[000:00:00;00] and precisely with regard to china, how russia plays with words for which there is nothing, sydenpin comes to putin, they sign a joint statement in which it is clearly stated that all nuclear states must not deploy nuclear weapons from outside their national territories and must withdraw their nuclear weapons deployed abroad within a few days after this statement, putin said in an interview that by july 1 in belarus, we will build storage facilities for nuclear weapons and, well , we will probably store them there. what what what can we expect from china in this regard after this to be discussed and agreed upon, but well, from the outside, it looks like putin just got up and wiped his feet on this joint statement, well, china needs to analyze all this, and i think that they will analyze the chinese, not russia, but they still know how to remember and they are very

they are very offended when they are deceived, but let's put it another way. and what should putin have done after meeting with siedenpin, without receiving anything there, first, without receiving powerful informational support, he did not receive it, second, without receiving powerful economic support, third without receiving diplomatic diplomatic words about the fact that we, together with russia, are huge partners, etc. it was said that we will increase economic cooperation there and so on , but they did not get what they wanted. i am not talking about weapons, about any business in the military-industrial complex there is none of this, that is, the visit for putin is extremely negative and he is offended, but in addition he understands he understands that he is left alone with an anti-russian coalition with a huge

powerful democratic community that publicly recorded the impossibility of russia winning this war, the impossibility. i mean, for those who exist in the world, this is very important, and he is afraid. and when a person is afraid, he takes affective steps that are quite primitive . he did come out, you know how such a comparison is possible. he came out and said, look, we will now be here in belarus, be afraid of us. well, he does not understand that it looks worthless, again, this is a classic word today, it is a word worthless, this is the only characteristic for the russian federation in all senses and in the economic and in the raw materials and in the technological and in the cultural today look at what kind of culture they have, yes, all these subjects, these mr. gazmanova yes, and so on , this is the same nonsense, yes, in the xxi century, mother and cinema . you know that, soviet cinema, agitprop yes, and so on, if riefenstadt was there, but they don’t even have that

, and in the meantime, let’s return to china, and this will provoke certain consequences for the russian federation, because china did not come for this , china came in order to fix its a new role, a political role in global politics as such china understands that russia as a subject of the global political process no longer exists and china wants to take this place because china believes that the world should be multi- polar, let's not discuss this their external er, the foreign policy position has the right and china wants to take this position, but in order to take it, it needs to settle the issue of russia's aggressive and brainy behavior, and china came to see if it can do it, and on the other hand on the part of china, as a sufficiently thought-out, strategically cunning partner of the russian federation, wants to rebuild the architecture of russian statehood, take it under control

internally, take control of everything, but with these words, the placement of nuclear weapons is from a storage facility in belarus. putin practically multiplied his relations with china by zero, and secondly, he proved that - to our partners that there really is no one to talk to because it will be constant he said one thing did another third - he significantly increased the risks for belarus definitely and fourth he finally unblocked the opportunity for ukraine finally, i emphasize, unlocked the possibility of winning this war without any ambiguities. why do you think so, and because before these actions and words of putin, some representatives of the political elites and european american countries and especially communities believed that putin

is rational after all and it is necessary to talk to him about something and you can agree on something compromising with him , today they understand that this is a completely mentally unbalanced person who does not guarantee anything and to sit down at the negotiating table with a person who does not guarantee anything is absurd and one thing, when you and i talked about this information because ukraine understands russia much more deeply, well, everyone would say that we are interested parties, so we misunderstand something there, and today putin himself emphasized that there is no need to talk to him, that is , that he is definitely president zelenskyi, by the way he said about this six months ago in a decree, even from uh, i didn't read it, you know, it's just active, but president zelenskyi said by decree that putin cannot be the subject of the negotiation process because he absolutely does not adhere

to anything. and today putin confirmed it and this means and he confirmed it in this way that he said, look there are nuclear weapons and it is very frightening, but it is frightening as it is not from the point of view that everyone falls into a stupor and let's give something to russia. everyone understands that if we give something to russia today, then tomorrow it will definitely be nuclear weapons will work against them and tomorrow for sure europe will be in chaos in instability and so on and political assassinations there will be terror and everything else and that is why today they are making principled decisions for themselves they are not even ready to speak it yet but they are subconsciously just like certain russians subconsciously understand that they will lose this war, just as in europe they understand that there is no other final except for the defeat of russia, well, that is, the concept of ukraine dominates, it dominates at all levels, not everyone is ready to admit it in full, but the concept of the final of ukraine, which is also proposed by president zelensky and in ukraine as a whole it dominates at all levels the fact that you have already touched on the topic of the fact that president volodymyr

