula wrote fondern in his social network. also the head