zelensky clearly declared that no one will talk to the war criminal putin and there can be no negotiations with him we remember this clearly, but let's imagine that somewhere putin seems to have died, moved somewhere, got sick, and some acting president of the russian federation appears from his entourage from the same bloodthirsty environment with these people, will ukraine talk and with whom is ukraine ready saying it will be a little different because when it will be clear and they are already somewhere there , again, these statements are little-known characters prigozhyn yosif and akhmedov farkhat, they are not important in themselves but they showed what do russian letters think about at different levels, because the same prigozhin is a moderator

who runs between different political groups, power groups, arranges services for them, these are entertaining and so on , he understands the moods, this is very important and the moods there are very clear. they are waiting for the moment when putin will begin to fall. well, when he will lose his influence, various influences, and then the process of internal hryvnia will begin. there are several different power groups, they will fight among themselves for a certain time for which of them will have the right to transit the power in the direction of his favorite and they will look different in the final of this internal battle, but it is still the same cod, sorry for the word yake is now nesting there and nothing against putin, besides , there is much more in this conversation of beauty and

akhmedov talks about the fact that if they have already started a war, then they should win, the fact that they kill ukrainians by the thousands , no one is spared there at all, the fact that they lose, this is the problem, russia can't win anything , russia always loses historically, it's simple not everyone understands this right away, but in the meantime, let's get back to what will happen like this. and we don't care who among them will be the temporary acting responsibilities. why? because these temporary acting responsibilities will then pay a large legal or physical assessment, it must be consciously, this will not mean that tomorrow there will be a rebellious revolution and someone completely unknown will become the president of russia for a certain time, but it will not be a little bit wrong, let's fix it, they begin to suffer a few more significant tactical defeats at some point putin loses his voice well, that is, he can no longer say anything and gradually in the propaganda, all today's wonderful faces, i say ironically

, they are starting to say that putin is not a fool , they will do it simply because it is russia in russia today to say we love you a tomorrow you will be like stalin there for three days in your filth, uh, dying well, this is like bread and butter for russia, it's a classic, and that's what will happen, they will start saying that putin is no one anymore, he is to blame for this. there is some transitive one acting because putin will be isolated there, well, if he physically has the opportunity to be isolated, he will be isolated in hill 9, for example, he will not dominate because it is very luxurious there. he will be somewhere in the stalinist, er, vodatsova dacha , isolated, i'm just saying historically because it is always one and the same in the russian federation, regardless of when it happens from time to time, so at this time he will

be isolated, there will be a temporary executive and who will be ready to take on certain obligations, the first is to immediately withdraw remnants of russian troops from the territory of ukraine we don't even say from which of the whole territory because i don't understand when they say from crimea that too and crimea is not prepared , well, that is, what is crimea for? crimea is the territory of ukraine if the war is of such intensity and if we say about the entire territory of ukraine, of course, including donbass and crimea, and so on . and this does not apply to whether someone wants to be there in crimea, as we are told by certain people who do not want ukraine to return, and there is no way around us legally - it is the territory of ukraine if does anyone want to live in chika, as i always say, please, is that one waiting for you? well, any other city you want there. yes, crystal goose , anything else, they leave from there , but we have other issues that will be on

the negotiating table first. - these are reparations, the second - these are international criminals, well, war criminals, the third is very important, for example, what i consider extremely important is the demilitarization of russia and the border demilitarization zone there 50-100 km so that there is nothing serious, no weapons , so that they do not conduct training there and in general demilitarization because you look at russia. by the way, they have such a minister in the ministry of foreign affairs, and there is such a minister as the minister of industry. yes, he listed 14 points there today as how they want to end the war, well, that is, it says again that ukraine has abandon nato, the eu, ukraine must abandon the army , ukraine must demilitarize and de -nazify, ukraine must recognize new territories, ukraine must say that all sanctions must be lifted and all other countries must join in

, ukraine must withdraw all warrants and so on well, that is, i just want it to be very important and a parameter so that it is clear how inadequate these people are, well, that is, they put up 14 points while losing, and in this case , i could still take it away. further, but in the meantime, that is, russia allows itself to say that you have no right to be in nato, it is dangerous for us, but for russia , ukraine is the same. after this war, it has the right to say and legally record what, for example, eh the presence in russia of cruise missiles with a range of one and a half or two and a half thousand kilometers is clearly a danger for us and means that russia has no right to keep them, it lost correctly, it got rid of the missiles, russia must turn into the type of state that it is internally, a small, worthless, non-

technologically backward country that sells oil if they want to buy it there in 20 years, it will be sold, then there will be a different type of economy , the structure of the economy, and they will use oil as drinking water, for example , the russian federation and so on, that is, this everything must be recorded, and therefore the transitory acting president , regardless of who he is, will sign it all and after that will lose his legitimacy because the rebellious processes in russia will increase significantly and what happened in 1991 will continue there with there will be new leaders , whom we may not yet know, there will be temporary populists, as usual in russia, there will be very weak parties with beautiful names, dayosh democracy , forward russia, russia for tomorrow, and so on,

tens of hundreds of thousands of military personnel will continue wounded , humiliated, those who lost, and this, as history shows, creates an excellent soil for the flourishing of revanchism. the reich must have intelligence. you overestimate russia. russia is quantity. and it is lack of quality. we just got used to it because we looked at russia as imperialism. we got used to the fact that there are very smart people and they are thinking of some strategic plans. it will not happen. the revanchist will happen differently, but in a different way, it will be an attempt in a chaotic society in an anarchized society to redistribute to take property from the local oligarchs and so on. that is

, it will be a war of resources, an internal war, and they will gradually subside from the point of view of economic influence, well, that is, economic influence on the world as such and russia will look completely different from what everyone thinks, it will not be consolidated as it was, for example , after the first world war germany after the weimar peace as such, germany no russia will look different. russia will be dirty, but in these internal riots, the seizure of power in various regions is not the collapse of the russian federation. no, it is just a redistribution of property as such, and after that, i emphasize once again, they will go through the procedures of general elections. you will choose some parties and so on. military there are very few of them those with intelligence those who can structure people there are a lot of people who will just kill in order to kill those who are nearby

or do what they did by the way from the 14th starting in our donbas to criminalize certain territories in order to keep surplus profits situationally no more but no less than the ideology of revanchism there will be no conceptuality and here it is important and here it is important for us not to make a mistake i mean the entire democratic world not only in ukraine but not as in in 1991, they said, well, everything is already a democracy. even if democracy is weak , after the communist party of ukraine, you can talk to them about anything. let's help them . let's invest through grants . there are some programs to support the civil society. society and so on, the main thing is not to do this in russia, there will never be a pseudo-democracy, but you don’t need to treat russia as a victim, if even internally there will be some excesses, blood and so on, conflicts at different levels and so on , it’s not a victim. they have to atone for their guilt is long and they have to receive huge

financial restrictions - it's not only reparations, isolation - it's not only the opportunity to go to a ball, for example, and get a wild card there, and so on, it's reputational, it's cultural restrictions, it's the presence of these or other international institutions they have to go through the stage again of acquiring membership, for example, the un , they are there illegally according to the law of 1991, this is another question for the secretariat of the then general secretary of the koehler transplant . what the hell did the russian federation take the place of the ussr, it was wrong because even today they should be excluded from this organization because they violate the main un charter and so on, that is, all this should significantly limit russia's global influence, which was wrong granted to russia starting

in principle beginning somewhere in the 97-98th year of the last century p mykhailo e but at the same time you regularly communicate with those whom we used to call good russians, they have their youtube channels there, do you really believe that these people can be a real force and their audience is capable of more than liking and subscribing to the channel three important elements , after all, i am engaged in information work and i have to communicate with many even if it seems strange to someone, why do i not communicate with him i am not about russians at all in general, the number of russian speakers is much larger than those who live in russia. they are in europe, they are diasporas. they are in the former soviet space . kazakhstan has armenians. there are many countries where there are many people who use the russian language and we must dominate. our theses must dominate

. we must show that we we have a much deeper , much clearer understanding of the historicity of this moment . component is definitely important to dominate the discourse led as you say хорошие русские it is not completely clear to me the concept of good or bad definitely russia is responsible yes that is, it is counterintuitive for me it is obvious that russia is corporately responsible for everything it does in russia, it is not the responsibility of putin's subject no, it is the responsibility of the country, because if it wasn't for the country, then putin is gone and in 2000 he is gone and after the chechen wars he is gone and after kursk and so on after

all this he is gone but he is there he is and and today, if we take sociology, a fairly significant part of russian communities supports it actively and a part supports it passively, but meanwhile we have to dominate even in this environment, dominate from the point of view of why russia will lose why russia will pay the price why russia is still not a historically important state for the modern world why is russia losing to ukraine from a conceptual point of view? why is this war not about territory and not about propaganda? russia thought that it would be possible to win this war by pumping up its platforms there with propaganda budgets. no, because we more intellectual and deeper, we have to show it and the third element, well, there will certainly be alternatives to the post-war period when russia loses and there will be a certain political process where there will be no more putin and his descendants and they will definitely not be because historically

an era always ends with the physical disappearance of everything that concerns of putinism as such, but there will be other political currents and they are structured in one way or another today, including among all the audiences you are talking about, and again we have to make them understand the doubts they already cause and they will again after all, they should get rid of this great russian chauvinism towards us because we are not a province. unfortunately, i want to emphasize here that it is very important during the 30 years of ukraine's sovereign foreign policy in the russian direction, ukrainians behaved like provincials who went to moscow to ask for something after in the 14th year, it was almost all gone, although russia thought that ’s how it is, they come and don’t ask. we

were there in 2014. it became obscene to just talk about it. nevertheless, unfortunately, the ukrainian political elite knowingly or unknowingly came to get something in russia in moscow, believing that it is the center, not kyiv, the center, but moscow, the center , this is the problem of 1991, i am constantly talking about it , then there were borders, then it was necessary to break them, so it would be it's a little harder than it was in 1991 and 1993. we remember those years , yes, that's obvious. but it would have been harder, but then there would have been no war . this is a direct connection. to record, but it was definitely not necessary for the representatives of the political elites of ukraine to travel to russia and ask for something to stand in the waiting rooms and wait until the tsar gives you a shortcut to the princedom, this is for some kind of joke, and therefore today we have to show that no friends, at least we are more important for modern civilization, and at

the most we generally think that you are a province that has to come and ask us for something after the war. in this context, i was very glad to see the five tons of grigory skovoroda in your office, because this fantastic baroque philosopher very clearly shows where the center was at that moment, and where the province was and how much the russians tried itself drag him down, but it's not exactly that they didn't catch him. that's why we really have a lot to say about ourselves, and now, at a time when you can't just sit and watch, you have to do something to show what a fantastic country we have. i think that we will have its own philosophical school is powerful enough, which will have an impact not only on eastern europe , but on europe as a whole, we will have a literary school of its own, which will have e.e. genre literature powerful enough, but i am talking about something else, i am talking about the fact that we

have a unique chance to be sub objects which they shape the agenda on different platforms, we need to work in latin america, we need to work in africa with meanings , yes, that is, to say that we are what subjectivity is, in general, it is an opportunity to formulate e-e meanings that will influence decision-making at various levels and today ukraine can influence eastern europe, europe as a whole, you see how they treat ukraine and influence those environments that we did not reach at all, including the russian-speaking audience. we have always influenced the russian-speaking audience when we were invited to say something. and today we come and dominate, we say, look, it will look like this, it will influence , this is how we will do it, and russia subconsciously follows the rules of the game laid down by ukraine, because they listen to whoever is strong and i am convinced that

after this war, there will be no doubts about who is strong in ukraine and who is not polite russia. thank you for spending time with us today . mykhailo podolyak, adviser to the head of the president's office, was with us and the marathon continues if we our children will fight, protect theirs, there are people who do not hide behind their backs, who listen to the call of the heart and are the first to go into battle, people of great strength , people of unbroken spirit, people of good will. glory to ukrainian volunteers, they are light

, they are humanity, they are wisdom but courage. strength and indomitability - these are also ukrainian. women protect every day , help, teach, treat, work and become an example for the whole world

. of school, i am a neighbor who always knocks on the battery. i am the only son. good evening in marathon. the final issue of the chronicle of the four hundredth day of the war was prepared for you by the journalists of the facts . look today in the issue. planes at the moment the situation at the front

will not be fundamentally resolved in the kiev-pechersk lavra , a gradual process of purification from the muscovite spirit has begun, russian peace will have to be squeezed out of pochayiv lavra, see special reports from kyiv and pochayiv, what to bring ukrainians home security guarantees are needed, the availability of housing and tangible changes in the education system also, the ukrainian government should cooperate with european issues of the return of our citizens, a fresh opinion poll for the anniversary of the liberation of buchi from the russian occupiers, the facts were interested in the process of gathering evidence and the investigation of the crimes of the russians , to what extent the materials are ready for transfer to the court , pay attention to these emotional states, the stress of the war, despair, and it will go around completely affect our psyche, military and civilian ukrainians began to turn to psychologists more often, did not run away from the war and covid-march became the peak of diseases and deaths, doctors call to inject booster where

it can be done and to whom, first of all , a special report, but first of all, fresh reports of the general staff of 5 attacks from jet systems volley fire, three air strikes and one missile attack were carried out today by the russians in ukraine with aircraft , the occupiers attacked the village of lviv nahar in the kherson region from the debris and the blast wave fortunately, 10 private houses were damaged without casualties. in addition, in the village of mala oleksandrivka, two civilian men in a car blew up at a fortune-telling event. one died and the other was hospitalized with serious injuries . kupyansk in the kharkiv region was also under fire. russian inhumans opened fire on the residential sector in the morning. after destroying the empty houses of civilians, the most hellish direction on the eastern front remains the front line from kreminnaya to maryinka under heavy fire from all